UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington,D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant toRule 13a-16 or 15d-16
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of August 2025

Commission File Number 001-11444

MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

337 Magna Drive, Aurora, Ontario, Canada L4G 7K1

(Address of principal executive office)

Indicate bycheck mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F ¨ Form 40-F x

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC.
	(Registrant)

Date: August 1, 2025

	By:	/s/ “Bassem Shakeel”
		Bassem A. Shakeel,
		Vice-President, Associate General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

EXHIBITS

Exhibit 99.1	Q2 2025 Financial Review

Exhibit 99.2	Q2 2025 Results Webcast Presentation (August 1, 2025)

Exhibit 99.3	Q2 2025 Results Webcast Transcript (August 1, 2025)

Exhibit 99.1

FINANCIAL REVIEW OF MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC.

(United States dollars in millions, except per share figures) (Unaudited)

Prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP

		2023															2024															2025
	Note	1st Q			2nd Q			3rd Q			4th Q			TOTAL			1st Q			2nd Q			3rd Q			4th Q			TOTAL			1st Q			2nd Q			TOTAL

VEHICLE VOLUME STATISTICS (in millions)
North America			3.884			4.079			3.930			3.720			15.613			3.976			4.096			3.675			3.632			15.379			3.641			3.834			7.475
Europe			4.640			4.659			3.867			4.447			17.613			4.529			4.416			3.685			4.122			16.752			4.233			4.322			8.555
China			5.941			6.801			7.622			8.864			29.228			6.435			7.165			7.366			9.845			30.811			7.081			7.513			14.594
Other			6.926			6.690			6.912			7.038			27.566			6.661			6.646			6.751			7.005			27.063			6.924			6.795			13.719
Global			21.391			22.229			22.331			24.069			90.020			21.601			22.323			21.477			24.604			90.005			21.879			22.464			44.343
Magna Steyr vehicle assembly volumes			0.034			0.027			0.023			0.021			0.105			0.022			0.019			0.015			0.016			0.072			0.017			0.016			0.033

AVERAGE FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES
1 Canadian dollar equals U.S. dollars			0.740			0.745			0.746			0.735			0.742			0.741			0.731			0.733			0.715			0.730			0.697			0.723			0.710
1 euro equals U.S. dollars			1.073			1.089			1.088			1.076			1.082			1.085			1.076			1.099			1.066			1.082			1.053			1.134			1.093
1 Chinese renminbi equals U.S. dollars			0.146			0.143			0.138			0.138			0.141			0.139			0.138			0.140			0.139			0.139			0.138			0.138			0.138

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
Sales
Body Exteriors & Structures			4,439			4,540			4,354			4,178			17,511			4,429			4,465			4,038			4,067			16,999			3,966			4,253			8,219
Power & Vision			3,323			3,462			3,745			3,775			14,305			3,842			3,926			3,837			3,786			15,391			3,646			3,857			7,503
Seating Systems			1,486			1,603			1,529			1,429			6,047			1,455			1,455			1,379			1,511			5,800			1,312			1,433			2,745
Complete Vehicles			1,626			1,526			1,185			1,201			5,538			1,383			1,242			1,159			1,402			5,186			1,276			1,226			2,502
Corporate & Other			(201	)		(149	)		(125	)		(129	)		(604	)		(139	)		(130	)		(133	)		(138	)		(540	)		(131	)		(138	)		(269	)
			10,673			10,982			10,688			10,454			42,797			10,970			10,958			10,280			10,628			42,836			10,069			10,631			20,700

Costs and expenses
Cost of goods sold			9,416			9,544			9,264			8,961			37,185			9,642			9,494			8,828			9,073			37,037			8,827			9,127			17,954
Selling, general and administrative			488			505			491			566			2,050			516			523			487			535			2,061			539			565			1,104
Equity income			(33	)		(36	)		(40	)		(3	)		(112	)		(34	)		(9	)		(13	)		(45	)		(101	)		(20	)		(32	)		(52	)
Adjusted EBITDA			802			969			973			930			3,674			846			950			978			1,065			3,839			723			971			1,694
Depreciation			353			353			358			372			1,436			377			373			384			376			1,510			369			388			757
Adjusted EBIT			449			616			615			558			2,238			469			577			594			689			2,329			354			583			937
Amortization of acquired intangible assets			12			13			32			31			88			28			28			28			28			112			26			29			55
Other expense (income), net	1		142			86			(4	)		164			388			356			68			(188	)		228			464			53			6			59
Interest expense, net			20			34			49			53			156			51			54			54			52			211			50			52			102
Income from operations before income taxes			275			483			538			310			1,606			34			427			700			381			1,542			225			496			721
Income tax expense			58			129			121			12			320			8			99			192			147			446			72			102			174
Net income			217			354			417			298			1,286			26			328			508			234			1,096			153			394			547
Income attributable to non-controlling interests			(8	)		(15	)		(23	)		(27	)		(73	)		(17	)		(15	)		(24	)		(31	)		(87	)		(7	)		(15	)		(22	)
Net income attributable to Magna International Inc.			209			339			394			271			1,213			9			313			484			203			1,009			146			379			525

Diluted earnings per common share		$	0.73		$	1.18		$	1.37		$	0.94		$	4.23		$	0.03		$	1.09		$	1.68		$	0.71		$	3.52		$	0.52		$	1.35		$	1.86

Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding during the period (in millions):			286.6			286.3			286.8			286.6			286.6			287.1			287.3			287.3			285.9			286.9			282.0			281.7			281.9

NON-GAAP MEASURES
Adjusted EBITDA			802			969			973			930			3,674			846			950			978			1,065			3,839			723			971			1,694
Adjusted EBIT	2		449			616			615			558			2,238			469			577			594			689			2,329			354			583			937
Adjusted return on invested capital	2		8.7	%		11.0	%		10.3	%		9.6	%		9.9	%		7.8	%		9.4	%		9.0	%		11.8	%		9.5	%		5.7	%		9.6	%		7.7	%
Adjusted net income attributable to Magna International Inc.	2		329			441			419			383			1,572			311			389			369			482			1,551			219			407			626
Adjusted Diluted earnings per common share	2	$	1.15		$	1.54		$	1.46		$	1.33		$	5.49		$	1.08		$	1.35		$	1.28		$	1.69		$	5.41		$	0.78		$	1.44		$	2.22

PROFITABILITY RATIOS
Selling, general and administrative /Sales			4.6	%		4.6	%		4.6	%		5.4	%		4.8	%		4.7	%		4.8	%		4.7	%		5.0	%		4.8	%		5.4	%		5.3	%		5.3	%
Adjusted EBIT /Sales			4.2	%		5.6	%		5.8	%		5.3	%		5.2	%		4.3	%		5.3	%		5.8	%		6.5	%		5.4	%		3.5	%		5.5	%		4.5	%
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes /Sales			2.6	%		4.4	%		5.0	%		3.0	%		3.8	%		0.3	%		3.9	%		6.8	%		3.6	%		3.6	%		2.2	%		4.7	%		3.5	%
Effective tax rate
Reported			21.1	%		26.7	%		22.5	%		3.9	%		19.9	%		23.5	%		23.2	%		27.4	%		38.6	%		28.9	%		32.0	%		20.6	%		24.1	%
Excluding Other expense (income) and amortization, net of taxes and valuation allowance adjustments			21.4	%		21.6	%		21.9	%		18.8	%		21.0	%		21.5	%		22.8	%		27.2	%		19.5	%		22.7	%		25.7	%		20.5	%		22.4	%

Q2 2025 Financial Review of Magna International Inc.

Page 1 of 6

Prepared as at 7/28/2025

FINANCIAL REVIEW OF MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC.

(United States dollars in millions) (Unaudited)

Prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP

		2023												2024												2025
		1st Q			2nd Q			3rd Q			4th Q			1st Q			2nd Q			3rd Q			4th Q			1st Q			2nd Q
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

FUNDS EMPLOYED
Current assets:
Accounts receivable			7,959			8,556			8,477			7,881			8,379			8,219			8,377			7,376			8,198			8,258
Inventories			4,421			4,664			4,751			4,606			4,511			4,466			4,592			4,151			4,184			4,207
Prepaid expenses and other			367			455			387			352			399			314			303			344			358			333
			12,747			13,675			13,615			12,839			13,289			12,999			13,272			11,871			12,740			12,798
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable			7,731			7,984			7,911			7,842			7,855			7,639			7,608			7,194			7,376			7,127
Accrued salaries and wages			822			858			900			912			883			862			962			867			893			917
Other accrued liabilities			2,526			2,637			2,537			2,626			2,728			2,650			2,642			2,572			2,723			2,845
Income taxes payable (receivable)			9			(14	)		33			125			132			79			176			192			152			88
			11,088			11,465			11,381			11,505			11,598			11,230			11,388			10,825			11,144			10,977

Working capital			1,659			2,210			2,234			1,334			1,691			1,769			1,884			1,046			1,596			1,821

Investments			1,390			1,287			1,311			1,273			1,195			1,161			1,165			1,045			1,062			1,129
Fixed assets, net			8,304			8,646			8,778			9,618			9,545			9,623			9,836			9,584			9,650			9,853
Goodwill, other assets and intangible assets			3,640			4,733			4,726			4,962			4,646			4,709			4,865			4,532			4,669			4,896
Operating lease right-of-use assets			1,638			1,667			1,696			1,744			1,733			1,688			1,780			1,941			2,032			2,061
Funds employed			16,631			18,543			18,745			18,931			18,810			18,950			19,530			18,148			19,009			19,760
FINANCING
Straight debt:
Cash and cash equivalents			(2,429	)		(1,281	)		(1,022	)		(1,198	)		(1,517	)		(999	)		(1,061	)		(1,247	)		(1,059	)		(1,536	)
Short-term borrowings			4			150			2			511			838			848			828			271			614			349
Long-term debt due within one year			668			1,426			1,398			819			824			65			65			708			1,005			706
Long-term debt			4,500			4,159			4,135			4,175			4,549			4,863			4,916			4,134			3,892			4,984
Current portion of operating lease liabilities			285			303			384			399			306			306			319			293			305			318
Operating lease liabilities			1,318			1,345			1,289			1,319			1,407			1,378			1,458			1,662			1,742			1,759
			4,346			6,102			6,186			6,025			6,407			6,461			6,525			5,821			6,499			6,580
Long-term employee benefit liabilities			563			579			564			591			584			564			571			533			552			574
Other long-term liabilities			451			448			453			475			471			507			339			396			349			267
Deferred tax assets, net			(218	)		(242	)		(210	)		(437	)		(576	)		(592	)		(592	)		(542	)		(557	)		(564	)
			796			785			807			629			479			479			318			387			344			277
Shareholders' equity			11,489			11,656			11,752			12,277			11,924			12,010			12,687			11,940			12,166			12,903
			16,631			18,543			18,745			18,931			18,810			18,950			19,530			18,148			19,009			19,760

ASSET UTILIZATION RATIOS
Days in accounts receivable			67.1			70.1			71.4			67.8			68.7			67.5			73.3			62.5			73.3			69.9
Days in accounts payable			73.9			75.3			76.9			78.8			73.3			72.4			77.6			71.4			75.2			70.3
Inventory turnover - cost of goods sold			8.5			8.2			7.8			7.8			8.5			8.5			7.7			8.7			8.4			8.7
Working capital turnover			25.7			19.9			19.1			31.3			25.9			24.8			21.8			40.6			25.2			23.4
Total asset turnover			2.6			2.4			2.3			2.2			2.3			2.3			2.1			2.3			2.1			2.2

CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Straight debt			26.1	%		32.9	%		33.0	%		31.8	%		34.1	%		34.1	%		33.4	%		32.1	%		34.2	%		33.3	%
Long-term employee benefit liabilities, other long-term liabilities & deferred tax liabilities, net			4.8	%		4.2	%		4.3	%		3.3	%		2.5	%		2.5	%		1.6	%		2.1	%		1.8	%		1.4	%
Shareholders' equity			69.1	%		62.9	%		62.7	%		64.9	%		63.4	%		63.4	%		65.0	%		65.8	%		64.0	%		65.3	%
			100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

Adjusted Debt to Adjusted EBITDA	2		2.19	x		2.19	x		2.02	x		1.85	x		1.98	x		1.91	x		1.93	x		1.75	x		1.92	x		2.03	x

Debt to total capitalization			37.1	%		38.8	%		38.0	%		37.0	%		39.9	%		38.3	%		37.4	%		37.2	%		38.3	%		38.6	%

Q2 2025 Financial Review of Magna International Inc.

Page 2 of 6

Prepared as at 7/28/2025

FINANCIAL REVIEW OF MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC.

(United States dollars in millions) (Unaudited)

Prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP

		2023										2024										2025
	Note	1st Q		2nd Q		3rd Q		4th Q		TOTAL		1st Q		2nd Q		3rd Q		4th Q		TOTAL		1st Q		2nd Q		TOTAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Operating activities
Net income		217		354		417		298		1,286		26		328		508		234		1,096		153		394		547
Items not involving current cash flows		351		525		404		362		1,642		565		353		277		662		1,857		394		368		762
		568		879		821		660		2,928		591		681		785		896		2,953		547		762		1,309
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		(341	)	(332	)	(24	)	918		221		(330	)	55		(58	)	1,014		681		(470	)	(135	)	(605	)
Cash provided from operating activities		227		547		797		1,578		3,149		261		736		727		1,910		3,634		77		627		704

Investment activities
Fixed asset additions		(424	)	(502	)	(630	)	(944	)	(2,500	)	(493	)	(500	)	(476	)	(709	)	(2,178	)	(268	)	(246	)	(514	)
Increase in investments, other assets and intangible assets		(101	)	(96	)	(176	)	(189	)	(562	)	(125	)	(170	)	(115	)	(207	)	(617	)	(148	)	(94	)	(242	)
Net cash (outflow) inflow from disposal of facilities	1(f), 1(g)	(25	)	-		(23	)	-		(48	)	4		-		78		-		82		-		-		-
Investment in Public and Private Equity Investments		-		(3	)	(7	)	(1	)	(11	)	(23	)	2		(1	)	10		(12	)	(1	)	(3	)	(4	)
Proceeds from disposition		19		44		32		27		122		87		57		38		37		219		26		14		40
Business combinations		-		(1,475	)	-		(29	)	(1,504	)	(30	)	(56	)	-		-		(86	)	(4	)	4		-
Cash used for investment activities		(531	)	(2,032	)	(804	)	(1,136	)	(4,503	)	(580	)	(667	)	(476	)	(869	)	(2,592	)	(395	)	(325	)	(720	)

Financing activities
Net issues (repayments) of debt		1,636		544		(135	)	(119	)	1,926		757		(416	)	(47	)	(513	)	(219	)	322		341		663
Common Shares issued on exercise of stock options		6		-		8		6		20		30		-		-		-		30		-		-		-
Repurchase of Common Shares		(9	)	(2	)	-		(2	)	(13	)	(3	)	(2	)	-		(202	)	(207	)	(51	)	-		(51	)
Tax withholdings on vesting of equity awards		(9	)	(1	)	-		(1	)	(11	)	(4	)	(1	)	-		(3	)	(8	)	(4	)	-		(4	)
Contributions to subsidiaries by non-controlling interests		-		-		-		11		11		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests		(7	)	(24	)	(18	)	(25	)	(74	)	-		(26	)	(10	)	(10	)	(46	)	-		(25	)	(25	)
Dividends paid		(132	)	(129	)	(128	)	(133	)	(522	)	(134	)	(134	)	(138	)	(133	)	(539	)	(136	)	(137	)	(273	)
Cash provided from (used for) financing activities		1,485		388		(273	)	(263	)	1,337		646		(579	)	(195	)	(861	)	(989	)	131		179		310

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		14		(51	)	21		(3	)	(19	)	(8	)	(8	)	6		6		(4	)	(1	)	(4	)	(5	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents, during the period		1,195		(1,148	)	(259	)	176		(36	)	319		(518	)	62		186		49		(188	)	477		289

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		1,234		2,429		1,281		1,022		1,234		1,198		1,517		999		1,061		1,198		1,247		1,059		1,247
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		2,429		1,281		1,022		1,198		1,198		1,517		999		1,061		1,247		1,247		1,059		1,536		1,536

Q2 2025 Financial Review of Magna International Inc.

Page 3 of 6

Prepared as at 7/28/2025

FINANCIAL REVIEW OF MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC.

(United States dollars in millions, except per share figures) (Unaudited)

Prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP

This Analyst should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Note 1: OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME), NET

Other expense (income), net consists of significant items such as: impairment charges; restructuring costs generally related to significant plant closures or consolidations; net losses (gains) on investments; gains or losses on disposal of facilities or businesses; and other items not reflective of on-going operating profit or loss. Other expense (income), net consists of:

		2023							2024								2025
		1st Q	2nd Q		3rd Q		4th Q	TOTAL	1st Q	2nd Q		3rd Q		4th Q	TOTAL		1st Q	2nd Q		TOTAL
Restructuring activities	[a]	118	(35	)	(1	)	66	148	38	55		-		94	187		44	13		57
Investment revaluations, (gains) losses on sales, and impairments	[b]	2	85		(1	)	5	91	2	3		1		3	9		9	(7	)	2
Impacts related to Fisker Inc. [“Fisker”]	[c]	22	13		(18	)	93	110	316	19		(189	)	52	198		-	-		-
Impairments	[d]	-	-		-		-	-	-	-		-		79	79		-	-		-
Gain on business combination	[e]	-	-		-		-	-	-	(9	)	-		-	(9	)	-	-		-
Veoneer AS transaction costs	[f]	-	23		-		-	23	-	-		-		-	-		-	-		-
Operations in Russia	[g]	-	-		16		-	16	-	-		-		-	-		-	-		-
		142	86		(4	)	164	388	356	68		(188	)	228	464		53	6		59

[a]

Restructuring activities

	2023							2024					2025
	1st Q	2nd Q		3rd Q		4th Q	TOTAL	1st Q	2nd Q	3rd Q	4th Q	TOTAL	1st Q	2nd Q	TOTAL
Power & Vision	105	(44	)	(1	)	57	117	-	55	-	49	104	11	13	24
Complete Vehicles	-	-		-		-	-	26	-	-	29	55	33	-	33
Body Exteriors & Structures	13	9		-		9	31	12	-	-	16	28	-	-	-
	118	(35	)	(1	)	66	148	38	55	-	94	187	44	13	57

Restructuring charges generally related to significant plant closures and consolidations primarily in Europe and to a lesser extent in North America. During the second quarters of 2025 and 2024, the Company recorded $6 million and $35 million, respectively, of restructuring charges associated with its acquisition of the Veoneer Active Safety Business [“Veoneer AS”]; during the second and third quarters of 2023, the Company’s Power & Vision segment recorded a $10 million and $8 million gain on the sale of a building as a result of restructuring activities, respectively; during the second quarter of 2023, the Company’s Power & Vision segment reversed $39 million of charges due to a change in the restructuring plans related to a plant closure.

	[b]	Investment revaluations, (gains) losses on sales, and impairments

		The Company revalues its public and private equity investments and certain public company warrants every quarter. The gains and losses related to this revaluation, as well as gain and losses on disposition, are primarily recorded in Corporate. In the second quarter of 2023, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $85 million on a private equity investment and related long-term receivables within Other assets in its Corporate segment. In the fourth quarter of 2023, the Company also recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $5 million on a private equity investment in its Power & Vision segment. In the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $13 million on a private equity investment in its Corporate segment.

	[c]	Impacts related to Fisker Inc. [“Fisker”]

		During 2023 and 2024, the Company recorded impairment charges on its Fisker related net assets, including its Fisker warrants, which were received in connection with the agreements with Fisker for platform sharing, engineering and manufacturing of the Fisker Ocean SUV. The Company also recorded additional restructuring charges during the first quarter of 2024 related to its Fisker related assembly operations. In the course of such bankruptcy proceedings, the Company terminated its manufacturing agreement for the Fisker Ocean SUV and recognized the remaining $196 million of deferred revenue into income.

	2023						2024							2025
	1st Q	2nd Q	3rd Q		4th Q	TOTAL	1st Q	2nd Q	3rd Q		4th Q	TOTAL		1st Q	2nd Q	TOTAL
Impairment of Fisker related net assets	-	-	-		-	-	261	19	7		43	330		-	-	-
Impairment of Fisker warrants	22	13	(18	)	93	110	33	-	-		-	33		-	-	-
Additional restructuring related to Complete Vehicles	-	-	-		-	-	22	-	-		9	31		-	-	-
Recognition of related deferred revenue	-	-	-		-	-	-	-	(196	)	-	(196	)	-	-	-
	22	13	(18	)	93	110	316	19	(189	)	52	198		-	-	-

	[d]	Impairments

		During 2024, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $79 million on fixed assets, right of use assets and intangible assets at two European facilities in its Power & Vision segment.

	[e]	Gain on business combination

		During 2024, the Company acquired a business in the Body Exteriors & Structures segment for $5 million, resulting in a bargain purchase gain of $9 million.

	[f]	Veoneer AS transaction costs

		During 2023, the Company incurred $23 million of transaction costs related to the acquisition of the Veoneer Active Safety Business.

	[g]	Operations in Russia

		As a result of the expected lack of future cashflows and the continuing uncertainties connected with the Russian economy, during 2023, the Company completed the sale of all of its investments in Russia resulting in a final loss of $16 million including a net cash outflow of $23 million.

Q2 2025 Financial Review of Magna International Inc.

Page 4 of 6

Prepared as at 7/28/2025

Note 2:		NON-GAAP MEASURES

		The Company presents Adjusted EBIT (Earnings before interest, taxes, Other expense (income), net and amortization of acquired intangible assets); Adjusted Net Income (Net Income before Other expense (income), net, net of tax excluding significant income tax valuation allowance adjustments, and amortization of acquired intangible assets); Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share; Adjusted EBIT as a percentage of sales; Adjusted Return on Invested Capital; and Adjusted Debt to Adjusted EBITDA. The Company presents these financial figures because such measures are widely used by analysts and investors in evaluating the operating performance of the Company. However, such measures do not have any standardized meaning under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and may not be comparable to the calculation of similar measures by other companies.

The following table reconciles Income from operations before income taxes to Adjusted EBIT:

	2023						2024						2025
	1st Q	2nd Q	3rd Q		4th Q	TOTAL	1st Q	2nd Q	3rd Q		4th Q	TOTAL	1st Q	2nd Q	TOTAL
Income from operations before income taxes	275	483	538		310	1,606	34	427	700		381	1,542	225	496	721
Exclude:
Amortization of acquired intangible assets	12	13	32		31	88	28	28	28		28	112	26	29	55
Other expense (income), net	142	86	(4	)	164	388	356	68	(188	)	228	464	53	6	59
Interest expense, net	20	34	49		53	156	51	54	54		52	211	50	52	102
Adjusted EBIT	449	616	615		558	2,238	469	577	594		689	2,329	354	583	937

The following table shows the calculation of Adjusted Return on Invested Capital:

	2023										2024										2025
	1st Q		2nd Q		3rd Q		4th Q		FY		1st Q		2nd Q		3rd Q		4th Q		FY		1st Q		2nd Q		TOTAL
Net income	217		354		417		298		1,286		26		328		508		234		1,096		153		394		547
Add (deduct):
Interest expense, net	20		34		49		53		156		51		54		54		52		211		50		52		102
Amortization of acquired intangible assets	12		13		32		31		88		28		28		28		28		112		26		29		55
Other expense (income), net	142		86		(4	)	164		388		356		68		(188	)	228		464		53		6		59
Tax effect on Interest expense, net, Amortization of acquired intangible assets and Other expense, net	(38	)	(4	)	(14	)	(46	)	(103	)	(93	)	(32	)	30		(38	)	(133	)	(19	)	(18	)	(37	)
Adjustments to Deferred Tax Valuation Allowances	-		-		-		(47	)	(47	)	-		-		-		51		51		-		-		-
Adjusted After-tax operating profits	353		483		480		453		1,768		368		446		432		555		1,801		263		463		726
Total Assets	30,654		31,837		31,675		32,255				32,678		31,986		32,790		31,039				32,074		33,175
Excluding:
Cash and cash equivalents	(2,429	)	(1,281	)	(1,022	)	(1,198	)			(1,517	)	(999	)	(1,061	)	(1,247	)			(1,059	)	(1,536	)
Deferred tax assets	(506	)	(535	)	(527	)	(621	)			(753	)	(807	)	(811	)	(819	)			(862	)	(902	)
Less Current Liabilities	(12,045	)	(13,358	)	(13,165	)	(13,234	)			(13,566	)	(12,449	)	(12,600	)	(12,097	)			(13,068	)	(12,350	)
Excluding:
Short-term borrowing	4		150		2		511				838		848		828		271				614		349
Long-term debt due within one year	668		1,426		1,398		819				824		65		65		708				1,005		706
Current portion of operating lease liabilities	285		303		384		399				306		306		319		293				305		318
Invested Capital	16,631		18,542		18,745		18,931				18,810		18,950		19,530		18,148				19,009		19,760
Adjusted After-tax operating profits	353		483		480		453		1,768		368		446		432		555		1,801		263		463		726
Average Invested Capital	16,318		17,587		18,644		18,838		17,771		18,871		18,880		19,240		18,839		18,875		18,579		19,385		18,972
Adjusted Return on Invested Capital	8.7	%	11.0	%	10.3	%	9.6	%	9.9	%	7.8	%	9.4	%	9.0	%	11.8	%	9.5	%	5.7	%	9.6	%	7.7	%

The following table shows the calculation of Adjusted Debt to Adjusted EBITDA:

		2023												2024												2025
		1st Q			2nd Q			3rd Q			4th Q			1st Q			2nd Q			3rd Q			4th Q			1st Q			2nd Q
Debt per balance sheet			6,775			7,383			7,208			7,223			7,924			7,460			7,586			7,068			7,558			8,116
Long-Term Employee Benefit Liabilities	[i]		148			148			148			125			125			125			125			127			127			127
Adjusted Debt	[A]		6,923			7,531			7,356			7,348			8,049			7,585			7,711			7,195			7,685			8,243
Rolling four quarter Adjusted EBITDA			3,007			3,258			3,449			3,674			3,718			3,699			3,704			3,839			3,716			3,737
Capitalized operating lease expense	[i]		344			344			344			353			353			353			353			410			410			410
Pension adjustment	[i], [ii]		(6	)		(6	)		(6	)		4			4			4			4			(20	)		(20	)		(20	)
Interest income	[i]		45			45			45			86			86			86			86			98			98			98
Rolling four quarter cash portion of other expense, net			(227	)		(200	)		(198	)		(152	)		(94	)		(161	)		(149	)		(219	)		(203	)		(161	)
	[B]		3,163			3,441			3,634			3,965			4,067			3,981			3,998			4,108			4,001			4,064

Adjusted Debt to Adjusted EBITDA	[A] / [B]		2.19	x		2.19	x		2.02	x		1.85	x		1.98	x		1.91	x		1.93	x		1.75	x		1.92	x		2.03	x

	[i]	The long-term employee benefit liabilities, capitalized operating lease expense, interest income and pension adjustment figures included in the Adjusted EBITDA calculations are based on the annual figures for the years ended December 31, 2024, December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively.
	[ii]	Pension adjustment calculated as Net Periodic Pension Benefit Cost less Current Service Cost for defined benefit pension plans.

Q2 2025 Financial Review of Magna International Inc.

Page 5 of 6

Prepared as at 7/28/2025

Note 2: NON-GAAP MEASURES (Continued)

Thefollowing table reconciles Net income attributable to Magna International Inc. to Adjusted net income attributable to Magna InternationalInc.:

		2023									2024								2025
		1st Q	2nd Q		3rd Q		4th Q		TOTAL		1st Q	2nd Q		3rd Q		4th Q	TOTAL		1st Q	2nd Q		TOTAL
Net income attributable to Magna International Inc.		209	339		394		271		1,213		9	313		484		203	1,009		146	379		525
Exclude:
Amortization of acquired intangible assets		10	11		25		25		71		22	23		22		22	89		21	24		45
Restructuring activities		92	(26	)	(2	)	60		124		32	45		-		82	159		44	9		53
Investment revaluations, (gains) losses on sales, and impairments		2	85		(1	)	4		90		1	2		3		6	12		8	(5	)	3
Impacts related to Fisker Inc. [“Fisker”]		16	10		(13	)	70		83		247	15		(140	)	39	161		-	-		-
Impairments		-	-		-		-		-		-	-		-		79	79		-	-		-
Gain on business combination		-	-		-		-		-		-	(9	)	-		-	(9	)	-	-		-
Veoneer AS transaction costs		-	22		-		-		22		-	-		-		-	-		-	-		-
Operations in Russia		-	-		16		-		16		-	-		-		-	-		-	-		-
Adjustments to Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance	[iii]	-	-		-		(47	)	(47	)	-	-		-		51	51		-	-		-
																			-			-
Adjusted net income attributable to Magna International Inc.		329	441		419		383		1,572		311	389		369		482	1,551		219	407		626

Thefollowing table reconciles diluted earnings per common share to Adjusted diluted earnings per common share:

		2023														2024													2025
		1st Q		2nd Q			3rd Q			4th Q			TOTAL			1st Q		2nd Q			3rd Q			4th Q		TOTAL			1st Q		2nd Q			TOTAL
Diluted earnings per common share		$	0.73	$	1.18		$	1.37		$	0.94		$	4.23		$	0.03	$	1.09		$	1.68		$	0.71	$	3.52		$	0.52		1.35		$	1.86
Exclude:
Amortization of acquired intangible assets			0.04		0.04			0.09			0.09			0.25			0.08		0.08			0.08			0.08		0.31			0.08		0.08			0.16
Restructuring activities			0.31		(0.09	)		-			0.20			0.43			0.11		0.15			-			0.29		0.55			0.15		0.03			0.19
Investment revaluations, (gains) losses on sales, and impairments			0.01		0.30			(0.01	)		0.01			0.31			-		0.01			0.01			0.01		0.04			0.03		(0.02	)		0.01
Impacts related to Fisker Inc. [“Fisker”]			0.06		0.03			(0.05	)		0.25			0.29			0.86		0.05			(0.49	)		0.14		0.56			-		-			-
Impairments			-		-			-			-			-			-		-			-			0.28		0.28			-		-			-
Gain on business combination			-		-			-			-			-			-		(0.03	)		-			-		(0.03	)		-		-			-
Veoneer AS transaction costs			-		0.08			-			-			0.08			-		-			-			-		-			-		-			-
Operations in Russia			-		-			0.06			-			0.06			-		-			-			-		-			-		-			-
Adjustments to Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance	[iii]		-		-			-			(0.16	)		(0.16	)		-		-			-			0.18		0.18			-		-			-

Adjusted diluted earnings per common share		$	1.15	$	1.54		$	1.46		$	1.33		$	5.49		$	1.08	$	1.35		$	1.28		$	1.69	$	5.41		$	0.78	$	1.44		$	2.22

[iii] Adjustments to Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance

The Company records quarterly adjustments to the valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets and liabilities in continents like North America, Europe, Asia, and South America. The net effect of these adjustments is an increase to income tax expense in the fourth quarter of 2024 and a reduction in the fourth quarter of 2023.

Note3: SEGMENTED INFORMATION

	2023										2024										2025
	1st Q		2nd Q		3rd Q		4th Q		TOTAL		1st Q		2nd Q		3rd Q		4th Q		TOTAL		1st Q		2nd Q		TOTAL
Body Exteriors & Structures
Sales	4,439		4,540		4,354		4,178		17,511		4,429		4,465		4,038		4,067		16,999		3,966		4,253		8,219
Adjusted EBIT	272		394		358		280		1,304		298		341		273		371		1,283		230		347		577
Adjusted EBIT as a percentage of sales	6.1	%	8.7	%	8.2	%	6.7	%	7.4	%	6.7	%	7.6	%	6.8	%	9.1	%	7.5	%	5.8	%	8.2	%	7.0	%

Power & Vision
Sales	3,323		3,462		3,745		3,775		14,305		3,842		3,926		3,837		3,786		15,391		3,646		3,857		7,503
Adjusted EBIT	92		124		221		231		668		98		198		279		235		810		124		162		286
Adjusted EBIT as a percentage of sales	2.8	%	3.6	%	5.9	%	6.1	%	4.7	%	2.6	%	5.0	%	7.3	%	6.2	%	5.3	%	3.4	%	4.2	%	3.8	%

Seating Systems
Sales	1,486		1,603		1,529		1,429		6,047		1,455		1,455		1,379		1,511		5,800		1,312		1,433		2,745
Adjusted EBIT	37		67		70		44		218		52		53		51		67		223		(30	)	42		12
Adjusted EBIT as a percentage of sales	2.5	%	4.2	%	4.6	%	3.1	%	3.6	%	3.6	%	3.6	%	3.7	%	4.4	%	3.8	%	-2.3	%	2.9	%	0.4	%

Complete Vehicles
Sales	1,626		1,526		1,185		1,201		5,538		1,383		1,242		1,159		1,402		5,186		1,276		1,226		2,502
Adjusted EBIT	52		34		(5	)	43		124		27		20		27		56		130		44		28		72
Adjusted EBIT as a percentage of sales	3.2	%	2.2	%	-0.4	%	3.6	%	2.2	%	2.0	%	1.6	%	2.3	%	4.0	%	2.5	%	3.4	%	2.3	%	2.9	%

Corporate and other
Intercompany eliminations	(201	)	(149	)	(125	)	(129	)	(604	)	(139	)	(130	)	(133	)	(138	)	(540	)	(131	)	(138	)	(269	)
Adjusted EBIT	(4	)	(3	)	(29	)	(40	)	(76	)	(6	)	(35	)	(36	)	(40	)	(117	)	(14	)	4		(10	)

Total
Sales	10,673		10,982		10,688		10,454		42,797		10,970		10,958		10,280		10,628		42,836		10,069		10,631		20,700
Adjusted EBIT	449		616		615		558		2,238		469		577		594		689		2,329		354		583		937
Adjusted EBIT as a percentage of sales	4.2	%	5.6	%	5.8	%	5.3	%	5.2	%	4.3	%	5.3	%	5.8	%	6.5	%	5.4	%	3.5	%	5.5	%	4.5	%

Q2 2025 Financial Review of Magna International Inc.

Page 6 of 6

Prepared as at 7/28/2025

Exhibit 99.2

August 1, 2025 Second Quarter 2025 Results Webcast SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 1

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 2 Vice President, Investor Relations Louis Tonelli

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 3 Certain statements in this document constitute "forward - looking information" or "forward - looking statements" (collectively, "forward - looking statements") . Any such forward - looking statements are intended to provide information about management's current expectations and plans and may not be appropriate for other purposes . Forward - looking statements may include financial and other projections, as well as statements regarding our future plans, strategic objectives or economic performance, or the assumptions underlying any of the foregoing, and other statements that are not recitations of historical fact . We use words such as "may", "would", "could", "should", "will", "likely", "expect", "anticipate", "assume", "believe", "intend", "plan", "aim", "forecast", "outlook", "project", "potential", "estimate", "target" and similar expressions suggesting future outcomes or events to identify forward - looking statements . The following table identifies the material forward - looking statements contained in this document, together with the material potential risks that we currently believe could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward - looking statements . Readers should also consider all of the risk factors which follow below the table : Material Potential Risks Related to Applicable Forward - Looking Statement Material Forward - Looking Statement Light vehicle sales levels, including due to : - A decline in consumer confidence - Economic uncertainty - Elevated interest rates and availability of consumer credit - Deteriorating vehicle affordability Tariffs and/or other actions that erode free trade agreements Production deferrals, cancellations and volume reductions Production and supply disruptions Commodities prices Availability and relative cost of skilled labour Light Vehicle Production Same risks as for Light Vehicle Production above Alignment of our product mix with production demand Customer concentration Uncertain pace of EV adoption, including North American electric vehicle program deferrals, cancellations and volume reductions and growth with EV - focused OEMs, particularly Chinese OEMs Shifts in market shares among vehicles or vehicle segments Shifts in consumer "take rates" for products we sell Relative currency values Total Sales Segment Sales Same risks as for Total Sales and Segment Sales above Execution of critical program launches Operational underperformance Product warranty/recall risks Production inefficiencies Unmitigated incremental tariff costs Restructuring costs and/or impairment charges, including due to the ‘reshoring’ of production to the U . S . Inflation Ability to secure planned cost recoveries from our customers and/or otherwise offset higher input costs Price concessions Risks of conducting business with newer EV - focused OEMs Commodity cost volatility Scrap steel price volatility Tax risks, including our dispute with the Mexican tax authority regarding VAT Adjusted EBIT Margin Net Income Attributable to Magna Same risks as Adjusted EBIT Margin and Net Income Attributable to Magna Risks related to conducting business through joint ventures Risks of doing business in foreign markets Legal and regulatory proceedings Changes in law Equity Income Forward Looking Statements

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 4 Forward Looking Statements (cont.) Forward - looking statements are based on information currently available to us and are based on assumptions and analyses made by us in light of our experience and our perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors we believe are appropriate in the circumstances . While we believe we have a reasonable basis for making any such forward - looking statements, they are not a guarantee of future performance or outcomes . In addition to the factors in the table above, whether actual results and developments conform to our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks, assumptions, and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, and the effects of which can be difficult to predict, including, without limitation : IT Security/Cybersecurity Risks IT/cybersecurity breach; product cybersecurity; Acquisition Risks inherent merger and acquisition risks; acquisition integration and synergies; Other Business Risks joint ventures; intellectual property; risks of doing business in foreign markets; relative foreign exchange rates; pension risks; tax risks, including our dispute with the Mexican tax authority regarding VAT; returns on capital investments; financial flexibility; credit ratings changes; stock price fluctuation; Legal, Regulatory and Other Risks legal and regulatory proceedings; changes in laws; and environmental compliance. Supply Chain Risks supply base; supplier claims; supply chain disruptions; regional energy supply and pricing; Manufacturing/Operational Risks product launch; operational underperformance; restructuring costs and impairment charges, including those related to the ‘reshoring’ of production to the U.S.; skilled labour attraction/retention; leadership expertise and succession; Pricing Risks quote/pricing assumptions; customer pricing pressure/contractual arrangements; commodity cost volatility; scrap steel/aluminum price volatility; Warranty/Recall Risks repair/replace costs; warranty provisions; product liability; Climate Change Risks transition risks and physical risks; strategic and other risks; Macroeconomic, Geopolitical and Other Risks unpredictable tariff and trade environment; trade disputes and threats to free trade agreements; consumer confidence levels; increasing economic uncertainty; interest rates and availability of consumer credit; geopolitical risks; Risks Related to the Automotive Industry program deferrals, cancellations and volume reductions; economic cyclicality; regional production volume declines; deteriorating vehicle affordability; uncertain pace of EV adoption, including North American electric vehicle program deferrals, cancellations and volume reductions; intense competition; Strategic Risks planning and forecasting challenges; evolution of the vehicle; evolving business risk profile; technology and innovation; investments in mobility and technology companies; Customer - Related Risks customer concentration; market shifts; growth of EV - focused OEMs, particularly Chinese OEMs; risks of conducting business with newer EV - focused OEMs; dependence on outsourcing; customer cooperation and consolidation; consumer take rate shifts; customer purchase orders; potential OEM production - related disruptions; In evaluating forward - looking statements or forward - looking information, we caution readers not to place undue reliance on any f orward - looking statement. Additionally, readers should specifically consider the various factors which could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward - looking statements, including the risks, assumptions and uncertainties above which are: discussed under the "Industry Trends and Risks" heading of our Management’s Discussion and Analysis; and set out in our Annual Information Form filed with securities commissions in Canada, our annual report on Form 40 - F with the Unit ed States Securities and Exchange commission, and subsequent filings. Readers should also consider discussion of our risk mitigation activities with respect to certain risk factors, which can als o b e found in our Annual Information Form. Additional information about Magna, including our Annual Information Form, is availab le through the System for Electronic Data Analysis and Retrieval + (SEDAR+) at www.sedarplus.ca , as well as on the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval Syst em (EDGAR), which can be accessed at www.sec.gov .

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 5 All amounts are in U.S. Dollars Today's discussion excludes the impact of other expense (income), net ("Unusual Items") and amortization of acquired intangible assets. Please refer to the reconciliation of Non - GAAP measures in our press release dated August 1, 2025 for further information. "Organic", in the context of sales movements, means "excluding the impact of foreign exchange, acquisitions and divestitures". Weighted Sales Growth over Market ( GoM ) compares organic sales growth (%) to vehicle production change (%) after applying Magna geographic sales weighting, excluding Complete Vehicles, to regional production. Reminders

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 6 Chief Executive Officer Swamy Kotagiri

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 7 Key Takeaways Strong Q2 financial performance, reflecting consistent execution across our business • YoY: Adj. EBIT +1%, Adj. EBIT margin +20 bps, Adj. Diluted EPS +7%, FCF +$178 million • Versus our expectations: Ahead, mainly reflecting strong incremental margins on higher sales Increasing Outlook • Sales: Increase largely reflects foreign currency translation and better than expected Q2 program mix • Adj. EBIT Margin: Raising low end of range to 5.2% reflecting cost savings initiatives • Net Income Attributable to Magna: Increased due to higher expected Adj. EBIT and lower effective income tax rate Continued actions with customers to mitigate tariff impacts • Lower annualized tariff exposure (~$200 million) versus Q1 disclosure (~$250 million) • Settled with multiple OEMs for substantially all of our 2025 net tariff exposure with them • Working with our other customers and suppliers to mitigate substantially all of our remaining exposure, including through recoveries Returned $137 million to shareholders in dividends in Q2 • $324 million Return of Capital YTD, through dividends and share repurchases

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 8 J.D. Power Platinum Plant Quality Award to Magna’s Complete Vehicle Assembly Operation in Graz, Austria • Based on J.D. Power’s 39 th annual Initial Quality Study • Award acknowledges quality and precision in producing BMW Z4 Earned Volkswagen Group Award 2025 in Product category for Innovative Battery Cover on VW MEB platform • Award recognizes Magna’s technical ingenuity, flexibility and persistence • Solution highlights our effective collaboration on a complex battery cover Success Through Quality and Innovation

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 9 Advancing Vehicle Safety Innovation with Integrated Interior Sensing Systems • Redefining vehicle safety with Magna’s Child Presence Detection (CPD) technology • Recent business awards from OEMs in Asia and North America • Integrating cameras and radars to deliver holistic safety solutions Continue to Win Business and Advance Technologies Awarded Dedicated Hybrid Transmission with North America - based Global OEM • Application for PHEV models launching in 2028 • Quoting similar product with additional global OEM • Further demonstrates our ability to support OEMs in “bringing power to the wheels” across all powertrain configurations

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 10 Tariff Cost Update • Estimated 2025 annualized net tariff exposure reduced to ~$200 million 1 from ~$250 million • Settled with multiple OEMs for substantially all of our 2025 net tariff exposure with them • Expect modest negative impact to 2 025 FCF, compared to previous Outlook x Utilizing government remissions programs where appropriate x Continuing cost reduction programs already in place x Being disciplined with capital spend x Working with our other customers and suppliers to mitigate substantially all of our remaining exposure, including through recoveries Updated tariff impacts: What we remain focused on: 1 Based on updates to tariff rates up to mid - July 2025

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 11 Updated 2025 Outlook – Key Assumptions August 2025 May 2025 2024 Light Vehicle Production: (millions of units) 14.7 15.0 15.379 • North America 16.6 16.6 16.752 • Europe 30.8 30.2 30.811 • China Foreign Exchange Rates: 0.715 0.714 0.730 • 1 CDN dollar equals USD 1.127 1.111 1.082 • 1 EURO equals USD 0.138 0.137 0.139 • 1 RMB equals USD

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 12 Updated 2025 Outlook August 2025 May 2025 2024 ($Billions, unless otherwise noted) 40.4 – 42.0 40.0 – 41.6 42.836 Total Sales 5.2% – 5.6% 5.1% – 5.6% 5.4% Adjusted EBIT Margin % 1 75M – 105M 65M – 95M 101 Equity Income ~210M ~210M 211 Interest Expense ~25% ~26% 22.7% Income Tax Rate 2 1.35 – 1.55 1.30 – 1.50 1,551 Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Magna 3 1.6 – 1.7 1.7 – 1.8 2.178 Capital Spending 0.8 – 1.0 0.8 – 1.0 1.058 Free Cash Flow 4 1 Adjusted EBIT Margin is the ratio of Adjusted EBIT to Total Sales 2 Income Tax Rate has been calculated using Adjusted EBIT and is based on current tax legislation 3 Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Magna represents Net Income excluding Other expense (income), net 4 Free Cash Flow (FCF) is Cash from Operations plus Proceeds from normal course Dispositions of fixed and other assets minus Fi xed Asset Additions and Increase in Investment in other assets

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 13 Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Pat McCann

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 14 Q2 2025 Performance Highlights Consolidated Sales 10.6B Weighted GoM 1 of - 1% ( - 1% excl. Complete Vehicles) - 3% Adjusted Diluted EPS $1.44 +7% Free Cash Flow 2 $301M 1 Weighted Growth over Market (GoM) compares organic sales growth (%) to vehicle production change (%) after applying Magna geo gra phic sales weighting, excluding Complete Vehicles, to regional production 2 Free Cash Flow (FCF) is Cash from Operations plus Proceeds from normal course Dispositions of fixed and other assets minus Fi xed Asset Additions and Increase in Investment in other assets Adjusted EBIT 5.5% +20 bps $583M +1% +$178M

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 15 Q2 2025 Financial Results Weighted Sales GoM 1 - 1% ( - 1% excl. Complete Vehicles) Q2 2025 LV Production 1% Global - 6% North America - 9% Detroit - based - 2% Europe 5% China - 3% Magna Weighted 1 Weighted Sales Growth over Market ( GoM ) compares organic sales growth (%) to vehicle production change (%) after applying Magna geographic sales weighting, excludi ng Complete Vehicles, to regional production 2 Includes net customer price concessions 3 Substantially the divestiture of our controlling interest in metalforming operations in India Consolidated Sales ($Millions) - 3% 10,958 - 392 - 75 - 54 194 10,631 Q2 2024 Volumes, Launches & Other Complete Vehicles excl. FX Divestitures, Net of Acquisitions Foreign Exchange Q2 2025 2 3

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 16 Q2 2025 Financial Results 0.50% 0.20% 0.10% - 0.40% - 0.20% 5.3% 5.5% Q2 2024 Operational Equity Income Discrete Items Tariffs Volumes & Other Q2 2025 $583 $577 Adjusted EBIT & Margin ($Millions and %) Note: bps changes are approximate 1 • Operational Operational excellence activities driving productivity and efficiency improvements (+) Lower launch costs (+) Higher new facility costs ( - ) • Equity Income Higher net favourable commercial items (+) Higher earnings due to favourable product mix and higher sales (+) Lower launch costs (+) (all with respect to certain equity - accounted entities) • Discrete Items 1 Supply chain premiums in ‘24 (+) Lower net warranty (+) Lower restructuring costs (+) Lower net favourable commercial items ( - ) • Tariff Costs Incurred, Not Yet Recovered from Customers ( - ) • Volumes & Other Reduced earnings on lower sales ( - ) 1 Includes items from both Q2 2025 and Q2 2024. Represents the net change year over year.

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 17 Q2 2025 Financial Results Change Q2 2025 Q2 2024 ($Millions, unless otherwise noted) (327) 10,631 10,958 Sales 6 583 577 Adjusted EBIT 2 52 54 Interest Expense 8 531 523 Adjusted Pre - Tax Income 10 (109) (119) Adjusted Income Taxes - (15) (15) Income Attributable to Non - Controlling Interests 18 407 389 Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Magna (5.6) 281.7 287.3 Diluted Shares Outstanding (millions of shares) 0.09 1.44 1.35 Adjusted Diluted EPS ($) 22.8% 20.5% 5.3% 5.5%

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 18 Q2 2025 Cash Flow and Investment Activities Free Cash Flow 1 ($Millions) 123 301 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Q2'24 Q2'25 1 Free Cash Flow (FCF) is Cash from Operations plus Proceeds from normal course Dispositions of fixed and other assets minus Fixed Asset Additions and Increase in Investment in other assets Key Sources (Uses) of Cash 341 (416) Net (Repayment) Issue of Debt (137) (134) Dividends paid Q2 2025 Q2 2024 ($Millions) 762 681 Cash from Operations Before Changes in Operating Assets & Liabilities (135) 55 Changes in Operating Assets & Liabilities 627 736 Cash from Operations (246) (500) Fixed Asset Additions (94) (170) Increase in Investments, Other Assets and Intangible Assets 14 57 Proceeds from Dispositions (326) (613) Investment Activities 301 123 Free Cash Flow 1

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 19 Maintaining Strong Balance Sheet Leverage Ratio (LTM, 30JUN25) ($millions) 8,243 Adjusted Debt 4,064 Adjusted EBITDA 2.03x Adjusted Debt / Adjusted EBITDA 1.87x Adjusted Debt / Adjusted EBITDA (excl. excess cash) 1 Total Liquidity (30JUN25) ($millions) 1,536 Cash 3,501 Available Term & Operating Lines of Credit 5,037 Total Liquidity Investment - grade ratings from Moody's, S&P, DBRS 1 Excluding excess cash held to pay down debt coming due • Raised €575M and $400M in Senior Notes • To be used principally to repay $650M debt in September 2025 Better Than Anticipated

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 20 In Summary: Magna’s Performance and Outlook Strong Q2 financial performance better year over year and ahead of our expectations Increasing Outlook • Higher sales range • Raising low end of Adj. EBIT margin range • Increased Adj. net income attributable to Magna Continued actions with customers to mitigate potential tariff impacts • Lower annualized tariff exposure versus Q1 disclosure • Settled with multiple OEMs for substantially all of our related 2025 net tariff exposure with them • Working with our other customers and suppliers to mitigate substantially all of our remaining exposure, including through recoveries Operational excellence initiatives continuing to enhance margins despite challenging industry backdrop Returned $137 million to shareholders in dividends

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 21 Q&A

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 22

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 23 Appendix

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 24 Q2 2025 Reconciliation of Reported Results Adjusted (2) (1) Reported Excluding: (1) Other Expense (Income), Net and (2) Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets $Millions, except for share figures $ 531 $ 29 $ 6 $ 496 Income Before Income Taxes 5.0% 4.7% % of Sales $ 109 $ 5 $ 2 $ 102 Income Tax Expense 20.5% 20.6% % of Pretax $ (15) $ - $ - $ (15) Income Attributable to Non - Controlling Interests $ 407 $ 24 $ 4 $ 379 Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Magna 1 $ 1.44 $ 0.08 $ 0.01 $ 1.35 Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share 1 Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Magna represents Net Income excluding Other expense (income), net and Amortization of Acquired Int ang ible Assets

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 25 Q2 2024 Reconciliation of Reported Results Adjusted (2) (1) Reported Excluding: (1) Other Expense (Income), Net and (2) Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets $Millions, except for share figures $ 523 $ 28 $ 68 $ 427 Income Before Income Taxes 4.8% 3.9% % of Sales $ 119 $ 5 $ 15 $ 99 Income Tax Expense 22.8% 23.2% % of Pretax $ (15) $ - $ - $ (15) Income Attributable to Non - Controlling Interests $ 389 $ 23 $ 53 $ 313 Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Magna 1 $ 1.35 $ 0.08 $ 0.18 $ 1.09 Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share 1 Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Magna represents Net Income excluding Other expense (income), net and Amortization of Acquired Int ang ible Assets

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 26 Q2 2025 vs Q2 2024 Sales Performance vs Market Performance vs Weighted Global Production (Weighted GoM ) Organic 1 Reported (1%) (4%) (5%) Body Exteriors & Structures (1%) (4%) (2%) Power & Vision - (3%) (2%) Seating Systems (3%) (6%) (1%) Complete Vehicles (1%) (4%) (3%) TOTAL SALES 1.0% Unweighted Production Growth (3%) Weighted Production Growth 2 1 Organic Sales represents sales excluding acquisitions net of divestitures and FX movements 2 Calculated by applying Magna geographic sales weighting, excluding Complete Vehicles, to regional production

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 27 Q2 2025 vs Q2 2024 Segment Impact on Adjusted EBIT % of Sales Adjusted EBIT as a Percentage of Sales Adjusted EBIT Sales ($Millions) 5.3% $ 577 $ 10,958 2 nd Quarter of 2024 Increase (Decrease) Related to: 0.2% $ 6 $ (212) Body Exteriors & Structures (0.3%) $ (36) $ (69) Power & Vision (0.1%) $ (11) $ (22) Seating Systems 0.1% $ 8 $ (16) Complete Vehicles 0.3% $ 39 $ (8) Corporate and Other 5.5% $ 583 $ 10,631 2 nd Quarter of 2025

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 28 Q2 2025 vs Q2 2024 Geographic Sales Q2 2024 Q2 2025 Asia Asia Production 3% China Production 5% $1.47B $1.30B $0.00B $0.20B $0.40B $0.60B $0.80B $1.00B $1.20B $1.40B $1.60B $1.80B $2.00B $5.50B $5.20B $0.00B $1.00B $2.00B $3.00B $4.00B $5.00B $6.00B North America Production (6%) $4.08B $4.23B $0.00B $0.50B $1.00B $1.50B $2.00B $2.50B $3.00B $3.50B $4.00B $4.50B Europe Production (2%) $130M $149M $0M $20M $40M $60M $80M $100M $120M $140M $160M ROW Production 12% South America Production 17% Rest of World

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 29 2025 Segment Adjusted EBIT Margin 2024 May 2025 Outlook August 2025 Outlook Seating Body Exteriors & Structures Power & Vision Complete Vehicles 7.5% 6.8 - 7.4% 5.3% 5.0 - 5.6% 3.8% 2.4 - 3.0% 2.5% 2.0 - 2.6% 7.1 - 7.7% 2.4 - 3.0% 5.0 - 5.6% 2.0 - 2.6%

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 30 Leverage Ratio Q2 2025 ($Millions) $ 8,116 Debt per Balance Sheet 127 Credit Rating Agency Adjustments $ 8,243 Adjusted Debt $ 3,737 LTM EBITDA 327 Credit Rating Agency Adjustments $ 4,064 Adjusted EBITDA 2.03x Adjusted Debt / Adjusted EBITDA Ratio (636) Excess Cash 1.87x Adjusted Debt / Adjusted EBITDA (excl. excess cash) 1 1 Excluding excess cash held to pay down debt coming due

SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS WEBCAST 31

Exhibit 99.3

TRANSCRIPT

08 – 1 - 2025

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

TOTAL PAGES: 27

Page | 1

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

DISCLAIMER:

This transcript is derived from arecording of the webcast. While efforts have been made to transcribe accurately, the following transcription may still contain inaccuracies,errors, or omissions. Readers are advised to refer to the webcast itself together with additional information about Magna, including inour Annual Information Form filed with securities commissions in Canada, our annual report on Form 40-F with the United StatesSecurities and Exchange Commission, and subsequent filings, available through the System for Electronic Data Analysis and Retrieval +(SEDAR+) at www.sedarplus.ca, as well as on the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis,and Retrieval System (EDGAR), which can be accessed at www.sec.gov.

CORPORATE SPEAKERS:

Louis Tonelli

Magna International; Vice President, Investor Relations

Seetarama Kotagiri

Magna International; Chief Executive Officer

Patrick McCann

Magna International; Executive Vice-President and ChiefFinancial Officer

PARTICIPANTS:

Tamy Chen

BMO Capital Markets; Analyst

Dan Levy

Barclays; Analyst

Chris McNally

Evercore ISI; Analyst

Joseph Spak

UBS; Analyst

Unidentified Participant

Unknown; Unknown

James Picariello

BNP Paribas; Analyst

Emmanuel Rosner

Wolfe Research; Analyst

Colin Langan

Wells Fargo; Analyst

Brian Morrison

TD Cowen; Analyst

Jonathan Goldman

Scotiabank; Analyst

Mark Delaney

Goldman Sachs; Analyst

Michael Glen
Raymond James; Analyst

Page | 2

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

PRESENTATION:

Operator^ Hello and thank you for standing by. (Operator Instructions)At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Magna International Second Quarter 2025 Results Webcast. (Operator Instructions)

I would now like to turn the conference over to Louis Tonelli, youmay begin.

Louis Tonelli^ Thanks, Operator. Hello, everyone, and welcome to ourconference call covering our second quarter 2025 results. Joining me today are Swamy Kotagiri and Pat McCann. Yesterday our Board of Directorsmet and approved our financial results for the second quarter of 2025 and our updated outlook.

We issued a press release this morning outlining our results. You'llfind the press release, today's conference call webcast, the slide presentation to go along with the call, and our updated quarterly financialreview all in the Investor Relations section of our website at magna.com.

Before we get started, just as a reminder, the discussion today maycontain forward-looking information or forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Such statementsinvolve certain risks, assumptions and uncertainties which may cause the company's actual or future results and performance to be materiallydifferent from those expressed or implied in these statements. Please refer to today's press release for a complete description of oursafe harbor disclaimer. Please also refer to the reminder slide included in our presentation that relates to our commentary today.

With that, I'll pass it over to Swamy.

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Thank you, Louis. Good morning, everyone. I hopeyou're all enjoying the summer so far, and I appreciate you joining our call today. So let's get started. I'm happy to share a few notabletakeaways from the quarter that underscore our strong execution in spite of industry headwinds. We are pleased with our strong Q2 resultsdriven by consistent execution across our business and progress against our performance initiatives.

Page | 3

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

I am proud of our team's focus and ongoing efforts. Despite lower productionin our two largest markets, North America and Europe, negatively impacting year-over-year sales, we delivered solid financial resultsand notable improvements from last year. Adjusted EBIT increased 1% and EBIT margin was 20 basis points better despite a 40-basis pointnegative impact from tariffs not yet recovered from customers. In addition, adjusted diluted EPS was up 7% and free cash flow improvedby $178 million.

Relative to our expectations, our results for the quarter were better,reflecting strong incremental margins on higher sales. We are also raising our outlook for the year. Stronger sales supported largelyby foreign currency translation and also better-than-expected second quarter program mix, raising the low end of our adjusted EBIT marginrange, despite lower expected vehicle production in North America as we realize on our cost-saving initiatives and an increase in adjustednet income attributable to Magna, mainly reflecting higher expected adjusted EBIT on higher sales and a lower effective income tax rate.

We continue to work closely with our customers to mitigate the impactof tariffs. Based on our actions taken and recent updates to tariff rates up to mid-July, we have lowered our estimated annualized tariffexposure to $200 million from $250 million when we reported in Q1. We have settled with multiple OEMs for substantially all of our 2025net tariff exposure with them. and we are working with our other customers and suppliers to mitigate substantially all of our remainingexposure, including through recoveries. Lastly, we returned $137 million to shareholders in dividends in the second quarter, bringingour year-to-date return of capital to $324 million.

We continue to assess industry conditions as well as the macroeconomicand trade environment and remain committed to our long-stated capital allocation strategy including share repurchases once conditionsbecome less uncertain. Under our normal course issuer bid initiated last November, they have purchased about 5.7 million shares to dayrepresenting 2% of our shares outstanding.

Page | 4

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

At Magna, we placed a premium on delivering innovation and high qualityto our customers to differentiate ourselves in the industry, and we have enjoyed some success recently. In J.D. Power's 39th annual initialquality study, their platinum planned Quality Award was recently given to our complete vehicle assembly operation in Graz, Austria. Theaward acknowledges quality and precision in producing the BMW Z4. Based solely on defects and mile functions reported by customers, onlyone plant in the world receives this platinum distinction each year, making it an exceptionally rare and elite achievement.

We also earned the Volkswagen Group Award for 2025 and in the productcategory, recognizing Magna's technical ingenuity, flexibility and persistence in developing and launching an innovative battery coverfor all-electric platform. Even during this period of uncertainty for our industry, we continue to execute to win new business and advancedautomotive technologies.

We were recently awarded a dedicated hybrid transmission program witha North American-based global OEM for PHEV models launching in 2028. We are also quoting a similar hybrid product with an additional globalOEM. This Evolve is a testament to the building block and platform strategy that we have been speaking about for some time demonstratingour ability to support our customers to bring power to the wheels across a wide range of powertrain configurations from ICE through differenthybrid variants all the way to pure BEVs.

With the increased industry focus on hybrid technologies, we continueto add to our business in this area and we are advancing vehicle safety innovation with integrated interior sensing systems includingthrough our child presence detection technology which has been recognized recently with business awards from OEMs in Asia and North America.The industry continues to face a high degree of uncertainty as a result of the tariff and trade environment. Despite this uncertainty,we continue to execute against our plan as we have through a variety of challenges in recent years.

In terms of recent updates impacting Magna, our estimate of annualizedtariff exposure is reduced to approximately $200 million from approximately $250 million when we reported in Q1. We have settled withmultiple OEMs for substantially all of our 2025 net tariff exposure with them. In our current 2025 outlook, we expect a less than 10 basispoint impact to our EBIT margin as well as a modest increase in working capital based on the timing of recoveries or expected tariff costslate in 2025. We remain highly focused on utilizing government remission programs where appropriate, continuing cost reduction programsalready in place and being disciplined with capital spend, and working with our other customers and suppliers to mitigate substantiallyall of our remaining exposure including through recoveries. Next, I'll cover our updated outlook.

Page | 5

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

While the current environment makes forecasting more challenging thannormal, we remain focused on what we can control and continue to adapt to an evolving situation. Relative to our previous outlook, wehave adjusted our North American production forecast to 14.7 million units. While this reflects a reduction of about 300,000 units, themajority of the adjustment relates to a refinement in backward-looking data around first quarter production. These changes help alignour outlook with current market dynamics.

We are holding Europe production unchanged. We are raising our Chinaproduction to 30.8 million units, all of which relate to an adjustment to estimated Q1 production, and our Q2 production outperformance.We also assume exchange rates in our outlook with approximate recent rates. We now expect a higher euro and slightly higher Canadian dollarand RMB for 2025 relative to our previous outlook. We increased our sales range as a result of foreign exchange translation due to thehigher euro related to the U.S. dollar as well as better-than-anticipated program mix, particularly this past quarter.

We raised the low end of our adjusted EBIT margin range and now expectto be between 5.2% to 5.6%, reflecting our strong Q2 results supported by continued execution around our cost saving programs. Recallthat we indicated over the past two reports that we expected approximately 40% of our EBIT to be generated in the first half of 2025.And we are forecast to end up slightly ahead of that. We also said we expected our 2025 earnings to be lowest in the first quarter of2025 and to improve meaningfully in the second quarter, which we have also delivered on.

Looking forward to H2 based on some timing updates and revised vehiclevolumes, we now expect to generate approximately 35% of our full year EBIT in the fourth quarter of this year. The most significant margindriver sequentially from H1 to H2 are expected to be commercial recoveries, lower engineering spend, net tariff recoveries lower warrantyexpense and a step-up in the benefits from our operational excellence activities. We are excited about our progress in operational excellence.

Page | 6

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

While there is more work ahead, we continue to see additional potentialupside to margin from these initiatives over time. We reduced our tax rate to approximately 25% and from approximately 26%, mainly dueto favorable FX adjustments recognized for U.S. GAAP purposes in Q2 and changes in our reserves for uncertain tax positions. We modestlyincreased our net income attributable to Magna reflecting higher expected EBIT and the lower effective income tax rate. We are reducingour capital spending range by $100 million compared to our May outlook, reflecting our continuing efforts to defer or reduce capitalwherever possible.

Offsetting this CapEx reduction are modest increases in working capitalrelated to tariffs and in other asset spending, resulting in an unchanged free cash flow range. Lastly, our interest expense range isunchanged from our last outlook. To summarize, we are confident in our outlook for the remainder of the year supported by strong Q2 executionand ongoing operational discipline despite ongoing industry challenges. We remain on track to deliver the outlook shared in February whichis a testament to strong execution throughout the organization.

With that, I pass the call over to Pat.

Patrick McCann^ Thanks, Swamy. And good morning, everyone. As Swamyindicated, we delivered strong second quarter earnings, better year-over-year and ahead of our expectations. Comparing the second quarterof 2025 to the second quarter of 2024. Consolidated sales were $10.6 billion, down 3% compared to a 1% increase in global light vehicleproduction, which included 6% and 2% declines, respectively, in North America and Europe, our two largest markets. Despite the lower sales,adjusted EBIT was up 1% to $583 million and adjusted EBIT margin was 5.5% up 20 basis points year-over-year despite a 40 basis point negativeimpact from tariffs. Adjusted diluted EPS came in at $1.44, up 7% and free cash flow generated in the quarter was $301 million, up $178million year-over-year and ahead of our expectations.

Let me take you through some of the details. North American and Europeanlight vehicle production decreased 6% and 2%, respectively, and production in China increased 5%, (inaudible) to a 1% increase in globalproduction. On a sales-weighted basis, light vehicle production declined 3% from Q2 2024. Our consolidated sales were $10.6 billion comparedto $11 billion in the second quarter of 2024.

Page | 7

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

On an organic basis, our sales decreased 4% year-over-year for a negative1% growth over market in the quarter. The decline in our total sales largely reflects negative production mix from lower D3 productionin North America, a decline in complete vehicle assembly volumes including the end of production of the Jaguar E and IPAs in Graz, Austria;the end of production of certain other programs the divestiture of a controlling interest in our metal forming operations in India andnormal course customer price givebacks.

These were partially offset by the launch of new programs, the favorableimpact of changes in foreign exchange rates and customer price increases to recover certain higher production input costs. Adjusted EBITwas $583 million, and adjusted EBIT margin was 5.5%, up 20 basis points from Q2 2024 and largely due to our ongoing cost savings and efficiencyinitiatives. The higher EBIT percent in the quarter reflects positive 50 basis points from operational items reflecting operational excellenceactivities and lower launch costs, partially offset by higher new facility costs, positive 20 basis points related to higher equity incomeas a result of higher net favorable commercial items, higher earnings due to favorable product mix and higher sales and lower launch costs,all with respect to certain equity accounted investments and positive 10 basis points in net discrete items including supply chain premiumsincurred in 2024, and lower warranty and restructuring costs partially offset by lower net favorable commercial items.

These were partially offset by negative 40 basis points for tariffcosts incurred but not yet recovered from our customers, and volume and other items, which impact us by negative 20 basis points, largelyreflecting reduced earnings on lower sales. Below the EBIT line, interest was modestly lower than last year.

Our adjusted effective income tax rate came in at 20.5%, lower thanQ2 of last year, primarily due to favorable FX adjustments recognized for U.S. GAAP purposes and favorable changes in our reserves foruncertain tax positions, partially offset by lower nontaxable items, losses not benefited in Europe and a change in the mix of earnings.Net income was $407 million, $18 million higher than Q2 2024, mainly reflecting higher EBIT and lower income taxes.

Page | 8

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Adjusted EPS was $1.44, 7% better than last year, reflecting highernet income and 2% fewer diluted shares outstanding. The fewer shares outstanding largely reflects share repurchases in the fourth quarterof 2024 and first quarter of 2025. Turning to a review of our cash flows and investment activities. In the second quarter of 2025, wegenerated $762 million in cash from operations before changes in working capital and used $135 million in working capital. Investmentactivities in the quarter included $246 million for fixed assets and a $94 million increase in investments, other assets and intangibles.

Overall, we generated free cash flow of $301 million in Q2, higherthan we were forecasting and $178 million better than the second quarter of 2024. And we continue to return capital to shareholders, paying$137 million in dividends in Q2. Our balance sheet continues to be strong with investment-grade ratings from the major credit agencies.

During the second quarter, we successfully raised EUR 575 million andUSD 400 million in the form of senior notes, principally to repay $650 million of debt in September of this year. At the end of Q2,we had over $5 billion in liquidity including about $1.5 billion in cash. Currently, our adjusted debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio is at1.87, excluding excess cash held to repay debt coming due -- better than we had anticipated coming into the quarter and compared to ourtarget ratio of between one and 1.5x.

In summary, we delivered strong financial performance in the secondquarter. which exceeded our expectations and showed meaningful improvements to the bottom line on a year-over-year basis. We have alsoupdated our outlook to reflect this continued momentum including higher sales supported by favorable foreign currency translation andbetter-than-anticipated program mix, particularly in Q2, raising the low end of our adjusted EBIT margin range and increasing adjustednet income, largely due to higher expected adjusted EBIT and lower effective income tax rate.

In addition, we are proactively working with our customers to mitigatetariff impacts. Our annualized direct tariff exposure has been reduced since last quarter. We have settled with multiple OEMs for substantivelyall of our 2025 net tariff exposure with them and we are working with our other customers and suppliers to mitigate substantively allof our remaining exposure including through recoveries. Our operational excellence initiatives continue to contribute positively to marginsdespite a challenging industry backdrop, and we expect further contributions from these activities into 2026.

Page | 9

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Lastly, we returned $137 million to shareholders in the quarter inthe form of dividends, and we continue to assess industry conditions as well as the macroeconomic and trade environment and remain committedto our long-stated capital allocation strategy including share repurchases once conditions become less uncertain.

Thanks for your attention this morning. We'll be happy to take yourquestions.

QUESTIONS:

Operator^ (Operator Instructions) Your first question comes from theline of Tamy Chen with BMO Capital Markets.

Tamy Chen^ First, I just want to confirm for the BES segment,like were there any onetime items or really the strong margin result was largely just on the much better program mix?

Patrick McCann^ Tamy, I don't -- there was no real significantonetime result of the extraordinary. It really was being driven by operational excellence. And as you said, positive mix on a year-over-yearbasis. The only thing we did have last year, we did have a supplier issue at one facility down in Mexico, and that's behind us. So that'sa little bit of the improvement in margin, but it's not significant.

Tamy Chen^ Then on tariffs, so thanks for the update on all of that.I just want to confirm, are you expecting to receive the recoveries for your this year tariff impact by Q4 of this year? And given you'resaying already by this point, you've settled for a substantial [exposure -- amount] of this tariff impact. I'm wondering, like, have youbeen able to establish a more formal mechanism with your OEM customers to receive recoveries going forward at a more timely basis? Orwill those still be quite lumpy?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ A few things. I think mitigation of tariffs, partof it is recoveries, part of it is internal efforts to increase USMCA compliance, working through rebalancing and so on and so forth.We have signed agreements with a few customers, and there is framework in place to finish with the other customers. We have been focusedon working through a mechanism rather than a lump sum payment. So in short, to your question, we expect a cadence of recovery. But withthat said, I think still in Q4 we will have some tariffs coming in. It's a timing issue, but we feel comfortable with the outlookthat we have given.

Page | 10

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Tamy Chen^ Got it. And last one here, sort of a two part, just on impactyou since the tariffs come in. But first, we've seen some of your major customers increased production in their U.S. class and the lowerproduction are idle in their Canadian and Mexican plants. And just wondering, for those ones that have been announced, how they affectedyour assets in North America? Like is it a net negative for your Canadian Mexican plants? Or is it a bit of a wash and you're just shippingto those OEMs, U.S. plants? And second, I'm wondering if the topic of reshoring now if it is coming up a bit more in your discussionswith OEMs. Thank you.

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Yes, Tamy, I think the discussions are definitelythere to look at rebalancing based on the USMCA compliance and upcoming program planning. But the good thing is that we have the footprintin all three regions. So as far as the rebalancing of the production is concerned, we will be in a good position. But still, it's a variableto be addressed as the planning goes forward. The good thing is we have a seat at the table through the planning process with the OEMs. Butwith the tariffs on the rest of the world for -- if that changes or increases local production, it would be an opportunity for Magna.

Patrick McCann^ And I think the other thing to consider, Tamy, oursales in Canada are about $4.5 billion, and 70% of those sales are already coming into the U.S. So increased production in the U.S. versusCanada really is impacting our Canadian ops at this point.

Seetarama Kotagiri^ And most of it is U.S. anti-compliant -- that isthe key thing right for us.

Operator^ Your next question comes from the line of Dan Levy with Barclays.Dan Levy, your line is open.

Dan Levy^ Sorry, there. I wanted to first ask about the step-up intothe second half, and I appreciate the commentary about a number of drivers, the commercial recoveries, lower spend. But maybe you couldjust unpack of those items where you have clear line of sight versus where it's going to require a little bit more work. Then just asa follow-up to that, you're going to have a 6% margin in the second half. Is that the right jumping off point as we start to think aboutwhat 2026 will be?

Page | 11

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Seetarama Kotagiri^ A few points and Pat can add some. I think if youlook at H1 to H2, I think part of it is the launch cadence that we talked about of new programs into the second half of '25 goinginto '26. I would say a large number of these programs are also coming with new economics. You mentioned the cadence of tariff recoveries,which had a negative impact in the first half. And as I said, with the framework agreements, the payments are coming in the second halfof the year and usually on commercial recoveries based on our discussions, they tend to be back ended.

Overall, I would say we have pretty good visibility on what wehave included in the outlook. There's always some puts and takes, but we feel the visibility is pretty good. In terms of looking at it,we particularly mentioned as we did at the beginning of the year, that 40% of our earnings were coming in the first half. We were a littlebit ahead of that. And for the cadence of the second half, I would say about -- I think we mentioned roughly 35% of our earningswill come in the fourth quarter, right? So that should give you that.

Now we also talked a little bit of the operational activities takingtraction which we have been working for years, and with the incremental volume that is starting to show the incremental flow through intoour margins. We talked about 150 basis points improvement in our margin from '24, '25. So 110 basis points of that is behind us on trackto finish the remaining part this year. We also see a similar cadence of about 35 basis points going into '26. So all in all, if the volumeshold and the assumptions that we talked about in February stay we feel pretty good about operationally of what's in our control,if nothing changes again right on the outside world, we feel pretty good about '26 outlook that we talked about in February.

Dan Levy^ Great. That's very helpful. As a follow-up, I wantedto ask about seating specifically. And first, maybe you could just address there is a fairly material implied ramp in Seating marginsin the back half of the year. I know that first quarter was dragged by warranty, and we saw probably a more appropriate run rate in thesecond quarter, but you do have a big step up, I think in most like implied 5% margin in the second half, which you haven't donein a while. If you could just talk to that.

Page | 12

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Then just broadly, do you feel comfortable that within the contextof your broader ROIC target and how you're managing the portfolio that Seating is still earning in excess of its cost of capital and thatthis business still fits well within the type of return profile that's needed at Magna?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Again Dan, I think the more tactical questionon Seating. You have to remember that there is a tariff impact in the first half of the year in seating, but with agreements in place,you will see the recoveries come in the second half. So that's something to consider. But as we look into the second half based on whatwe see in terms of users and volumes and so on and so forth, it looks pretty good. That's what we've included in the outlook.

Pat, anything to add?

Patrick McCann^ No. I think the -- you mentioned the tariff impact,it's disproportionately hitting our P&P segment and our Seating segment. So just the tariff impact alone on seatings in the rangeof about 60 basis points in the first half of the year. The margin -- the warranty impact was about 110 basis points. So that's the bulkof the step up from H1 to H2, Dan.

Seetarama Kotagiri^ So -- and then to the second part of your question,look, we've always talked about looking at portfolio from the guiding principles. From a returns perspective, seating has been a goodbusiness. in terms of ROIC and definitely clears the bar for our financial metrics for returns. We have seen the operational improvementsthat we've talked about. We are starting to see that going from year to year except for the warranty issue in the first quarter. We areseeing the path -- but again like I said, we continue to look at the portfolio every year and be happy to assess.

Operator^ Your next question comes from the line of Chris McNally withEvercore ISI.

Chris McNally^ I apologize for being a little monotonous, but I'm goingto follow Dan and Tamy's question but ask about the second half of the PND segment. Again looking at the second half implied ramp versusthe first half. I think what we're all trying to think about is volumes are going to be lower in the second half but there's a heaviertint here to international. You talked about swim some of the launches that you have. Could you just apply that to P&D because marginshave been all over the place over the last year or two. So I would love to know if there's a natural progression here that we can takeinto 2026?

Page | 13

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Seetarama Kotagiri^ I would say the tariff comment applies to the P&E,Chris, definitely going from the first half to the second half. If you exclude that part of it, I think again from a performanceperspective, PNB is doing well. The cadence of (inaudible) I talked about is not specific to P&V, it's all across Magna, as you canimagine.

So again going back to the operational initiatives that are in place,we are starting to see the benefits coming through as we talk about it. Again if you just go back to what I talked about the improvementsin '24 '25, what is to be seen I would say we feel pretty good going into what we talked about in '26. Again the big assumption is thevolume staying and the assumption we have for 26 volumes is roughly in the same level as what we're talking about in '25.

Chris McNally^ That's great. So just wondering, maybe the best wayto think about a base of growth for Powervision is really more think again about the full year rather than a second half versus firsthalf. Then as we grow it in 2026, a lot of the actions, the better contracts, but then we need some volume to grow it at your typicalincrementals, whatever that be 20% or greater. Is that a fair way to think use that full base, the full year base of roughly low 5s forPNB?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Chris, you some did better than I could have.

Operator^ Your next question comes from the line of Joe Spak with UBS.

Joseph Spak^ I just want to dig into the 35% of EBIT in the fourthquarter comment again like we've seen obviously some lower schedules on some key programs in the third quarter. So is that really what'ssort of driving that 3Q versus 4Q timing you're talking about? Or is it also recoveries? Or is there anything else you could provide onthat split?

Page | 14

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Patrick McCann^ I think Joe, it's a combination of the two, right?So if we go back in history, the seasonality of our business is that Q3 tends to have lower sales with the shutdowns in North Americaand in Europe. So we're seeing some of that, which reflects your comment on the schedules for the next three months. The second part isthe commercial recoveries as we've seen over the last couple of years have been more in the fourth quarter, and that's still what we'reexpecting across the board. What we've added this year to some of that volatility, I would say is the recovery of tariffs.

And I don't want to -- I just want to emphasize, like the questionson PNB and seatings. As Swamy said, like the impacts just for Magna loan, we've expensed $55 million of tariffs in the first half of theyear. That impact loan is about 25 basis points. Our expectation is to recover substantially all of that. So we have another swing ofclose to, say 20 basis points going the other way in the second half of the year. That's another driver of that H1 to H2 improvement.

Seetarama Kotagiri^ And that's what we were saying. We have some agreementsalready signed with the customers and some in place that needs to be just signed, but that's the cadence.

Joseph Spak^ Yes. I guess maybe to follow up on that. I know this getssuper confusing because there's -- it's -- like you said, the timing issue. But -- if I take a face sort of what you said the margin impactwas in the (inaudible) quarter, it sounds like maybe $40 million or so wasn't recovered, and you're sitting now 200 for the year, yousaid 10 basis point margin hit for the year.

So that's like another $40 million, you're saying $40 million hit forthe year. So I mean I understand like what you get next quarter might not be for the tariffs in that quarter and everything, but overall,is what you're saying is like on a net basis, you don't expect that whatever the tariff hit is versus sort of the recoveries to be asbig an issue in the back half versus this quarter. I know that's a convoluted question, hopefully you followed.

Patrick McCann^ Yes. No. I absolutely get it. It's actually tariffswill be a pickup in the second half of the year as opposed to a headwind. Remember,.

Joseph Spak^ You'll recover more than you actually incur.

Page | 15

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Patrick McCann^ We're going to have a pickup in EBIT related to tariffsin the second half of the year, as Swamy said, based on the signed agreements to date plus the frameworks that are in place with mostof our other customers.

Joseph Spak^ Maybe one last quick one. GM sort of had put out a releaseback bringing back some production to the U.S. It looks like you do have some facilities including seating that support those productionfacilities, is that business you would look to sort of go after that you don't have today? Or how are you thinking about that opportunity?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Yes. I think there's many discussions ongoing,Joe, right? We have to look at one rebalancing as the OEMs are thinking about it. The other one is given our footprint of where we areas part of the overall rebalancing. And like I said, if there is other OEMs that are trying to increase their local production in theU.S., we've got to take all of that into account. I would say if it's a rebalancing between Mexico and Canada, we are in a good place,but it won't be an upside to sales, but it helps us think through -- but if it's an increase in local production, we are in a better placeto add further to what we have.

The key thing for us right now where we are focused is on capital.and investments really, really focused to understand long term what the plan is before we go to anything in terms of investments. Thecustomers have been very collaborative and sharing the plants and working with us.

Operator^ Your next question comes from the line of [Tom Narayan withRBC].

Unidentified Participant^ The first one, there's been some thoughtthat the tariff deals that are struck between the U.S. and other countries. It seems to be the 15% level for Europe, Japan, Korea, butthere could be a more favorable one for Mexico, Canada. Given your program mix, just curious, would the situation where volumes benefitin the North American OEMs versus European Japanese, Korean, would that be a net positive for you or a net negative? Then I have a follow-up.

Page | 16

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Yes. Tom, if you look at the net import from theEurope is roughly 800,000 units. I would say $0.5 million of that are coming from BWW, Mercedes. But with that said, the total exportsfor these OEMs into U.S. is about 10% or lesser. So that might have an impact in Europe sales, right, if you're supplying there. But onthe other hand, as they think of localizing in U.S., as being part of the ecosystem would be an uptake hopefully there. And as I saidbefore, if there are OEMs in North America, rebalancing between Canada, Mexico and U.S., we are at the table, we have the footprint, butthat is just a matter of working through the planning process with them.

So that remains to be seen. Since we have the footprint on all threeareas or all three regions, I would say we're in a better place to address the planning changes as the OEMs serve going through.

Unidentified Participant^ Got it. Then another question on this H1,H2 dynamic. I know that the tariff dynamic, it's kind of like a double swing, right? So I get that it's a pretty big benefit to seatingand T&D. But you also called out the commercial recoveries as something you've expected based on prior years. But is that just basedon kind of what you'd expect this in prior years? Or is this actually stuff that's already been negotiated? Just how much confidence Iguess do you have in that you've already negotiated the tariffs with them with these OEMs, now the recoveries, just curious as to howconfident you are in getting that?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ I think Tom, when we talk about commercial recoveries,some of them are based on normal cadence that we have done over years, and it is part of the overall discussions in terms of LTAs andnew programs and so on and so forth. Difficult to say finally that it's 100% or 0. But given where we stand with our discussions and lookinghistorically, over the last, I don't know decades of work, right. I think I would say we are very comfortable, and that's what wemake a pretty good judgment. That's what we include in the outlook.

Patrick McCann^ And just to be clear, Tom, these aren't placeholders.These are specific program-related commercial items that were in discussions with the customers already. So -- and I just want to right-seteverybody as well like implied or implied range for H2 of 2025 is in line with what we had in 2024 and in 2023. So the cadence is there.I think we have confidence, whether it's on the tariffs or the other commercial. So we have traction. So where we are, we haven't changedour second half of the year from our own expectations. So I think we're tracking to where we expect to be.

Page | 17

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Unidentified Participant^ Actually, if I could, just a quick follow-upto Dan's question on the portfolio discussion. I think in the past, you said there was some macro uncertainty, right, with everythingthat's been happening. It feels like maybe that uncertainty is dissipating a little. As you examine the portfolio of the different businessesyou have, would you say that the macro situation is now less of a hindrance in your evaluation or is that still a factor?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Yes. Tom, I think the key word that you saidis the macro fluidity. I think is a little unchanged. To me, it still remains very uncertain. Yes. There is visibility on things thatwe can control for sure, but a lot of other macroeconomic variables are still very fluid. So the uncertainty still prevails. With thatsaid, we continue to look at the entire portfolio all the time. that volatility and uncertainty adds further complexity now to make anydecisions.

Operator^ Your next question comes from the line of James Picariellowith BNP Paribas.

James Picariello^ Just wondering on your North America production outlook,right? If you could speak to the visibility into the third quarter because for North America, LVP to be down 5% this year. There's a ratherdramatic falloff likely in the fourth quarter, right, if we just use IHS as a blueprint there. Is there anything you're seeing cautionarywise in the third quarter? Or is it just embedded conservatism for the fourth quarter?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Good morning, James. I think as we look at it,when we -- if you go back into the last quarter when IHS was trying to model the impact of tariffs I think they decreased the North Americanvolume significantly, and we kind of used what we knew from the releases and customer discussions and so on. I think at that point, wewere higher than what IHS was looking at. That is kind of narrowed, download is converging now. If you look at H1 to H2, I wouldsay H2 is a little bit softer than H1. And our -- compared to our anticipated numbers, H1 came a little bit higher. I don't think H2 issignificantly off. We have taken a little bit of a pull-forward effect.

But beyond that, obviously we are not taking any secondary or impactsof tariffs or other where sales of the vehicles might not be there or the OEMs might decide to pass on or increase. So those effects arenot in place. But otherwise, I think H2 is a little softer than H1, but we don't see a precipitous fall in --

Page | 18

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Patrick McCann^ And just to put data to Swamy's statements James. Thefirst half of the year, we had seven -- just under 7.5 million units, which leaves with our guidance about just over $7.2 million forthe back half of the year and that's down slightly from what we expected in May when we gave the guidance and the $7.2 million isroughly in line with IHS.

James Picariello^ Understood. Okay. Then my follow-up on capital allocation.How are you thinking about buybacks in the second half if the year has progressed toward your updated outlook here? Then on the reductionto this year's CapEx now at 4% of sales, I believe your 2026 targets had captured the idea of lower year-over-year CapEx? Can thisstill be the case? Or are certain investments getting pushed from this year to next?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Well James, I think on the CapEx question,we typically thought about getting back to the low 4s, I would say over collective years in terms of CapEx to sales ratio. Givenall the discussions that are on, like I said, we are being very deliberate and looking at every dollar of investment that's going in.So that -- as a result of that, we've been able to reduce the range by $100 million, and we continue to look at it going forward. I thinkoverall, going into 2026, the focus on capital investment will stay and we are still focusing, I would say in the 4% to low 4% CapExto sales ratio.

On the capital allocation strategy, no change. I think our currentfocus is completely on capital discipline and free cash flow generation so we can return value to the shareholders. As we talked about,we bought about 5.7 million shares. We have an NCIB in place. Last time when we spoke, we talked about uncertainty being the reason forpause. Those conditions haven't changed yet. But if we see better visibility, we can act on the existing NCIB, and we still have timethere.

Operator^ Your next question comes from the line of Emmanuel Rosnerwith Wolfe Research.

Emmanuel Rosner^ Great. Just wanted to come back again to the firsthalf to second half margin improvement. So I guess that's midpoint of your full year guidance, the revenue is probably not all that differentin the first half to second half, but obviously the margin would take a fairly meaningful step up. You mentioned commercial recovery,lower engineering spend, the tariff fees, warranty and then operational excellence.

Page | 19

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Some of the pieces you quantified on the tariff, for example, the $55million in the first half. Can you just give us a sense specifically for this year or maybe based on history? How should we think aboutthe magnitude of improvement of some of the other stuff, maybe based on what you've historically been able to achieve or anything thatyou're able to quantify this year, just curious how impactful some of these pockets could actually be because obviously tariffs only getsyou a small part of the way?

Louis Tonelli^ Yes. We're not going to quantify. I mean the items thatwe talked about are all impactful to us we wouldn't have talked about them. We're not going to get into that affecting how much is ineach given you the tariff from at, but the rest are -- and it's implied in our guidance, but we're not going to break down the details.

Emmanuel Rosner^ But is it different than the -- is there somethingthat is more pronounced this year than historically? I understand the tariff is a new dynamic. But is there any -- are there any driversthis year where commercial recovery should be so much more loaded than in the second half than historical or the engineering spend orjust anything compared to history would be helpful.

Seetarama Kotagiri^ I think Emmanuel, short answer there is no outlieror nothing that stands out in terms of the key buckets that Louis talked about, that would stand out this year compared to the previoushistory other than tariffs like the engineering spend CapEx and a few of those things are controllable and very visible line for us. Sothat's the reason why we are saying the others are discussions based on many other variables. So all in all, nothing significantly differentthan historical trend.

Louis Tonelli^ And I think if you look at the segments that we disclosedwhat we had last year for our various segments, if you look at the back half and then you look at where we are given the range that weprovided for the back half of this year, they're not really that far, they're pretty much of the same kind of ranges at the midpoint anyway.So it gives you some comfort that we've been there. We've been in this -- we've been able to do this recently.

Page | 20

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Emmanuel Rosner^ Understood. Then just it's just a clarification, butI think you were trying to give a quantification of some of the operational excellence piece of the opportunity. Can you just go backover the math around that, the extra 40 basis points that you mentioned for this year and then into next year?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Yes. I mean there is a mix of many things. As wetalk through it is material savings. It is purchasing initiatives with our own supply base -- it is reshoring, there is some verticalintegration activities. Over the past few quarters are actually maybe 1.5 years, I've talked about specific initiatives on digitizationand automation. We have started seeing the results yield with incremental volumes coming, the flow-through is much better, which is whatwe expect. And Emmanuel, so all of this continues. So it's difficult to say specifically each one. That's what we mean by operationalexcellence activities.

Some of this is (inaudible), some of this is additive. And to sum itup, that was the 40 basis points, and we feel pretty comfortable hitting that in '25, and we also see a roadmap for a similar magnitudeagain in '26.

Operator^ Your next question comes from the line of Colin Langan withWells Fargo.

Colin Langan^ Not that you've asked the same point, but you've commentedthat margins first half to second half are seasonally stronger I think that might be true in recent history, but is that referring tojust post Covid? Because I look at pre-Covid and it looks like margins historically actually fall and normally not because productionis weaker. Do you make a to understanding the comments?

Patrick McCann^ You're 100% accurate, Colin. So if you go back precoated,the seasonality would be you'd have strong Q1, Q2 would be your strongest quarter. Q3 will be our weakest quarter and Q4 would be rightin the middle. What's changed since Covid and the chip crisis primarily has been the inflation in the system. Now we get layer on volatilityin production volumes and now the tariffs and that's driving cost being incurred on January one of each year and recovery negotiationshappening throughout the year and history is showing that most of those are closed in the second half of the year. That's the biggestchange.

Page | 21

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Colin Langan^ Got it. That makes sense. Then the guide does imply salesdown about 1%. You said it's not too different than SMT on your forecast, but complete vehicles down and then if I look at North Americaand Europe, which are the largest of your markets, S&P has those down almost 9%. So are you expecting similar half declines? And ifthat's the case, how are you only down one if some of your largest markets are down that much. Are there big launches hitting? Is therea mix impact that's helping in the second half?

Patrick McCann^ And there's also foreign exchange. But I think theother thing you have to consider is if you look at our volume projections, for the first half of the year and compare those to S&P,there is a difference between what we have. We have seven -- we're showing just under 7.5 million units of production. They're showinga higher number. So that's going to factor into the math as well. But there's foreign exchange positive, there's mix, there's launch.Then there's just some math going on between us and S&P.

Colin Langan^ And just lastly, any update on the leverage target. Ithink you're [1.87]. The target has been to get below [1.5]. When is the timeline for that?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Yes. We talked about getting back into the rangethat we've always talked about in 2026, and we are on track as we looked at in February and looked at it for the year going into'26, and we are very much on track to that.

Operator^ Your next question comes from the line of Brian Morrisonwith TD Cowen.

Brian Morrison^ I appreciate the details on the flight plan to 2026margins and confirming that you can get to the high 6s, maybe low 7%. But if I look back at the 2026 disclosure previously the progressseems reasonable in each segment, except for Power & Vision. It seems to need the most acceleration to approach higher singledigits. I know tariffs are weighing on in the first half of this year, but what needs to jump-start that segment margin performance andhigh level, how is (inaudible) now performing versus expectations?

Page | 22

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Yes. I think from a T&E perspective, you touchedon the tariffs that is significant piece. I think from launch cadence in terms of internaling spend in terms of operational performance,all are on track, going not just from first half to second half, but looking forward, again volumes need to hold and other assumptionsneed to be there. From a (inaudible) perspective, we are not looking at as much as banner itself.

We're looking at the consolidated entity. And we hit the synergiesthat we talked about, maybe slightly ahead. We continue to do the optimization in terms of resources and so on and so forth. So all inall, pretty good. The take rates and what's happening in the markets and architecture always will have an impact on it. But I would saythe rationale is holding.

Operator^ Your next question comes from the line of Jonathan Goldmanwith Scotiabank.

Jonathan Goldman^ Swamy, if we sit here today like what's the confidencelevel in getting the North American production assumptions of $14.7 million -- do you think that's a reasonable level looking out to therest of the year? I know you don't have a crystal ball, but just given all the tariff had lines out there and potential downside risks,how confident are you hitting that 14.7% number?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Jonathan, you talked about the crystal ball. So-- but that's what you're asking me to look into. Again looking at releases, looking at or taking into consideration our discussions withthe customers. I would say we are pretty comfortable unless there is a complete dynamic change in the pricing of the vehicles and whathappens in the market. You look at the inventory levels, look at the data that's out there and the production today. I would say I'm prettyconfident with the numbers that we're talking about. Again this is a little bit of crystal ball as...

Louis Tonelli^ We've also, last couple of quarters, taken our numbersdown in North America in each last two quarters, the numbers have exceeded what we expected. So we continue to kind of look at it andsay well this may be some pull forward, but the numbers have been pretty good and sales seem to be pretty resilient even in July. So Ithink that gives us some confidence.

Page | 23

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Jonathan Goldman^ No. That's a fair point. Got it. I guess anotherone may be looking out a bit longer term. Swamy has the outlook for EVs changed with all the rhetoric about renewables, energy and thenew legislation passed in the U.S. with some things we're thinking about in terms of adoption of EVs. And if it's changed, how do yousee that impact on your business, whether it's on the top line margins or maybe on the capital piece?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Yes. Jonathan, we talked about EV take rates goingback again five years, I just want to remind, we've been, I would say conservative compared to the general outlook. And as westand and look at the market today it's even softer than that. But we still believe that is a long-term trend. But as I talked about inmy prepared comments, the product portfolio is flexible to address the hybrid uptick that we are seeing and the continuing is mono.

I also want to point out that investment for our BES in terms of opportunitiesbehind us. I talked about platform technologies on our PMV, also significantly behind us, right? So if the bans come forward, even atthe current rate are a little bit higher. I would say it would be a tailwind, right? Because all the heavy lift is behind us.

Operator^ Your next question comes from the line of Mark Delaney withGoldman Sachs.

Mark Delaney^ First is on the industry environment. hoping to betterunderstand what Magna has seen in terms of award activity year-to-date? And how you'd characterize your expectation about the bookingsenvironment going into 2H. I ask in part because some of the Tier 1s have talked about strength in areas like hybrid powertrains, digitalcockpit. You mentioned some hybrid awards this morning, but we've also heard other Tier 1s say that the booking environment has been abit difficult given some of the policy changes and tariff environment?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Mark, short answer, we are seeing good cadencein terms of our overall expected bookings for 2025. Yes. There is program dynamics in terms of pushout cancellations and so on and soforth at (inaudible) and look where we stand as of now compared to the past years, we are seeing not a whole lot of change. We are ina good place in terms of hitting our numbers that we had put in our plan.

Page | 24

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Mark Delaney^ Second question and kind of following up on some of theprior questions around some of the changing policy dynamics, especially for U.S. emissions policy and just better understanding in thateffect Magna right? So we think about the potential for more ICE vehicles, increased hybrid mix, but lower BEVs. You just -- as you thinkthe net of those effects, do you envision those being a net tailwind from Magna in your ability to outgrow the market or more offsetting?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ I think most of the policy impacts are secondaryimpacts, right, like the EV credits going away and therefore, the consumers may be not buying as many EVs as an example. I think thatmight soften the BEV. But on the other hand, if it increases hybrid and ICE vehicle sales, then we are part of the equation there, right?That's what we are seeing currently and that continues. Our -- all our cost initiatives, all the work that we've done in terms of footprintconsolidation and cost optimization, it will show through in the margins. If the BEV come back, like I said before, a couple of questionsbefore, the investment is behind us, and we would see that as a tailwind going forward.

Mark Delaney^ Just one last one for me. Just trying to understand thebridge of your revenue outlook from the last earnings call until today. I think the midpoint of the revenue outlook is now $400 millionhigher. You spoke about North America production being lower, China a bit higher. You also said FX is a is a tailwind. So can you justtalk a little bit more on the puts and takes? Maybe I missed it, but how much of an incremental tailwind is FX and maybe just other keyputs and takes around your customer exposure growth over market, et cetera.

Louis Tonelli^ I'd say roughly half of this currency roughly half onis the net of pretty strong -- a better mix than we had anticipated, offset by lower volumes in North America. I think that would be thebest way to break down that bridge.

Operator^ Your final question comes from the line of Michael Glen withRaymond James.

Michael Glen^ I just want to visit something we talked about more 3-plusyears ago with this idea of North American reshoring. How has the business case for have backed the (inaudible) facility in North Americaevolved? Is this something that could happen at this point in time? Is it something that Magna consider it?

Page | 25

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Michael, we've always said in terms of lookingat complete vehicle assembly in North America is a decision based on a customer multiple programs, multiple life cycles for it to makesense. I think the -- those required assumptions remain the same. But given production capacities and how things are going, we don't seeanything active right now right? So our criteria for looking at that hasn't changed. It is the same. It has to be multiple customers,multiple life cycles before we look at it, and there is nothing on the table as I speak today.

Michael Glen^ Then when I sit here and look at your production, yourNorth American production outlook at $14.7 million, which for me is like -- it's a very low number, considering what we used to see. Youhave very low inventory levels. In the back row, there seems to be this creeping dynamic where the Detroit three are shifting towardsor would like to shift towards a made-to-order type model. Like how do we think about all of this, especially like this dynamic with D3moving to made to order, how does that impact Magna? And is it something that you're increasingly seeing?

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Yes. I think from a volume perspective, right,we have to look at the data that we have in terms of programs and platforms have to base it on customer discussions and releases. So that'show we come up with a number in terms of the 14.7% as we stand to date. If the dynamics change there, and if that number increases, Ihope you're right, it's going to be a tailwind for all of us. We are just basing it on the facts and the same method of calculation everytime that we look at it. There is some amount of judgment, but it's -- again it's based on a lot of data.

In terms of your I think the word you used was, made to buy order.I don't know made-to-order, I haven't seen a whole lot of that in terms of -- there is a complexity and vary introduction that theOEMs continue to talk about to simplify the complexity of manufacturing, sequencing and so on. I think that's good for everyone. But evenif it does go that way I don't think from a product portfolio perspective that we have as Magna would mean a lot of change here. I guessthat was the last question.

Operator^ At this time, I would like to turn it back over to SwamyKotagiri for closing remarks.

Page | 26

Magna International

Q2 2025 Results

Seetarama Kotagiri^ Thank you, Operator. I jump the gun. But thanksfor listening to everyone today. We continue to execute despite the high degree of uncertainty in the industry I have to reiterate thatwe remain focused on the many initiatives that are driving cost, launch and capital discipline, and we had solid free cash flow generation.We plan to both get back within our target leverage ratio and are committed to our capital allocation strategy, and we remain highly confidentin Magna's future. Thank you. And have a great day.

Operator^ This concludes today's call. You may disconnect.

Page | 27