RegistrationNo. 333-
UNITEDSTATES
SECURITIESAND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,D.C. 20549
FORM
REGISTRATIONSTATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)
| 2834 | ||||
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Telephone:
(Address,including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
ChiefExecutive Officer
Telephone:(
(Name,address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
Copiesto:
Marcelle Balcombe Rohini Sud (212) 653-8700 | Wendy Pizarro Chief Legal Officer and Chief Corporate Development Officer 4475 Executive Drive, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 794-9600 |
Approximatedate of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time to time after the effective date of this registration statement.
Ifany of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under theSecurities Act of 1933 check the following box. ☒
Ifthis Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check thefollowing box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the sameoffering. ☐
Ifthis Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list theSecurities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐
Ifthis Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list theSecurities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐
Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company,or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smallerreporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
| ☒ | Smaller reporting company | ||
| Emerging growth company |
Ifan emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complyingwith any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act.
Theregistrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until theregistrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effectivein accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such dateas the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
Theinformation in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the registrationstatement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securitiesnor does it seek an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
| Preliminary Prospectus | Subject To Completion | Dated July 3, 2025 |
6,355,650Shares of Common Stock
Thisprospectus relates to the resale or other disposition from time to time by the selling stockholders identified herein (each, a “SellingStockholder” and, together, the “Selling Stockholders”), in this prospectus of Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”)of: (i) 6,053,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per shares (“Common Stock”) issuable on the exercise of SeriesG common warrants, exercisable at an exercise price of $0.6954 per share, first exercisable on September 28, 2025 and expiring on March28, 2033; and (ii) 302,650 shares of Common Stock issued to Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc. (“Ladenburg”) (or its designees),as placement agent in the public offering placement deal, exercisable at an exercise price of $0.8125 per share, first exercisable onSeptember 28, 2025 and expiring on September 28, 2030. For further information with respect to the issuance of such shares of CommonStock, see the section “Unregistered Sales of Common Stock” beginning on page 68 of this prospectus.
Wewill not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of Common Stock by the Selling Stockholders. However, upon any exercise of the warrants(specified herein and held by the Selling Stockholders) by payment of cash, we will receive the exercise price of such warrants.
TheSelling Stockholders may sell or otherwise dispose of the Common Stock covered by this prospectus in a number of different ways and atvarying prices. We provide more information about how the Selling Stockholders may sell or otherwise dispose of the Common Stock coveredby this prospectus in the section entitled “Plan of Distribution” on page 152 of this prospectus. For information on theSelling Stockholders, see the section entitled “Selling Stockholders” on page 68 of this prospectus. Discounts, concessions,commissions and similar selling expenses attributable to the sale of Common Stock covered by this prospectus will be borne by the SellingStockholders. We will pay all expenses (other than discounts, concessions, commissions and similar selling expenses) relating to theregistration of the Common Stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC.
Ourcommon stock is listed on the NYSE American LLC under the symbol “CLDI.” On July 2, 2025, the last reported sale price pershare of our common stock was $0.2339.
Wemay amend or supplement this prospectus from time to time by filing amendments or supplements as required. You should read the entireprospectus and any amendments or supplements carefully before you make your investment decision.
Weare an “emerging growth company” and a “smaller reporting company” under applicable Securities and Exchange Commission(“SEC”) rules and, as such, have elected to comply with certain reduced public company disclosure requirements for this prospectusand future filings. See the discussions in the section titled “Summary – Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Companyand a Smaller Reporting Company.”
Investingin our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should review carefully the risks and uncertainties described in the section entitled“Risk Factors” beginning on page 10 of this prospectus, and under similar headings in any amendments or supplementsto this prospectus.
Neitherthe Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passedupon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Thedate of this prospectus is , 2025.
TABLEOF CONTENTS
| i |
ABOUTTHIS PROSPECTUS
Youmay only rely on the information contained in this prospectus or that we have referred you to. We have not authorized anyone to provideyou with information different from, or in addition to, that contained in this prospectus. This prospectus does not constitute an offerto sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities other than the common stock offered by this prospectus. This prospectus doesnot constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any common stock in any circumstances in which such offer or solicitationis unlawful. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any sale made in connection with this prospectus shall, under any circumstances,create any implication that there has been no change in our affairs since the date of this prospectus. For investors outside the UnitedStates: Neither we nor the selling stockholders have done anything that would permit this offering or possession or distribution of thisprospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than in the United States. Persons outside the UnitedStates who come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any restrictions relating to, the offeringof the shares of common stock and the distribution of this prospectus outside the United States.
Unlessthe context otherwise requires, “we,” “us,” “our,” “registrant,” or “Registrant,”“Calidi,” “Calidi Biotherapeutics,” and the “Company” refer to Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (f/k/a First Light Acquisition Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation), and its consolidated subsidiaries following the BusinessCombination. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “FLAG” refer to First Light Acquisition Group, Inc., aDelaware corporation, prior to the Business Combination. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “Calidi NV”means Calidi Biotherapeutics (Nevada), Inc. (formerly Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc.), a Nevada corporation and our wholly-owned subsidiary.In addition, unless the context otherwise requires, “common stock” or “Common Stock” refer to our voting commonstock, and “Escalation Shares” and Non-Voting Escalation Shares” refer to our Non-Voting Common Stock held in escrow.
MARKETAND INDUSTRY DATA
Thisprospectus contains statistical data, estimates and information concerning our industry, including market position and the size and growthrates of the markets in which we participate, that are based on independent industry publications and reports or other publicly availableinformation, as well as other information based on our internal sources. Although we believe the market and industry data included inthis prospectus are reliable and are based on reasonable assumptions, these data involve many assumptions and limitations, and you arecautioned not to give undue weight to these estimates. We have not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of the data containedin these industry publications and reports. The industry in which we operate is subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk dueto a variety of factors, including those described in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “CautionaryNote Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” These and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressedin these publications and reports.
Certaininformation included in this prospectus concerning our industry and the markets served by us, including our market share, is also basedon our good-faith estimates derived from our management’s knowledge of the industry and other information currently available tous.
| 1 |
CAUTIONARYNOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Thisprospectus contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“SecuritiesAct”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statementsinclude, among other things, statements regarding our and our management team’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategiesregarding the future. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events orcircumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identifiedby words such as “plan,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “outlook,”“estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” “continue,” “could,” “may,”“might,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “should,” “would,”“will,” “seek,” “target,” and other similar words and expressions, but the absence of these wordsdoes not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements in this prospectus may include, for example, statementsabout:
| ● | we are a clinical stage biotechnology company developing novel genetic medicines for oncology with a limited operating history and have not generated any revenue to date from product sales; | |
| ● | we have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated revenues. We have incurred significant operating losses since our inception and we anticipate that we will incur continued losses for the foreseeable future; | |
| ● | we need to raise substantial additional funding. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, or if at all, we will be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate some of our product development programs or commercialization efforts, or cease our operations altogether. In addition, the issuance of a substantial number of shares of common stock as a result of a financing could adversely affect the price of our common stock; | |
| ● | our ability to realize the expected benefits of the Business Combination; | |
| ● | our ability to maintain the listing of our securities on the NYSE American; | |
| ● | our financial and business performance, including our financial projections and business metrics; | |
| ● | our market opportunity; | |
| ● | changes in our strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, forecasts, projected costs, prospects and plans; | |
| ● | expectations regarding the time during which we will be an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act; | |
| ● | our ability to retain or recruit officers, key employees and directors; | |
| ● | the impact of the regulatory environment and complexities with compliance related to such environment; | |
| ● | the expected costs associated with our research and development initiatives, including investments in technology and product development; | |
| ● | our ability to secure sufficient funding and alternative source of funding to support when needed and on terms favorable to us to support our business objective, product development, other operations or commercialization efforts; | |
| ● | our ability to enroll patients in our proposed clinical trials and development activities; | |
| ● | the impact of governmental laws and regulations; and | |
| ● | our ability to obtain, maintain, protect and enforce sufficient patent and other intellectual property rights for our drug candidates and technology. |
Theforward-looking statements contained in this prospectus are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developmentsand their potential effects on our business. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting our business will be thosethat we have anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control)or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by theseforward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those factors described in the section entitled“Risk Factors.” Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks and uncertaintiesemerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the effect of all such riskfactors on our business or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially fromthose contained in any forward-looking statements. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of theassumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements.
Theforward-looking statements made by us in this prospectus speak only as of the date of this prospectus. Except to the extent requiredunder the federal securities laws and rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we disclaimany obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is madeor to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there is no assurance that the eventsor results suggested by the forward-looking statements will in fact occur, and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-lookingstatements.
| 2 |
SELECTEDDEFINITIONS
Unlessthe context otherwise requires or has otherwise been defined, the following defined terms shall have the meaning set forth below.
“anchorinvestors” means certain unaffiliated qualified institutional buyers or institutional accredited investors who have each enteredinto an Investment Agreement pursuant to which such anchor investors have purchased in the aggregate 145,265 founder shares from ourSponsor and Metric at approximately $0.04 per share;
“BusinessCombination” means the business combination of FLAG with Calidi pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement;
“Bylaws”means the Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended, in effect as of the date of this prospectus;
“Calidi”or “Calidi Biotherapeutics” means Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation;
“Charter”or “Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation” means the Second Amended and Restated Certificate ofIncorporation in effect;
“Closing”means the closing of the Merger and all of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement in accordance with the terms of theMerger Agreement;
“ClosingDate” means the date on which the Business Combination was consummated which occurred on September 12, 2023;
“commonstock” or “Common Stock” means Calidi Common Stock following the Business Combination, with the rights and preferencesand subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Charter;
“DGCL”means the Delaware General Corporation Law, as amended;
“ExchangeAct” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
“FLAG”means First Light Acquisition Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation;
“InvestmentAgreement” means each of the investment agreements entered into between our Sponsor, Metric and the anchor investors pursuantto which such anchor investors have purchased in the aggregate 145,265 founder shares from our Sponsor and Metric at approximately $0.04per share;
“Metric”means Metric Finance Holdings I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and an affiliate of Guggenheim Securities, LLC;
“CommonStock” or “common stock” means, following the consummation of the Business Combination, the common stock, par value$0.0001 per share, of Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc.;
“RegistrationRights Agreements” mean certain agreements requiring the Company to register the holders’ shares of common stock withthe Securities and Exchange Commission consisting of that certain (i) Amended And Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated September12, 2023; (ii) Voting and Lock-Up Agreement dated as of January 9, 2023, and amended on April 12, 2023, and (iii) Series B PreferredStock Investors’ Rights Agreement dated June 16, 2023;
“SeriesB Financing” means the equity financing contemplated by the Securities Purchase Agreements between Calidi Biotherapeutics,Inc., and Jackson Investment Group, LLC and Calidi Cure, LLC, dated June 16, 2023, to secure commitments for the purchase of Series BConvertible Preferred Stock of Calidi;
“Sponsor”means First Light Acquisition Group, LLC, a Delaware series limited liability company; and
“SponsorShares” means 552,709 shares of common stock (net of cancellations from the original 575,000 shares of common stock sold) inthe aggregate originally sold to the Sponsor and Metric at $0.04 per share, and subsequently sold to the anchor investors at the samepurchase price or transferred other shareholders as an inducement to complete and finance the Business Combination.
| 3 |
PROSPECTUSSUMMARY
Thefollowing summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary is not complete and does not containall of the information you should consider before investing in our securities. You should read this entire prospectus carefully, includingthe sections entitled “Risk Factors,” “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” and “Management’sDiscussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our consolidated financial statements and the relatednotes included elsewhere in this prospectus, before making an investment decision.
TheCompany is in the process of obtaining stockholder approval for a reverse stock split in a ratio ranging between 1-for-2 to 1-for-19,with the final ratio to be approved by the Board. Once such stockholder approval is obtained and the Company effectuates a reverse stocksplit, all historical per share data, number ofshares issued and outstanding, stock awards, and other common stock equivalents set forth herein relating to our common stock willbe adjusted to give effect to such reverse stock split.
CompanyOverview
Weare a clinical stage biotechnology company that is developing genetic medicines and proprietary genetically-engineered oncolyticviruses. We are currently developing RedTail, an enveloped vaccinia virus platform designed to deliver genetic medicine to tumorsites, and two proprietary stem cell-based oncolytic virus platforms (SuperNova and NeuroNova). The RedTail platform is expected tocommence a Phase I trial by the end of 2026 with the first compound (CLD-401) delivering IL-15 superagonist to the tumormicroenvironment (“TME”).
OurRedTail platform is the culmination of a over a decade of work around genetic engineering of viruses and allows for the systemic administrationof a proprietarily-modified oncolytic virus that can:
| ● | Survive in circulation and hone to metastatic tumor sites | |
| ● | Induce cell kill tumor cells and immune priming in the TME | |
| ● | Deliver genetic medicine payloads like IL-15 superagonist for expression in the TME |
OurSuperNova and NeuroNova platforms are designed to:
| ● | Protect oncolytic viruses from neutralizing antibodies and complement inactivation and innate immune cell inactivation; | |
| ● | Enhance oncolytic viral amplification inside the allogeneic cells; and | |
| ● | Modify the TME to allow improvements in cell targeting and viral amplification at the tumor site. |
Oncolyticviruses have been pursued as therapeutic platforms in oncology because of their ability to preferentially infect and replicate withincancer cells, resulting in both direct lysis of the tumor cells as well as activation of an antitumor immune response, while leavingnormal, healthy cells unharmed. Despite the promises of oncolytic viruses, a major obstacle against their therapeutic use has been theirrapid elimination by the patient’s immune system; this has meant that oncolytic viruses have been largely relegated to being usedfor local delivery to tumors but have not been successful in patients with extensive metastatic disease. The only approved oncolyticvirus therapy is T-VEC (Imlygic®), a modified herpes simplex virus (HSV) for the treatment of patients with melanoma given intratumorally.
| 4 |
Wehave been working on protecting oncolytic virusesfrom immune clearance for over a decade. Our NeuroNova investigational drug candidate is currently in a Phase 1 trial being run byour partner, City of Hope, in an investigator-initiated trial and we have an open IND for a Phase 1 trial for our SuperNova investigationaldrug candidate. The platforms used in NeuroNova and SuperNova use oncolytic viruses embedded in stem cells to avoid immune clearanceand facilitate initial viral amplification and expansion at the tumor sites. This approach has shown substantial benefit over unprotectedvirus in preclinical studies of intratumoral delivery, but stem cell encapsulation does not allow for systemic delivery of virus to tumormetastases in animal models. The size of the stem cells prohibited efficient dissemination into metastatic sites.
Morerecently, we used the learnings from NeuroNova and SuperNova to create RedTail, a novel oncolytic viral platform for systemicdelivery. The virus used in RedTail has been proprietarily engineered to avoid immune clearance and to specifically replicate in tumortissue where the virus also has the ability to deliver genetic medicines to the tumor microenvironment. RedTail utilizes a proprietaryform of enveloped virus with genetic modifications to avoid immune clearance. Because the virus is not encapsulated in stem cells, itis thousands of times smaller than the NeuroNova or SuperNova products and disseminates efficiently into metastatic sites in syngeneicanimal models. In addition, the virus can be engineered to express genetic medicines while replicating in the tumor.
CLD-401,the first lead derived from the RedTail platform, expresses IL-15 superagonist at high concentrations in the tumor microenvironment.In animal models, CLD-401 can be given systemically and clear metastatic sites in syngeneic tumor mouse models. The combination ofthe RedTail virus with its genetic payload drives complete tumor eradication in the tumor models compared to the RedTail virus alone.We believe that RedTail, given its systemic administration and targeting to metastatic sites and its delivery of geneticmedicines, represents a major advancement in the space of oncolytic virus in oncology.
RecentDevelopments
OnApril 17, 2025, Allan Camaisa notified the Board of Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) of his resignation as theCompany’s Chief Executive Officer and as Chairman of the Board and from all his positions with the Companies subsidiaries (exceptNova Cell, Inc.), effective April 21, 2025, subject to finalization of the terms of the General Release of Claims and Transition Agreement,which agreement was fully-executed on April 22, 2025. Mr. Camaisa will continue to serve as a Class III director of the Company, andhas assumed the title of “CEO Emeritus”. Mr. Camaisa would also continue to serve as a director on the board of directorsof our subsidiary Nova Cell, Inc. Mr. Camaisa’s resignation was not the result of any disagreement with the Company or its Boardor any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies, or practices.
OnApril 22, 2025, the Company executed a General Release of Claims and Transition Agreement (“Release Agreement”) with Mr.Camaisa. The Release Agreement contains customary protections, including a general release of claims by Mr. Camaisa in favor of the Companyand certain other related parties. Pursuant to the terms of the Release Agreement, the Company is obligated to pay Mr. Camaisa $500,000separation pay in the form of compensation continuation over 12 months pursuant to the Company’s regular and customary payrollschedule, less all regular and customary payroll withholdings and shall also be liable to pay Mr. Camaisa’s COBRA premiums for12 months, commencing May 2025, upon timely election. Mr. Camaisa is also entitled to receive a transition/ consulting pay of $10,000per month during the transition period, and may also be entitled to incentive payments for opportunities that Mr. Camaisa has developed,as more specifically described in the Release Agreement. Such incentive will be calculated and paid based on revenues, capital, or moniesactually received by the Company on or before December 31, 2026. No incentive will be earned or paid for revenues, capital, or moniesthat are received by the Company after that date. Mr. Camaisa will not receive compensation as a member of the Board during the periodthat he receives consideration pursuant to the Release Agreement.
OnApril 17, 2025, the Board, by a unanimous vote, appointed Eric Poma, Ph.D. to serve as CEO of the Company, effective April 22, 2025.In addition, on April 22, 2025, the Board, upon recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, appointedDr. Poma to serve as a Class I director of the Company, also effective April 22, 2025, with a term expiring at the annual meeting ofstockholders to be held in 2027.
| 5 |
OnApril 22, 2025, the Board appointed James Schoeneck as chairman of the Board, effective April 22, 2025, to serve until his successoris duly elected and qualified, or until his earlier resignation or removal. As previously disclosed, Mr. Schoeneck has served on theBoard since September 12, 2023.
OnJune 11, 2025, the Board accepted the resignation of Mr. Camaisa as the sole director and officer of Nova Cell, and approved the appointmentof Dr. Poma as the sole director and officer of Nova Cell.
CorporateBackground
Ourprincipal executive offices are located at 4475 Executive Drive, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92121. Our telephone number is (858)794-9600. Our website address is www.calidibio.com. The references to our website in this prospectus are inactive textual referencesonly. The information on our website is neither incorporated by reference into this prospectus nor intended to be used in connectionwith this offering. We have included our website address in this prospectus as an inactive textual reference only and not as an activehyperlink.
Weand our subsidiaries own or have rights to trademarks, trade names and service marks that we use in connection with the operation ofour business, including “Calidi,” Calidi Biotherapeutics,” “SuperNova, “NeuroNova,” “SNV-1,”“ SNV,” “NNV,” “NNV1,” and “NNV2.” In addition, our names, logos and website names andaddresses are our trademarks or service marks. Other trademarks, trade names and service marks appearing in this prospectus are the propertyof their respective owners. Solely for convenience, in some cases, the trademarks, trade names and service marks referred to in thisprospectus are listed without the applicable ®, ™ and SM symbols.
Summaryof Risk Factors
Ourbusiness is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in the section entitled “Risk Factors,”that represent challenges that we face in connection with the successful implementation of our strategy and growth of our business. Theoccurrence of one or more of the events or circumstances described in the section entitled “Risk Factors,” alone or in combinationwith other events or circumstances, may adversely affect our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the Business Combinationand may harm our business. Such risks include, but are not limited to, the following:
●We are a clinical-stage biotechnology company with a limited operating history and has not generated any revenue to date from productsales;
●We have incurred significant operating losses since our inception, and we anticipate that we will incur continued losses for the foreseeablefuture;
●We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales;
●Our engineered RedTail enveloped virus platform and our allogeneic stem cell virus product candidates represent a novel approach to cancertreatment that creates significant challenges;
●Our engineered allogeneic stem cell product candidates represent a novel approach to cancer treatment that creates significant challenges.
●Adverse publicity regarding stem cell-based immunotherapy could have a material adverse impact on our business.
●We need to raise substantial additional funding. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, or if at all, we would be forced to delay,reduce or eliminate some or all of our product development programs or cease operations altogether.
| 6 |
●Our business is highly dependent on the success of our RedTail platform and our SuperNova and NeuroNova compounds. If we are unable toeffectively commercialize any of these product candidates for the treatment of patients in its approved indications, our business wouldbe significantly harmed.
●Our preclinical studies and clinical trials may fail to demonstrate adequately the safety and efficacy of any of our product candidates,which would prevent or delay development, regulatory approval, and commercialization.
●Interim, top line and preliminary data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patientdata become available and are subject to regulatory audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the finaldata;
●Results of earlier studies and trials of our product candidates may not be predictive of future trial results.
●Our product candidates are based on a novel approach to the treatment of cancer which makes it difficult to predict the time and costof product candidate development and subsequently obtaining regulatory approval, if at all.
●We may develop our product candidates in combination with other therapies, which exposes us to additional risks related to other agentsor active pharmaceutical or biological ingredients used in combination with our product candidates.
●Negative developments in the field of immuno-oncology and, in particular, oncolytic viral immunotherapy, could damage public perceptionof any of our product candidates and negatively affect our business.
●Difficulty in enrolling patients could delay or prevent clinical trials of our product candidates, and ultimately delay or prevent regulatoryapproval.
●Even if we receive marketing approval for our current or future product candidates, our current or future product candidates may notachieve broad market acceptance, which would limit the revenue that we generate from their sales.
●We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing product candidates before or moresuccessfully than we do.
●The regulatory approval processes of the FDA and other regulatory authorities are lengthy, time consuming and inherently unpredictable.If we are not able to obtain, or experience delays in obtaining, required regulatory approvals, we will not be able to commercializeour current and future product candidates as expected, and our ability to generate revenue may be materially impaired.
●A Breakthrough Therapy designation by the FDA, even if granted for any of our product candidates, may not lead to a faster developmentor regulatory review or approval process and it does not increase the likelihood that our product candidates will receive marketing approval.
●Accelerated approval by the FDA, even if granted for certain of our current or future product candidates, may not lead to a faster developmentor regulatory review or approval process and it does not increase the likelihood that our product candidates will receive marketing approval.
●Even if our development efforts are successful, we may not obtain regulatory approval of our current or any future product candidatesin the United States or other jurisdictions, which would prevent us from commercializing our current and future product candidates. Evenif we obtain regulatory approval for our current and future product candidates, any such approval may be subject to limitations, includingwith respect to the approved indications or patient populations, which could impair our ability to successfully commercialize our currentor any future product candidates.
●Changes in product candidate manufacturing or formulation may result in additional costs or delay.
●Inadequate funding for the FDA, the SEC and other government agencies, including from government shutdowns, or other disruptions to theseagencies’ operations, could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, prevent new products andservices from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal businessfunctions on which the operation of our business may rely, which could negatively impact our business.
●Even if our current or any future product candidates receive regulatory approval, we will be subject to ongoing obligations and continuedregulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense and limit how we manufacture and market our products.
| 7 |
●Regulatory approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities is limited to those specific indications and conditions for which approvalhas been granted, and we may be subject to substantial fines, criminal penalties, injunctions or other enforcement actions if we aredetermined to be promoting the use of our products for unapproved or “off-label” uses, or in a manner inconsistent with theapproved labeling, resulting in damage to our reputation and business.
●Physicians may choose to prescribe products for uses that are not described in the product’s labeling and for uses that differfrom those tested in clinical trials and approved by the regulatory authorities. Regulatory authorities in the United States generallydo not restrict or regulate the behavior of physicians in their choice of treatment within the practice of medicine. Regulatory authoritiesdo, however, restrict communications by biopharmaceutical companies concerning off-label use.
●We may not be able to file INDs or IND amendments to commence additional clinical trials on the timelines we expect, and even if we areable to, the FDA or other regulatory authority may not permit us to proceed.
●If approved, our investigational products regulated as biologics may face competition from biosimilars approved through an abbreviatedregulatory pathway.
●Healthcare reform measures may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
●If we fail to develop additional product candidates, our commercial opportunity could be limited.
●Our relationships with customers and third-party payors will be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcarelaws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, exclusion from government healthcare programs, contractualdamages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.
●If we fail to comply with the continued listing standards of the NYSE American, our common stock could be delisted. If it is delisted,the market value and the liquidity of our common stock would be impacted.
Implicationsof Being an Emerging Growth Company
Weare an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “SecuritiesAct”), as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and we may take advantage ofcertain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies,including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”); reduced obligations with respect to financial data, including presenting only twoyears of audited financial statements in addition to any required unaudited interim financial statements, with correspondingly reduced“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” disclosure; reduced disclosureobligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports, proxy statements and registration statements; exemptions from therequirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute paymentsnot previously approved; and an exemption from compliance with the requirement of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the“PCAOB”) regarding the communication of critical audit matters in the auditor’s report on the financial statements.
Inaddition, pursuant to the JOBS Act, as an emerging growth company we have elected to take advantage of an extended transition periodfor complying with new or revised accounting standards. This effectively permits us to delay adoption of certain accounting standardsuntil those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. As a result, our consolidated financial statements may not be comparableto companies that comply with new or revised accounting pronouncements as of the public company effective dates.
Wemay take advantage of these provisions until the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the consummation of FLAG’sIPO on September 14, 2021. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of: (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) followingthe fifth anniversary of the completion of FLAG’s IPO, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion,or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliatesexceeds $700 million as of the end of the prior fiscal year’s second fiscal quarter; and (2) the date on which we have issued morethan $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. References herein to “emerging growth company”shall have the meaning associated with it in the JOBS Act.
Implicationsof Being a Smaller Reporting Company
Asa “smaller reporting company,” as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”), in addition to providing reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements and business developments, amongother reduced disclosure requirements available to smaller reporting companies, we present only two years of audited financial statementsin addition to any required unaudited interim financial statements with correspondingly reduced “Management’s Discussionand Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” disclosure. We have taken advantage of reduced reporting requirementsin this prospectus. Accordingly, the information contained herein may be different from the information you receive from other publiccompanies in which you hold stock.
| 8 |
THEOFFERING
| Securities Offered by the Selling Stockholders | Up to 6,355,650 of our Common Stock comprising: (i) 6,053,000 shares of Common Stock, issuable on the exercise of Series G common warrants, exercisable at an exercise price of $0.6954 per share, first exercisable on September 28, 2025 and expiring on March 28, 2033; and (ii) 302,650 shares of Common Stock issued to Ladenburg (or its designees), as placement agent in the public offering placement deal, exercisable at an exercise price of $0.8125 per share, first exercisable on September 28, 2025 and expiring on September 28, 2030. | |
| Shares of Common Stock to be Outstanding Immediately Before this Offering | 36,320,580 | |
Shares of Common Stock to be this Offering (1) | 42,676,230 (considering that all Series G Warrants will be exercised) | |
| Use of Proceeds | We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the shares of our Common Stock being offered for sale by the Selling Stockholders. Upon the exercise of the warrants issued to the Selling Stockholder for an aggregate of 6,053,000 shares of Common Stock by payment of cash however, we will receive the exercise price of the warrants, or an aggregate of approximately $[ ] from such exercise of warrants. | |
| Plan of Distribution | The Selling Stockholders may sell all or a portion of the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by them and offered hereby from time to time directly or through one or more underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. Registration of the Common Stock covered by this prospectus does not mean, however, that such shares necessarily will be offered or sold. See “Plan of Distribution.” | |
| Risk Factors | Investing in our securities involve significant risks. See “Risk Factors” on page 10 of this prospectus and under similar headings in the documents incorporated by reference into this prospectus for a discussion of the factors you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in our securities. | |
| Trading Symbol | Our common stock is listed on the NYSE American under the symbol “CLDI”. |
| (1) | The number of shares of Common Stock expected to be outstanding after this offering is based on 36,320,580 shares outstanding (inclusive of 1,800,000 shares outstanding of non-voting Escalation Shares) as of June 20, 2025, and excludes: |
| ● | Up to 15,548,256 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants with a weighted-average exercise price of $1.16 per share; | |
| ● | Up to 1,628,566 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options, which options have a weighted average exercise price of $10.31 per share; | |
| ● | Up to an aggregate of 96,662 shares of Common Stock reserved for future issuance under our 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2023 Plan”); | |
| ● | Up to 1,150,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of Public Warrants at an exercise price of $115.00 per share, which were issued in connection with our initial public offering; | |
| ● | Up to 191,217 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of Private Warrants at an exercise price of $115.00 per share, subject to certain adjustments, issued to certain investors in a private placement at a price of $115.00 per warrant concurrently with the close of our initial public offering; | |
| ● | Up to 66,000 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to a Forward Purchase Agreement entered into on August 28, 2023 and August 30, 2023 among FLAG and Calidi with certain investors for an OTC Equity Prepaid Forward Transaction. |
Unlessotherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus assumes:
| ● | no release of the Non-Voting Escalation Shares; | |
| ● | no exercise of the outstanding options or warrants described above; | |
| ● | no issuance of the common stock issuable under the Forward Purchase Agreements described above; |
| 9 |
RISKFACTORS
Aninvestment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below,together with all of the other information in this prospectus, including the section titled “Management’s Discussion andAnalysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes includedherein, before making an investment decision in our securities. Our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospectscould also be harmed by risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to us or that we currently believe are not material. Ifany of the risks actually occur, our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects could be materially and adverselyaffected. Unless otherwise indicated, references in these risk factors to our business being harmed will include harm to our business,reputation, brand, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. In such event, the market price of our securities coulddecline. You also should read the section entitled “Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements” above for a discussionof what types of statements are forward-looking statements, as well as the significance of such statements in the context of this prospectus.
RisksRelated to Our Business, Financial Position and Capital Requirements
Weare a clinical-stage biotechnology company with a limited operating history and have not generated any revenue to date from product sales.
Biopharmaceuticalproduct development is a highly speculative undertaking and involves a substantial degree of risk. Since inception, we have focused substantiallyall of our efforts and financial resources on raising capital and developing our initial product candidates. We have incurred net lossessince our inception, and we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $121.7 million as of December 31, 2024. For the three monthsended March 31, 2025, and the years ended December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, we reported net losses of approximately $5.1 million,$22.2 million and $29.2 million, respectively. We have no products approved for commercial sale and, therefore, have never generatedany revenue from product sales, and we do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. We have not obtained regulatory approvals forany of our product candidates, and even if our clinical development efforts result in positive data, our product candidates may not receiveregulatory approval or be successfully introduced and marketed at prices that would permit us to operate profitably. Calidi has no otherexperience as a company conducting clinical trials, submitting applications for regulatory approvals, such as a New Drug Application(“NDA”), or commercializing any products. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses over thenext several years and for the foreseeable future. Our prior losses, combined with expected future losses, have had and will continueto have an adverse effect on our stockholders’ deficit and working capital.
Wehave incurred significant operating losses since our inception and anticipate that we will incur continued losses for the foreseeablefuture.
Substantiallyall of our operating losses have resulted from costs incurred in connection with our research and development programs and from generaland administrative costs associated with our operations. We expect our research and development expenses to significantly increase inconnection with the commencement and continuation of clinical trials of our product candidates. In addition, if we obtain marketing approvalfor our product candidates, we will incur significant sales, marketing and manufacturing expenses. Because of the Business Combination,we will incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. As a result, we expect to continue to incur significantand increasing operating losses for the foreseeable future. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developingbiopharmaceutical products, we are unable to predict the extent of any future losses or when we will become profitable, if at all. Evenif we do become profitable, we may not be able to sustain or increase our profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.
| 10 |
Theamount of our future losses is uncertain, and our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly or may fall below the expectationsof investors or securities analysts, each of which may cause our stock price to fluctuate or decline. Our quarterly and annual operatingresults may fluctuate significantly in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control and may be difficultto predict, including the following:
●the timing and success or failure of clinical trials for our product candidates or competing product candidates, or any other changein the competitive landscape of our industry, including consolidation among our competitors or partners;
●our ability to successfully enroll and retain subjects for clinical trials, and any delays caused by difficulties in such efforts;
●our ability to obtain marketing approval for our product candidates, and the timing and scope of any such approvals we may receive;
●the timing and cost of, and level of investment in, research and development activities relating to our product candidates, which maychange from time to time;
●the cost of manufacturing our product candidates, which may vary depending on the quantity of production, and the success of achievingcommercial scale manufacturing operations in our new facility or at third-party manufacturers;
●our ability to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel;
●expenditures that we will or may incur to develop additional product candidates;
●the level of demand for our product candidates should they receive approval, which may vary significantly;
●the risk/benefit profile, cost and reimbursement policies with respect to our product candidates, if approved, and existing and potentialfuture therapeutics that compete with our product candidates; and
●future accounting pronouncements or changes in our accounting policies.
Thecumulative effects of these factors could result in large fluctuations and unpredictability in our quarterly and annual operating results.As a result, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful. This variability and unpredictabilitycould also result in our failing to meet the expectations of industry or financial analysts or investors for any period. If our revenueor operating results fall below the expectations of analysts or investors or below any forecasts we may provide to the market, or ifthe forecasts we provide to the market are below the expectations of analysts or investors, the price of our common stock could declinesubstantially. Such a stock price decline could occur even when we have met any previously publicly stated guidance we may provide.
Wehave no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales.
Ourability to become profitable depends upon our ability to generate revenue. To date, we have not generated any revenue from our productcandidates, and we do not expect to generate any revenue from the sale of products in the near future, if any. We do not expect to generatesignificant revenue unless and until we obtain marketing approval of, and begin to sell, one or more of our product candidates. Our abilityto generate revenue depends on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, our ability to:
●successfully complete our ongoing and planned preclinical studies and clinical trials for CLD-401, the lead compound from our RedTailplatform, and for our allogeneic stem cell delivery ofoncolytic virus programs;
●timely file and receive acceptance of our Investigational New Drug applications, or INDs, in order to commence our planned clinical trialsor future clinical trials;
●successfully enroll subjects in, and complete, clinical trials for our oncolytic viral allogeneic stem cell programs;
●timely file Biologics License Applications (“BLAs”) and receive regulatory approvals for our product candidates from theFDA and other regulatory authorities;
| 11 |
●initiate and successfully complete all safety studies required to obtain U.S. and foreign marketing approval for our product candidates;
●establish commercial manufacturing capabilities through third-party manufacturers for clinical supply and commercial manufacturing ofour product candidates;
●obtain and maintain patent and trade secret protection or regulatory exclusivity for our product candidates;
●launch commercial sales of our product candidates, if and when approved, whether alone or in collaboration with others;
●maintain a continued acceptable safety profile of the product candidates following approval;
●obtain and maintain acceptance of the product candidates, if and when approved, by patients, the medical community and third-party payors;
●position our products to effectively compete with other therapies;
●obtain and maintain favorable coverage and adequate reimbursement by third-party payors for our product candidates;
●enforce and defend intellectual property rights and claims with respect to our product candidates; and
●hire additional staff, including clinical, scientific and management personnel.
Ifwe do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability tosuccessfully commercialize our product candidates, which would materially harm our business. If we do not receive regulatory approvalsfor our product candidates, we may not be able to continue our operations.
Ourengineered RedTail enveloped virus platform and our allogeneic stem cell product candidates represent a novel approach to cancer treatmentthat creates significant challenges.
Weare developing an enveloped form of a proprietarily modified virus that can also deliver genetic medicines directly and exclusively totumor cells.
| ● | Systemic immunotherapies, if not properly controlled, can trigger a wide range of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to their immune-activating mechanism. These include serious conditions such as Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS), commonly referred to as a “cytokine storm” in severe cases. | |
| ● | Standard immunomodulatory therapies used to manage CRS or other irAEs may not be effective in all patients, potentially resulting in unmitigated immune responses and increased severity of adverse effects. | |
| ● | In the context of unexpected and uncontrolled viral replication and systemic viremia, the antiviral agent safety switch, TPOXX, may not function as intended. This failure could lead to uncontrolled and severe immune-related side effects. |
| 12 |
Weare also developing a pipeline of allogeneic stem cell product candidates engineered from healthy donor adipose-derived mesenchymal stemcells and enveloped vaccina virus to potentiate and deliver oncolytic viruses to the tumor site and are intended for use in any patientwith certain cancers. Advancing these novel product candidates creates significant challenges for us, including:
●manipulating and manufacturing our product candidates to required specifications and in a timely manner to support our clinical trials,and, if approved, commercialization;
●sourcing clinical and, if approved, commercial supplies of adipose and neuronal stem- and other cell types used to manufacture our productcandidates;
●understanding and addressing intra-donor variability in the quality and type of donor-derived stem cells, which could ultimately negativelyaffect our ability to produce a product reliably and consistently, if at all;
●understanding and addressing the sourcing of stem cells for our product candidates;
●educating medical personnel regarding the potential side effect profile of our product candidates, if approved, such as the potentialfor serious adverse events;
●using medicines to manage adverse side effects or the potential for serious adverse events of our product candidates which may not adequatelycontrol such side effects or serious adverse events, and/or may have a detrimental impact on the efficacy of treatment;
●conditioning patients with chemotherapy and possibly checkpoint inhibitors in advance of administering our product candidates, whichmay increase the risk of adverse side effects or serious adverse events;
●obtaining regulatory approval, as the FDA and other regulatory authorities have limited experience with the development and regulationof allogeneic stem cell and enveloped vaccina virus therapies for cancer; and
●establishing sales and marketing capabilities upon obtaining regulatory approval, if any, in order to gain market acceptance of a noveltherapy.
Adversepublicity regarding viral-based or genetic therapies could have a material adverse impact on our business.
Althoughwe are not utilizing embryonic stem cells, we utilize neural stem cells that have been derived from fetal tissue. Adverse publicity dueto ethical and social controversies surrounding the use of such cells or any adverse reported side effects from any stem cell, dendriticor other cell therapy clinical trial or due to the failure of such trials to demonstrate that these therapies are efficacious could materiallyand adversely affect our ability to raise capital or recruit managerial or scientific personnel or obtain research grants. In addition,in August of 2017, when we were formerly known as StemImmune, Inc., we experienced adverse publicity when the FDA incorrectly identifiedus as a Stem Cell Clinic, associated with Stem Cell Clinics that the FDA subsequently sued in federal court for alleged violations ofthe Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act. While we were never named in the FDA’s litigation, our business was temporarily disruptedand our management was forced to spend time correcting the misinformation and rebuilding our reputation with the FDA and state regulatoryauthorities. Because the use of human stem cells may be controversial to some segments of society, we may experience adverse publicityagain, which may disrupt our business and distract our executive management from executing on our business plan.
Weneed to raise substantial additional funding. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, or if at all, we would be forced to delay,reduce or eliminate some or all of our product development programs or cease operations altogether.
Thedevelopment of biopharmaceutical products is capital intensive. We are currently advancing our product candidates through pre-clinicaltesting and clinical development across a number of potential indications. We have in-licensed CLD-101 for newly diagnosed high gradeglioma (“HGG”) that has completed a Phase 1 clinical trial sponsored by Northwestern University. We have opened an IND fromthe FDA to initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial for our product candidate CLD-201 that utilizes allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stemcell (“AD-MSC”) line VP-001 loaded with tumor selective “CAL1” oncolytic vaccinia virus strain. Our third program,RedTail, involves significant preclinical research involving enveloping vaccinia virus within a cellular membrane that can express geneticmedicine in situ. Consequently, we expect our expenses to significantly increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularlyas we continue our pre-clinical studies and initiate our planned clinical trials or initiate future trials on other product candidatesand pursue the research and development of, and seek marketing approval for, our product candidates. In addition, depending on the statusof regulatory approvals or, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercializationexpenses related to product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution. We may also need to raise additional funds sooner if wechoose to pursue additional indications and/or geographies for our product candidates or otherwise expand more rapidly than we presentlyanticipate. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we would be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate certainof our research and development programs or future commercialization efforts, and may be unable to expand our operations or otherwisecapitalize on our business opportunities, as desired, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results ofoperations.
| 13 |
Ourfuture capital requirements will depend on and could increase significantly as a result of many factors, including:
●the scope, progress, results and costs of product discovery, preclinical and clinical development, laboratory testing and clinical trialsfor the development of CLD-401 (our lead compound from the RedTail platform), CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, or our other potential productcandidates;
●the timing of, and the costs involved in, obtaining marketing approvals for any of our initial target indications and our other potentialproduct candidates that we may develop;
●if approved, the costs of commercialization activities for any of our product candidates that receives regulatory approval to the extentsuch costs are not the responsibility of a collaborator that we may contract with in the future, including the costs and timing of establishingproduct sales, marketing, distribution and manufacturing capabilities;
●the scope, prioritization and number of our research and development programs;
●the costs, timing and outcome of regulatory review of our product candidates;
●our ability to establish and maintain additional collaborations on favorable terms, if at all;
●the achievement of milestones or occurrence of other developments that trigger payments under any additional collaboration agreementswe may enter into;
●the extent to which we are obligated to reimburse, or entitled to reimbursement of, clinical trial costs under future collaboration agreements,if any;
●the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property rights and defendingintellectual property-related claims;
●the extent to which we acquire or in-license other product candidates and technologies;
●the costs of securing manufacturing arrangements for commercial production;
●the emergence of competing oncolytic viral immunotherapies as well as immuno-oncology therapies in general and other adverse market developments;
●the costs of establishing or contracting for sales and marketing capabilities if we obtain regulatory approvals to market our productcandidates; and
Identifyingpotential product candidates and conducting preclinical development testing and clinical trials is a time-consuming, expensive and uncertainprocess that takes years to complete, and we may never generate the necessary data or results required to obtain marketing approval andachieve product sales. In addition, our product candidates, if approved, may not achieve commercial success. Our commercial revenues,if any, will be derived from sales of products that we do not expect to be commercially available for many years, if at all. Accordingly,we will need to continue to rely on additional financing to achieve our business objectives.
| 14 |
Anyadditional fundraising efforts may divert our management from their day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability todevelop and commercialize our product candidates. Disruptions in the financial markets in general have made equity and debt financingmore difficult to obtain, and may have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our fundraising needs. We cannot guarantee thatfuture financing will be available in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Moreover, the terms of any financing,including a potential private investment in public equity, if any, may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of our stockholdersand the issuance of additional securities, whether equity or debt, by us, or the possibility of such issuance, may cause the market priceof our shares to decline. The sale of additional equity or convertible securities would dilute all of our stockholders. The incurrenceof indebtedness would result in increased fixed payment obligations and we may be required to agree to certain restrictive covenants,such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, limitations on our ability to acquire, sell or license intellectual propertyrights and other operating restrictions that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. We could also be required toseek funds through arrangements with collaborators or otherwise at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable and we may be requiredto relinquish rights to some of our technologies or product candidates or otherwise agree to terms unfavorable to us, any of which mayhave a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and prospects.
Ifwe are unable to obtain funding on a timely basis, we may be required to significantly curtail, delay or discontinue one or all of ourresearch or development programs or the commercialization of any product candidate or be unable to expand or continue our operationsor otherwise capitalize on our business opportunities, as desired, which could materially affect our business, financial condition andresults of operations.
RisksRelated to Product Development
Ourbusiness is highly dependent on the success of our RedTail platform and our SuperNova and NeuroNova compounds. If we are unable to anyof our compounds effectively commercialize any of these product candidates for the treatment of patients in its approved indications,our business would be significantly harmed.
Ourbusiness and future success depend on our ability to obtain regulatory approval of, and then successfully commercialize, our productcandidates. The preclinical and clinical results to date may not predict outcomes for our planned trial or any future studies.
Ourproduct candidates will require additional clinical and non-clinical development, regulatory review and approval in multiple jurisdictions,a substantial investment, access to sufficient commercial manufacturing capacity and significant marketing efforts before we can generateany revenue from product sales.
Ourpreclinical studies and clinical trials may fail to demonstrate adequately the safety and efficacy of any of our product candidates,which would prevent or delay development, regulatory approval, and commercialization.
Beforeobtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of our product candidates,we must demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our productcandidates for use in each target indication through lengthy, complex, and expensive preclinical studies and clinical trials. Failurecan occur at any time during the preclinical study and clinical trial processes and there is a high risk of failure, so we may neversucceed in developing marketable products. Any preclinical studies or clinical trials that we may conduct may not demonstrate the safetyand efficacy necessary to obtain regulatory approval to market any of our product candidates. If the results of our ongoing or futurepreclinical studies and clinical trials are inconclusive with respect to the safety and efficacy of our product candidates, if we donot meet the clinical endpoints with statistical and clinically meaningful significance, or if there are safety concerns associated withour product candidates, we may be prevented or delayed in obtaining marketing approval for such product candidates. In some instances,there can be significant variability in safety or efficacy results between different preclinical studies and clinical trials of the sameproduct candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in trial procedures set forth in protocols, differences in the size andtype of the patient populations, changes in and adherence to the clinical trial protocols and the rate of dropout among clinical trialparticipants. While we are currently in early stages of clinical development for CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, and the RedTailplatform, it is likely, as is the case with many oncology therapies, that there may be side effects associated with their use.
| 15 |
Resultsof our trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of side effects. In such an event, our trials could be suspendedor terminated, and the FDA or other regulatory authorities could order us to cease further development of or deny approval of our productcandidates for any or all targeted indications. Treatment-related side effects could also affect patient recruitment or the ability ofenrolled patients to complete the trial or result in potential product liability claims. Any of these occurrences may harm our business,financial condition and prospects significantly.
Interim,top line and preliminary data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient databecome available and are subject to regulatory audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.
Fromtime to time, we may publish interim, top line or preliminary data from our clinical trials. We may decide to conduct an interim analysisof the data after a certain number or percentage of patients have been enrolled, or after only a part of the full follow-up period butbefore completion of the trial. Similarly, we may report top line or preliminary results of primary and key secondary endpoints beforethe final trial results are completed. Preliminary, top line and interim data from our clinical trials may change as more patient dataor analyses become available. Preliminary, top line or interim data from our clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of finalresults and are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues,more patient data become available and we issue our final clinical trial report. These data also remain subject to audit and verificationprocedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result,preliminary, interim and top line data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Material adverse changes inthe final data compared to the interim data could significantly harm our business prospects.
Further,others, including regulatory agencies, may not accept or agree with our assumptions, estimates, calculations, conclusions or analysesor may interpret or weigh the importance of data differently, which could impact the value of the particular program, the approvabilityor commercialization of the particular product candidate or product and our company in general. In addition, the information we chooseto publicly disclose regarding a particular study or clinical trial is based on what is typically extensive information, and you or othersmay not agree with what we determine is material or otherwise appropriate information to include in our disclosure.
Ifthe interim, topline, or preliminary data that we report differ from more complete results, or if others, including regulatory authorities,disagree with the conclusions reached, our ability to obtain marketing authorization for, and commercialize, our product candidates maybe harmed, which could harm our business, operating results, prospects or financial condition.
Resultsof earlier studies and trials of our product candidates may not be predictive of future trial results.
Successin preclinical studies and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful. Product candidates inlater stages of clinical trials may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having progressed through preclinicalstudies and initial clinical trials. As we commence new clinical trials and continue our ongoing clinical trials, issues may arise thatcould suspend or terminate such clinical trials. A number of companies in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries have sufferedsignificant setbacks in clinical trials, even after positive results in earlier preclinical studies or clinical trials. These setbackshave been caused by, among other things, preclinical findings made while clinical trials were underway and safety or efficacy observationsmade in clinical trials, including previously unreported adverse events. Notwithstanding any potential promising results in earlier studiesand trials, we cannot be certain that we will not face similar setbacks. In addition, the results of our preclinical animal studies,including our oncology mouse studies and animal studies, may not be predictive of the results of outcomes in human clinical trials. Forexample, our oncology product candidates that are in preclinical development may demonstrate different chemical and biological propertiesin patients than they do in laboratory animal studies or may interact with human biological systems in unforeseen or harmful ways.
| 16 |
Additionally,some of past, ongoing and planned clinical trials utilize and “open-label” study design. An “open-label” clinicaltrial is one where both the patient and investigator know whether the patient is receiving the investigational product candidate or eitheran existing approved drug or placebo. Most typically, open-label clinical trials test only the investigational product candidate andsometimes may do so at different dose levels. Open-label clinical trials are subject to various limitations that may exaggerate any therapeuticeffect, as patients in open-label clinical trials are aware when they are receiving treatment. Open-label clinical trials may be subjectto a “patient bias” where patients perceive their symptoms to have improved merely due to their awareness of receiving anexperimental treatment. Moreover, patients selected for early clinical studies often include the most severe sufferers and their symptomsmay have improved notwithstanding the new treatment. In addition, open-label clinical trials may be subject to an “investigatorbias” where those assessing and reviewing the physiological outcomes of the clinical trials are aware of which patients have receivedtreatment and may interpret the information of the treated group more favorably given this knowledge.
Ourproduct candidates are based on a novel approach to the treatment of cancer which makes it difficult to predict the time and cost ofproduct candidate development and subsequently obtaining regulatory approval, if at all.
Wehave concentrated all of our research and development efforts on our product candidates and our future success depends on the successfuldevelopment of our therapeutic approaches.
Weexpect the novel nature of our product candidates to create significant challenges in obtaining regulatory approval. Few viral immunotherapieshave been approved globally or by the FDA to date. While the first viral immunotherapy, talimogene laherparepvec (Imlygic, Amgen), hasreceived FDA approval, regulatory agencies have reviewed relatively few viral immunotherapy product candidates such as CLD-401, CLD-101and CLD-201. This may lengthen the regulatory review process, increase our development costs and delay or prevent commercialization ofour product candidates. Further, any viral immunotherapies that are approved may be subject to extensive post-approval regulatory requirements,including requirements pertaining to manufacturing, distribution and promotion. We may need to devote significant time and resourcesto compliance with these requirements.
TheFDA may also require a panel of experts, referred to as an Advisory Committee, to deliberate on the adequacy of the safety and efficacydata to support licensure. The opinion of the Advisory Committee, although not binding, may have a significant impact on our abilityto obtain licensure of the product candidates based on the completed clinical trials, as the FDA often adheres to the Advisory Committee’srecommendations. Accordingly, the regulatory approval pathway for our product candidates may be uncertain, complex, expensive and lengthy,and approval may not be obtained.
Inaddition, our product candidates are live, gene-modified viruses for which the FDA, and other regulatory authorities and other publichealth authorities, such as the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention and hospitals involved in clinical studies, have establishedheightened safety and contagion rules and procedures, which could establish additional hurdles for the development, manufacture or useof our vectors. These hurdles may lead to delays in the conduct of clinical trials or in obtaining regulatory approvals for further development,manufacturing or commercialization of our product candidates. We may also experience delays in transferring our process to commercialpartners, which may prevent us from completing our clinical trials or commercializing our product candidates on a timely or profitablebasis, if at all.
Furthermore,there has been limited historical clinical trial experience for the development of products that utilize the adenovirus. Moreover, thedesign and conduct of our clinical trials utilizing both neural stem cells and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (“AD-MSC”)and vaccinia virus enveloped in a cellular membrane to deliver oncolytic viruses differs from the design and conduct of previously conductedclinical trials in this area. As a result, there is substantial risk that the design or outcomes of our clinical trials will not be satisfactoryto support marketing approval.
| 17 |
Wemay develop our product candidates in combination with other therapies, which exposes us to additional risks related to other agentsor active pharmaceutical or biological ingredients used in combination with our product candidates.
Inthe future, we may develop our product candidates to be used with one or more currently approved other therapies. Even if any productcandidate we develop were to receive marketing approval or be commercialized for use in combination with other existing therapies, wewould continue to be subject to the risks that the FDA or other regulatory authorities could revoke approval of the therapy used in combinationwith our product candidate or that safety, efficacy, manufacturing or supply issues could arise with these existing therapies. Combinationtherapies are commonly used for the treatment of cancer, and we would be subject to similar risks if we develop any of our product candidatesfor use in combination with other drugs or for indications other than cancer. This could result in our own products being removed fromthe market or being less successful commercially.
Ifthe FDA or other regulatory authorities revoke their approval of these other drugs or revoke their approval of, or if safety, efficacy,manufacturing or supply issues arise with, the drugs we choose to evaluate in combination with any product candidate we develop, we maybe unable to obtain approval.
Wemay also evaluate our future product candidates in combination with one or more other cancer therapies that have not yet been approvedfor marketing by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. We will not be able to market any product candidate we develop in combinationwith any such unapproved cancer therapies that do not ultimately obtain marketing approval. In addition, unapproved therapies face thesame risks described with respect to our product candidates currently in development and clinical trials, including the potential forserious adverse effects, delays in their clinical trials and lack of FDA approval.
Negativedevelopments in the field of immuno-oncology and, in particular, oncolytic viral immunotherapy, could damage public perception of anyof our product candidates and negatively affect our business.
Thecommercial success of any of our compounds will depend in part on public acceptance of the use of oncolytic viral immunotherapy. Adverseevents in clinical trials of CLD-101, CLD-201 or any other adenovirus or any other ACAM2000-based or vaccinia virus based product candidateswhich we may develop, or in clinical trials of others developing similar products and the resulting publicity, as well as any other negativedevelopments in the field of immuno-oncology that may occur in the future, including in connection with competitor therapies, could resultin a decrease in demand for any adenovirus-, vaccinia virus or ACAM2000-based product candidates that we may develop. These events couldalso result in the suspension, discontinuation, or clinical hold of or modification to our clinical trials. If public perception is influencedby claims that the use of oncolytic immunotherapies is unsafe, whether related to our therapies or those of our competitors, our productcandidates may not be accepted by the general public or the medical community and potential clinical trial subjects may be discouragedfrom enrolling in our clinical trials. In addition, responses by national or state governments to negative public perception may resultin new legislation or regulations that could limit our ability to develop or commercialize any product candidates, obtain or maintainregulatory approval or otherwise achieve profitability. More restrictive statutory regimes, government regulations or negative publicopinion would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, prospects and results of operations and may delay or impairthe development and commercialization of our product candidates or demand for any products we may develop. As a result, we may not beable to continue or may be delayed in conducting our development programs.
Ourproduct candidates consist of modified viruses. Adverse developments in clinical trials of other immunotherapy products based on viruses,like oncolytic viruses, may result in a disproportionately negative effect for our technologies as compared to other products in thefield of infectious disease and immuno-oncology that are not based on viruses. Future negative developments in the biopharmaceuticalindustry could also result in greater governmental regulation, stricter labeling requirements and potential regulatory delays in thetesting or approvals of our products. Any increased scrutiny could delay or increase the costs of obtaining marketing approval for ourproduct candidates.
Difficultyin enrolling patients could delay or prevent clinical trials of our product candidates, and ultimately delay or prevent regulatory approval.
Identifyingand qualifying patients to participate in clinical trials of our product candidates is critical to our success. The timing of completionof our clinical trials depends in part on the speed at which we can recruit patients to participate in testing our product candidates,and we may experience delays in our clinical trials if we encounter difficulties in enrollment. We may not be able to initiate or continueclinical trials for our product candidates if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participatein these trials as required by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, or as needed to provide appropriate statistical power for a giventrial. In particular, because we are focused on patients with brain cancer for the development of CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG andCLD-101 for recurrent HGG, our ability to enroll eligible patients may be limited or enrollment may be slower than we anticipate dueto the small eligible patient population.
| 18 |
Inaddition to the potentially small target populations for our planned clinical trials, particularly in brain cancer, the eligibility criteriawill further limit the pool of available trial participants as we will require that patients have specific characteristics, such as acertain severity or stage of disease progression, to include them in a trial. Additionally, the process of finding eligible patientsmay prove costly. We also may not be able to identify, recruit, and enroll a sufficient number of patients to complete our clinical trialsbecause of the perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate under evaluation, the availability and efficacy of competing therapiesand clinical trials, the proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients, and the patient referral practicesof physicians. If patients are unwilling to participate in our studies for any reason, the timeline for recruiting patients, conductingstudies, and obtaining regulatory approval of potential products may be delayed.
Theenrollment of patients further depends on many factors, including:
●the proximity of patients to clinical trial sites;
●patient referral practices of physicians;
●the design of the clinical trial, including the number of site visits and invasive assessments required;
●our ability to recruit clinical trial investigators with the appropriate competencies and experience;
●our ability to obtain and maintain patient consents;
●reporting of the preliminary results of any of our clinical trials;
●the risk that patients enrolled in clinical trials will drop out of the clinical trials before clinical trial completion; and
●factors we may not be able to control, such as the COVID-19 pandemic that limited patient participation, hiring of principal investigatorsand availability of staff or clinical sites.
Inaddition, our clinical trials will compete with other clinical trials for product candidates that are in the same therapeutic areas asour product candidates, and this competition will reduce the number and types of patients available to us because some patients who mighthave opted to enroll in our clinical trials may instead opt to enroll in a clinical trial being conducted by one of our competitors.Since the number of qualified clinical investigators is limited, we expect to conduct some of our clinical trials at the same clinicaltrial sites that some of our competitors use, which will reduce the number of patients who are available for our clinical trials at suchclinical trial sites. Moreover, because certain of our product candidates represent a departure from more commonly used methods for cancertreatment and because certain of our product candidates have not been tested in humans before, potential patients and their doctors maybe inclined to use conventional therapies, such as chemotherapy, rather than enroll patients in any future clinical trial of our productcandidates.
Ifwe experience delays in the completion of, or termination of, any clinical trial of our product candidates, the commercial prospectsof our product candidates will be harmed, and our ability to generate product revenue from any of these product candidates could be delayedor prevented.
Evenif we receive marketing approval for our current or future product candidates, our current or future product candidates may not achievebroad market acceptance, which would limit the revenue that we generate from their sales.
Thecommercial success of our current or future product candidates, if approved by the FDA or other applicable regulatory authorities, willdepend upon the awareness and acceptance of our current or future product candidates among the medical community, including physicians,patients and healthcare payors. Market acceptance of our current or future product candidates, if approved, will depend on a number offactors, including, among others:
●the efficacy of our current or future product candidates as demonstrated in clinical trials, and, if required by any applicable regulatoryauthority in connection with the approval for the applicable indications, to provide patients with incremental health benefits, as comparedwith other available medicines;
| 19 |
●limitations or warnings contained in the labeling approved for our current or future product candidates by the FDA or other applicableregulatory authorities;
●the prevalence and severity of adverse events associated with our product candidates or those products with which they may be co-administeredin immuno-oncology and, in particular, oncolytic viral immunotherapies;
●the clinical indications for which our current or future product candidates are approved;
●availability of alternative treatments already approved or expected to be commercially launched in the near future;
●the potential and perceived advantages of our current or future product candidates over current treatment options or alternative treatments,including future alternative treatments;
●the willingness of the target patient populations to try new therapies or treatment methods and of physicians to prescribe these therapiesor methods in immuno-oncology and, in particular, oncolytic viral immunotherapies;
●the need to dose such product candidates in combination with other therapeutic agents, and related costs;
●the strength of marketing and distribution support and timing of market introduction of competitive products;
●publicity concerning our products or competing products and treatments;
●pricing and cost effectiveness;
●the effectiveness of our sales and marketing strategies;
●our ability to increase awareness of our current or future product candidates;
●our ability to obtain sufficient third-party coverage or reimbursement;
●the ability or willingness of patients to pay out-of-pocket in the absence of third-party coverage; and
●potential product liability claims.
Ifour current or future product candidates are approved but do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance by patients, physicians andpayors, we may not generate sufficient revenue from our current or future product candidates to become or remain profitable. Before grantingreimbursement approval, healthcare payors may require us to demonstrate that our current or future product candidates, in addition totreating these target indications, also provide incremental health benefits to patients. Our efforts to educate the medical community,patient organizations and third-party payors about the benefits of our current or future product candidates may require significant resourcesand may never be successful.
Weface substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing product candidates before or moresuccessfully than we do.
Thedevelopment and commercialization of new product candidates is highly competitive. We face competition from major pharmaceutical, specialtypharmaceutical and biotechnology companies among others and will face similar competition with respect to any product candidates thatwe may seek to develop or commercialize in the future. We compete in pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other related markets that developimmuno-oncology therapies for the treatment of cancer. There are other companies working to develop viral immunotherapies for the treatmentof cancer, including divisions of large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies of various sizes. The large pharmaceutical and biotechnologycompanies that have commercialized and/or are developing immuno-oncology treatments for cancer include AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb,Gilead Sciences, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche/Genentech.
| 20 |
Someof the products and therapies developed by our competitors are based on scientific approaches that are the same as or similar to ourapproach, including with respect to the use of viral immunotherapy with adenovirus and other oncolytic viruses. Other competitive productsand therapies are based on entirely different approaches. We are aware that Oncorus, Replimune, Amgen, Immavir, Fergene and IconOVir,among others, are developing viral immunotherapies that may have utility for the treatment of indications that we are targeting. Potentialcompetitors also include academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations that conductresearch, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and commercialization.
Manyof the companies we compete against or may compete against in the future have significantly greater financial resources and expertisein research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketingapproved drugs than we do. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in concentration ofeven more resources among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors,particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These competitors also compete with us in recruitingand retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, in establishing clinical trial sites and enrolling subjects for our clinicaltrials and in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.
Wecould see a reduction or elimination of our commercial opportunity if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer,more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, or are more convenient or are less expensive than any products that we or ourcollaborators may develop. Our competitors also may obtain FDA or foreign regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than wemay obtain approval for ours, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enterthe market. The key competitive factors affecting the success of all our product candidates, if approved, are likely to be their efficacy,safety, convenience and price, and if required, the level of biosimilar or generic competition and the availability of reimbursementfrom government and other third-party payors.
RisksRelated to Government Regulation and Commercialization of Our Product Candidates
Theregulatory approval processes of the FDA and other regulatory authorities are lengthy, time consuming and inherently unpredictable. Ifwe are not able to obtain, or experience delays in obtaining, required regulatory approvals, we will not be able to commercialize anyof our current or future product candidates as expected, and our ability to generate revenue may be materially impaired.
Thetime required to obtain approval by the FDA and other regulatory authorities is unpredictable, but typically takes many years followingthe commencement of clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities.In addition, approval policies, regulations, or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during thecourse of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions. These regulatory requirements may requireus to amend our clinical trial protocols, including to comply with the protocols of any applicable Special Protocol Assessment (“SPA”)we receive from the FDA; conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical trials that may require regulatory or independent institutionalreview board, or IRB, approval; or otherwise cause delays in obtaining approval or rejection of an application. Any delay in obtainingor failure to obtain required approvals could materially adversely affect our ability to generate revenue from the particular productcandidate, which may materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, stock price and prospects. Regulatoryauthorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application or may decide that our dataare insufficient for approval and require additional preclinical, clinical or other studies. In addition, varying interpretations ofthe data obtained from preclinical and clinical testing could delay, limit or prevent marketing approval of a product candidate. Thenumber and types of preclinical studies and clinical trials that will be required for regulatory approval also varies depending on theproduct candidate, the disease or condition that the product candidate is designed to address, and the regulations applicable to anyparticular product candidate. Approval policies, regulations or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may changeduring the course of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions, and there may be varying interpretationsof data obtained from preclinical studies or clinical trials, any of which may cause delays or limitations in the approval or a decisionnot to approve an application. It is possible that our current or future product candidates will never obtain the appropriate regulatoryapprovals necessary for us to commence product sales.
| 21 |
Inaddition, changes in or the enactment of additional statutes, promulgation of regulations or issuance of guidance during preclinicalor clinical development, or comparable changes in the regulatory review process for each submitted product application, may cause delaysin the approval or rejection of an application. For example, in December 2022, with the passage of Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act,or FDORA, Congress required sponsors to develop and submit a Diversity Action Plan, or DAP, for each Phase 3 clinical trial or any other“pivotal study” of a new drug or biological product. These plans are meant to encourage the enrolment of more diverse patientpopulations in late-stage clinical trials of FDA regulated products. In June 2024, as mandated by FDORA, the FDA issued draft guidanceoutlining the general requirements for DAPs. Unlike most guidance documents issued by the FDA, the DAP guidance when finalized will havethe force of law because FDORA specifically dictates that the form and manner for submission of DAPs are specified in FDA guidance. OnJanuary 27, 2025, in response to an Executive Order issued by President Trump on January 21, 2025, on Diversity, Equity and Inclusionprograms, the FDA removed this draft guidance from its website. This action raises questions about the applicability of statutory obligationsto submit DAPs and the agency’s current thinking on best practices for clinical development.
Further,clinical trials by their nature utilize a sample of the potential patient population. With a limited number of patients and limited durationof exposure, rare and severe side effects of a product candidate may only be uncovered when a significantly larger number of patientsare exposed to the product candidate or when patients are exposed for a longer period of time.
Undesirableside effects caused by any of our current or future product candidates could also result in denial of regulatory approval by the FDAor other regulatory authorities for any or all targeted indications or the inclusion of unfavorable information in our product labeling,such as limitations on the indicated uses for which the products may be marketed or distributed, a label with significant safety warnings,including boxed warnings, contraindications, and precautions, a label without statements necessary or desirable for successful commercialization,or may result in requirements for costly post-marketing testing and surveillance, or other requirements, including REMS, to monitor thesafety or efficacy of the products, and in turn prevent us from commercializing and generating revenues from the sale of our currentand future product candidates. Any such limitations or restrictions could similarly impact any supplemental marketing approvals we mayobtain. Undesirable side effects may limit the potential market for any approved products or could result in restrictions on manufacturingprocesses, the discontinuation of the sales and marketing of the product, or withdrawal of product approvals. We could also be sued andheld liable for harm caused to patients, or become subject to fines, injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
Ifany of our current or future product candidates are associated with serious adverse events or undesirable side effects or have propertiesthat are unexpected, we may need to abandon development or limit development of that product candidate to certain uses or subpopulationsin which the undesirable side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefitperspective. The therapeutic-related side effects could affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete thetrial or result in potential product liability claims.
Finally,with the change in presidential administrations in 2025, there is substantial uncertainty as to how, if at all, the new administrationwill seek to modify or revise the requirements and policies of the FDA and other regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over our productcandidates. The impending uncertainty could present new challenges or potential opportunities as we navigate the clinical developmentand approval process for our product candidates. Any of these occurrences may materially harm our business, financial condition, resultsof operations, stock price and prospects.
| 22 |
ABreakthrough Therapy designation by the FDA, even if granted for any of our product candidates, may not lead to a faster developmentor regulatory review or approval process and it does not increase the likelihood that our product candidates will receive marketing approval.
Wemay seek Breakthrough Therapy designation for some or all of our future product candidates. A Breakthrough Therapy is defined as a drugor biologic that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs or biologics, to treat a serious or life-threateningdisease or condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug or biologic may demonstrate substantial improvement overexisting therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints. Sponsors of product candidates that have been designated as BreakthroughTherapies are eligible to receive more intensive FDA guidance on developing an efficient drug development program, an organizationalcommitment involving senior managers, and eligibility for rolling review and priority review. Drugs and biologics designated as BreakthroughTherapies by the FDA may also be eligible for other expedited approval programs, including accelerated approval.
Designationas a Breakthrough Therapy is within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we believe one of our product candidates meets thecriteria for designation as a Breakthrough Therapy, the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to make such designation. In any event,the receipt of a Breakthrough Therapy designation for a product candidate may not result in a faster development process, review or approvalcompared to product candidates developed and considered for approval that have not received Breakthrough Designation and does not assureultimate approval by the FDA. In addition, even if one or more of our product candidates qualify as Breakthrough Therapies, the FDA maylater decide that the product no longer meets the conditions for qualification. Thus, even though we may seek Breakthrough Therapy designationfor our current and future product candidates for the treatment of various cancers, there can be no assurance that we will receive breakthroughtherapy designation.
Acceleratedapproval by the FDA, even if granted for certain of our current or future product candidates, may not lead to a faster development orregulatory review or approval process and it does not increase the likelihood that our product candidates will receive marketing approval.
Wemay seek approval of certain of our current or future product candidates using the FDA’s accelerated approval pathway. A productmay be eligible for accelerated approval if it treats a serious or life-threatening condition, generally provides a meaningful advantageover available therapies, and demonstrates an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. Asa condition of approval, the FDA may require that a sponsor of a product receiving accelerated approval perform adequate and well-controlledpost-marketing clinical trials. These confirmatory trials must be completed with due diligence by the sponsor. In addition, the FDA currentlyrequires as a condition for accelerated approval pre-approval of promotional materials, which could adversely impact the timing of thecommercial launch of the product. Even if we do receive accelerated approval, we may not experience a faster development or regulatoryreview or approval process, and receiving accelerated approval does not provide assurance of ultimate full FDA approval.
Evenif our development efforts are successful, we may not obtain regulatory approval of CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrentHGG, CLD-201, CLD-400 or any future product candidates in the United States or other jurisdictions, which would prevent us from commercializingCLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400 and future product candidates. Even if we obtain regulatoryapproval for CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400 and future product candidates, any such approvalmay be subject to limitations, including with respect to the approved indications or patient populations, which could impair our abilityto successfully commercialize CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 for recurrent HGG, CLD-201, CLD-400 or any future product candidates.
Weare not permitted to market or promote or sell any of our current or any future product candidates before we receive regulatory approvalfrom the FDA or other regulatory authorities, and we may never receive such regulatory approval. Securing marketing approval requiresthe submission of extensive preclinical and clinical data and supporting information to regulatory authorities for each therapeutic indicationto establish the product candidate’s safety and efficacy for that indication. Securing marketing approval also requires the submissionof information about the product manufacturing process to, and inspection of manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites by, theregulatory authorities. If we do not receive approval from the FDA and other regulatory authorities for any of our current or futureproduct candidates, we will not be able to commercialize such product candidates in the United States or in other jurisdictions. If significantdelays in obtaining approval for and commercializing our current or future product candidates occur in any jurisdictions, our business,financial condition, results of operations, stock price and prospects will be materially harmed. Even if any of our current or futureproduct candidates are approved, they may:
●be subject to limitations on the indicated uses or patient populations for which they may be marketed, distribution restrictions, orother conditions of approval;
| 23 |
●not be approved with label statements necessary or desirable for successful commercialization; or
●contain requirements for costly post-market testing and surveillance, or other requirements, including the submission of a Risk Evaluationand Mitigation Strategy, or REMS, to monitor the safety or efficacy of the products.
Wehave not previously submitted a Biologics License Application, or BLA, to the FDA, or a similar marketing application to other regulatoryauthorities, for CLD-101 for any product candidate, and we can provide no assurance that we will ultimately be successful in obtainingregulatory approval for claims that are necessary or desirable for successful marketing, if at all.
Changesin product candidate manufacturing or formulation may result in additional costs or delay.
Asproduct candidates are developed through preclinical studies to later-stage clinical trials towards approval and commercialization, itis common that various aspects of the development program, such as manufacturing methods and formulation, are altered along the way inan effort to optimize processes and results. Any of these changes could cause our current or any future product candidates to performdifferently and affect the results of planned clinical trials or other future clinical trials conducted with the altered materials. Changesin third-party manufacturers and manufacturing processes may also require additional testing, or notification to, or approval by theFDA or another regulatory authority. Such changes could be further delayed due to development of commercial scale manufacturing operationsin our new facility or at third-party manufacturers. This could delay completion of clinical trials, require the conduct of bridgingclinical trials or studies, require the repetition of one or more clinical trials, increase clinical trial costs, delay approval of ourcurrent and future product candidates and jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate revenue.
Inadequatefunding for the FDA, the SEC and other government agencies, including from government shutdowns, or other disruptions to these agencies’operations, could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, prevent new products and services frombeing developed or commercialized in a timely manner or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal business functions onwhich the operation of our business may rely, which could negatively impact our business.
Theability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and fundinglevels, ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory, and policy changes.Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the SEC and othergovernment agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activities, is subject to thepolitical process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.
Futurelegislative and regulatory proposals may materially impact the ability of the FDA and other regulatory agencies to operate as they havehistorically operated. We cannot be sure whether additional legislative changes or executive orders will be enacted, or whether any ofthe FDA’s regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes on the agency and its scientificreview staff, if any, may be. For example, the next FDA user fee reauthorization package is expected to enter stakeholder negotiationsbeginning in mid-2025, with any agreement sent to Congress in early 2027 for purposes of initiating the legislative process. Reauthorizationof the prescription drug user fee program would need to be finalized by Congress by the end of September 2027 in order to avoid a disruptionin FDA’s review goals for NDAs and other activities supported by user fees assessed against industry.
| 24 |
Disruptionsat the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new product candidates to be reviewed and/or approved by necessarygovernment agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years, the U.S. government has shutdown several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the SEC, have had to furlough critical FDA, SEC and other governmentemployees and stop critical activities. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDAto timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, futuregovernment shutdowns could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalizeand continue our operations. Future government shutdowns or slowdowns could also result in delays in the Company’s interactionswith the SEC and other government agencies, which could impact the Company’s ability to access the public markets and obtain necessarycapital in order to properly capitalize and continue its operations.
Evenif any of our current or any future product candidates receive regulatory approval, we will be subject to ongoing obligations and continuedregulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense and limit how we manufacture and market our products.
Anyproduct candidate for which we may obtain marketing approval will be subject to extensive and ongoing requirements of and review by theFDA and other regulatory authorities, including requirements related to the manufacturing processes, post-approval clinical data, labeling,packaging, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, recordkeeping, export, import, advertising, marketing, and promotional activitiesfor such product. These requirements further include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information, including manufacturingdeviations and reports, registration and listing requirements, the payment of annual fees, continued compliance with current good manufacturingpractice, or cGMP, requirements relating to manufacturing, quality control, quality assurance, and corresponding maintenance of recordsand documents, and good clinical practices, or GCPs, for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval.
Anyregulatory approvals that we receive for our product candidates may also be subject to limitations on the approved indicated uses, includingthe duration of use, for which the product may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentiallycostly post-marketing studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product.The FDA may also require a REMS, in order to approve a product candidate, which could entail requirements for a medication guide, physiciancommunication plans or additional elements to ensure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and otherrisk minimization tools.
TheFDA and other regulatory authorities will continue to closely monitor the safety profile of any product even after approval. If the FDAor other regulatory authorities become aware of new safety information after approval of any of our current and future product candidates,they may withdraw approval, issue public safety alerts, require labeling changes or establishment of a REMS or similar strategy, imposesignificant restrictions on a product’s indicated uses or marketing, or impose ongoing requirements for potentially costly post-approvalstudies or post-market surveillance. Any such restrictions could limit sales of the product.
Weand any of our suppliers or collaborators, including our contract manufacturers, could be subject to periodic unannounced inspectionsby the FDA to monitor and ensure compliance with cGMPs and other FDA regulatory requirements. Application holders must further notifythe FDA, and depending on the nature of the change, obtain FDA pre-approval for product and manufacturing changes. Manufacturers andmanufacturers’ facilities are required to comply with extensive FDA requirements, including ensuring that quality control and manufacturingprocedures conform to current GMP regulations and implementing tracking and tracing requirements for certain prescription pharmaceuticalproducts. As such, we and our contract manufacturers will be subject to continual review and inspections to assess compliance with currentGMP and adherence to commitments made in any approved marketing application. Accordingly, we and others with whom we work must continueto expend time, money, and effort in all areas of regulatory compliance, including manufacturing, production, and quality control.
Inaddition, later discovery of previously unknown adverse events or that the product is less effective than previously thought or otherproblems with any products, manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements both before andafter approval, may yield various negative results, including:
●restrictions on manufacturing, distribution, or marketing of such products;
| 25 |
●restrictions on the labeling, including required additional warnings, such as boxed warnings, contraindications, precautions, and restrictionson the approved indication or use;
●manufacturing delays and supply disruptions where regulatory inspections identify observations of noncompliance requiring remediation;
●modifications to promotional pieces;
●issuance of corrective information;
●requirements to conduct post-marketing studies or other clinical trials;
●clinical holds or termination of clinical trials;
●requirements to establish or modify a REMS or similar strategy;
●changes to the way the product is administered to patients;
●liability for harm caused to patients or subjects;
●reputational harm;
●the product becoming less competitive;
●warning or untitled letters;
●suspension of marketing or withdrawal of the products from the market;
●regulatory authority issuance of safety alerts, Dear Healthcare Provider letters, press releases, or other communications containingwarnings or other safety information about the product;
●refusal to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications that we submit;
●recalls of products;
●fines, restitution or disgorgement of profits or revenues;
●suspension or withdrawal of marketing approvals;
●refusal to permit the import or export of our products;
●product seizure or detention;
●FDA debarment, suspension and debarment from government contracts, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts, exclusionfrom federal healthcare programs, consent decrees, or corporate integrity agreements; or
●injunctions or the imposition of civil, criminal or administrative penalties, including imprisonment.
Anyof these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of any particular product or could substantially increasethe costs and expenses of commercializing such product, which in turn could delay or prevent us from generating significant revenuesfrom its marketing and sale. Any of these events could further have other material and adverse effects on our operations and businessand could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, stock price and prospects.
| 26 |
Further,the FDA’s policies or those of other regulatory authorities may change and could impose extensive and ongoing regulatory requirementsand obligations on any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existingrequirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose anymarketing approval that we may have obtained and be subject to regulatory enforcement action, which would adversely affect our business,prospects and ability to achieve or sustain profitability.
Regulatoryapproval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities is limited to those specific indications and conditions for which approval has beengranted, and we may be subject to substantial fines, criminal penalties, injunctions or other enforcement actions if we are determinedto be promoting the use of our products for unapproved or “off-label” uses, or in a manner inconsistent with the approvedlabeling, resulting in damage to our reputation and business.
Wemust comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotion for any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval.Promotional communications with respect to therapeutics are subject to a variety of legal and regulatory restrictions and continuingreview by the FDA, Department of Justice, Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General, state attorneysgeneral, members of Congress and the public. When the FDA or other regulatory authorities issue regulatory approval for a product candidate,the regulatory approval is limited to those specific uses and indications for which a product is approved. If we are not able to obtainFDA approval for desired uses or indications for any of our current and future product candidates, we may not market or promote themfor those indications and uses, referred to as off-label uses, and our business, financial condition, results of operations, stock priceand prospects will be materially harmed. We also must sufficiently substantiate any claims that we make for any products, including claimscomparing those products to other companies’ products, and must abide by the FDA’s strict requirements regarding the contentof promotion and advertising.
Physiciansmay choose to prescribe products for uses that are not described in the product’s labeling and for uses that differ from thosetested in clinical trials and approved by the regulatory authorities. Regulatory authorities in the United States generally do not restrictor regulate the behavior of physicians in their choice of treatment within the practice of medicine. Regulatory authorities do, however,restrict communications by biopharmaceutical companies concerning off-label use.
Ifwe are found to have impermissibly promoted any of our current and future product candidates, we may become subject to significant liabilityand government fines. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations regarding product promotion, particularlythose prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted a product may be subject tosignificant sanctions. The federal government has levied large civil and criminal fines against companies for alleged improper promotionand has enjoined several companies from engaging in off-label promotion. The FDA has also requested that companies enter into consentdecrees or permanent injunctions under which specified promotional conduct is changed or curtailed. In the United States, engaging inthe impermissible promotion of any products, following approval, for off-label uses can also subject us to false claims and other litigationunder federal and state statutes. These include fraud and abuse and consumer protection laws, which can lead to civil and criminal penaltiesand fines, agreements with governmental authorities that materially restrict the manner in which we promote or distribute therapeuticproducts and conduct our business. These restrictions could include corporate integrity agreements, suspension or exclusion from participationin federal and state healthcare programs, and suspension and debarment from government contracts and refusal of orders under existinggovernment contracts. These False Claims Act lawsuits against manufacturers of drugs and biologics have increased significantly in volumeand breadth, leading to several substantial civil and criminal settlements pertaining to certain sales practices and promoting off-labeluses. In addition, False Claims Act lawsuits may expose manufacturers to follow-on claims by private payers based on fraudulent marketingpractices. This growth in litigation has increased the risk that a biopharmaceutical company will have to defend a false claim action,pay settlement fines or restitution, as well as criminal and civil penalties, agree to comply with burdensome reporting and complianceobligations, and be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal and state healthcare programs. If we do not lawfully promote ourapproved products, if any, we may become subject to such litigation and, if we do not successfully defend against such actions, thoseactions may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, stock price and prospects.
| 27 |
Inthe United States, the promotion of biopharmaceutical products is subject to additional FDA requirements and restrictions on promotionalstatements. If, after our current or any future product candidates obtains marketing approval, the FDA determines that our promotionalactivities violate its regulations and policies pertaining to product promotion, it could request that we modify our promotional materialsor subject us to regulatory or other enforcement actions, including issuance of warning letters or untitled letters, suspension or withdrawalof an approved product from the market, requests for recalls, payment of civil fines, disgorgement of money, imposition of operatingrestrictions, injunctions or criminal prosecution, and other enforcement actions. Similarly, industry codes in foreign jurisdictionsmay prohibit companies from engaging in certain promotional activities, and regulatory agencies in various countries may enforce violationsof such codes with civil penalties. If we become subject to regulatory and enforcement actions, our business, financial condition, resultsof operations, stock price and prospects will be materially harmed.
Wemay not be able to file INDs or IND amendments to commence additional clinical trials on the timelines we expect, and even if we areable to, the FDA or other regulatory authority may not permit us to proceed.
TheFDA or other regulatory authorities may require us to file separate INDs for additional clinical trials we plan to conduct with our currentlead product candidates. We may not be able to file any additional INDs required for our current product candidates and any future productcandidates on the timelines we expect. For example, we may experience manufacturing delays or other delays with IND-enabling studies,including due to a contagious disease outbreak such as the COVID-19 pandemic on suppliers, study sites or third-party contractors andvendors on whom we depend. Moreover, we cannot be sure that submission of an IND will result in the FDA or other regulatory authoritiesallowing further clinical trials to begin, or that, once begun, issues will not arise that suspend or terminate clinical trials. Additionally,even if such regulatory authorities agree with the design and implementation of the clinical trials set forth in an IND, we cannot guaranteethat such regulatory authorities will not change their requirements in the future. These considerations also apply to new clinical trialswe may submit as amendments to existing INDs or to a new IND. Any failure to file INDs on the expected timelines to obtain regulatoryapprovals for our trials may prevent us from completing our clinical trials or commercializing our products on a timely basis, if atall. There are similar risks related to the review and authorization of our protocols and amendments by other regulatory authorities.
Ifapproved, our investigational products regulated as biologics may face competition from biosimilars approved through an abbreviated regulatorypathway.
ThePatient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or collectively theACA, includes a subtitle called the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, or BPCIA, which created an abbreviated approvalpathway for biologic products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable with an FDA-licensed reference biologic product. Under the BPCIA,an application for a biosimilar product may not be submitted to the FDA until four years following the date that the reference productwas first licensed by the FDA. In addition, the approval of a biosimilar product may not be made effective by the FDA until 12 yearsfrom the date on which the reference product was first licensed. During this 12-year period of exclusivity, another company may stillmarket a competing version of the reference product if the FDA approves a BLA for the competing product containing the sponsor’sown preclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the safety, purity and potency of theother company’s product. The law is complex and is still being interpreted and implemented by the FDA. As a result, its ultimateimpact, implementation and meaning are subject to uncertainty.
Webelieve that any of our product candidates approved as a biologic product under a BLA should qualify for the 12-year period of exclusivity.However, there is a risk that this exclusivity could be shortened due to congressional action or otherwise, or that the FDA will notconsider our investigational medicines to be reference products for competing products, potentially creating the opportunity for genericcompetition sooner than anticipated. Other aspects of the BPCIA, some of which may impact the BPCIA exclusivity provisions, have alsobeen the subject of recent litigation. Moreover, the extent to which a biosimilar, once licensed, will be substituted for any one ofour reference products in a way that is similar to traditional generic substitution for non-biologic products is not yet clear, and willdepend on a number of marketplace and regulatory factors that are still developing.
Ifcompetitors are able to obtain marketing approval for biosimilars referencing our products, our products may become subject to competitionfrom such biosimilars, with the attendant competitive pressure and consequences.
| 28 |
Thesize of the potential market for our product candidates is difficult to estimate and, if any of our assumptions are inaccurate, the actualmarkets for our product candidates may be smaller than our estimates.
Ourcurrent and future target patient populations are based on our beliefs and estimates regarding the incidence or prevalence of certaintypes of the indications that may be addressable by our product candidates, which is derived from a variety of sources, including scientificliterature and surveys of clinics. Our projections may prove to be incorrect and the number of potential patients may turn out to belower than expected. The total addressable market opportunity for our product candidates will ultimately depend upon a number of factorsincluding the diagnosis and treatment criteria included in the final label, if approved for sale in specified indications, acceptanceby the medical community, patient access, the success of competing therapies and product pricing and reimbursement. Further, the marketopportunity for viral immunotherapies is hard to estimate given that it is an emerging field with few globally or FDA-approved therapies,none of which have yet to enjoy broad market acceptance. Even if we obtain significant market share for our product candidates, becausethe potential target populations could be small, we may never achieve profitability without obtaining regulatory approval for additionalindications.
Healthcarereform measures may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
TheUnited States and many foreign jurisdictions have enacted or proposed legislative and regulatory changes affecting the healthcare systemthat could prevent or delay marketing approval of our current or any future product candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval activitiesand affect our ability to profitably sell a product for which we obtain marketing approval. Changes in regulations, statutes or the interpretationof existing regulations could impact our business in the future by requiring, for example: (i) changes to our manufacturing arrangements,(ii) additions or modifications to product labeling, (iii) the recall or discontinuation of our products or (iv) additional record-keepingrequirements. If any such changes were to be imposed, they could adversely affect the operation of our business. More recently, however,on January 28, 2021, President Biden issued a new Executive Order which directs federal agencies to reconsider rules and other policiesthat limit Americans’ access to healthcare and to consider actions that will protect and strengthen that access.
Inthe United States, there have been and continue to be a number of legislative initiatives to contain healthcare costs. For example, inMarch 2010, the ACA was passed, which substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers,and significantly impacted the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. The ACA, among other things, subjects biological products to potential competitionby lower-cost biosimilars, addresses a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Programare calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected, increases the minimum Medicaid rebates owed bymanufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and extends the rebate program to individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed careorganizations, establishes annual fees and taxes on manufacturers of certain branded prescription drugs, and creates a new Medicare PartD coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer 70% (increased pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018,effective as of 2019) point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during theircoverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D.
Sinceits enactment, there have been numerous judicial, administrative, executive, and legislative challenges to certain aspects of the ACA,and we expect there will be additional challenges and amendments to the ACA in the future. Various portions of the ACA are currentlyundergoing legal and constitutional challenges in the Fifth Circuit Court and the United States Supreme Court; the Trump Administrationhas issued various Executive Orders which eliminated cost sharing subsidies and various provisions that would impose a fiscal burdenon states or a cost, fee, tax, penalty or regulatory burden on individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers ofpharmaceuticals or medical devices; and Congress has introduced several pieces of legislation aimed at significantly revising or repealingthe ACA. It is unclear whether the ACA will be overturned, repealed, replaced, or further amended. We cannot predict what affect furtherchanges to the ACA would have on our business.
InAugust 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, created measures for spending reductions by Congress. A Joint SelectCommittee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with recommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2013 through2021, was unable to reach required goals, thereby triggering the legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs.This includes aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers up to 2% per fiscal year, and, due to subsequent legislative amendments,will remain in effect through 2030 unless additional Congressional action is taken. These Medicare sequester reductions were suspendedfrom May 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 among other things, reducedMedicare payments to several providers, including hospitals, imaging centers and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statuteof limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.
| 29 |
Therehas been increasing legislative and enforcement interest in the U.S. with respect to specialty drug pricing practices. Specifically,there have been several recent U.S. Congressional inquiries and proposed federal and state legislation designed to, among other things,bring more transparency to drug pricing, reduce the cost of prescription drugs under Medicare, review the relationship between pricingand manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drugs.
Atthe federal level, budget proposals may contain further drug price control measures that could be enacted during the budget process orin other future legislation, including, for example, measures to permit Medicare Part D plans to negotiate the price of certain drugsunder Medicare Part B, to allow some states to negotiate drug prices under Medicaid, and to eliminate cost sharing for generic drugsfor low income patients. Additionally, the prior presidential administration released a “Blueprint” to lower drug pricesand reduce out of pocket costs of drugs that contains additional proposals to increase manufacturer competition, increase the negotiatingpower of certain federal healthcare programs, incentivize manufacturers to lower the list price of their products and reduce the outof pocket costs of product candidates paid by consumers. The HHS has already started the process of soliciting feedback on some of thesemeasures and, at the same time, is immediately implementing others under its existing authority. For example, in May 2019, the Centersfor Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, issued a final rule to allow Medicare Advantage Plans the option of using step therapy, atype of prior authorization, for Part B drugs beginning January 1, 2020. This final rule codified CMS’s policy change that waseffective January 1, 2019. On March 10, 2020, the prior administration sent “principles” for drug pricing to Congress, callingfor legislation that would, among other things, cap Medicare Part D beneficiary out-of-pocket pharmacy expenses, provide an option tocap Medicare Part D beneficiary monthly out-of-pocket expenses, and place limits on pharmaceutical price increases. Further, the Trumpadministration previously released a “Blueprint” to lower drug prices and reduce out of pocket costs of drugs that containedproposals to increase drug manufacturer competition, increase the negotiating power of certain federal healthcare programs, incentivizemanufacturers to lower the list price of their products, and reduce the out of pocket costs of drug products paid by consumers. Additionally,on July 24, 2020 and September 13, 2020, the Trump administration announced several executive orders related to prescription drug pricingthat seek to implement several of the administration’s proposals. As a result, the FDA released a final rule on September 24, 2020,effective November 30, 2020, providing guidance for states to build and submit importation plans for drugs from Canada. Further, on November20, 2020, the Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, finalized a regulation removing safe harbor protection for price reductionsfrom pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Part D, either directly or through pharmacy benefit managers, unless the pricereduction is required by law. The rule also creates a new safe harbor for price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well asa safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers. On November 20, 2020, the CMS issuedan interim final rule implementing President Trump’s Most Favored Nation executive order, which would tie Medicare Part B paymentsfor certain physician-administered drugs to the lowest price paid in other economically advanced countries, effective January 1, 2021.On December 28, 2020, the United States District Court in Northern California issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against implementationof the interim final rule. It is unclear whether the current administration will work to reverse these measures or pursue similar policyinitiatives. Any new laws or regulations that result in additional reductions in Medicare and other healthcare funding could have a materialadverse effect on customers for our products, if approved, and, accordingly, on our results of operations.
Additionally,on October 1, 2020, the FDA issued a final rule allowing for the importation of certain prescription drugs from Canada. FDA also issueda final guidance document outlining a pathway for manufacturers to obtain an additional National Drug Code, or NDC, for an FDA-approveddrug that was originally intended to be marketed in a foreign country and that was authorized for sale in that foreign country. The regulatoryand market implications of the final rule and guidance are unknown at this time, but legislation, regulations or policies allowing thereimportation of drugs, if enacted and implemented, could decrease the price we receive for our products and adversely affect our futurerevenues and prospects for profitability.
| 30 |
Further,on May 30, 2018, the Right to Try Act, was signed into law. The law, among other things, provides a federal framework for certain patientsto access certain investigational new product candidates that have completed a Phase I clinical trial and that are undergoing investigationfor FDA approval. Under certain circumstances, eligible patients can seek treatment without enrolling in clinical trials and withoutobtaining FDA permission under the FDA expanded access program. There is no obligation for a pharmaceutical manufacturer to make itsproduct candidates At the state level, individual states are increasingly aggressive in passing legislation and implementing regulationsdesigned to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictionson certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importationfrom other countries and bulk purchasing. In addition, regional health care authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly usingbidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and otherhealth care programs. These measures could reduce the ultimate demand for our products, once approved, or put pressure on our productpricing. We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limitthe amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand forour current or future product candidates or additional pricing pressures.
Ourrevenue prospects could be affected by changes in healthcare spending and policy in the U.S. and abroad. We operate in a highly regulatedindustry and new laws, regulations or judicial decisions, or new interpretations of existing laws, regulations or decisions, relatedto healthcare availability, the method of delivery or payment for healthcare products and services could negatively impact our business,operations and financial condition. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from futurelegislation or administrative action in the United States or any other jurisdiction. If we or any third parties we may engage are slowor unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we or such third partiesare not able to maintain regulatory compliance, our product candidates may lose any regulatory approval that may have been obtained andwe may not achieve or sustain profitability.
Therehave been, and likely will continue to be, legislative and regulatory proposals at the foreign, federal and state levels directed atbroadening the availability of healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. We cannot predict the initiatives that maybe adopted in the future, including repeal, replacement or significant revisions to the ACA. We cannot predict the likelihood, natureor extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad.For example, the Trump Administration has discussed several changes to the reach and oversight of the FDA, which could affect its relationshipwith the pharmaceutical industry, transparency in decision making and ultimately the cost and availability of prescription drugs. Ifwe are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are notable to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any regulatory approval that we may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustainour business operations. The continuing efforts of the government, insurance companies, managed care organizations and other payors ofhealthcare services to contain or reduce costs of healthcare and/or impose price controls may adversely affect:
●the demand for our current or future product candidates, if we obtain regulatory approval;
●our ability to set a price that we believe is fair for our products;
●our ability to obtain coverage and reimbursement approval for a product;
●our ability to generate revenue and achieve or maintain profitability;
●the level of taxes that we are required to pay; and
●the availability of capital.
Anyreduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors,which may adversely affect our future profitability.
| 31 |
If,in the future, we are unable to establish sales and marketing and patient support capabilities or enter into agreements with third partiesto sell and market our current or future product candidates, we may not be successful in commercializing our current or future productcandidates if and when they are approved, and we may not be able to generate any revenue.
Wedo not currently have a sales or marketing infrastructure and have limited experience in the sales, marketing, patient support or distributionof products. To achieve commercial success for any approved product candidate for which we retain sales and marketing responsibilities,we must build our sales, marketing, patient support, managerial and other non-technical capabilities or make arrangements with thirdparties to perform these services. In the future, we may choose to build a focused sales and marketing infrastructure to sell, or participatein sales activities with our collaborators for, some of our current or future product candidates if and when they are approved.
Thereare risks involved with both establishing our own sales and marketing and patient support capabilities and entering into arrangementswith third parties to perform these services. For example, recruiting and training a sales force is expensive and time consuming andcould delay any drug launch. If the commercial launch of a product candidate for which we recruit a sales force and establish marketingcapabilities is delayed or does not occur for any reason, we would have prematurely or unnecessarily incurred these commercializationexpenses. This may be costly, and our investment would be lost if we cannot retain or reposition our sales and marketing personnel.
ourown include:
●our inability to recruit and retain adequate numbers of effective sales and marketing personnel;
●the inability of sales personnel to obtain access to physicians or persuade adequate numbers of physicians to use any future products;
●the lack of complementary products to be offered by sales personnel, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage relative to companieswith more extensive product lines; and
●unforeseen costs and expenses associated with creating an independent sales and marketing organization.
Ifwe enter into arrangements with third parties to perform sales, marketing, patient support and distribution services, our drug revenuesor the profitability of these drug revenues to us are likely to be lower than if we were to market and sell any current or future productcandidates that we develop ourselves. In addition, we may not be successful in entering into arrangements with third parties to selland market our current or future product candidates or may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us. We likely will havelittle control over such third parties, and any of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market ourcurrent or future product candidates effectively. If we do not establish sales and marketing capabilities successfully, either on ourown or in collaboration with third parties, we will not be successful in commercializing our current or future product candidates. Further,our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects will be materially adversely affected.
Ifany product candidate for which we receive regulatory approval does not achieve broad market acceptance among physicians, patients, healthcarepayors, and the medical community, the revenues that we generate from its sales will be limited.
Evenif our product candidates receive regulatory approval, they may not gain market acceptance among physicians, patients, healthcare payors,and others in the medical community. Commercial success also will depend, in large part, on the coverage and reimbursement of our productcandidates by third-party payors, including private insurance providers and government payors. The degree of market acceptance of anyapproved product would depend on a number of factors, including:
●the efficacy, safety and tolerability as demonstrated in clinical trials;
●the timing of market introduction of such product candidate as well as competitive products;
●the clinical indications for which the product is approved;
| 32 |
●acceptance by physicians, major operators of cancer or neurology clinics and patients of the product as a safe, tolerable and effectivetreatment;
●the potential and perceived advantages of the product candidate over alternative treatments;
●the safety and tolerability of the product candidate in a broader patient group;
●the cost of treatment in relation to alternative treatments;
●the availability of adequate reimbursement by third party payors and government authorities;
●changes in regulatory requirements by government authorities for the product candidate;
●relative convenience and ease of administration;
●the prevalence and severity of side effects and adverse events;
●the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts; and
●favorable or unfavorable publicity relating to the product or relating to the Company.
Ourability to successfully launch and secure market acceptance of our pipeline candidates, CLD-101 for newly diagnosed HGG, CLD-101 forrecurrent HGG, CLD-201, and CLD-400 (if approved), may be impacted by contagious disease outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic, thepotential impact of which we may be able to predict or quantify with any degree of certainty.
Ifany product candidate is approved but does not achieve an adequate level of acceptance by physicians, hospitals, healthcare payors andpatients, we may not generate sufficient revenue from these products and we may not become profitable, which would have a material adverseeffect on our business.
Ifwe fail to develop additional product candidates, our commercial opportunity could be limited.
Weexpect initially to develop our lead product candidates. A key part of our strategy, however, is to pursue clinical development of additionalproduct candidates. Developing, obtaining marketing approval for, and commercializing additional product candidates will require substantialfunding and will be subject to the risks of failure inherent in medical product development. We cannot assure you that we will be ableto successfully advance any of these additional product candidates through the development process.
Evenif we obtain approval from the FDA or other regulatory authorities to market additional product candidates for the treatment of solidtumors, we cannot assure you that any such product candidates will be successfully commercialized, widely accepted in the marketplace,or more effective than other commercially available alternatives. If we are unable to successfully develop and commercialize additionalproduct candidates our commercial opportunity may be limited and our business, financial condition, results of operations, stock priceand prospects may be materially harmed.
| 33 |
Ourrelationships with customers and third-party payors will be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcarelaws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, exclusion from government healthcare programs, contractualdamages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.
Althoughwe do not currently have any drugs on the market, if we begin commercializing our current or future product candidates, we will be subjectto additional healthcare statutory and regulatory requirements and enforcement by the federal government and the states and foreign governmentsin which we conduct our business. Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors play a primary role in the recommendation andprescription of any current or future product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Our future arrangements with third-partypayors and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrainthe business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we market, sell and distribute our current or future product candidatesfor which we obtain marketing approval. Restrictions under applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations, include thefollowing:
●the federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receivingor providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward either the referral of an individual for,or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may be made under federal and state healthcare programssuch as Medicare and Medicaid. The Anti-Kickback Statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturerson the one hand and prescribers, purchasers, and formulary managers on the other hand. The term remuneration has been interpreted broadlyto include anything of value. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violateit in order to have committed a violation. On November 20, 2020, the Office of Inspector General, or OIG, finalized further modificationsto the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. Under the final rules, OIG added safe harbor protections under the Anti-Kickback Statute for certaincoordinated care and value-based arrangements among clinicians, providers, and others. This rule (with exceptions) became effective January19, 2021. We continue to evaluate what effect, if any, this rule will have on our business;
●the federal False Claims Act imposes criminal and civil penalties, including through civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, againstindividuals or entities for knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, claims for payment that arefalse or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government. Inaddition, manufacturers can be held liable under the False Claims Act even when they do not submit claims directly to government payorsif they are deemed to “cause” the submission of false or fraudulent claims. False Claims Act liability is potentially significantin the healthcare industry because the statute provides for treble damages and mandatory penalties. Government enforcement agencies andprivate whistleblowers have investigated pharmaceutical companies for or asserted liability under the False Claims Act for a varietyof alleged promotional and marketing activities, such as providing free products to customers with the expectation that the customerswould bill federal programs for the products; providing consulting fees and other benefits to physicians to induce them to prescribeproducts; engaging in promotion for “off-label” uses; and submitting inflated best price information to the Medicaid RebateProgram. In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items and services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-KickbackStatute constitutes a false of fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act;
●the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, imposes criminal and civil liability for executinga scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material factor making any materially false statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services; similarto the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent toviolate it in order to have committed a violation;
●the federal physician payment transparency requirements, sometimes referred to as the “Sunshine Act” under the ACA requiremanufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies that are reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’sHealth Insurance Program to report to the Department of Health and Human Services information related to physician payments and othertransfers of value and the ownership and investment interests of such physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists,podiatrists and chiropractors) and their immediate family members. Effective January 1, 2022, these reporting obligations will extendto include transfers of value made to certain non-physician providers such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners;
●HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or HITECH, and its implementingregulations, which also imposes obligations on certain covered entity healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghousesas well as their business associates that perform certain services involving the use or disclosure of individually identifiable healthinformation, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individuallyidentifiable health information. HITECH also created new tiers of civil monetary penalties, amended HIPAA to make civil and criminalpenalties directly applicable to business associates, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damagesor injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuingfederal civil actions; and
| 34 |
●analogous state laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws that may apply to sales or marketing arrangementsand claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers; andsome state laws require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines andthe relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government in addition to requiring drug manufacturers to report informationrelated to payments to physicians and other health care providers or marketing expenditures, and state laws governing the privacy andsecurity of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preemptedby HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
Becauseof the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available, it is possible that some of ourbusiness activities could be subject to challenge and may not comply under one or more of such laws, regulations and guidance. Law enforcementauthorities are increasingly focused on enforcing fraud and abuse laws, and it is possible that some of our practices may be challengedunder these laws. Ensuring that our future business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulationscould involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices do not complywith current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations.If our operations, including anticipated activities to be conducted by our sales team, were to be found to be in violation of any ofthese laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrativepenalties, damages, fines, exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and the curtailment orrestructuring of our operations, as well as additional reporting obligations and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrityagreement or other agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws, any of which could adversely affect our abilityto operate our business and our financial results.
Wemay face potential liability if we obtain identifiable patient health information from clinical trials sponsored by us.
Mosthealthcare providers, including certain research institutions from which we may obtain patient health information, are subject to privacyand security regulations promulgated under HIPAA, as amended by the HITECH. We are not currently classified as a covered entity or businessassociate under HIPAA and thus are not directly subject to its requirements or penalties. However, any person may be prosecuted underHIPAA’s criminal provisions either directly or under aiding-and-abetting or conspiracy principles. Consequently, depending on thefacts and circumstances, we could face substantial criminal penalties if we knowingly receive individually identifiable health informationfrom a HIPAA-covered healthcare provider or research institution that has not satisfied HIPAA’s requirements for disclosure ofindividually identifiable health information. In addition, in the future, we may maintain sensitive personally identifiable information,including health information, that we receive throughout the clinical trial process, in the course of our research collaborations, anddirectly from individuals (or their healthcare providers) who may enroll in patient assistance programs if we choose to implement suchprograms. As such, we may be subject to state laws requiring notification of affected individuals and state regulators in the event ofa breach of personal information, which is a broader class of information than the health information protected by HIPAA.
TheEU General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, also confers a private right of action on data subjects and consumer associations tolodge complaints with supervisory authorities, seek judicial remedies, and obtain compensation for damages resulting from violationsof the GDPR. In addition, the GDPR includes restrictions on cross-border data transfers. The GDPR may increase our responsibility andliability in relation to personal data that we process where such processing is subject to the GDPR, and we may be required to put inplace additional mechanisms to ensure compliance with the GDPR, including as implemented by individual countries. Compliance with theGDPR is a rigorous and time-intensive process that may increase our cost of doing business or require us to change our business practices,and despite those efforts, there is a risk that we may be subject to fines and penalties, litigation, and reputational harm in connectionwith our European activities. Further, the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union, referred to as Brexit, has createduncertainty with regard to data protection regulation in the United Kingdom. In particular, it is unclear how data transfers to and fromthe United Kingdom will be regulated now that the United Kingdom has left the European Union.
| 35 |
Inaddition, California recently enacted and has proposed companion regulations to the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, which wentinto effect January 1, 2020. The CCPA creates new individual privacy rights for California consumers (as defined in the law) and placesincreased privacy and security obligations on entities handling personal data of consumers or households. The CCPA requires covered companiesto provide certain disclosures to consumers about its data collection, use and sharing practices, and to provide affected Californiaresidents with ways to opt-out of certain sales or transfers of personal information. As of March 28, 2020, the California State AttorneyGeneral has proposed varying versions of companion draft regulations which are not yet finalized. Despite the delay in adopting regulations,the California State Attorney General commenced enforcement actions against violators on July 1, 2020. While there are currently exceptionsfor protected health information that is subject to HIPAA and clinical trial regulations, as currently written, the CCPA may impact ourbusiness activities. On August 14, 2020, implementing regulations were finalized and became effective as of that date. While clinicaltrial data and information governed by HIPAA are currently exempt from the current version of the CCPA, other personal information maybe applicable and possible changes to the CCPA may broaden its scope. We continue to monitor the impact the CCPA may have on our businessactivities.
Furthermore,certain health privacy laws, data breach notification laws, consumer protection laws and genetic testing laws may apply directly to ouroperations and/or those of our collaborators and may impose restrictions on our collection, use and dissemination of individuals’health information. Patients about whom we or our collaborators may obtain health information, as well as the providers who may sharethis information with us, may have statutory or contractual rights that limit our ability to use and disclose the information. We maybe required to expend significant capital and other resources to ensure ongoing compliance with applicable privacy and data securitylaws. Claims that we have violated individuals’ privacy rights or breached our contractual obligations, even if we are not foundliable, could be expensive and time-consuming to defend and could result in adverse publicity that could harm our business.
Ifwe or third-party contract research organizations, or CROs, or other contractors or consultants fail to comply with applicable federal,state/provincial or local regulatory requirements, we could be subject to a range of regulatory actions that could affect our or ourcontractors’ ability to develop and commercialize our therapeutic candidates and could harm or prevent sales of any affected therapeuticsthat we are able to commercialize, or could substantially increase the costs and expenses of developing, commercializing and marketingour therapeutics. Any threatened or actual government enforcement action could also generate adverse publicity and require that we devotesubstantial resources that could otherwise be used in other aspects of our business. Increasing use of social media could give rise toliability, breaches of data security or reputational damage.
Additionally,we are subject to other state and foreign equivalents of each of the healthcare laws described above, among others, some of which maybe broader in scope and may apply regardless of the payor.
Ifwe fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incurcosts that could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.
Weare subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and thehandling, use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Our operations involve the use of hazardous and flammablematerials, including chemicals and biological and radioactive materials. Our operations also produce hazardous waste products. We generallycontract with third parties for the disposal of these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury fromthese materials. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from our use of hazardous materials, we could be held liable for anyresulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminalfines and penalties.
Althoughwe maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees resultingfrom the use of hazardous materials, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintaininsurance for environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us in connection with our storage or disposalof biological, hazardous or radioactive materials.
| 36 |
Healthcarelegislative reform measures may have a negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Inthe United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have been, and we expect there will continue to be, several legislative and regulatorychanges and proposed changes regarding the healthcare system that could prevent or delay marketing approval of product candidates, restrictor regulate post-approval activities and affect our ability to profitably sell any product candidates for which we may obtain marketingapproval. In particular, there have been and continue to be a number of initiatives at the U.S. federal and state levels that seek toreduce healthcare costs and improve the quality of healthcare. We expect that additional U.S. federal healthcare reform measures willbe adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that the U.S. federal government will pay for healthcare products andservices, which could result in reduced demand for our current or future product candidates or additional pricing pressures.
Whileit is currently unclear how certain new measures, including the drug pricing provisions of the IRA, will ultimately be effectuated, wecannot predict with certainty what impact any federal or state health reforms will have on us, but such changes could impose new or morestringent regulatory requirements on our activities or result in reduced reimbursement for our products, any of which could adverselyaffect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, it is unclear whether the new Trump Administration willreverse or modify any existing regulatory requirements, pursue new reform initiatives or otherwise influence the overall healthcare regulatoryenvironment, and even if proposed, whether such changes or modifications would be implemented or withstand potential litigation.
Shouldwe seek and obtain regulatory approval in the United States, we expect that these and other healthcare reform measures that may be adoptedin the future may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and in additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for anyapproved product, which could have an adverse effect on demand for our product candidates. The implementation of cost containment measuresor other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our products.
Changesin U.S. and international trade policies may adversely impact our business and operating results.
TheU.S. government has made statements and taken actions that have led to certain changes and may lead to additional changes to U.S. andinternational trade policies. For example, President Trump has imposed, or is likely to impose, a series of tariffs on certain productsmanufactured outside the United States, and it is unknown whether and to what extent additional tariffs (or other new laws or regulations)will be adopted, or the effect that any such actions would have on us or our industry. Any unfavorable government policies on internationaltrade, such as export controls, capital controls or tariffs, may affect the demand for our product candidates, the competitive positionof our product candidates, and import or export of raw materials and products used in our development and clinical manufacturing activities.If any new tariffs, export controls, legislation and/or regulations are implemented, or if existing trade agreements are renegotiatedor if the U.S. government takes retaliatory trade actions due to the ongoing trade tensions, such changes could have an adverse effecton our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Unstableglobal economic and geopolitical conditions may have serious adverse consequences on our business, financial condition, stock price andresults of operations.
Aswidely reported, global credit and financial markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruptions in the past several years, includingseverely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, increases in unemploymentrates and uncertainty about economic stability. The financial markets and the global economy may also be adversely affected by the potentialfor significant changes in U.S policies or regulatory environment given the new administration, military conflict, including the ongoingconflicts between Russia and Ukraine, and in the Middle East, terrorism, or other geopolitical events. Sanctions imposed by the UnitedStates and other countries in response to such conflicts, including in Ukraine, may also continue to adversely impact the financial marketsand the global economy, and any economic countermeasures by the affected countries or others could exacerbate market and economic instability.There can be no assurance that further deterioration in credit and financial markets and confidence in economic conditions will not occur.Our general business strategy may be adversely affected by any such economic downturn, volatile business environment or continued unpredictableand unstable market conditions. If the current equity and credit markets deteriorate, or do not improve, it may make any necessary debtor equity financing more difficult, more costly, and more dilutive. Furthermore, our stock price may decline due in part to the volatilityof the stock market and the general economic downturn. Failure to secure any necessary financing in a timely manner and on favorableterms could have a material adverse effect on our growth strategy, financial performance and stock price and could require us to delay,scale back or discontinue the development and commercialization of one or more of our product candidates or delay our pursuit of potentialin-licenses or acquisitions. In addition, there is a risk that one or more of our current service providers, manufacturers and otherpartners may not survive these difficult economic times, which could directly affect our ability to attain our operating goals on scheduleand on budget.
| 37 |
Changesin U.S. federal policy that affect the geopolitical landscape could give rise to circumstances outside our control that could have negativeimpacts on our business operations. For example, during the prior Trump administration, increased tariffs were implemented on goods importedinto the U.S., particularly from China, Canada, and Mexico. On February 1, 2025, the U.S. imposed a 25% tariff on imports from Canadaand Mexico, which were subsequently suspended for a period of one month, and a 10% additional tariff on imports from China. Historically,tariffs have led to increased trade and political tensions, between not only the U.S. and China, but also between the U.S. and othercountries in the international community. In response to tariffs, other countries have implemented retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods.Political tensions as a result of trade policies could reduce trade volume, investment, technological exchange and other economic activitiesbetween major international economies, resulting in a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of globalfinancial markets. Any changes in political, trade, regulatory, and economic conditions, including U.S. trade policies, could have amaterial adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
RisksRelated to Employee Matters, Managing Growth and General Business Operations
Ourfuture success depends on our ability to retain key executives and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.
Weare highly dependent on the research and development, clinical, financial, operational and other business expertise of our executiveofficers, as well as the other principal members of our management, scientific and clinical teams. Although we have entered into employmentagreements with our executive officers, each of them may terminate their employment with us at any time. We do not maintain “keyperson” insurance for any of our executives or other employees. Recruiting and retaining qualified scientific, clinical, manufacturing,accounting, legal and sales and marketing personnel will also be critical to our success.
Theloss of the services of our executive officers or other key employees could impede the achievement of our research, development and commercializationobjectives and seriously harm our ability to successfully implement our business strategy. Furthermore, replacing executive officersand key employees may be difficult and may take an extended period of time because of the limited number of individuals in our industrywith the breadth of skills and experience required to successfully develop, gain marketing approval of and commercialize products. Competitionto hire from this limited pool is intense, and we may be unable to hire, train, retain or motivate these key personnel on acceptableterms given the competition among numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for similar personnel. We also experience competitionfor the hiring of scientific and clinical personnel from universities and research institutions. In addition, we rely on consultantsand advisors, including scientific and clinical advisors, to assist us in formulating our research and development and commercializationstrategy. Our consultants and advisors may be employed by employers other than us and may have commitments under consulting or advisorycontracts with other entities that may limit their availability to us. Our success as a public company also depends on implementing andmaintaining internal controls and the accuracy and timeliness of our financial reporting. If we are unable to continue to attract andretain high quality personnel, our ability to pursue our growth strategy will be limited.
Weexpect to expand our development, manufacturing and regulatory capabilities and potentially implement sales, marketing and distributioncapabilities, and as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.
Aswe seek to advance our product candidates through clinical trials and commercialization, we will need to expand our development, regulatory,manufacturing, marketing and sales capabilities or contract with third parties to provide these capabilities. We expect to experiencesignificant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of drug development, clinical,regulatory affairs and, if any product candidate receives marketing approval, sales, marketing and distribution. To manage our anticipatedfuture growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities andcontinue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial resources and the limited experience of ourmanagement team in managing a company with such anticipated growth, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operationsor recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert ourmanagement and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or disruptour operations.
| 38 |
Theincreasing use of social media platforms presents new risks and challenges.
Socialmedia is increasingly being used to communicate about our clinical development programs and the diseases our therapeutics are being developedto treat, and we intend to utilize appropriate social media in connection with our commercialization efforts following approval of ourproduct candidates, if any. Social media practices in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industry continue to evolve and regulationsand regulatory guidance relating to such use are evolving and not always clear. This evolution creates uncertainty and risk of noncompliancewith regulations applicable to our business, resulting in potential regulatory actions against us, along with the potential for litigationrelated to off-label marketing or other prohibited activities and heightened scrutiny by the FDA, the SEC and other regulators. For example,patients may use social media channels to comment on their experience in an ongoing blinded clinical trial or to report an alleged adverseevent. If such disclosures occur, there is a risk that trial enrollment may be adversely impacted, that we may fail to monitor and complywith applicable adverse event reporting obligations or that we may not be able to defend our business or the public’s legitimateinterests in the face of the political and market pressures generated by social media due to restrictions on what we may say about ourproduct candidates. There is also a risk of inappropriate disclosure of sensitive information or negative or inaccurate posts or commentsabout us on any social networking website. In addition, we may encounter attacks on social media regarding our company, management, productcandidates or products. If any of these events were to occur or we otherwise fail to comply with applicable regulations, we could incurliability, face regulatory actions or incur other harm to our business.
Ourinternal computer systems, or those of our third-party CROs that we may use in the future, or other contractors or consultants, may failor suffer security breaches, which could result in a material disruption of our product candidates’ development programs.
Despiteour implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems, and those of our CROs that we may use in the future, informationtechnology suppliers and other contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, cyberattacks and other unauthorizedaccess, natural disasters, terrorism, war, and telecommunication and electrical failures. If such an event were to occur and cause interruptionsin our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our product candidate development programs. For example, the loss of clinicaltrial data from completed, ongoing or planned clinical trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantlyincrease our costs to recover or reproduce the data. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss ofor damage to our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of personal, confidential or proprietary information, we could incurliability and the further development of any of our product candidates could be delayed.
Ouroperations or those of the third parties upon whom we depend might be affected by the occurrence of a natural disaster, pandemic or othercatastrophic event.
Wedepend on our employees and consultants, CDMOs and CROs that we may use in the future, as well as regulatory agencies and other parties,for the continued operation of our business. While we maintain disaster recovery plans, they might not adequately protect us. Despiteany precautions we take for natural disasters or other catastrophic events, these events, including terrorist attack, pandemics, hurricanes,fire, floods and ice and snowstorms, could result in significant disruptions to our research and development, preclinical studies, clinicaltrials, and, ultimately, commercialization of our products. Long-term disruptions in the infrastructure caused by events, such as naturaldisasters, the outbreak of war, the escalation of hostilities and acts of terrorism or other “acts of God,” particularlyinvolving cities in which we have offices, manufacturing or clinical trial sites, could adversely affect our businesses. Although wecarry business interruption insurance policies and typically have provisions in our contracts that protect us in certain events, ourcoverage might not respond or be adequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur. Any natural disaster or catastrophic eventaffecting us, our CDMOs or CROs, regulatory agencies or other parties with which we are engaged could have a significant negative impacton our operations and financial performance.
| 39 |
Recentstatements and proposed action by the United States House of Representatives has been critical of the Chinese biopharmaceutical industryand may raise scrutiny as to the use of our contract manufacturer in China.
Recently,the U. S. House of Representatives has been become critical of the Chinese biopharmaceutical industry with a focus on their alleged tiesto the Chinese Communist Party and handling of Americans’ data. Proposed action by the House of Representatives includes legislationthat could restrict the ability of U.S. biopharmaceutical companies to collaborate with certain Chinese entities without losing the abilityto contract with the U.S. government. We currently use Genscript ProBio in China to manufacture the “CAL1” oncolytic vacciniavirus strain. Although Genscript ProBio has not been identified as a “biotechnology company of concern” as set forth in theproposed legislation, in the event that Genscript ProBio is defined as such, or their activities are otherwise scrutinized by the U.S.government, this determination could adversely affect our ability to contract manufacture the CAL1 oncolytic vaccinia virus strain tobe use with our allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells.
Ourdisclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.
Weare subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. We designed our disclosure controls and procedures to reasonablyassure that information we must disclose in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management,and recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. We believe thatany disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well-conceived and operated, can provide onlyreasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. These inherent limitations include the realitiesthat judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. For example, our directorsor executive officers could inadvertently fail to disclose a new relationship or arrangement causing us to fail to make a required relatedparty transaction disclosure. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of twoor more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system,misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Ourrecurring losses from operations since inception and requirement for additional funding to finance our operations raise substantial doubtabout our ability to continue as a going concern.
Ourrecurring losses from operations since inception and required additional funding to finance our operations raise substantial doubt aboutour ability to continue as a going concern. These conditions could materially limit our ability to raise additional funds through theissuance of new debt or equity securities or otherwise. There is no assurance that sufficient financing will be available when needed,or at all, to allow us to continue as a going concern. The perception that we may not be able to continue as a going concern may alsomake it more difficult to operate our business due to concerns about our ability to meet our contractual obligations. Our ability tocontinue as a going concern is contingent upon, among other factors, the sale of our securities. There is no assurance that sufficientfinancing will be available when needed, or at all, to allow us to continue as a going concern.
Ifwe are unable to secure additional capital, we may be required to curtail our clinical and research and development initiatives and takeadditional measures to reduce costs in order to conserve our cash in amounts sufficient to sustain operations and meet our obligations.These measures could cause significant delays in our clinical and regulatory efforts, which is critical to the realization of our businessplan. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may be necessary should we be unable to continue as agoing concern. It is not possible for us to predict at this time the potential success of our business. The revenue and income potentialof our proposed business and operations are currently unknown. If we cannot continue as a viable entity, you may lose some or all ofyour investment.
| 40 |
Ifwe fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financialresults or prevent fraud. As a result, stockholders could lose confidence in our financial and other public reporting, which would harmour business and the trading price of our common stock.
Effectiveinternal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and, together with adequate disclosurecontrols and procedures, is designed to prevent fraud. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encounteredin their implementation could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. In addition, any testing by us conducted in connectionwith Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or any subsequent testing by our independent registered public accounting firm, may revealdeficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses or that may require prospectiveor retroactive changes to our financial statements or identify other areas for further attention or improvement. Inferior internal controlscould also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could harm our business and have a negativeeffect on the trading price of our stock.
Wewill be required to disclose changes made in our internal controls and procedures on a quarterly basis and our management will be requiredto assess the effectiveness of these controls annually. However, for as long as we are an Emerging Growth Company (“EGC”)under the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internalcontrol over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We could be an EGC until the last day of our fiscalyear following the fifth anniversary of the consummation of FLAG’s IPO on September 14, 2021. Our assessment of internal controlsand procedures may not detect material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Undetected material weaknesses inour internal control over financial reporting could lead to financial restatements and require us to incur the expense of remediation,which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our stock.
Forthe quarter ended June 30, 2023, FLAG’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were not effective, due to the material weaknessesin FLAG’s internal control over financial reporting. FLAG identified a material weakness in internal controls over financial reportingrelated to the fact that it had not yet designed and maintained effective controls relating to the accounting for derivatives and presentationof our statement of cash flows due to the lack of a sufficient number of trained professionals with an appropriate level of accountingknowledge, training and experience to appropriately analyze, record and disclose accounting matters timely and accurately. In addition,during the quarter ended June 30, 2023, FLAG identified material weaknesses in internal controls due to the fact that it had not yetdesigned and maintained effective internal controls related to the evaluation and recording of troubled debt restructuring within thefinancial statements and recording of accrued expenses.
Asa privately held company, Calidi was not required to have, and did not have, a well defined disclosure and financial controls and proceduresor systems of internal controls over financial reporting that are generally required of publicly held companies. For the year ended December31, 2024, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effectiveat the reasonable assurance level. However, no assurance can be given that our existing internal controls over financial reporting willmeet the requirements under the Exchange Act.
RisksRelated to Legal and Compliance Matters
Weface potential product liability exposure, and if successful claims are brought against us, we may incur substantial liability and haveto limit the commercialization of any approved products and/or our product candidates.
Theuse of our product candidates in clinical trials, and the sale of any product for which we obtain regulatory approval, exposes us tothe risk of product liability claims. We face inherent risk of product liability related to the testing of our product candidates inhuman clinical trials, including liability relating to the actions and negligence of our investigators, and will face an even greaterrisk if we commercially sell any product candidates that we may develop. For example, we may be sued if any product candidate we developallegedly causes injury or is found to be otherwise unsuitable during clinical testing, manufacturing, marketing or sale. Any such productliability claims may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in theproduct, negligence, strict liability or a breach of warranties. Claims could also be asserted under state consumer protection acts.Product liability claims might be brought against us by consumers, healthcare providers or others using, administering or selling ourproducts. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against these claims, we will incur substantial liabilities or be required to limitcommercialization of our product candidates. Even successful defense would require significant financial and management resources. Regardlessof merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:
●loss of revenue from decreased demand for our products and/or product candidates;
| 41 |
●impairment of our business reputation or financial stability;
●costs of related litigation;
●substantial monetary awards to patients or other claimants;
●diversion of management attention;
●withdrawal of clinical trial participants and potential termination of clinical trial sites or entire clinical programs;
●the inability to commercialize our product candidates;
●significant negative media attention;
●decreases in our stock price;
●initiation of investigations and enforcement actions by regulators; and
●product recalls, withdrawals or labeling, marketing or promotional restrictions, including withdrawal of marketing approval.
Webelieve we have sufficient insurance coverage in place for our business operations. However, our insurance coverage may not reimburseus or may not be sufficient to reimburse us for any expenses or losses we may suffer. Moreover, insurance coverage is becoming increasinglyexpensive, and, in the future, we may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protectus against losses due to liability. Failure to obtain and retain sufficient product liability insurance at an acceptable cost could preventor inhibit the commercialization of products we develop. On occasion, large judgments have been awarded in class action lawsuits basedon therapeutics that had unanticipated side effects. A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against us couldcause our stock price to fall and, if judgments exceed our insurance coverage, could decrease our cash, and materially harm our business,financial condition, results of operations, stock price and prospects.
Weare subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other anti-corruption laws, as well as import and export control laws, customslaws, sanctions laws and other laws governing our operations. If we fail to comply with these laws, we could be subject to civil or criminalpenalties, other remedial measures, and legal expenses, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations,stock price and prospects.
Ouroperations are subject to anti-corruption laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, and other anti-corruption lawsthat apply in countries where we do business. The FCPA and these other laws generally prohibit us and our employees and intermediariesfrom bribing, being bribed or making other prohibited payments to government officials or other persons to obtain or retain businessor gain some other business advantage. We also may participate in collaborations and relationships with third parties whose actions,if non-compliant, could potentially subject us to liability under the FCPA or local anti-corruption laws. In addition, we cannot predictthe nature, scope or effect of future regulatory requirements to which our international operations might be subject or the manner inwhich existing laws might be administered or interpreted.
Weare also subject to other laws and regulations governing our international operations, including regulations administered by the governmentof the United States, including applicable import and export control regulations, economic sanctions on countries and persons, anti-moneylaundering laws, customs requirements and currency exchange regulations, collectively referred to as the trade control laws.
| 42 |
Wecan provide no assurance that we will be completely effective in ensuring our compliance with all applicable anti-corruption laws orother legal requirements, including trade control laws. If we are not in compliance with applicable anti-corruption laws or trade controllaws, we may be subject to criminal and civil penalties, disgorgement and other sanctions and remedial measures, and legal expenses,which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, stock price and prospects. Likewise,any investigation of any potential violations of these anti-corruption laws or trade control laws by United States or other authoritiescould also have an adverse impact on our reputation, our business, financial condition, results of operations, stock price and prospects.
Ifwe fail to comply with federal and state healthcare laws, including fraud and abuse and health and other information privacy and securitylaws, we could face substantial penalties and our business, financial condition, results of operations, stock price and prospects willbe materially harmed.
Weare subject to many federal and state healthcare laws, including those described in “Business — Government Regulation”such as the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal civil and criminal False Claims Acts, the civil monetary penalties statute, theMedicaid Drug Rebate statute and other price reporting requirements, the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992, or VHCA HIPAA, the FCPA, theACA and similar state laws. Even though we do not and will not control referrals of healthcare services or bill directly to Medicare,Medicaid or other third-party payors, certain federal and state healthcare laws, and regulations pertaining to fraud and abuse, reimbursementprograms, government procurement, and patients’ rights are and will be applicable to our business. We would be subject to healthcarefraud and abuse and patient privacy regulation by both the federal government and the states and foreign jurisdictions in which we conductour business. In the European Union, the data privacy laws are generally stricter than those which apply in the United States and includespecific requirements for the collection of personal data of European Union persons or the transfer of personal data outside of the EuropeanUnion to the United States to ensure that European Union standards of data privacy will be applied to such data.
Ifwe or our operations, including our arrangements with physicians and other healthcare providers, some of whom receive share options orother financial interest in the business as compensation for services provided, are found to be in violation of any federal or statehealthcare law, or any other governmental laws or regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil, criminal,and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, suspension and debarment from government contracts, and refusal of ordersunder existing government contracts, exclusion from participation in U.S. federal or state health care programs, corporate integrityagreements, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could materially adversely affect our ability to operateour business and our financial results. If any of the physicians or other healthcare providers or entities with whom we expect to dobusiness is found not to be in compliance with applicable laws, it or they may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions,including but not limited to, exclusions from participation in government healthcare programs, which could also materially affect ourbusiness.
Althoughan effective compliance program can mitigate the risk of investigation and prosecution for violations of these laws, the risks cannotbe entirely eliminated. Moreover, achieving and sustaining compliance with applicable federal, state and foreign privacy, data protection,security, reimbursement, and fraud laws may prove costly. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfullydefend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operationof our business.
Changesin tax laws or in their implementation or interpretation may adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Recentchanges in tax law may adversely affect our business or financial condition. On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted the TaxCuts and Jobs Act, or TCJA, which significantly reformed the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. The TCJA, amongother things, contains significant changes to corporate taxation, including reducing the corporate tax rate from a top marginal rateof 35% to a flat rate of 21%, limiting the tax deduction for net interest expense to 30% of adjusted taxable income (except for certainsmall businesses), limiting the deduction for NOLs arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 to 80% of current yeartaxable income and elimination of NOL carrybacks for losses arising in taxable years ending after December 31, 2017 (though any suchNOLs may be carried forward indefinitely), imposing a one-time taxation of offshore earnings at reduced rates regardless of whether theyare repatriated, eliminating U.S. tax on foreign earnings (subject to certain important exceptions), allowing immediate deductions forcertain new investments instead of deductions for depreciation expense over time, and modifying or repealing many business deductionsand credits. It is uncertain if and to what extent various states will conform to the TCJA.
| 43 |
Itcannot be predicted whether, when, in what form, or with what effective dates, new tax laws may be enacted, or regulations and rulingsmay be enacted, promulgated or issued under existing or new tax laws, which could result in an increase in the Company or its stockholders’tax liability or require changes in the manner in which the Company operates in order to minimize or mitigate any adverse effects ofchanges in tax law or in the interpretation thereof. We urge prospective investors in our common stock to consult with their legal andtax advisors with respect to any recently enacted tax legislation, or proposed changes in law, and the potential tax consequences ofinvesting in or holding our common stock.
Ifthe government or third-party payors fail to provide adequate coverage, reimbursement and payment rates for our product candidates, orif health maintenance organizations or long-term care facilities choose to use therapies that are less expensive or considered a bettervalue, our revenue and prospects for profitability will be limited.
Inboth domestic and foreign markets, sales of our products will depend in part upon the availability of coverage and reimbursement fromthird-party payors. Such third-party payors include government health programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, managed care providers,private health insurers, and other organizations. Coverage decisions may depend upon clinical and economic standards that disfavor newtherapeutic products when more established or lower cost therapeutic alternatives are already available or subsequently become available,even if our products are alone in a class. If reimbursement is not available, or is available only to limited levels, our product candidatesmay be competitively disadvantaged, and we may not be able to successfully commercialize our product candidates. Even if coverage isprovided, the approved reimbursement amount may not be high enough to allow us to establish or maintain a market share sufficient torealize a sufficient return on our or their investments. Alternatively, securing favorable reimbursement terms may require us to compromisepricing and prevent us from realizing an adequate margin over cost.
Thereis significant uncertainty related to third-party payor coverage and reimbursement of newly approved therapeutics. Marketing approvals,pricing, and reimbursement for new therapeutic products vary widely from country to country. Current and future legislation may significantlychange the approval requirements in ways that could involve additional costs and cause delays in obtaining approvals. Some countriesrequire approval of the sale price of a therapeutic before it can be marketed. In many countries, the pricing review period begins aftermarketing or product licensing approval is granted. In some foreign markets, prescription biopharmaceutical pricing remains subject tocontinuing governmental control even after initial approval is granted. As a result, we might obtain marketing approval for a productin a particular country, but then be subject to price regulations that delay commercial launch of the product, possibly for lengthy timeperiods, which may negatively impact the revenues we are able to generate from the sale of the product in that country. Adverse pricinglimitations may hinder our ability to recoup our or their investment in one or more product candidates, even if our product candidatesobtain marketing approval. Our ability to commercialize our product candidates will depend in part on the extent to which coverage andreimbursement for these products and related treatments will be available from government health administration authorities, privatehealth insurers and other organizations. Regulatory authorities and third-party payors, such as private health insurers, and health maintenanceorganizations, decide which medications they will cover and establish reimbursement levels. The healthcare industry is acutely focusedon cost containment, both in the United States and elsewhere. Several third-party payors are requiring that companies provide them withpredetermined discounts from list prices, are using preferred drug lists to leverage greater discounts in competitive classes, are disregardingtherapeutic differentiators within classes, are challenging the prices charged for therapeutics, and are negotiating price concessionsbased on performance goals.
Third-partypayors, whether foreign or domestic, or governmental or commercial, are developing increasingly sophisticated methods of controllinghealthcare costs. In addition, in the United States, no uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for products exists among third-partypayors. Therefore, coverage and reimbursement for products can differ significantly from payor to payor. Further, we believe that futurecoverage and reimbursement will likely be subject to increased restrictions both in the United States and in international markets. Third-partycoverage and reimbursement for our products or product candidates for which we receive regulatory approval may not be available or adequatein either the United States or international markets, which could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition, resultsof operations, stock price and prospects.
| 44 |
Assumingcoverage is approved, the resulting reimbursement payment rates might not be adequate. If payors subject our product candidates to maximumpayment amounts, or impose limitations that make it difficult to obtain reimbursement, providers may choose to use therapies which areless expensive when compared to our product candidates. Additionally, if payors require high copayments, beneficiaries may seek alternativetherapies.
Wemay need to conduct post-marketing studies in order to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of any products to the satisfaction of hospitals,other target customers and their third-party payors. Such studies might require us to commit a significant amount of management timeand financial and other resources. Our products might not ultimately be considered cost-effective. Adequate third-party coverage andreimbursement might not be available to enable us to maintain price levels sufficient to realize an appropriate return on investmentin product development.
Inaddition, federal programs impose penalties on manufacturers of therapeutics in the form of mandatory additional rebates and/or discountsif commercial prices increase at a rate greater than the Consumer Price Index-Urban, and these rebates and/or discounts, which can besubstantial, may impact our ability to raise commercial prices. A few states have also passed or are considering legislation intendedto prevent significant price increases. Regulatory authorities and third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverageand the amount of reimbursement for particular medications, which could affect our ability to sell our product candidates profitably.These payors may not view our products, if any, as cost-effective, and coverage and reimbursement may not be available to our customers,or may not be sufficient to allow our products, if any, to be marketed on a competitive basis. Cost-control initiatives could cause usto decrease, discount, or rebate a portion of the price we, or they, might establish for products, which could result in lower than anticipatedproduct revenues. If the realized prices for our products, if any, decrease or if governmental and other third-party payors do not provideadequate coverage or reimbursement, our prospects for revenue and profitability will suffer.
Theremay also be delays in obtaining coverage and reimbursement for newly approved therapeutics, and coverage may be more limited than theindications for which the product is approved by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. Such delays have made it increasingly commonfor manufacturers to provide newly approved drugs to patients experiencing coverage delays or disruption at no cost for a limited periodin order to ensure that patients are able to access the drug. Moreover, eligibility for reimbursement does not imply that any therapeuticwill be paid for in all cases or at a rate that covers our costs, including research, development, manufacture, sale, and distribution.Interim reimbursement levels for new therapeutics, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may only be temporary.Reimbursement rates may vary, by way of example, according to the use of the product and the clinical setting in which it is used. Reimbursementrates may also be based on reimbursement levels already set for lower cost products or may be incorporated into existing payments forother services.
Inaddition, third-party payors are increasingly requiring higher levels of evidence of the benefits and clinical outcomes of new technologies,benchmarking against other therapies, seeking performance-based discounts, and challenging the prices charged. We cannot be sure thatcoverage will be available for any product candidate that we commercialize and, if available, that the reimbursement rates will be adequate.An inability to promptly obtain coverage and adequate payment rates from both government-funded and private payors for any of our productcandidates for which we obtain marketing approval could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, our ability to raisecapital needed to commercialize products and our overall financial condition.
Ouremployees, independent contractors, consultants, commercial partners, principal investigators or CROs may engage in misconduct or otherimproper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements and insider trading, which could have a materialadverse effect on our business.
Weare exposed to the risk of employee fraud or other misconduct. Misconduct by employees, independent contractors, consultants, commercialpartners, principal investigators, contract manufacturing organizations or CROs could include intentional, reckless, negligent, or unintentionalfailures to comply with FDA regulations, comply with applicable fraud and abuse laws, provide accurate information to the FDA, properlycalculate pricing information required by federal programs, report financial information or data accurately or disclose unauthorizedactivities to us. This misconduct could also involve the improper use or misrepresentation of information obtained in the course of clinicaltrials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. It is not always possible to identify and deterthis type of misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknownor unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failureto be in compliance with such laws or regulations. Moreover, it is possible for a whistleblower to pursue a False Claims Act case againstus even if the government considers the claim unmeritorious and declines to intervene, which could require us to incur costs defendingagainst such a claim. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting ourrights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, stock price and prospects,including the imposition of significant fines or other sanctions.
| 45 |
Violationsof or liabilities under environmental, health and safety laws and regulations could subject us to fines, penalties or other costs thatcould have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.
Weare subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures, the handling,use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Our operations involvethe use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological and radioactive materials. Our operations also producehazardous waste products. We would incur substantial costs as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental requirementsin connection with our operations or property, including fines, penalties and other sanctions, investigation and cleanup costs and third-partyclaims. Although we generally contract with third parties for the disposal of hazardous materials and wastes from our operations, wecannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from ouruse of hazardous materials, we could be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. We alsocould incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties.
Althoughwe maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees resultingfrom the use of hazardous materials, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintaininsurance for environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us in connection with our storage or disposalof biological, hazardous or radioactive materials.
RisksRelated to Our Reliance on Third Parties
Wedepend on banks insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to safeguard our cash deposits critical to our operations,including to fund our payroll to our employees, and should our depository bank be put into receivership by the FDIC we could experiencedelays in accessing our cash deposits or lose our cash deposits that may exceed the FDIC insured amounts of $250,000.
Actualevents involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactionalcounterparties or other companies in the financial services industry or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumorsabout any events of these kinds or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems.Our ability to pay our employees and to fund our anticipated clinical trials depends on the safety and soundness of the banks that holdour cash deposits. If our depository bank experiences losses or a rapid loss of deposits, it may be put into receivership by the FDICand its applicable banking regulatory authority. For example, on March 10, 2023, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation took controland was appointed receiver of Silicon Valley Bank. Similarly, on March 12, 2023, Signature Bank and Silvergate Capital Corp. were alsoput into receivership. As of March 10, 2023, we maintained our payroll account with Silicon Valley Bank, as well as our general operatingaccount and a restricted cash balance account that served as security for our office lease. We did not experience any material delayin accessing our cash deposits with Silicon Valley Bank and have moved or are in the process of moving our operating and payroll accountsto another bank. However, if our new bank or other banks and financial institutions enter receivership or become insolvent in the futurein response to financial conditions affecting the banking system and financial markets, our ability to access our existing cash, cashequivalents and investments may be threatened and could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
| 46 |
Inflationand rapid increases in interest rates have led to a decline in the trading value of previously issued government securities with interestrates below current market interest rates. Although the U.S. Department of Treasury, FDIC and Federal Reserve Board have announced theBank Term Funding Program to provide up to $25 billion of loans to financial institutions secured by certain of such government securitiesheld by financial institutions to mitigate the risk of potential losses on the sale of such instruments, widespread demands for customerwithdrawals or other liquidity needs of financial institutions for immediate liquidity may exceed the capacity of such program. Additionally,there is no guarantee that the U.S. Department of Treasury, FDIC and Federal Reserve Board will provide access to uninsured funds inthe future in the event of the closure of other banks or financial institutions, or that they would do so in a timely fashion.
Ouraccess to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our current and projected future business operations could besignificantly impaired by factors that affect us, the financial institutions with which we have relationships, or the financial servicesindustry or economy in general. These factors could include, among others, events such as liquidity constraints or failures, the abilityto perform obligations under various types of financial, credit or liquidity agreements or arrangements, the loss of uninsured deposits,disruptions or instability in the financial services industry or financial markets, or concerns or negative expectations about the prospectsfor companies in the financial services industry.
Inaddition, any further deterioration in the macroeconomic economy or financial services industry could lead to losses or defaults by ouranticipated suppliers or future collaboration partners, which in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our future business operationsand results of operations and financial condition. For example, a collaboration partner may fail to make payments when due, default undertheir agreements with us, become insolvent or declare bankruptcy, or a supplier may determine that it will no longer deal with us asa customer. In addition, a future supplier or future collaboration partner could be adversely affected by any of the liquidity or otherrisks that are described above or by the loss of the ability to draw on existing credit facilities involving a troubled or failed financialinstitution. Any supplier or collaboration partner bankruptcy or insolvency, or the failure of any collaboration partner to make paymentswhen due, or any breach or default by a supplier or collaboration partner, or the loss of any significant supplier or collaboration partnerrelationships, could result in material losses to us and may have a material adverse impact on our business.
Forcertain product candidates, we depend, or will depend, on development and commercialization collaborators to develop and conduct clinicaltrials with, obtain regulatory approvals for, and if approved, market and sell product candidates. If such collaborators fail to performas expected, the potential for us to generate future revenue from such product candidates would be significantly reduced and our businesswould be harmed.
Forcertain product candidates, we depend, or will depend, on our development and commercial collaborators to develop, conduct clinical trialsof, and, if approved, commercialize product candidates. We have entered into collaborations with Northwestern University and the Cityof Hope for a Phase 2 clinical trial in newly diagnosed HGG patients. We cannot provide assurance that our collaborators will be successfulin or that they will devote sufficient resources to these collaborations. If our current or future collaboration and commercializationpartners do not perform in the manner we expect or fail to fulfill their responsibilities in a timely manner, or at all, if our agreementswith them terminate or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised, the clinical development, regulatoryapproval and commercialization efforts related to their and our product candidates and products could be delayed or terminated and itcould become necessary for us to assume the responsibility at our own expense for the clinical development of such product candidates.Moreover, our ability to generate revenues from these collaborations and product candidates will depend on such collaborators’abilities to perform in the manner we expect or fulfill their responsibilities in a timely manner, and delays by collaborators, or causedby other collaboration contract obligations, may result in a delay of our ability to disclose data.
Ourcurrent collaborations and any future collaborations that we enter into are subject to numerous risks, including:
●collaborators have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to the collaborations;
●collaborators may not perform their obligations as expected or fail to fulfill their responsibilities in a timely manner, or at all;
| 47 |
●collaborators may not pursue development and commercialization of any product candidates that achieve regulatory approval or may electnot to continue or renew development or commercialization programs based on preclinical studies or clinical trial results, changes inthe collaborators’ strategic focus or available funding or external factors, such as an acquisition, that divert resources or createcompeting priorities;
●collaborators may delay preclinical studies or clinical trials, provide insufficient funding for clinical trials, stop a preclinicalstudy or clinical trial or abandon a product candidate, repeat or conduct new clinical trials or require a new formulation of a productcandidate for clinical testing;
●collaborators could fail to make timely regulatory submissions for a product candidate;
●we may not have access to, or may be restricted from disclosing, certain information regarding product candidates being developed orcommercialized under a collaboration and, consequently, may have limited ability to inform our shareholders about the status of suchproduct candidates;
●collaborators could independently develop, or develop with third parties, products that compete directly or indirectly with our productcandidates if the collaborators believe that competitive products are more likely to be successfully developed or can be commercializedunder terms that are more economically attractive than ours;
●the collaborations may not result in product candidates to develop and/or preclinical studies or clinical trials conducted as part ofthe collaborations may not be successful;
●product candidates developed with collaborators may be viewed by our collaborators as competitive with their own product candidates orproducts, which may cause collaborators to stop commercialization of our product candidates;
●a collaborator with marketing and distribution rights to one or more of our product candidates that achieve regulatory approval may notcommit sufficient resources to the marketing and distribution of any such product candidate; and
●collaborators may not properly maintain or defend our intellectual property rights or may use our proprietary information in such a wayas to invite litigation that could jeopardize or invalidate our intellectual property or proprietary information or expose us to potentiallitigation.
Asa result of the foregoing, our current and any future collaboration agreements may not lead to development or commercialization of ourproduct candidates in the most efficient manner or at all. If a collaborator of ours were to be involved in a business combination, thecontinued pursuit and emphasis on our product development or commercialization program could be delayed, diminished or terminated. Ifone of our collaborators terminates its agreement with us, we may find it more difficult to attract new collaborators and our reputationin the business and financial communities could be adversely affected. Any failure to successfully develop or commercialize our productcandidates pursuant to our current or any future collaboration agreements could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financialcondition, results of operations and prospects.
Ifconflicts arise with our development and commercialization collaborators or licensors, they may act in their own self-interest, whichmay be adverse to the interests of our company.
Wemay in the future experience disagreements with our development and commercialization collaborators or licensors. Conflicts may arisein our collaboration and license arrangements with third parties due to one or more of the following:
●disputes with respect to milestone, royalty and other payments that are believed due under the applicable agreements;
●disagreements with respect to the ownership of intellectual property rights or scope of licenses;
●disagreements with respect to the scope of any reporting obligations;
| 48 |
●disagreements with respect to contract interpretation or the preferred course of development;
●unwillingness on the part of a collaborator to keep us informed regarding the progress of its development and commercialization activities,or to permit public disclosure of these activities; and
●disputes with respect to a collaborator’s or our development or commercialization efforts with respect to our products and productcandidates.
Conflictswith our development and commercialization collaborators or licensors could materially adversely affect our business, financial conditionor results of operations and future growth prospects.
Werely on third parties, including independent clinical investigators and CROs to conduct and sponsor some of the clinical trials of ourproduct candidates. Any failure by a third party to meet its obligations with respect to the clinical development of our product candidatesmay delay or impair our ability to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates.
Wehave relied upon and plan to continue to rely upon third parties, including independent clinical investigators, academic partners, medicalinstitutions, regulatory affairs consultants and third-party CROs, to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials, includingin some instances sponsoring such clinical trials, and to engage with regulatory authorities and monitor and manage data for our ongoingpreclinical and clinical programs. While we have, or will have, agreements governing the activities of such third parties, we will controlonly certain aspects of their activities and have limited influence over their actual performance.
Anyof these third parties may terminate their engagements with us under certain circumstances. We may not be able to enter into alternativearrangements or do so on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new contract researchorganization begins work. As a result, delays would likely occur, which could negatively impact our ability to meet our expected clinicaldevelopment timelines and harm our business, financial condition and prospects.
Weremain responsible for ensuring that each of our preclinical studies and clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the applicableprotocol and legal, regulatory and scientific standards, and our reliance on these third parties does not relieve us of our regulatoryresponsibilities. We and our third-party contractors and CROs are required to comply with GCP requirements, which are regulations andguidelines enforced by the FDA, the Competent Authorities of the Member States of the EEA and other regulatory authorities for all ofour products in clinical development. Regulatory authorities enforce these GCP requirements through periodic inspections of trial sponsors,principal investigators and trial sites. If we fail to exercise adequate oversight over any of our academic partners or CROs or if weor any of our academic partners or CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations, fail to meet expecteddeadlines, or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinicalprotocols or regulatory requirements, or for any other reasons, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliableand the FDA, the EMA or other regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketingapplications. We cannot assure you that upon a regulatory inspection of us, our academic partners or our CROs or other third partiesperforming services in connection with our clinical trials, such regulatory authority will determine that any of our clinical trialscomplies with GCP regulations. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with product produced under applicable cGMP regulations.Our failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process.
Furthermore,the third parties conducting clinical trials on our behalf are not our employees, and except for remedies available to us under our agreementswith such contractors, we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time, skill and resources to our ongoing development programs.These contractors may also have relationships with other commercial entities, including our competitors, for whom they may also be conductingclinical trials or other drug development activities, which could impede their ability to devote appropriate time to our clinical programs.If these third parties, including clinical investigators, do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlinesor conduct our clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or our stated protocols, we may not be able to obtain, or maybe delayed in obtaining, marketing approvals for our product candidates. If that occurs, we will not be able to, or may be delayed inour efforts to, successfully commercialize our product candidates.
| 49 |
Inaddition, with respect to investigator-sponsored trials that may be conducted, we do not control the design or conduct of these trials,and it is possible that the FDA or EMA will not view these investigator-sponsored trials as providing adequate support for future clinicaltrials or market approval, whether controlled by us or third parties, for any one or more reasons, including elements of the design orexecution of the trials or safety concerns or other trial results. We expect that such arrangements will provide us certain informationrights with respect to the investigator-sponsored trials, including the ability to obtain a license to obtain access to use and referencethe data, including for our own regulatory submissions, resulting from the investigator-sponsored trials. However, we do not have controlover the timing and reporting of the data from investigator-sponsored trials, nor do we own the data from the investigator-sponsoredtrials. If we are unable to confirm or replicate the results from the investigator-sponsored trials or if negative results are obtained,we would likely be further delayed or prevented from advancing further clinical development. Further, if investigators or institutionsbreach their obligations with respect to the clinical development of our product candidates, or if the data proves to be inadequate comparedto the firsthand knowledge we might have gained had the investigator-sponsored trials been sponsored and conducted by us, then our abilityto design and conduct any future clinical trials ourselves may be adversely affected. Additionally, the FDA or EMA may disagree withthe sufficiency of our right of reference to the preclinical, manufacturing or clinical data generated by these investigator-sponsoredtrials, or our interpretation of preclinical, manufacturing or clinical data from these investigator-sponsored trials. If so, the FDAor EMA may require us to obtain and submit additional preclinical, manufacturing, or clinical data.
Ifthe manufacturers upon which we may rely fail to produce our product candidates in the volumes that we require on a timely basis, orfail to comply with stringent regulations applicable to biopharmaceutical manufacturers, we may face delays in the development and commercializationof, or be unable to meet demand for, our product candidates and may lose potential revenues.
Wemay rely on third-party contract manufacturers to manufacture our clinical trial product supplies and for commercial scale manufacturing.There can be no assurance that our clinical development will not be limited, interrupted, or of satisfactory quality or continue to beavailable at acceptable prices. In particular, any replacement of our contract manufacturer could require significant effort and expertisebecause there may be a limited number of qualified replacements. Any delays in obtaining adequate supplies of our product candidatesthat meet the necessary quality standards, including delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, may delay our development or commercialization.
Wemay not succeed in our efforts to establish manufacturing relationships or other alternative arrangements for any of our product candidatesor programs. Our product candidates may compete with other products and product candidates for access to manufacturing facilities. Thereare a limited number of manufacturers that operate under cGMP regulations and that are both capable of manufacturing and filling ourviral product for us and willing to do so. If our existing third-party manufacturers, or the third parties that we engage in the future,should cease to work with us, we likely would experience delays in obtaining sufficient quantities of our product candidates for us tomeet commercial demand or to advance our clinical trials while we identify and qualify replacement suppliers. If for any reason we areunable to obtain adequate supplies of our product candidates or the therapeutic substances used to manufacture them, it will be moredifficult for us to develop our product candidates and compete effectively. Further, even if we do establish such collaborations or arrangements,our third-party manufacturers may breach, terminate, or not renew these agreements.
Anyproblems or delays we experience in preparing for commercial scale manufacturing of a product candidate or component may result in adelay in product development timelines and FDA or other regulatory authority approval of the product candidate or may impair our abilityto manufacture commercial quantities or such quantities at an acceptable cost and quality, which could result in the delay, prevention,or impairment of clinical development and commercialization of our product candidates and may materially harm our business, financialcondition, results of operations, stock price and prospects.
| 50 |
Themanufacture of biopharmaceutical products requires significant expertise and capital investment, including the development of advancedmanufacturing techniques and process controls. Manufacturers of therapeutics often encounter difficulties in production, particularlyin scaling up initial production. These problems include difficulties with production costs and yields, quality control, including stabilityof the product candidate and quality assurance testing, shortages of qualified personnel or key raw materials, and compliance with strictlyenforced federal, state, and foreign regulations. Our contract manufacturers may not perform as agreed. If our manufacturers were toencounter these or other difficulties, our ability to provide product candidates to patients in our clinical trials could be jeopardized.
Contractmanufacturers of our product candidates may be unable to comply with our specifications, applicable cGMP requirements or other FDA, stateor foreign regulatory requirements. Poor control of production processes can lead to the introduction of adventitious agents or othercontaminants, or to inadvertent changes in the properties or stability of a product candidate that may not be detectable in final producttesting. If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatoryrequirements of the FDA or other regulatory authorities, they will not be able to secure or maintain regulatory approval for their manufacturingfacilities. Any such deviations may also require remedial measures that may be costly and/or time consuming for us or a third party toimplement and that may include the temporary or permanent suspension of a clinical trial or the temporary or permanent closure of a facility.Any such remedial measures imposed upon us or third parties with whom we contract could materially harm our business. Any delays in obtainingproducts or product candidates that comply with the applicable regulatory requirements may result in delays to clinical trials, productapprovals, and commercialization. It may also require that we conduct additional studies.
Whilewe are ultimately responsible for the manufacturing of our product candidates and therapeutic substances, other than through our contractualarrangements, we have little control over our manufacturers’ compliance with these regulations and standards. If the FDA or anotherregulatory authority does not approve these facilities for the manufacture of our product candidates or if it withdraws any such approvalin the future, we may need to find alternative manufacturing facilities, which would significantly impact our ability to develop, obtainregulatory approval for or market our product candidates, if approved. Any new manufacturers would need to either obtain or develop thenecessary manufacturing know-how, and obtain the necessary equipment and materials, which may take substantial time and investment. Wemust also receive FDA approval for the use of any new manufacturers for commercial supply.
Afailure to comply with the applicable regulatory requirements, including periodic regulatory inspections, may result in regulatory enforcementactions against our manufacturers or us (including fines and civil and criminal penalties, including imprisonment) suspension or restrictionsof production, injunctions, delay or denial of product approval or supplements to approved products, clinical holds or termination ofclinical trials, warning or untitled letters, regulatory authority communications warning the public about safety issues with the productcandidate, refusal to permit the import or export of the products, product seizure, detention, or recall, operating restrictions, suitsunder the civil False Claims Act, corporate integrity agreements, consent decrees, withdrawal of product approval, environmental or safetyincidents and other liabilities. If the safety of any quantities supplied is compromised due to our manufacturers’ failure to adhereto applicable laws or for other reasons, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our productcandidates.
Anyfailure or refusal to supply our product candidates or components for our product candidates that we may develop could delay, preventor impair our clinical development or commercialization efforts. Any change in our manufacturers could be costly because the commercialterms of any new arrangement could be less favorable and because the expenses relating to the transfer of necessary technology and processescould be significant.
Ourreliance on third parties requires us to share our trade secrets, which increases the possibility that a competitor will discover themor that our trade secrets will be misappropriated or disclosed.
Becausewe may rely on third parties to manufacture our product candidates, and because we collaborate with various organizations and academicinstitutions on the development of our product candidates, we must, at times, share trade secrets with them. We seek to protect our proprietarytechnology in part by entering into confidentiality agreements and, if applicable, material transfer agreements, collaborative researchagreements, consulting agreements or other similar agreements with our collaborators, advisors, employees and consultants prior to beginningresearch or disclosing proprietary information. These agreements typically limit the rights of the third parties to use or disclose ourconfidential information, such as trade secrets.
| 51 |
Despitethe contractual provisions employed when working with third parties, the need to share trade secrets and other confidential informationincreases the risk that such trade secrets become known by our competitors, are inadvertently incorporated into the technology of others,or are disclosed or used in violation of these agreements. Given that our proprietary position is based, in part, on our know-how andtrade secrets, a competitor’s discovery of our trade secrets or other unauthorized use or disclosure would impair our competitiveposition and may have a material adverse effect on our business.
Inaddition, these agreements typically restrict the ability of our collaborators, advisors, employees and consultants to publish data potentiallyrelating to our trade secrets. Our academic collaborators typically have rights to publish data, provided that we are notified in advanceand may delay publication for a specified time in order to secure our intellectual property rights arising from the collaboration. Inother cases, publication rights are controlled exclusively by us, although in some cases we may share these rights with other parties.Despite our efforts to protect our trade secrets, our competitors may discover our trade secrets, either through breach of these agreements,independent development or publication of information including our trade secrets in cases where we do not have proprietary or otherwiseprotected rights at the time of publication. A competitor’s discovery of our trade secrets would impair our competitive positionand have an adverse impact on our business.
RisksRelated to Intellectual Property
Ourrights to develop and commercialize certain of our product candidates are subject and may in the future be subject, in part, to the termsand conditions of licenses granted to us by third parties. If we fail to comply with our obligations under our current or future intellectualproperty license agreements or otherwise experience disruptions to our business relationships with our current or any future licensors,we could lose intellectual property rights that are important to our business.
Weare and expect to continue to be reliant upon third-party licensors for certain patent and other intellectual property rights that areimportant or necessary to the development of some of our technology and product candidates. For example, we rely on licenses from NorthwesternUniversity and City of Hope to certain development, commercialization, regulatory and patent rights. These license agreements impose,and we expect that any future license agreement will impose, specified diligence, milestone payment, royalty, commercialization, developmentand other obligations on us and require us to meet development timelines, or to exercise diligent or commercially reasonable effortsto develop and commercialize licensed products, in order to maintain the licenses. For more information on the terms of these licenseagreements, see “Business —Intellectual Property.”
Furthermore,our licensors have, or may in the future have, the right to terminate a license if we materially breach the agreement and fail to curesuch breach within a specified period or in the event we undergo certain bankruptcy events. In spite of our best efforts, our currentor any future licensors might conclude that we have materially breached our license agreements and might therefore terminate the licenseagreements. If our license agreements are terminated, we may lose our rights to develop and commercialize certain of our product candidatesand technology, lose patent protection, experience significant delays in the development and commercialization of certain of our productcandidates and technology, and incur liability for damages. If these in-licenses are terminated, or if the underlying intellectual propertyfails to provide the intended exclusivity, our competitors or other third parties could have the freedom to seek regulatory approvalof, and to market, products and technologies identical or competitive to ours and we may be required to cease our development and commercializationof certain of our product candidates and technology. In addition, we may seek to obtain additional licenses from our licensors and, inconnection with obtaining such licenses, we may agree to amend our existing licenses in a manner that may be more favorable to the licensors,including by agreeing to terms that could enable third parties, including our competitors, to receive licenses to a portion of the intellectualproperty that is subject to our existing licenses and to compete with any product candidates we may develop and our technology. Any ofthe foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operationsand prospects.
Disputesmay arise regarding intellectual property subject to a licensing agreement, including:
●the scope of rights granted under the license agreement and other interpretation-related issues;
| 52 |
●our or our licensors’ ability to obtain, maintain and defend intellectual property and to enforce intellectual property rightsagainst third parties;
●the extent to which our technology, product candidates and processes infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate the intellectual propertyof the licensor that is not subject to the license agreement;
●the sublicensing of patent and other intellectual property rights under our license agreements;
●our diligence, development, regulatory, commercialization, financial or other obligations under the license agreement and what activitiessatisfy those diligence obligations;
●the inventorship and ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual property by our currentor future licensors and us and our partners; and
●the priority of invention of patented technology.
Inaddition, our license agreements are, and future license agreements are likely to be, complex, and certain provisions in such agreementsmay be susceptible to multiple interpretations. The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could narrowwhat we believe to be the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property or technology, or increase what we believe to beour diligence, development, regulatory, commercialization, financial or other obligations under the relevant agreement. In addition,if disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed or any other dispute related to our license agreements prevent or impairour ability to maintain our current license agreements on commercially acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop andcommercialize the affected product candidates and technology. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business,financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Licenseagreements we may enter into in the future may be non-exclusive. Accordingly, third parties may also obtain non-exclusive licenses fromsuch licensors with respect to the intellectual property licensed to us under such license agreements. Accordingly, these license agreementsmay not provide us with exclusive rights to use such licensed patent and other intellectual property rights, or may not provide us withexclusive rights to use such patent and other intellectual property rights in all relevant fields of use and in all territories in whichwe may wish to develop or commercialize our technology and any product candidates we may develop in the future.
Moreover,some of our in-licensed patent and other intellectual property rights may in the future be subject to third-party interests such as co-ownership.If we are unable to obtain an exclusive license to such third-party co-owners’ interest, in such patent and other intellectualproperty rights, such third-party co-owners may be able to license their rights to other third parties, including our competitors, andour competitors could market competing products and technology. We or our licensors may need the cooperation of any such co-owners ofour licensed patent and other intellectual property rights in order to enforce them against third parties, and such cooperation may notbe provided to us or our licensors.
Additionally,we may not have complete control over the preparation, filing, prosecution, maintenance, enforcement and defense of patents and patentapplications that we license from third parties. It is possible that our licensors’ filing, prosecution and maintenance of thelicensed patents and patent applications, enforcement of patents against infringers or defense of such patents against challenges ofvalidity or claims of enforceability may be less vigorous than if we had conducted them ourselves, and accordingly, we cannot be certainthat these patents and patent applications will be prepared, filed, prosecuted, maintained, enforced and defended in a manner consistentwith the best interests of our business. If our licensors fail to file, prosecute, maintain, enforce and defend such patents and patentapplications, or lose rights to those patents or patent applications, the rights we have licensed may be reduced or eliminated, our rightto develop and commercialize any of our technology and any product candidates we may develop that are the subject of such licensed rightscould be adversely affected and we may not be able to prevent competitors or other third parties from making, using and selling competingproducts.
Furthermore,our owned and in-licensed patent rights may be subject to a reservation of rights by one or more third parties. When new technologiesare developed with government funding, in order to secure ownership of patent rights related to the technologies, the recipient of suchfunding is required to comply with certain government regulations, including timely disclosing the inventions claimed in such patentrights to the U.S. government and timely electing title to such inventions. A failure to meet these obligations may lead to a loss ofrights or the unenforceability of relevant patents or patent applications.
| 53 |
Oursuccess depends in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property. It is difficult and costly to protect our proprietary rightsand technology, and we may not be able to ensure their protection.
Ourbusiness will depend in large part on obtaining and maintaining patent, trademark and trade secret protection of our proprietary technologiesand our product candidates, their respective components, synthetic intermediates, formulations, combination therapies, methods used tomanufacture them and methods of treatment, as well as successfully defending these patents against third-party challenges. Our abilityto stop unauthorized third parties from making, using, selling, offering to sell or importing our product candidates is dependent uponthe extent to which we have rights under valid and enforceable patents that cover these activities and whether a court would issue aninjunctive remedy. If we are unable to secure and maintain patent protection for any product or technology we develop, or if the scopeof the patent protection secured is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize products and technology similaror identical to ours, and our ability to commercialize any product candidates we may develop may be adversely affected.
Thepatenting process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applicationsat a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. In addition, we may not pursue, obtain, or maintain patent protection in all relevant markets.It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development output before it is too late toobtain patent protection. Moreover, in some circumstances, we may not have the right to control the preparation, filing and prosecutionof patent applications, or to maintain the patents, covering technology that we license from or license to third parties and are relianton our licensors or licensees.
Thestrength of patents in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical field involves complex legal and scientific questions and can be uncertain.The patent applications that we own or in-license may fail to result in issued patents with claims that cover our product candidatesor uses thereof in the United States or in other foreign countries. Even if the patents do successfully issue, third parties may challengethe validity, enforceability or scope thereof, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. Furthermore,even if they are unchallenged, our patents and patent applications may not adequately protect our technology, including our product candidates,or prevent others from designing around our claims. If the breadth or strength of protection provided by the patent applications andpatents we hold with respect to our product candidates is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to develop,and threaten our ability to commercialize, our product candidates. Further, if we encounter delays in our clinical trials, the periodof time during which we could market our product candidates under patent protection would be reduced.
Wecannot be certain that we were the first to file any patent application related to our technology and directed to our product candidates,and, if we were not, we may be precluded from obtaining patent protection for our technology, including our product candidates.
Wecannot be certain that we are the first to invent the inventions covered by pending patent applications and patents, and, if we are not,we may be subject to priority disputes. Furthermore, for United States applications in which all claims are entitled to a priority datebefore March 16, 2013, an interference proceeding can be provoked by a third-party or instituted by the United States Patent and TrademarkOffice, or USPTO, to determine who was the first to invent any of the subject matter covered by the patent claims of our applicationsand patents. Similarly, for United States applications in which at least one claim is not entitled to a priority date before March 16,2013, derivation proceedings can be instituted to determine whether the subject matter of a patent claim was derived from a prior inventor’sdisclosure.
| 54 |
Wemay be required to disclaim part or all of the term of certain patents or all of the term of certain patent applications. There may beprior art of which we are not aware that may affect the validity or enforceability of a patent or patent application claim. There alsomay be prior art of which we are aware, but which we do not believe affects the validity or enforceability of a claim, which may, nonetheless,ultimately be found to affect the validity or enforceability of a claim. No assurance can be given that if challenged, our patents wouldbe declared by a court to be valid or enforceable or that even if found valid and enforceable, would adequately protect our product candidates,or would be found by a court to be infringed by a competitor’s technology or product. We may analyze patents or patent applicationsof our competitors that we believe are relevant to our activities, and consider that we are free to operate in relation to our productcandidates, but our competitors may achieve issued claims, including in patents we consider to be unrelated, which block our effortsor may potentially result in our product candidates or our activities infringing such claims. The possibility exists that others willdevelop products which have the same effect as our products on an independent basis which do not infringe our patents or other intellectualproperty rights, or will design around the claims of patents that may issue that cover our products.
Recentor future patent reform legislation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applicationsand the enforcement or defense of our issued patents. Under the enacted Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or America Invents Act, enactedin 2013, the United States moved from a “first to invent” to a “first-to-file” system. Under a “first-to-file”system, assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application generally will beentitled to a patent on the invention regardless of whether another inventor had made the invention earlier. The America Invents Actincludes a number of other significant changes to U.S. patent law, including provisions that affect the way patent applications are prosecuted,redefine prior art and establish a new post-grant review system. The effects of these changes are currently unclear as the USPTO onlyrecently developed new regulations and procedures in connection with the America Invents Act and many of the substantive changes to patentlaw, including the “first-to-file” provisions, only became effective in March 2013. In addition, the courts have yet to addressmany of these provisions and the applicability of the act and new regulations on specific patents discussed herein have not been determinedand would need to be reviewed. However, the America Invents Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surroundingthe prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material adverseeffect on our business and financial condition.
Thedegree of future protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain because legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequatelyprotect our rights or permit us to gain or keep our competitive advantage. For example:
●others may be able to make or use compounds that are similar to the compositions of our product candidates but that are not covered bythe claims of our patents or those of our licensors;
●we or our licensors, as the case may be, may fail to meet our obligations to the U.S. government in regards to any in-licensed patentsand patent applications funded by U.S. government grants, leading to the loss of patent rights;
●we or our licensors, as the case may be, might not have been the first to file patent applications for these inventions;
●others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies;
●it is possible that our pending patent applications will not result in issued patents;
●it is possible that there are prior public disclosures that could invalidate our or our licensors’ patents, as the case may be,or parts of our or their patents;
●it is possible that others may circumvent our owned or in-licensed patents;
●it is possible that there are unpublished applications or patent applications maintained in secrecy that may later issue with claimscovering our products or technology similar to ours;
●the laws of foreign countries may not protect our or our licensors’, as the case may be, proprietary rights to the same extentas the laws of the United States;
●the claims of our owned or in-licensed issued patents or patent applications, if and when issued, may not cover our product candidates;
| 55 |
●our owned, co-owned, or in-licensed issued patents may not provide us with any competitive advantages, may be narrowed in scope, or beheld invalid or unenforceable as a result of legal challenges by third parties;
●the inventors of our owned, co-owned, or in-licensed patents or patent applications may become involved with competitors, develop productsor processes which design around our patents, or become hostile to us or the patents or patent applications on which they are named asinventors;
●the co-owners of certain of our patent applications may become involved with, or license or assign the co-owned applications to competitors,or become hostile to us or the patents or patent applications on which they are named as co-owners;
●it is possible that our owned or in-licensed patents or patent applications omit individual(s) that should be listed as inventor(s) orinclude individual(s) that should not be listed as inventor(s), which may cause these patents or patents issuing from these patent applicationsto be held invalid or unenforceable;
●we have engaged in scientific collaborations in the past, and will continue to do so in the future. Such collaborators may develop adjacentor competing products to ours that are outside the scope of our patents;
●we may not develop additional proprietary technologies for which we can obtain patent protection;
●it is possible that product candidates or diagnostic tests we develop may be covered by third parties’ patents or other exclusiverights; or
●the patents of others may have an adverse effect on our business.
Wemay enter into license or other collaboration agreements in the future that may impose certain obligations on us. If we fail to complywith our obligations under such future agreements with third parties, we could lose license rights that may be important to our futurebusiness.
Inconnection with our efforts to expand our pipeline of product candidates, we may enter into certain licenses or other collaboration agreementsin the future pertaining to the in-license of rights to additional candidates. Such agreements may impose various diligence, milestonepayment, royalty, insurance or other obligations on us. If we fail to comply with these obligations, our licensor or collaboration partnersmay have the right to terminate the relevant agreement, in which event we would not be able to develop or market the products coveredby such licensed intellectual property.
Moreover,disputes may arise regarding intellectual property subject to a licensing agreement, including:
●the scope of rights granted under the license agreement and other interpretation-related issues;
●the extent to which our product candidates, technology and processes infringe on intellectual property of the licensor that is not subjectto the licensing agreement;
●the sublicensing of patent and other rights under our collaborative development relationships;
●our diligence obligations under the license agreement and what activities satisfy those diligence obligations;
●the inventorship and ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual property by our licensorsand us and our partners; and
●the priority of invention of patented technology.
| 56 |
Inaddition, the agreements under which we currently license intellectual property or technology from third parties are complex, and certainprovisions in such agreements may be susceptible to multiple interpretations. The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreementthat may arise could narrow what we believe to be the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property or technology, or increasewhat we believe to be our financial or other obligations under the relevant agreement, either of which could have a material adverseeffect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. Moreover, if disputes over intellectual property thatwe have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangements on commercially acceptable terms, we maybe unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on ourbusiness, financial conditions, results of operations, and prospects.
Inaddition, we may have limited control over the maintenance and prosecution of these in-licensed patents and patent applications, or anyother intellectual property that may be related to our in-licensed intellectual property. For example, we cannot be certain that suchactivities by any future licensors have been or will be conducted in compliance with applicable laws and regulations or will result invalid and enforceable patents and other intellectual property rights. We have limited control over the manner in which our licensorsinitiate an infringement proceeding against a third-party infringer of the intellectual property rights, or defend certain of the intellectualproperty that is licensed to us. It is possible that the licensors’ infringement proceeding or defense activities may be less vigorousthan had we conducted them ourselves.
Ifwe are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.
Inaddition to patent protection, we rely heavily upon know-how and trade secret protection, as well as non-disclosure agreements and inventionassignment agreements with our employees, consultants and third-parties, to protect our confidential and proprietary information, especiallywhere we do not believe patent protection is appropriate or obtainable. In addition to contractual measures, we try to protect the confidentialnature of our proprietary information using physical and technological security measures. Such measures may not, for example, in thecase of misappropriation of a trade secret by an employee or third-party with authorized access, provide adequate protection for ourproprietary information. Our security measures may not prevent an employee or consultant from misappropriating our trade secrets andproviding them to a competitor, and recourse we take against such misconduct may not provide an adequate remedy to protect our interestsfully. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret can be difficult, expensive, and time-consuming,and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, trade secrets may be independently developed by others in a manner that could preventlegal recourse by us. For example, our clinical development strategy includes our techniques for obtaining, processing and preservingneuronal-derived stem cells and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells that are proprietary and confidential. If one or more third partiesobtain or are otherwise able to replicate these techniques, an important feature and differentiator of our clinical development strategywill become available to potential competitors. If any of our confidential or proprietary information, such as our trade secrets, wereto be disclosed or misappropriated, or if any such information was independently developed by a competitor, our competitive positioncould be harmed.
Inaddition, courts outside the United States are sometimes less willing to protect trade secrets. If we choose to go to court to stop athird-party from using any of our trade secrets, we may incur substantial costs. These lawsuits may consume our time and other resourceseven if we are successful. Although we take steps to protect our proprietary information and trade secrets, including through contractualmeans with our employees and consultants, third parties may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information andtechniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or disclose our technology.
Thus,we may not be able to meaningfully protect our trade secrets. It is our policy to require our employees, consultants, outside scientificcollaborators, sponsored researchers and other advisors to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment orconsulting relationships with us. These agreements provide that all confidential information concerning our business or financial affairsdeveloped or made known to the individual or entity during the course of the party’s relationship with us is to be kept confidentialand not disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances. In the case of employees, the agreements provide that all inventionsconceived by the individual, and which are related to our current or planned business or research and development or made during normalworking hours, on our premises or using our equipment or proprietary information, are our exclusive property. In addition, we take otherappropriate precautions, such as physical and technological security measures, to guard against misappropriation of our proprietary technologyby third parties. We have also adopted policies and conduct training that provides guidance on our expectations, and our advice for bestpractices, in protecting our trade secrets.
| 57 |
Third-partyclaims of intellectual property infringement may prevent or delay our product discovery and development efforts.
Ourcommercial success depends in part on our ability to develop, manufacture, market and sell our product candidates and use our proprietarytechnologies without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. There is a substantial amount of litigation involving patentsand other intellectual property rights in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries, as well as administrative proceedings forchallenging patents, including interference, derivation, inter partes review, post grant review, and reexamination proceedings beforethe USPTO or oppositions and other comparable proceedings in foreign jurisdictions. We may be exposed to, or threatened with, futurelitigation by third parties having patent or other intellectual property rights alleging that our product candidates and/or proprietarytechnologies infringe their intellectual property rights. Numerous U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications, whichare owned by third parties, exist in the fields in which we are developing our product candidates. As the biotechnology and biopharmaceuticalindustries expand and more patents are issued, the risk increases that our product candidates may give rise to claims of infringementof the patent rights of others. Moreover, it is not always clear to industry participants, including us, which patents cover varioustypes of drugs, products or their methods of use or manufacture. Thus, because of the large number of patents issued and patent applicationsfiled in our fields, there may be a risk that third parties may allege they have patent rights encompassing our product candidates, technologiesor methods.
Ifa third-party claims that we infringe its intellectual property rights, we may face a number of issues, including, but not limited to:
●infringement and other intellectual property claims which, regardless of merit, may be expensive and time-consuming to litigate and maydivert our management’s attention from our core business;
●substantial damages for infringement, which we may have to pay if a court decides that the product candidate or technology at issue infringeson or violates the third-party’s rights, and, if the court finds that the infringement was willful, we could be ordered to paytreble damages and the patent owner’s attorneys’ fees;
●a court prohibiting us from developing, manufacturing, marketing or selling our product candidates, or from using our proprietary technologies,unless the third-party licenses its product rights to us, which it is not required to do;
●if a license is available from a third-party, we may have to pay substantial royalties, upfront fees and other amounts, and/or grantcross-licenses to intellectual property rights for our products and any license that is available may be non-exclusive, which could resultin our competitors gaining access to the same intellectual property; and
●redesigning our product candidates or processes so they do not infringe, which may not be possible or may require substantial monetaryexpenditures and time.
Someof our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation more effectively than we can because they have substantiallygreater resources. In addition, any uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation could have a materialadverse effect on our ability to raise the funds necessary to continue our operations or could otherwise have a material adverse effecton our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discoveryrequired in connection with intellectual property litigation or administrative proceedings, there is a risk that some of our confidentialinformation could be compromised by disclosure.
| 58 |
Ourcollaborators may assert ownership or commercial rights to inventions they develop from research we support or that we develop from ouruse of the tissue samples or other biological materials, which they provide to us, or otherwise arising from the collaboration.
Wecollaborate with institutions, universities, medical centers, physicians and researchers in scientific matters and expect to continueto enter into additional collaboration agreements. In certain cases, we do not have written agreements with these collaborators, or thewritten agreements we have do not cover intellectual property rights. Also, we rely on numerous third parties to provide us with tissuesamples and biological materials that we use to conduct our research activities and develop our product candidates. If we cannot successfullynegotiate sufficient ownership and commercial rights to any inventions that result from our use of a third-party collaborator’smaterials, or if disputes arise with respect to the intellectual property developed with the use of a collaborator’s samples, ordata developed in a collaborator’s study, we may be limited in our ability to capitalize on the market potential of these inventionsor developments.
Thirdparties may assert that we are employing their proprietary technology without authorization.
Theremay be third-party patents of which we are currently unaware with claims to compositions of matter, materials, formulations, methodsof manufacture or methods for treatment that encompass the composition, use or manufacture of our product candidates. There may be currentlypending patent applications of which we are currently unaware which may later result in issued patents that our product candidates ortheir use or manufacture may infringe. In addition, third parties may obtain patents in the future and claim that use of our technologiesinfringes upon these patents.
Ifany third-party patent were held by a court of competent jurisdiction to cover our product candidates, intermediates used in the manufactureof our product candidates or our materials generally, aspects of our formulations or methods of use, the holders of any such patent maybe able to block our ability to develop and commercialize the product candidate unless we obtained a license or until such patent expiresor is finally determined to be held invalid or unenforceable. In either case, such a license may not be available on commercially reasonableterms or at all. If we are unable to obtain a necessary license to a third-party patent on commercially reasonable terms, or at all,our ability to commercialize our product candidates may be impaired or delayed, which could in turn significantly harm our business.Even if we obtain a license, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us.In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuadecompanies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future product candidates.
Partiesmaking claims against us may seek and obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability to furtherdevelop and commercialize our product candidates. Defense of these claims, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigationexpense and would be a substantial diversion of employee resources from our business. In the event of a successful claim of infringementagainst us, we may have to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees for willful infringement, obtainone or more licenses from third parties, pay royalties or redesign our infringing products, which may be impossible or require substantialtime and monetary expenditure. We cannot predict whether any such license would be available at all or whether it would be availableon commercially reasonable terms. Furthermore, even in the absence of litigation, we may need to obtain licenses from third parties toadvance our research or allow commercialization of our product candidates. We may fail to obtain any of these licenses at a reasonablecost or on reasonable terms, if at all. In that event, we would be unable to further develop and commercialize our product candidates,which could harm our business significantly.
Thirdparties may assert that our employees or consultants have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information, misappropriated tradesecrets, or are in breach of non-competition or non-solicitation agreements with our competitors.
Asis common in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries, we employ individuals who were previously employed at universities orother biotechnology or biopharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Although no claims against usare currently pending, and although we try to ensure that our employees and consultants do not use the proprietary information or know-howof others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertentlyor otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of a former employeror other third parties. We may also be subject to claims that we caused an employee to breach the terms of their non-competition or non-solicitationagreement, or that we or these individuals have, inadvertently or otherwise, used or disclosed the alleged trade secrets or other proprietaryinformation of a former employer or competitor or other party. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we failin defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel.Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claimsmay cause us to incur significant expenses, and could distract our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities.In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments, and,if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price ofour common stock. This type of litigation or proceeding could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce our resources availablefor development activities. We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings.Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of theirsubstantially greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or otherintellectual property related proceedings could adversely affect our ability to compete in the marketplace.
| 59 |
Wemay not be successful in obtaining or maintaining necessary rights to develop any future product candidates on acceptable terms.
Becauseour programs may involve additional product candidates that may require the use of proprietary rights held by third parties, the growthof our business may depend in part on our ability to acquire, in-license or use these proprietary rights.
Ourproduct candidates may also require specific formulations to work effectively and efficiently and these rights may be held by others.We may develop products containing our compounds and pre-existing biopharmaceutical compounds. We may be unable to acquire or in-licenseany compositions, methods of use, processes or other third-party intellectual property rights from third parties that we identify asnecessary or important to our business operations. We may fail to obtain any of these licenses at a reasonable cost or on reasonableterms, if at all, which would harm our business. We may need to cease use of the compositions or methods covered by such third-partyintellectual property rights, and may need to seek to develop alternative approaches that do not infringe on such intellectual propertyrights which may entail additional costs and development delays, even if we were able to develop such alternatives, which may not befeasible. Even if we are able to obtain a license, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologieslicensed to us. In that event, we may be required to expend significant time and resources to develop or license replacement technology.
Additionally,we sometimes collaborate with academic institutions to accelerate our preclinical research or development under written agreements withthese institutions. In certain cases, these institutions provide us with an option to negotiate a license to any of the institution’srights in technology resulting from the collaboration. Regardless of such option, we may be unable to negotiate a license within thespecified timeframe or under terms that are acceptable to us. If we are unable to do so, the institution may offer the intellectual propertyrights to others, potentially blocking our ability to pursue our program. If we are unable to successfully obtain rights to requiredthird-party intellectual property or to maintain the existing intellectual property rights we have, we may have to abandon developmentof such program and our business and financial condition could suffer.
Thelicensing and acquisition of third-party intellectual property rights is a competitive area, and companies, which may be more established,or have greater resources than we do, may also be pursuing strategies to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rightsthat we may consider necessary or attractive in order to commercialize our product candidates. More established companies may have acompetitive advantage over us due to their size, cash resources and greater clinical development and commercialization capabilities.There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully complete such negotiations and ultimately acquire the rights to the intellectualproperty surrounding the additional product candidates that we may seek to acquire.
Wemay be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or the patents of our licensors, which could be expensive, time-consumingand unsuccessful.
Competitorsmay infringe our patents or the patents of our current or future licensors. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be requiredto file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decidethat one or more of our patents is not valid or is unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology atissue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question or for other reasons. An adverse result in any litigationor defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated, held unenforceable, or interpreted narrowlyand could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing. Defense of these claims, regardless of their merit, would involve substantiallitigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of employee resources from our business.
| 60 |
Wemay choose to challenge the patentability of claims in a third-party’s U.S. patent by requesting that the USPTO review the patentclaims in an ex-parte re-examination, inter partes review or post-grant review proceedings. These proceedings are expensive and may consumeour time or other resources. We may choose to challenge a third-party’s patent in patent opposition proceedings in the EuropeanPatent Office, or EPO, or other foreign patent office. The costs of these opposition proceedings could be substantial, and may consumeour time or other resources. If we fail to obtain a favorable result at the USPTO, EPO or other patent office then we may be exposedto litigation by a third-party alleging that the patent may be infringed by our product candidates or proprietary technologies.
Inaddition, because some patent applications in the United States may be maintained in secrecy until the patents are issued, patent applicationsin the United States and many foreign jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, and publications in thescientific literature often lag behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that others have not filed patent applications for technologycovered by our owned and in-licensed issued patents or our pending applications, or that we or, if applicable, a licensor were the firstto invent the technology. Our competitors may have filed, and may in the future file, patent applications covering our products or technologysimilar to ours. Any such patent application may have priority over our owned and in-licensed patent applications or patents, which couldrequire us to obtain rights to issued patents covering such technologies. If another party has filed a U.S. patent application on inventionssimilar to those owned by or in-licensed to us, we or, in the case of in-licensed technology, the licensor may have to participate inan interference or derivation proceeding declared by the USPTO to determine priority of invention in the United States. If we or oneof our licensors is a party to an interference or derivation proceeding involving a U.S. patent application on inventions owned by orin-licensed to us, we may incur substantial costs, divert management’s time and expend other resources, even if we are successful.
Interferenceor derivation proceedings provoked by third parties or brought by us or declared by the USPTO may be necessary to determine the priorityof inventions with respect to our patents or patent applications or those of our licensors. An unfavorable outcome could result in aloss of our current patent rights and could require us to cease using the related technology or to attempt to license rights to it fromthe prevailing party. Our business could be harmed if the prevailing party does not offer us a license on commercially reasonable termsor at all, or if a non-exclusive license is offered and our competitors gain access to the same technology. Litigation or interferenceproceedings may result in a decision adverse to our interests and, even if we are successful, may result in substantial costs and distractour management and other employees. We may not be able to prevent, alone or with our licensors, misappropriation of our trade secretsor confidential information, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the United States.
Furthermore,because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that someof our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, there could be publicannouncements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceivethese results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock.
Obtainingand maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirementsimposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.
Periodicmaintenance fees on any issued patent are due to be paid to the USPTO and foreign patent agencies in several stages over the lifetimeof the patent. The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary,fee payment and other provisions during the patent application process and following the issuance of a patent. While an inadvertent lapsecan in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations inwhich noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss ofpatent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Noncompliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent applicationinclude, but are not limited to, failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees and failureto properly legalize and submit formal documents. In certain circumstances, even inadvertent noncompliance events may permanently andirrevocably jeopardize patent rights. In such an event, our competitors might be able to enter the market, which would have a materialadverse effect on our business.
| 61 |
Anyissued patents covering our product candidates could be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged in court or the USPTO.
Ifwe or one of our licensors initiate legal proceedings against a third-party to enforce a patent covering one of our product candidates,the defendant could counterclaim that the patent covering our product candidate, as applicable, is invalid and/or unenforceable. In patentlitigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity and/or unenforceability are commonplace, and there are numerousgrounds upon which a third-party can assert invalidity or unenforceability of a patent. Third parties may also raise similar claims beforeadministrative bodies in the United States or abroad, even outside the context of litigation. Such mechanisms include re-examination,inter partes review, post grant review, and equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions (e.g., opposition proceedings). Such proceedingscould result in revocation or amendment to our patents in such a way that they no longer cover our product candidates. The outcome followinglegal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot becertain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we, our patent counsel and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution.If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity and/or unenforceability, or if we are otherwise unable to adequatelyprotect our rights, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on our product candidates. Such a loss ofpatent protection could have a material adverse impact on our business and our ability to commercialize or license our technology andproduct candidates.
Changesin patent law in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our abilityto protect our products.
Changesin either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States could increase the uncertainties and costs surroundingthe prosecution of patent applications and the enforcement or defense of issued patents. Assuming that other requirements for patentabilityare met, prior to March 16, 2013, in the United States, the first to invent the claimed invention was entitled to the patent, while outsidethe United States, the first to file a patent application was entitled to the patent. On March 16, 2013, under the Leahy-Smith AmericaInvents Act, or the America Invents Act, enacted in September 2011, the United States transitioned to a first inventor to file systemin which, assuming that other requirements for patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application will be entitledto the patent on an invention regardless of whether a third party was the first to invent the claimed invention. A third party that filesa patent application in the USPTO on or after March 16, 2013, but before us could therefore be awarded a patent covering an inventionof ours even if we had made the invention before it was made by such third party. This will require us to be cognizant of the time frominvention to filing of a patent application. Since patent applications in the United States and most other countries are confidentialfor a period of time after filing or until issuance, we cannot be certain that we or our licensors were the first to either (i) fileany patent application related to our product candidates or (ii) invent any of the inventions claimed in our or our licensor’spatents or patent applications.
TheAmerica Invents Act also includes a number of significant changes that affect the way patent applications will be prosecuted and alsomay affect patent litigation. These include allowing third party submission of prior art to the USPTO during patent prosecution and additionalprocedures to attack the validity of a patent by USPTO administered post-grant proceedings, including post-grant review, inter partesreview, and derivation proceedings. Because of a lower evidentiary standard in USPTO proceedings compared to the evidentiary standardin United States federal courts necessary to invalidate a patent claim, a third party could potentially provide evidence in a USPTO proceedingsufficient for the USPTO to hold a claim invalid even though the same evidence would be insufficient to invalidate the claim if firstpresented in a district court action. Accordingly, a third party may attempt to use the USPTO procedures to invalidate our patent claimsthat would not have been invalidated if first challenged by the third party as a defendant in a district court action. Therefore, theAmerica Invents Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our owned or in-licensedpatent applications and the enforcement or defense of our owned or in-licensed issued patents, all of which could have a material adverseeffect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
| 62 |
Inaddition, the patent positions of companies in the development and commercialization of biopharmaceuticals are particularly uncertain.Recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings have narrowed the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances and weakened the rightsof patent owners in certain situations. This combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the validity and enforceabilityof patents, once obtained. Depending on future actions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws and regulationsgoverning patents could change in unpredictable ways that could have a material adverse effect on our existing patent portfolio and ourability to protect and enforce our intellectual property in the future.
Wehave limited foreign intellectual property rights and may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.
Wehave limited intellectual property rights outside the United States. Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on product candidatesin all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outsidethe United States can be less extensive than those in the United States. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protectintellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the United States. Consequently, we may not be able to preventthird parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the United States, or from selling or importing products made usingour inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we havenot obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories wherewe have patent protection but where enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These products may compete with our productsin jurisdictions where we do not have any issued patents and our patent claims or other intellectual property rights may not be effectiveor sufficient to prevent them from competing.
Manycompanies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. Thelegal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of, and may require a compulsorylicense to, patents, trade secrets and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biopharmaceutical products,which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing products against third partiesin violation of our proprietary rights generally. The initiation of proceedings by third parties to challenge the scope or validity ofour patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial cost and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects ofour business. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our effortsand attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and ourpatent applications at risk of not issuing and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuitsthat we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforceour intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectualproperty that we develop or license.
Patentterms may be inadequate to protect our competitive position on our product candidates for an adequate amount of time.
Patentshave a limited lifespan. In the United States, if all maintenance fees are timely paid, the natural expiration of a patent is generally20 years from its earliest U.S. non-provisional filing date. Various extensions such as patent term adjustments and/or extensions, maybe available, but the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Even if patents covering our product candidates areobtained, once the patent life has expired, we may be open to competition from competitive products. Given the amount of time requiredfor the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire beforeor shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result, our owned and licensed patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficientrights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours.
| 63 |
Ifwe do not obtain patent term extension and data exclusivity for any product candidates we may develop, our business may be materiallyharmed.
Dependingupon the timing, duration and specifics of any FDA marketing approval of any product candidates we may develop, one or more of our U.S.patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Action of 1984Hatch-Waxman Amendments. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent extension term of up to five years as compensation for patent termlost during the FDA regulatory review process. A patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of14 years from the date of product approval, only one patent may be extended and only those claims covering the approved drug, a methodfor using it, or a method for manufacturing it may be extended. However, we may not be granted an extension because of, for example,failing to exercise due diligence during the testing phase or regulatory review process, failing to apply within applicable deadlines,failing to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents, or otherwise failing to satisfy applicable requirements. Moreover, the applicabletime period or the scope of patent protection afforded could be less than we request. If we are unable to obtain patent term extensionor the term of any such extension is less than we request, our competitors may obtain approval of competing products following our patentexpiration, and our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects could be materially harmed.
Ifour trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then we may not be able to build name recognition in our markets of interestand our business may be adversely affected.
Ourtrademarks or trade names may be challenged, infringed, circumvented or declared generic or determined to be infringing on other marks.We may not be able to protect our rights to these trademarks and trade names or may be forced to stop using these names, which we needfor name recognition by potential partners or customers in our markets of interest. If we are unable to establish name recognition basedon our trademarks and trade names, we may not be able to compete effectively and our business may be adversely affected.
RisksRelated to Ownership of Our Common Stock and this Offering
Wehave insufficient cash to continue our operations for the next 12 months and our continued operations are dependent on us raising capitaland these conditions give rise to substantial doubt over the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Asof March 31, 2025, we had approximately $10.6 million in cash, accumulated deficit of approximately $126.7 million and working capitalof approximately $6.1 million. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2025, and our anticipated expendituresand commitments for the next twelve months, will not enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements forthe twelve months from March 31, 2025. These conditions give rise to substantial doubt over the Company’s ability to continue asa going concern. We will need to raise additional capital to support our operations and execute our business plan. We will be requiredto pursue sources of additional capital through various means, including debt or equity financings. Newly issued securities may includepreferences, superior voting rights, and the issuance of warrants or other convertible securities that will have additional dilutiveeffects. Further, the sale of or the perception of the sale of a substantial number of our common stock by selling securityholders pursuantto a registration statement filed with the SEC will adversely affect the price of our common stock due to our limited trading volume.In addition, the sale of a substantial number of our common stock by such selling securityholders will adversely affect the share pricethat we may obtain in future financings and may adversely affect our ability to conduct and complete future financings. We cannot assurethat additional funds will be available when needed from any source or, if available, will be available on terms that are acceptableto us and may cause existing shareholders both book value and ownership dilution. Further, we may incur substantial costs in pursuingfuture capital and/or financing, including investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting fees, printing and distribution expenses andother costs. We may also be required to recognize non-cash expenses in connection with certain securities we may issue, such as convertiblenotes and warrants, which will adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. Our ability to obtain needed financingmay be impaired by such factors as the weakness of capital markets, and the fact that we have not been profitable, which could impactthe availability and cost of future financings. If the amount of capital we are able to raise from financing activities is not sufficientto satisfy our capital needs, we may have to reduce our operations accordingly.
Wemay not receive any additional funds upon the exercise of the Common Warrants.
EachCommon Warrant may be exercised by way of a cashless exercise if at the time of exercise hereof there is no effective registration statementregistering, or the prospectus contained therein is not available for the issuance of our common stock issuable upon exercise of theCommon Warrants to the holder.
Theprice of our stock may be volatile, which could result in substantial losses for investors. Further, an active, liquid and orderly tradingmarket for our common stock may not be sustained, and we do not know what the market price of our common stock will be, and as a resultit may be difficult for you to sell your shares of our common stock.
Althoughour common stock is listed on the NYSE American, the market for our shares has demonstrated varying levels of trading activity. Furthermore,an active trading market for our shares may not be sustained in the future. You may not be able to sell your shares quickly or at themarket price if trading in shares of our common stock is not active. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capitalby selling shares of our common stock and may impair our ability to enter into strategic partnerships or acquire companies or productsby using shares of our common stock as consideration, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,and results of operations. Further, the trading price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could be subject to widefluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including limited trading volume. In addition, thestock market in general, and biopharmaceutical companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that haveoften been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. Broad market and industry factors may negativelyaffect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In the past, securities class action litigationhas often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities. Thistype of litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, whichcould have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
| 64 |
Ifsecurities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock priceand trading volume could decline.
Thetrading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about usor our business.
Ifone or more of the analysts covering us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, ourstock price may decline. In addition, if one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports onus regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.
Salesand issuances of our common stock or other securities could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our shareholdersand could cause our share price to fall.
Ifwe sell additional shares of common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities, existing shareholders may be materiallydiluted by subsequent sales and new investors could gain rights, preferences, and privileges senior to existing holders of our commonstock. Pursuant to our obligations under certain registration rights agreements, we have registered on registration statements filedwith the SEC 8,732,089 warrants to purchase our common stock and 787,896 common shares. Until such time that they are no longer effective,the registration statements registering such securities will permit the resale of these shares. The resale, or perceived potential resale,of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could adversely affect the market price for our common stockand make it more difficult for other shareholders to sell their holdings at times and prices that they determine are appropriate.
TheSponsor, Metric, the anchor investors and other investors purchased or received as an inducement to facilitate the Business Combinationthe Sponsor Shares that were acquired by the Sponsor, Metric or anchor investors at $0.004 per share price which is significantly belowthe current market price of a share of our common stock and such holder could sell their shares and generate a significant profit whilecausing the trading price of our common stock to decline significantly.
Becausethe Sponsor, Metric, anchor investors and other investors purchased or received their founders shares at a $0.04 per share, significantlybelow the current market price of a share of our common stock, such holder could sell their shares and generate a significant profitwhile causing the trading price of our common stock to decline significantly. Those purchasers of our common stock who acquired theirshares at a price greater than our common stock’s current trading price, may not experience a similar profit or rate of returnrealized by a holder of the founder shares due to the difference in such purchaser’s purchase price and the current trading pricefor our common stock.
Ifwe fail to comply with the continued listing standards of the NYSE American, our common stock could be delisted. If it is delisted, themarket value and the liquidity of our common stock would be impacted.
Thecontinued listing of our common stock on the NYSE American is contingent on our continued compliance with a number of listing standards.The NYSE American retains substantial discretion to, at any time and without notice, suspend dealings in or remove from any securityfrom listing. In order to maintain this listing, we must maintain certain share prices, financial and share distribution targets, includingmaintaining a minimum amount of shareholders’ equity and a minimum number of public shareholders. In addition to these objectivestandards, the NYSE American may delist the securities of any issuer: (i) if, in its opinion, the issuer’s financial conditionand/or operating results appear unsatisfactory; (ii) if it appears that the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market valueof the security has become so reduced as to make continued listing on the NYSE American inadvisable; (iii) if the issuer sells or disposesof principal operating assets or ceases to be an operating company; (iv) if an issuer fails to comply with the NYSE American’slisting requirements; (v) if an issuer’s common stock sells at what the NYSE American considers a “low selling price”and the issuer fails to correct this via a reverse split of shares after notification by the NYSE American; or (vi) if any other eventoccurs or any condition exists which makes continued listing on the NYSE American, in its opinion, inadvisable. There is no assurancethat we will remain in compliance with these standards.
| 65 |
Delistingfrom the NYSE American would adversely affect our ability to raise additional financing through the public or private sale of equitysecurities, significantly affect the ability of investors to trade our securities and negatively affect the value and liquidity of ourcommon stock. Delisting also could limit our strategic alternatives and attractiveness to potential counterparties and have other negativeresults, including the potential loss of employee confidence, decreased analyst coverage of our securities, the loss of institutionalinvestors or interest in business development opportunities. Moreover, we committed in connection with the sale of securities to usecommercially reasonable efforts to maintain the listing of our common stock during such time that certain warrants are outstanding.
Becausethe Trading Price of our Common Stock has decreased, it is unlikely that we will receive any Settlement Amount Under the Forward PurchaseAgreements.
Inconjunction with and as an inducement to accredited investors to invest in a concurrent Series B Financing by Calidi, FLAG and certainaccredited investors (“Sellers”) entered into an OTC Equity Prepaid Forward Transaction (“Forward Purchase Agreements”).This derivative security purchased from the Sellers is based on the value of our common stock to be settled in cash in three years subjectto reset price features and earlier termination as set forth in the Forward Purchase Agreement. The Forward Purchase Agreements and relatedagreements cover up to an aggregate 100,000 shares of our common stock at an initial reset price of $100.00 per share. FLAG and Calidientered into the Forward Purchase Agreements with the Sellers as a condition precedent to the Sellers’ participation in Calidi’sSeries B Financing. On September 12, 2023, the date of and as part of the Business Combination Closing, Sellers received a net 65,948shares of common stock pursuant to the Forward Purchase Agreements and may receive an additional 24,679 shares upon the election of theSellers. Except for the possible issuance of 24,679 shares at the election of the Sellers for no additional consideration, no furthershares will be issued under nor be subject to the Forward Purchase Agreements. Under the terms of the Forward Purchase Agreements, Sellersare obligated to pay us a settlement amount based on the product of 100,000 shares times the reset price of $100.00 per share which issubject to adjustment in the event we conduct an offering or Seller elects an optional early termination at less than the current resetprice. In addition, pursuant to the Forward Purchase Agreement, the settlement amount is subject to a further reduction settlement amountadjustment equal to the number of subject shares times $20.00. Because we need to seek additional financing for our operations at currenttrading prices, which are significantly below the initial $100 per share reset price, such financing at our current trading price willhave the effect of reducing the Forward Purchase Agreement initial $100 reset price, and the settlement amount that we may receive fromthe Sellers, if any. Therefore, in light of our current trading price and after giving further effect to the reduction settlement amountadjustment of $20.00 per share, it is unlikely Sellers will pay and that we will receive any funds in connection with the settlementof the Forward Purchase Agreements.
Ourstockholders are subject to significant dilution upon the occurrence of certain events which could result in a decrease in our stockprice. In addition, certain of our outstanding securities are subject to mandatory conversion and/or exercise price reset.
Asof June 20, 2025, we had approximately 18,518,039 million shares of our common stock reserved or designated for future issuance uponthe exercise of outstanding options or warrants. Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock into the public and the issuanceof the shares reserved for future issuance, in payment of our term debt, and/or in exchange for outstanding warrants will be dilutiveto our existing stockholders and could result in a decrease in our stock price.
Wehave never paid dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently,any gains from an investment in our common stock will likely depend on whether the price of our common stock increases.
Wehave not paid dividends on any of our classes of capital stock to date and we currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any,to fund the development and growth of our business. In addition, the terms of any future indebtedness we may incur could preclude usfrom paying dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your sole source of gain from an investmentin our common stock for the foreseeable future. Consequently, in the foreseeable future, you will likely only experience a gain fromyour investment in our common stock if the price of our common stock increases.
Weare an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act of 2012 and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirementsapplicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.
Weare an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”),and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are not applicable to other public companiesthat are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestationrequirements of section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodicreports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation andstockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stockless attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there maybe a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.
Inaddition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extendedtransition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) for complying withnew or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accountingstandards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We are choosing to take advantage of the extended transitionperiod for complying with new or revised accounting standards.
Wewill remain an “emerging growth company” until the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the dateof the first sale of our common stock pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, although we will losethat status sooner if our revenues exceed $1.07 billion, if we issue more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt in a three year period,or if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last day of our most recentlycompleted second fiscal quarter.
Investorsmay be unable to compare our business with other companies in our industry if they believe that our financial accounting is not as transparentas other companies in our industry. If we are unable to raise additional capital as and when we need it, our financial condition andresults of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Youmay experience future dilution as a result of future equity offerings.
Inorder to raise additional capital, we may in the future offer additional shares of our Common Stock or other securities convertible intoor exchangeable for our Common Stock at prices that may not be the same as the price per share paid by any investor in this offering.We may sell shares or other securities in any other offering at a price per share that is less than the price per share paid by any investorin this offering, and investors purchasing shares or other securities in the future could have rights superior to you. The price pershare at which we sell additional shares of our Common Stock, or securities convertible or exchangeable into shares of Common Stock,in future transactions may be higher or lower than the price per share paid by any investor in this offering.
Managementwill have broad discretion as to the use of any proceeds received pursuant to the exercise of the Common Warrants for cash and we maynot use the proceeds effectively.
Ourmanagement will have broad discretion as to the application of any proceeds received from the Selling Stockholders on the exercise ofthe Warrants and could spend the proceeds in ways that do not necessarily improve our operating results or enhance the value of our CommonStock.
| 66 |
USEOF PROCEEDS
Thisprospectus relates to the resale by the Selling Stockholders of up to 6,355,650 shares of Common Stock. The Selling Stockholders willreceive all of the proceeds from this offering. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale or other disposition of our CommonStock by the Selling Stockholders pursuant to this prospectus. However, we may receive proceeds in the aggregate of up to approximately$4.45 million if all of the warrants in this offering are exercised for cash, based on the exercise price of the warrants. We cannotpredict when, or if, the warrants will be exercised. It is possible that the warrants may expire and may never be exercised for cash.
Weintend to use any proceeds from the exercise of the warrants for general corporate purposes and working capital. We may temporarily investthe net proceeds, if any, in short-term, interest-bearing instruments or other investment-grade securities. We have not determined theamount of net proceeds, if any, to be used specifically for such purposes. As a result, management will retain broad discretion overthe allocation of any net proceeds it receives as a result of the exercise of the warrants.
| 67 |
UNREGISTEREDSALES OF COMMON STOCK
March2025 Public Offering and Concurrent Private Placement and Placement Agent Warrants
OnMarch 28, 2025, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with a single institutional investor, pursuant to which we agreed toissue to the investor, (i) in a registered offering, 3,325,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, at a purchase price of $0.65per share, (ii) pre-funded warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,728,000 shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of $0.649per Pre-funded Warrant and an exercise price of $0.001 per share, and (iii) in a concurrent private placement, Series G common stockpurchase warrants to purchase up to 6,053,000 shares of Common Stock (the “Series G Common Warrants” or the “CommonWarrants”).
TheCommon Warrants are exercisable on the date that is six (6) months from the date of issuance for a term of seven and on-half years fromthe initial exercise date and have an exercise price of $0.6954per share of Common Stock.
Weare registering for resale pursuant to this prospectus, the 6,053,000 shares of Common Stock issuable on exercise of the Series G CommonWarrants, and the 302,650 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to the placement agent warrants. The placement agent warrants wereissued at an exercise price per share equal to $0.8125. The placement agent warrants are exercisable six (6) months from the date ofissuance and expire on the five-year anniversary of the Initial Exercise Date (as defined in the placement agent warrant). The CommonWarrants and the placement agent warrants may be exercisable via “cashless exercise” in certain circumstances.
SELLINGSTOCKHOLDERS
Thisprospectus relates to the resale from time to time of: (i) 6,053,000 shares of Common Stock issuable on the exercise of Series G commonwarrants, exercisable at an exercise price of $0.6954 per share, first exercisable on September 28, 2025 and expiring on March 28, 2033;and (ii) 302,650 shares of Common Stock issued to Ladenburg (or its designees), as placement agent in the public offering placement deal,exercisable at an exercise price of $0.8125 per share, first exercisable on September 28, 2025 and expiring on September 28, 2030; ;pursuant to this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement.
Whenwe refer to the “Selling Stockholders” in this prospectus, we mean the persons listed in the table below, and the pledgees,donees, transferees, assignees, successors, designees and others who later come to hold any of the Selling Stockholders’ interestin the Common Stock other than through a public sale. The following table sets forth, as of June 20, 2025, the names of the Selling Stockholders,and other information regarding the beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,and the rules and regulations thereunder) of the shares of Common Stock held by each of the Selling Stockholders, as of the date of thisprospectus, assuming exercise of all warrants held by each such Selling Stockholder on that date, without regard to any limitations onexercise. The third column lists the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that the Selling Stockholders may offer pursuant to thisprospectus.
Unlessindicated otherwise as set forth in the footnotes below, under the terms of the warrants, a selling stockholder may not exercisethe warrants to the extent such exercise would cause such selling stockholder, together with its affiliates and attribution parties,to beneficially own a number of shares of common stock which would exceed 4.99% of our then outstanding common stock following such exercise(or 9.99% at the election of the Selling Stockholder), excluding for purposes of such determination shares of common stock issuable uponexercise of the warrants which have not been exercised (the “Beneficial Ownership Limitation”). The number of shares in thesecond and fourth columns do not reflect this limitation. The selling stockholders may sell all, some or none of their shares in thisoffering. See “Plan of Distribution.”
| Name of Selling Stockholder | Number of securities Owned Prior to Offering | Maximum Number of shares of Common Stock to be Sold Pursuant to this Prospectus | Number of shares of Common Stock Owned After Offering | |||||||||
| Armistice Capital Master Fund Ltd. (1) | 8,403,000 | (2) | 6,053,000 | (3) | 0 | |||||||
| Ladenburg Thalmann & Co, Inc. (4) | 1,006,521 | (5) | 302,650 | (6) | 0 | |||||||
| (1) | The securities are directly held by Armistice Capital Master Fund Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Master Fund”), and may be deemed to be beneficially owned by: (i) Armistice Capital, LLC (“Armistice Capital”), as the investment manager of the Master Fund; and (ii) Steven Boyd, as the Managing Member of Armistice Capital. The warrants are subject to a beneficial ownership limitation of 4.99%, which such limitation restricts the Selling Stockholder from exercising that portion of the warrants that would result in the Selling Stockholder and its affiliates owning, after exercise, a number of shares of common stock in excess of the beneficial ownership limitation. The address of Armistice Capital Master Fund Ltd. is c/o Armistice Capital, LLC, 510 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022. |
| (2) | Includes (i) up to 6,053,000 shares of Common Stock issuable on the exercise of the Series G Common Warrants being registered pursuant to this resale prospectus, (ii) up to 550,000 shares of Common Stock issuable on exercise of the Series E Common Warrants, (iii) up to 550,000 shares of Common Stock issuable on exercise of the Series F Common Warrants, (iii) up to 500,000 shares of Common Stock issuable on exercise of the Series D Warrants (iv) 250,000 shares of Common Stock underlying the Series A Common Stock Warrants, (v) 250,000 shares of Common Stock underlying the Series B-1 Common Stock Warrants, and (iii) 250,000 shares of Common Stock underlying the Series C-1 Common Stock Warrants. The respective warrants are subject to certain beneficial ownership limitations that prohibit the Master Fund from exercising any portion of the warrants if, following such exercise, the Master Fund’s ownership of our common stock would exceed the relevant warrant’s ownership limitation. |
| (3) | The number of shares comprise (i) up to 6,053,000 shares of Common Stock issuable on exercise of the Series G Common Warrants, at an exercise price of $0.6954. The warrants are subject to certain beneficial ownership limitations that prohibit the Master Fund from exercising any portion of the warrants if, following such exercise, the Master Fund’s ownership of our common stock would exceed the relevant warrant’s ownership limitation. |
| (4) | Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. is a registered broker dealer with a registered address 640 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10019, and has sole voting and dispositive power over the securities held. |
| (5) | Includes up to 302,650 shares of Common Stock issuable on exercise of the placement agent warrants being registered pursuant to this resale prospectus, and up to 703,871 shares of Common Stock issuable on exercise of the other placement agent warrants issued to Ladenburg for services rendered as placement agent to us. |
| (6) | The shares of Common Stock to be offered pursuant to this prospectus includes 302,650 shares of Common Stock underlying the Placement Agent Warrants issued in the March 2025 financing by the Company, wherein Ladenburg acted as the placement agent. |
| 68 |
MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIALCONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Thefollowing discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidatedfinancial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion and analysis of our financial conditionand results of operations and other parts of this prospectus contain forward-looking statements based upon current beliefs that involverisks, uncertainties and assumptions, such as statements regarding our plans, objectives, expectations, intentions and projections. Ouractual results and the timing of selected events could differ materially from those described in or implied by these forward-lookingstatements as a result of several factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus.You should carefully read the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus to gain an understanding of the important factorsthat could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward- looking statements. Please also see the section entitled “SpecialNote Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
CompanyOverview
Overview
Weare a clinical stage biotechnology company that is developing genetic medicines and proprietary genetically-engineered oncolytic viruses.
Weare currently developing RedTail, an enveloped vaccinia virus platform designed to deliver genetic medicine to tumor sites, and two proprietarystem cell-based oncolytic virus platforms (SuperNova and NeuroNova). The RedTail platform is expected to commence a Phase I trial bythe end of 2026 with the first compound (CLD-401) delivering IL-15 superagonist to the tumor microenvironment (“TME”).
OurRedTail platform is the culmination of a over a decade of work around genetic engineering of viruses and allows for the systemic administrationof a proprietarily-modified oncolytic virus that can:
| ● | Survive in circulation and hone to metastatic tumor sites | |
| ● | Induce cell kill tumor cells and immune priming in the TME | |
| ● | Deliver genetic medicine payloads like IL-15 superagonist for expression in the TME |
OurSuperNova and NeuroNova platforms are designed to:
| ● | Protect oncolytic viruses from neutralizing antibodies and complement inactivation and innate immune cell inactivation; | |
| ● | Enhance oncolytic viral amplification inside the allogeneic cells; and | |
| ● | Modify the TME to allow improvements in cell targeting and viral amplification at the tumor site. |
Oncolyticviruses have been pursued as therapeutic platforms in oncology because of their ability to preferentially infect and replicate withincancer cells, resulting in both direct lysis of the tumor cells as well as activation of an antitumor immune response, while leavingnormal, healthy cells unharmed. Despite the promises of oncolytic viruses, a major obstacle against their therapeutic use has been theirrapid elimination by the patient’s immune system; this has meant that oncolytic viruses have been largely relegated to being usedfor local delivery to tumors but have not been successful in patients with extensive metastatic disease. The only approved oncolyticvirus therapy is T-VEC (Imlygic®), a modified herpes simplex virus (HSV) for the treatment of patients with melanoma given intratumorally.
Wehave been working on protecting oncolytic viruses from immune clearance for over a decade. Our NeuroNova investigational drug candidateis currently in a Phase 1 trial being run by our partner, City of Hope, in an investigator-initiated trial and we have an open IND fora Phase 1 trial for our SuperNova investigational drug candidate. The platforms used in NeuroNova and SuperNova use oncolytic virusesembedded in stem cells to avoid immune clearance and facilitate initial viral amplification and expansion at the tumor sites. This approachhas shown substantial benefit over unprotected virus in preclinical studies of intratumoral delivery, but stem cell encapsulation doesnot allow for systemic delivery of virus to tumor metastases in animal models. The size of the stem cells prohibited efficient disseminationinto metastatic sites.
Morerecently, we used the learnings from NeuroNova and SuperNova to create RedTail, a novel oncolytic viral platform for systemic delivery.The virus used in RedTail has been proprietarily engineered to avoid immune clearance and to specifically replicate in tumor tissue wherethe virus also has the ability to deliver genetic medicines to the tumor microenvironment. RedTail utilizes a proprietary form of envelopedvirus with genetic modifications to avoid immune clearance. Because the virus is not encapsulated in stem cells, it is thousands of timessmaller than the NeuroNova or SuperNova products and disseminates efficiently into metastatic sites in syngeneic animal models. In addition,the virus can be engineered to express genetic medicines while replicating in the tumor.
CLD-401,the first lead derived from the RedTail platform, expresses IL-15 superagonist at high concentrations in the tumor microenvironment.In animal models, CLD-401 can be given systemically and clear metastatic sites in syngeneic tumor mouse models. The combination of theRedTail virus with its genetic payload drives complete tumor eradication in the tumor models compared to the RedTail virus alone. Webelieve that RedTail, given its systemic administration and targeting to metastatic sites and its delivery of genetic medicines, representsa major advancement in the space of oncolytic virus in oncology.
| 69 |
Sinceinception, our operations have focused on organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, acquiring and developingour technology, establishing our intellectual property portfolio, identifying potential product candidates and undertaking preclinicalstudies and manufacturing. We do not have any products approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. We havefunded our operations primarily through private sales of common stock, convertible promissory notes, term debt, and the issuance of publiclytraded securities. These investments have included and have been made by various related parties, including our former chief executiveofficer and former chairman of the Board of Directors.
Sinceinception, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net loss was $5.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Asof March 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $126.7 million. We expect to continue to incur significant and increasing expensesand operating losses for the foreseeable future, as we advance our current and future product candidates through preclinical and clinicaldevelopment, manufacture drug product and drug supply, seek regulatory approval for our current and future product candidates, maintainand expand our intellectual property portfolio, hire additional research and development and business personnel and operate as a publiccompany.
Changesin economic conditions, including rising interest rates, public health issues, lower consumer confidence, volatile equity capital marketsand ongoing supply chain disruptions and the impacts of geopolitical conflicts, may also affect our business.
Wewill not generate revenue from product sales unless and until we successfully complete clinical development and obtain regulatory approvalfor our product candidates. In addition, if we obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates and do not enter into a third-partycommercialization partnership, we expect to incur significant expenses related to developing our commercialization capability to supportproduct sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution activities.
Asa result, we will need substantial additional funding to support our continuing operations and pursue our growth strategy. Until we cangenerate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through a combination of public or privateequity offerings and debt financings or other sources, such as potential collaboration agreements, strategic alliances and licensingarrangements. We may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such other agreements or arrangements when needed on acceptableterms, or at all. Our inability to raise capital or enter into such agreements as, and when needed, could have a material adverse effecton our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Basedon our operating plan, we believe we do not have sufficient cash on hand to support current operations for at least one year from thedate of issuance of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of, and for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Wehave concluded that this circumstance raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. See Note 1 to our unauditedcondensed consolidated financial statements. In addition, we will be required to raise additional capital through the issuance of ourequity securities to support our operations which will have an ownership and economic dilutive effect to our current shareholders whopurchased their shares of common stock at prices above our current trading price, and such capital raising may adversely affect the priceof our common stock. Further, the sale of or the perception of a sale of a substantial number of our common stock by certain sellingsecurityholders pursuant to another registration statement filed with the SEC will adversely affect the price of our common stock dueto our limited trading volume and adversely affect the share price that we may obtain in future financings and may adversely affect ourability to conduct and complete future financings.
Foradditional discussion on our liquidity, see the section below and further disclosures in the section titled “Liquidity and CapitalResources” included herein.
| 70 |
RecentDevelopments
OnApril 17, 2025, Allan Camaisa notified the Board of Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) of his resignation as theCompany’s Chief Executive Officer and as Chairman of the Board and from all his positions with the Companies subsidiaries (exceptNova Cell, Inc.), effective April 21, 2025, subject to finalization of the terms of the General Release of Claims and Transition Agreement,which agreement was fully-executed on April 22, 2025. Mr. Camaisa will continue to serve as a Class III director of the Company, andhas assumed the title of “CEO Emeritus”. Mr. Camaisa would also continue to serve as a director on the board of directorsof our subsidiary Nova Cell, Inc. Mr. Camaisa’s resignation was not the result of any disagreement with the Company or its Boardor any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies, or practices.
OnApril 22, 2025, the Company executed a General Release of Claims and Transition Agreement (“Release Agreement”) with Mr.Camaisa. The Release Agreement contains customary protections, including a general release of claims by Mr. Camaisa in favor of the Companyand certain other related parties. Pursuant to the terms of the Release Agreement, the Company is obligated to pay Mr. Camaisa $500,000separation pay in the form of compensation continuation over 12 months pursuant to the Company’s regular and customary payrollschedule, less all regular and customary payroll withholdings and shall also be liable to pay Mr. Camaisa’s COBRA premiums for12 months, commencing May 2025, upon timely election. Mr. Camaisa is also entitled to receive a transition/ consulting pay of $10,000per month during the transition period, and may also be entitled to incentive payments for opportunities that Mr. Camaisa has developed,as more specifically described in the Release Agreement. Such incentive will be calculated and paid based on revenues, capital, or moniesactually received by the Company on or before December 31, 2026. No incentive will be earned or paid for revenues, capital, or moniesthat are received by the Company after that date. Mr. Camaisa will not receive compensation as a member of the Board during the periodthat he receives consideration pursuant to the Release Agreement.
OnApril 17, 2025, the Board, by a unanimous vote, appointed Eric Poma, Ph.D. to serve as CEO of the Company, effective April 22, 2025.In addition, on April 22, 2025, the Board, upon recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, appointedDr. Poma to serve as a Class I director of the Company, also effective April 22, 2025, with a term expiring at the annual meeting ofstockholders to be held in 2027.
OnApril 22, 2025, the Board appointed James Schoeneck as chairman of the Board, effective April 22, 2025, to serve until his successoris duly elected and qualified, or until his earlier resignation or removal. As previously disclosed, Mr. Schoeneck has served on theBoard since September 12, 2023.
OnJune 11, 2025, the Board accepted the resignation of Mr. Camaisa as the sole director and officer of Nova Cell, and approved the appointmentof Dr. Poma as the sole director and officer of Nova Cell.
| 71 |
Componentsof Operating Results
Researchand Development Expenses
Researchand development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred for our research and development activities, including our product candidatediscovery efforts, preclinical studies and clinical trials under our research programs, which include:
| ● | personnel and related expenses, including salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense for our research and development personnel; | |
| ● | costs of funding research performed by third parties that conduct research and development and preclinical and clinical activities on our behalf; | |
| ● | costs of manufacturing drug product and drug supply related to our current or future product candidates; |
| ● | costs of conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates; |
| ● | consulting and professional fees related to research and development activities, including equity-based compensation to non-employees; | |
| ● | costs of maintaining our laboratory, including purchasing laboratory supplies and non-capital equipment used in our preclinical studies; | |
| ● | costs related to compliance with clinical regulatory requirements; | |
| ● | facility costs and other allocated expenses, which include expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities, insurance, depreciation and other supplies; and | |
| ● | fees for maintaining licenses and other amounts due under our third-party licensing agreements. |
Researchand development costs are expensed as incurred. Costs for certain activities are recognized based on an evaluation of the progress tocompletion of specific tasks using data such as information provided to us by our vendors and analyzing the progress of our preclinicaland clinical studies or other services performed. Significant judgment and estimates are made in determining the accrued expense balancesat the end of any reporting period.
Wetrack external research and development costs on a program-by-program basis beginning, with respect to each program, upon our internalnomination of a candidate in that program for further preclinical and clinical development. External costs include fees paid to consultants,contractors and vendors, including contract manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”), and clinical research organizations (“CROs”),in connection with our preclinical, clinical and manufacturing activities and license milestone payments related to candidate development.
| 72 |
Thesuccessful development of our product candidates is highly uncertain. We cannot reasonably estimate or know the nature, timing, and estimatedcosts of the efforts that will be necessary to complete development of our current or future product candidates. We are also unable topredict when, if ever, material net cash inflows will commence from the sale of our product candidates, if they are approved. This isdue to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing product candidates, including the uncertainty of:
| ● | the scope, rate of progress, and expenses of our ongoing research activities as well as any preclinical studies and clinical trials and other research and development activities; | |
| ● | establishing an appropriate safety profile; | |
| ● | successful enrollment in and completion of clinical trials; | |
| ● | whether our product candidates show safety and efficacy in our clinical trials; | |
| ● | receipt of marketing approvals from applicable regulatory authorities; | |
| ● | establishing commercial manufacturing capabilities or making arrangements with third-party manufacturers; | |
| ● | obtaining and maintaining patent and trade secret protection and regulatory exclusivity for our product candidates; | |
| ● | commercializing product candidates, if and when approved, whether alone or in collaboration with others; and | |
| ● | continued acceptable safety profile of the products following any regulatory approval. |
Achange in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of our current and future product candidates would significantlychange the costs and timing associated with the development of those product candidates.
Researchand development activities are central to our business model. Product candidates in later stages of clinical development generally havehigher development costs than those in earlier stages of clinical development, primarily due to the increased size and duration of later-stageclinical trials. We expect research and development costs to increase significantly for the foreseeable future as we commence clinicaltrials and continue the development of our current and future product candidates. However, we do not believe that it is possible at thistime to accurately project expenses through commercialization. There are numerous factors associated with the successful commercializationof any of our product candidates, including future trial design and various regulatory requirements, many of which cannot be determinedwith accuracy at this time based on our stage of development. Additionally, future commercial and regulatory factors beyond our controlwill impact our clinical development programs and plans.
Generaland Administrative Expenses
Generaland administrative expenses include salaries and other compensation-related costs, including stock-based compensation, for personnelin executive, finance and accounting, business development, operations and administrative roles. Other significant costs include professionalservice and consulting fees including legal fees relating to intellectual property and corporate matters, accounting fees, recruitingcosts and costs for consultants utilized to supplement our personnel, insurance costs, travel costs, facility and office-related costsnot included in research and development expenses and depreciation and amortization.
Weanticipate that our general and administrative expenses will increase in the future as our business expands to support expected growthin research and development activities, including our future clinical programs. These increases will likely include increased costs relatedto the hiring of additional personnel and fees to outside service providers, among other expenses. We also anticipate increased expensesassociated with being a public company, including costs for audit, legal, regulatory and tax-related services related to compliance withthe rules and regulations of the SEC, and listing standards applicable to companies listed on a national securities exchange, directorand officer insurance premiums, and investor relations costs. In addition, if we obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidatesand do not enter into a third-party commercialization collaboration, we expect to incur significant expenses related to building a salesand marketing team to support product sales, marketing and distribution activities.
| 73 |
OtherIncome (Expenses), Net
Otherincome (expenses), net, primarily includes the changes in fair value of warrants and derivatives. The changes in the fair value of theseinstruments are recorded in change in fair value of other liabilities and derivatives, and change in fair value of other liabilitiesand derivatives – related party, included as a component of other income (expenses), net, in the unaudited condensed consolidatedstatements of operations.
Interestexpense primarily consists of amortization of discounts on term notes, including from related parties, and other interest expense incurredfrom financing leases and other obligations.
Otherincome also includes grant income generated from a grant awarded to us by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (“CIRM”)in December 2022. Proceeds from the CIRM grant are recognized over the period necessary to match the related research and developmentexpenses when it is probable that we have complied with the CIRM conditions and will receive the proceeds pursuant to the milestonesdefined in the grant as reimbursement of those expenditures. Any CIRM grant proceeds received in advance of having incurred the relatedresearch and development expenses are recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and recognized as grant income on ourunaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations when the related research and developments expenses are incurred.
IncomeTaxes
Sinceinception, we have incurred net operating losses primarily for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes and have not reflected anybenefit of such net operating loss carryforwards for any periods presented in this prospectus. The income tax provision in the periodspresented is entirely attributable to amounts recorded from StemVac operations, our wholly-owned German subsidiary that provides researchand development services to us under a cost-plus development agreement.
Resultsof Operations
Comparisonof Three Months Ended March 31, 2025 and 2024
Thefollowing table summarizes our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
| Research and development | $ | (2,425 | ) | $ | (2,743 | ) | $ | 318 | (12 | )% | ||||||
| General and administrative | (2,637 | ) | (4,009 | ) | 1,372 | (34 | )% | |||||||||
| Total operating expenses | (5,062 | ) | (6,752 | ) | 1,690 | (25 | )% | |||||||||
| Loss from operations | (5,062 | ) | (6,752 | ) | 1,690 | (25 | )% | |||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | ||||||||||||||||
| Total other income (expenses), net | 3 | (469 | ) | 472 | (101 | )% | ||||||||||
| Loss before income taxes | (5,059 | ) | (7,221 | ) | 2,162 | (30 | )% | |||||||||
| Income tax provision | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | 1 | (25 | )% | |||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (5,062 | ) | $ | (7,225 | ) | $ | 2,163 | (30 | )% | ||||||
| 74 |
Researchand Development Expenses
Researchand development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 were $2.4 million and $2.7 million, respectively. The $0.3million decrease was primarily attributable to decrease in salaries and benefits of $0.3 million, and drug manufacturing and preclinicalof $0.3 million, partially offset by an increase in consulting costs of $0.2 million, and other expenses of $0.1 million.
Generaland Administrative Expenses
Generaland administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 were $2.6 million and $4.0 million, respectively. The$1.4 million decrease was primarily due to decreases in salaries and benefits of $0.5 million arising from lower stock-based compensationexpenses, decrease in headcount and lower separation costs, legal and settlement expenses of $0.5 million, insurance costs of $0.2 million,consulting and directors’ expenses of $0.1 million, and certain other public company expenses of $0.1 million.
OtherIncome (Expense), Net
Otherincome (expense), net for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 were $3,000 other income and $0.5 million other expense, respectively.The $0.5 million increase in net other income is primarily due to a decrease in interest expense of $0.2 million, the net change in fairvalue in Forward Purchase Agreement Derivative Asset, Public Warrants, and Private Placement Warrants of $0.2 million, and a decreasein grant income of $0.1 million.
Comparisonof Year Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023
Thefollowing table summarizes our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
| Research and development | $ | (8,878 | ) | $ | (13,008 | ) | $ | 4,130 | (32 | )% | ||||||
| General and administrative | (12,898 | ) | (15,984 | ) | 3,086 | (19 | )% | |||||||||
| Total operating expenses | (21,776 | ) | (28,992 | ) | 7,216 | (25 | )% | |||||||||
| Loss from operations | (21,776 | ) | (28,992 | ) | 7,216 | (25 | )% | |||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | ||||||||||||||||
| Total other income (expenses), net | (419 | ) | (208 | ) | (211 | ) | 101 | % | ||||||||
| Loss before income taxes | (22,195 | ) | (29,200 | ) | 7,005 | (24 | )% | |||||||||
| Income tax provision | (14 | ) | (16 | ) | 2 | (13 | )% | |||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (22,209 | ) | $ | (29,216 | ) | $ | 7,007 | (24 | )% | ||||||
Researchand Development Expenses
Researchand development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024, and 2023 were $8.9 million and $13.0 million, respectively. The $4.1 milliondecrease was primarily attributable to decrease in drug manufacturing and preclinical studies of $3.4 million, salaries and benefitsof $0.3 million, lab supplies of $0.2 million, consulting costs of $0.1 million, and other expenses of $0.1 million.
Generaland Administrative Expenses
Generaland administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were $12.9 million and $16.0 million, respectively. The $3.1million decrease was primarily due to decreases in compensation of $3.0 million arising from lower share based compensation expenses,decrease in headcount and lower separation costs, legal and settlement expenses of $0.9 million, consulting and directors’ expensesof $0.4 million, and other expenses of $0.3 million, partially offset by increases in insurance costs of $0.9 million, marketing andadvertising expenses of $0.3 million, and certain other public company expenses of $0.3 million.
| 75 |
OtherIncome (Expense), Net
Otherincome (expense), net for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were $0.4 million and $0.2 million other expense, respectively. The$0.2 million increase in net expenses primarily relates to a decrease in grant income from CIRM of $2.7 million and the net change infair value of Forward Purchase Agreement Derivative Asset, Public Warrants, and Private Placement Warrants of $0.8 million, partiallyoffset by decreases in Series B Convertible Preferred Stock financing costs of $2.7 million, debt extinguishment losses of $0.5 million,and interest expense of $0.1 million.
Liquidityand Capital Resources
Sourcesof Liquidity
Sinceinception, we have funded our operations primarily through private sales of common stock, promissory notes, term debt, and the issuanceof publicly traded securities. Certain of these investments were made by and included various related parties.
Asof March 31, 2025, we had a cash balance of $10.6 million and restricted cash of $0.2 million. Our debt and liability obligations asof March 31, 2025 include $3.0 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities, including related partyamounts, $2.8 million in operating lease liabilities, $1.1 million in related party term notes payable, $0.6 million in promissory notes,$0.2 million in finance lease liabilities, and $0.1 million in warrant liabilities, including related party amounts.
Financingand Financing-Related Transactions During the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
January2025 Public Offering
OnJanuary 9, 2025, Calidi entered into a Placement Agency Agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. (“Ladenburg”), pursuantto which Calidi agreed to issue and sell in a public offering 5,000,000 shares of Calidi’s common stock (the “Shares”),par value $0.0001 per share, at a purchase price of $0.85 per Share. The closing of the offering took place on January 10, 2025. Thegross proceeds from the offering were $4.3 million, before deducting placement agent fees and other offering expenses payable by Calidiand excluding the net proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the placement agent warrants . The common stock shares were offeredby Calidi pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3, which was declared effective by the Securities Exchange Commissionon October 10, 2024.
ShelfRegistration Statement
OnJanuary 10, 2025, Calidi filed a Form S-3 shelf registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, which was declared effectiveby the SEC on February 7, 2025, providing for the public offer and sale of up to $25.0 million of Calidi’s shares of common stock.
Terminationof Standby Equity Purchase Agreement
OnDecember 10, 2023, we entered into a Standby Equity Purchase Agreement (the “SEPA”) with YA II PN, Ltd., a Cayman Islandexempt limited partnership (“Yorkville”). Pursuant to the SEPA, we will have the right, but not the obligation, to sell toYorkville up to $25.0 million of its shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at our request any time during the 36 monthsfollowing the execution of the SEPA.
OnJanuary 23, 2025, Calidi delivered to Yorkville, a Notice of Termination of the SEPA, as required under Section 10.01(b) of the SEPA,which notifies Yorkville of Calidi’s election to terminate the SEPA. Termination of the SEPA became effective as of January 23,2025, as mutually agreed by Calidi and Yorkville.
Atthe time of the termination, there were no outstanding borrowings, advance notices or shares of common stock to be issued under the SEPA.In addition, there are no fees due by Calidi or Yorkville in connection with the termination of the SEPA.
| 76 |
Increasein Maximum Aggregate Offering Amount under the At The Market Offering Agreement
OnFebruary 4, 2025, Calidi increased the maximum aggregate offering amount of the shares of Calidi’s common stock, par value $0.0001per share issuable under the At The Market Offering Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc.,dated October 11, 2024, from $5.1 million to $11.2 million and filed a prospectus supplement (the “Current Prospectus Supplement”)under the Sales Agreement for an aggregate of $6.1 million. Prior to February 4, 2025, Calidi sold shares of common stock having an aggregatesales price of approximately $5.0 million under the Sales Agreement, including $3.2 million in 2024. During the period ended March 31,2025, Calidi sold 2,682,911 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $2.9 million under the Sales Agreement.
March2025 Registered Direct Offering and Concurrent Private Placement
OnMarch 28, 2025, Calidi entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with a single institutional investor (the “Purchaser”),pursuant to which Calidi issued to the Purchaser, (i) in a registered offering, 3,325,000 shares of Calidi common stock, at a purchaseprice of $0.65 per share, and at the election of the investor, in lieu of the common stock, pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 2,728,000shares of common stock at a price of $0.649 per pre-funded warrant, which represents the per share offering price for the common stockless the $0.001 per share exercise price for each such pre-funded warrant, and (ii) in a concurrent private placement, Series G commonstock purchase warrants to purchase up to 6,053,000 shares of common stock (the “Series G Common Warrants”).
ThePre-funded Warrants are exercisable immediately at an exercise price of $0.001 per share, and shall remain valid and exercisable untilall the Pre-funded Warrants are exercised in full. The Series G Common Warrants have an exercise price of $0.6954 per share, will beexercisable six months following the date of issuance, and will have a term of seven and one-half years from the date of exercisability.Such registered direct offering and concurrent private placement are referred to herein as the “Transactions.” Ladenburgacted as the placement agent. The securities issued in these Transactions do not contain any variable or priced based resets.
Theclosing of the Transactions took place on March 31, 2025. The gross proceeds from the Transactions were approximately $3.9 million beforededucting placement agent fees and other offering expenses payable by Calidi.
DebtObligations
Calidi’soutstanding debt obligations as of March 31, 2025, including related party components, are as follows (in thousands):
| March 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||
Unpaid Balance | Accrued Interest | Net Carrying Value | ||||||||||
| Term notes payable | $ | 750 | $ | 382 | $ | 1,132 | ||||||
| Promissory note | 600 | 23 | 623 | |||||||||
| Total debt | $ | 1,350 | $ | 405 | $ | 1,755 | ||||||
| Less: current portion of long-term debt | (1,155 | ) | ||||||||||
| Long-term debt, net of current portion | $ | 600 | ||||||||||
| 77 |
Warrants
Asof March 31, 2025, Calidi had outstanding warrants to purchase 20,256,808 shares of Common Stock, consisting of the following:
March31, 2025 | ||||
| Private Warrants to purchase Common Stock | 191,217 | |||
| Public Warrants to purchase Common Stock | 1,150,000 | |||
| Warrants to purchase Restricted Shares | 640,000 | |||
| Placement Agent Warrants to purchase Common Stock | 1,006,521 | |||
| Series A Warrants to purchase Common Stock | 1,051,635 | |||
| Series B Warrants to purchase Common Stock | 689,335 | |||
| Series B-1 Warrants to purchase Common Stock | 762,300 | |||
| Series C-1 Warrants to purchase Common Stock | 815,000 | |||
| Series D Warrants to purchase Common Stock | 1,069,800 | |||
| Series E Warrants to purchase Common Stock | 2,050,000 | |||
| Series F Warrants to purchase Common Stock | 2,050,000 | |||
| Series G Warrants to purchase Common Stock | 6,053,000 | |||
| Pre-Funded Series G Warrants to purchase Common Stock | 2,728,000 | |||
| 20,256,808 | ||||
Commitmentsand Contingencies
OnOctober 10, 2022, Calidi entered into an Office Lease Agreement (the “San Diego Lease”) that will serve as Calidi’sprincipal executive and administrative offices and laboratory facility. To secure and execute the San Diego Lease, Mr. Allan Camaisa,former Chief Executive Officer of Calidi, provided a personal Guaranty of Lease of up to $0.9 million (the “Guaranty”) tothe lessor for Calidi’s future performance under the San Diego Lease agreement. As consideration for the Guaranty, Calidi agreedto pay Mr. Camaisa 10% of the Guaranty amount for the first year of the San Diego Lease, and 5% per annum of the Guaranty amount thereafterthrough the life of the lease, with all amounts accrued and payable at the termination of the San Diego Lease or release of Mr. Camaisafrom the Guaranty by the lessor, whichever occurs first. The San Diego Lease has an initial term of 4 years.
Wefurther entered into separate license agreements with Northwestern University and City of Hope and the University of Chicago, whereinCalidi may be liable to make certain contingent payments pursuant to the terms and conditions of the license agreements. As of March31, 2025, we do not believe it probable that we will make these payments.
Othercommitments and contingencies include various operating and financing leases for equipment, office facilities, and other property containingfuture minimum lease payments totaling $3.3 million and, certain manufacturing and other supplier agreements with vendors principallyfor manufacturing drug products for clinical trials and continuing the development of the CLD-101, CLD-201 programs totaling $0.6 million.
RelatedParty Transactions
Pleasesee Note 6 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for more information on our related party transactions, includedelse where in this prospectus.
CashFlow Summary for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024
Thefollowing table shows a summary of our cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
| Net cash (used in) provided by: | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating activities | $ | (7,131 | ) | $ | (3,831 | ) | $ | (3,300 | ) | 86 | % | |||||
| Investing activities | (7 | ) | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | 40 | % | ||||||||
| Financing activities | 8,108 | 3,013 | 5,095 | 169 | % | |||||||||||
| Effect of exchange rate on cash | — | 17 | (17 | ) | (100 | )% | ||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and restricted cash | $ | 970 | $ | (806 | ) | $ | 1,776 | (220 | )% | |||||||
| 78 |
Operatingactivities
Netcash used in operating activities was $7.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily resulting from our net loss of$5.1 million. Our net loss was reduced by certain non-cash items that included $0.6 million in stock-based compensation, $0.3 millionin amortization of right of use assets, and $0.1 million in depreciation expense, partially offset by an increase of $3.0 million fromthe change in our operating assets and liabilities.
Netcash used in operating activities was $3.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024, primarily resulting from our net loss of$7.2 million. Our net loss was reduced by certain non-cash items that included $0.9 million in stock-based compensation, $0.3 millionin amortization of right of use assets, $0.2 million in change in fair value of debt and other liabilities, and $0.1 million in depreciationexpense, partially offset by an increase of $1.9 million from the change in our operating assets and liabilities.
Investingactivities
Netcash used in investing activities was $7,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2025, which primarily related to the purchase of certainmachinery and equipment.
Netcash used in investing activities was $5,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2024, which primarily related to the purchase of certainmachinery and equipment.
Financingactivities
Netcash provided by financing activities was $8.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, which primarily related to proceedsfrom the January Confidentially Marketed Public Offering of $3.8 million, proceeds from the March Registered Direct Offering and ConcurrentPrivate Placement of $3.5 million, and proceeds from the At the Market Offering of $2.8 million, partially offset by repayment of termnotes payable of $1.5 million, including related party amounts, payment of financing costs of $0.3 million, and repayment of bridge loanpayable of $0.2 million.
Netcash provided by financing activities was $3.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024, which primarily related to proceedsfrom issuance of convertible notes payable of $3.0 million, and related party proceeds from issuance of a bridge loan payable of $0.2million, partially offset by payment of financing costs of $0.2 million.
FundingRequirements
Weexpect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we continue our research and development,initiate clinical trials, and seek marketing approval for our current and any of our future product candidates. In addition, if we obtainmarketing approval for any of our current or our future product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expensesrelated to product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution, which costs we may seek to offset through entry into collaborationagreements with third parties. Furthermore, we expect to continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company.Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable toraise capital when needed or on acceptable terms, we would be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programsor future commercialization efforts.
Basedon our current operating plan, available cash and additional access to capital discussed above under the “Liquidity and CapitalResources” section, we believe we do not have sufficient cash on hand to support current operations for at least one year fromthe date of issuance of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2025appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. Assuming that we receive net proceeds of approximately $ million from this offering (assumingno exercise of the over-allotment option), we believe that the net proceeds from this offering, together with our existing cash and cashequivalents, will meet our capital needs for the next [ ] months under our current business plan. To finance our operations, we willneed to raise substantial additional capital, which cannot be assured. We have concluded that this circumstance raises substantial doubtabout our ability to continue as a going concern for at least one year from the date that our aforementioned unaudited condensed consolidatedfinancial statements were issued. See Note 1 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in thisprospecus for additional information on our assessment.
| 79 |
Ourfuture capital requirements will depend on a number of factors, including:
| ● | the costs of conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials; | |
| ● | the costs of manufacturing; | |
| ● | the scope, progress, results and costs of discovery, preclinical and clinical development, laboratory testing, and clinical trials for product candidates we may develop, if any; | |
| ● | the costs, timing, and outcome of regulatory review of our product candidates; | |
| ● | our ability to establish and maintain collaborations on favorable terms, if at all; | |
| ● | the achievement of milestones or occurrence of other developments that trigger payments under any license or collaboration agreements we might have at such time; | |
| ● | the costs and timing of future commercialization activities, including product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution, for any of our product candidates for which we receive marketing approval; | |
| ● | the amount of revenue, if any, received from commercial sales of our product candidates, should any of our product candidates receive marketing approval; | |
| ● | the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, obtaining, maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property rights, and defending intellectual property-related claims; |
| ● | our headcount growth and associated costs as we expand our business operations and research and development activities; and | |
| ● | the costs of operating as a public company. |
Ourexisting cash will not be sufficient to complete development of our current drug candidates. Accordingly, we will be required to obtainfurther funding to achieve our business objectives.
Untilsuch time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of publicor private equity offerings and debt financings or other sources, such as potential collaboration agreements, strategic alliances andlicensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, ownershipinterests may be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that could adversely affectthe rights as a common stockholder. Additional debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include restrictive covenantsthat limit our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends,that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. If we raise funds through potential collaborations, strategic alliancesor licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams,research programs or product candidates, or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additionalfunds when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization effortsor grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.
CriticalAccounting Estimates
Ourdiscussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our unaudited condensed consolidated financialstatements, which have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).The preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affectthe reported amounts of assets and liabilities disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet andthe reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Our estimates are based on historical trends and on other factors thatwe believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying valuesof assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under differentassumptions or conditions.
| 80 |
Oursignificant accounting policies and estimates are described in more detail in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements includedin our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. The accounting estimates that are most critical to a fullunderstanding and evaluation of our reported financial results are described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of FinancialCondition and Results of Operations in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. There wereno material changes to our critical accounting estimates during the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Off-BalanceSheet Arrangements
Wedid not have during the periods presented, and we do not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined under SEC rules.
Weenter into agreements in the normal course of business with vendors for preclinical and clinical studies, preclinical and clinical supplyand manufacturing services, professional consultants for expert advice, and other vendors for other services for operating purposes.These contracts do not contain any minimum purchase commitments and are cancellable at any time by us, generally upon 30 days prior writtennotice, and therefore we believe that our non-cancelable obligations under these agreements are not material.
Inaddition, we have entered into license and royalty agreements for intellectual property with certain parties. Such arrangements requireongoing payments, including payments upon achieving certain development, regulatory and commercial milestones, receipt of sublicenseincome, as well as royalties on commercial sales. Payments under these arrangements are expensed as incurred and are recorded as researchand development expenses. We paid amounts under such agreements at the time of execution and pay annual fees. We have not paid any royaltiesunder these agreements to date. We have not included the annual license fee payments contractual obligations because the license agreementsare cancelable by us and therefore, we believe that our non-cancelable obligations under these agreements are not material. We have notincluded potential royalties or milestone obligations because they are contingent upon the occurrence of future events and the timingand likelihood of such potential obligations are not known with certainty. For further information regarding these agreements and amountsthat could become payable in the future under these agreements, please see the sub-section entitled “License Agreements”within the “Item 1. Business” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
Quantitativeand Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Weare not currently exposed to significant market risk related to changes in interest rates because we do not have any cash equivalentsor interest-bearing investments at this time. Our debt typically contains a fixed interest rate or is issued to certain lenders, includingrelated party lenders, with other equity instruments, such as warrants, in lieu of a stated cash interest rate. However, for debt thatwe have issued that is variable and fluctuates with changes in interest rates, an immediate one percentage point change in market interestrates would not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Weare not currently exposed to significant market risk related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates; however, we have employeesand are contracted with and may continue to contract with foreign vendors that are located in Europe, particularly in Germany, wherewe operate through our wholly-owned subsidiary, StemVac GmbH. In October 2022, we also formed Calidi Biotherapeutics Australia Pty Ltd,a wholly-owned subsidiary in Australia, for purposes of operating in that country for a portion of our planned clinical trial activitiesfor our SNV1 program. Our operations may be subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates in the future.
Inflationgenerally affects us by increasing our cost of labor. We do not believe that inflation had a material effect on our business, financialcondition or results of operations during the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024.
| 81 |
EmergingGrowth Company and Smaller Reporting Company Status
Weare an “emerging growth company,” (“EGC”), under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, (the “JOBSAct”). Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an EGC can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. Thus, an EGC can delay the adoption of certainaccounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to avail ourselves of the delayedadoption of new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will be subject to the same requirements to adopt new or revised accountingstandards as private entities.
Asan EGC, we may also take advantage of certain exemptions and reduced reporting requirements under the JOBS Act. Subject to certain conditions,as an EGC:
| ● | we are presenting only two years of audited financial statements and only two years of related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations; | |
| ● | we will avail ourselves of the exemption from providing an auditor’s attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; | |
| ● | we will avail ourselves of the exemption from complying with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements, known as the auditor discussion and analysis; | |
| ● | we are providing reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements; and | |
| ● | we will not require nonbinding advisory votes on executive compensation or stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments. |
Wewill remain an EGC until the earliest of (i) December 31, 2026, (ii) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual grossrevenues of $1.235 billion or more, (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the previousrolling three-year period, or (iv) the date on which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer under the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”).
Weare also a “smaller reporting company,” meaning that the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates plus the proposedaggregate amount of gross proceeds to us as a result of this offering is less than $700 million and our annual revenue was less than$100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company after this offering ifeither (i) the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250 million or (ii) our annual revenue is less than $100million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700 million.
Ifwe are a smaller reporting company at the time we cease to be an EGC, we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirementsthat are available to smaller reporting companies. Specifically, as a smaller reporting company we may choose to present only the twomost recent fiscal years of audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and, similar to EGCs, smaller reporting companieshave reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation.
RecentAccounting Pronouncements
Otherthan as disclosed in Note 2 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, we donot expect that any recently issued accounting standards will have a material impact on our financial statements or will otherwise applyto our operations..
| 82 |
BUSINESS
Overview
Weare a clinical stage biotechnology company that is developing genetic medicines and proprietary genetically-engineered oncolytic viruses.We are currently developing RedTail, an enveloped vaccinia virus platform designed to deliver genetic medicine to tumor sites, and twoproprietary stem cell-based oncolytic virus platforms (SuperNova and NeuroNova). RedTail is expected to enter the clinic by the end of2026 with the first compound (CLD-401) delivering IL-15 superagonist to the tumor microenvironment (“TME”).
OurRedTail platform is the culmination of a over a decade of work around genetic engineering of viruses and allows for the systemic administrationof a proprietarily-modified oncolytic virus that can:
| ● | Survive in circulation and hone to metastatic tumor sites | |
| ● | Induce cell kill tumor cells and immune priming in the TME | |
| ● | Deliver genetic medicine payloads like IL-15 superagonist for expression in the TME |
OurSuperNova and NeuroNova platforms are designed to:
| ● | Protect oncolytic viruses from neutralizing antibodies and complement inactivation and innate immune cell inactivation; | |
| ● | Enhance oncolytic viral amplification inside the allogeneic cells; and | |
| ● | Modify the TME to allow improvements in cell targeting and viral amplification at the tumor site. |
Oncolyticviruses have been pursued as therapeutic platforms in oncology because of their ability to preferentially infect and replicate withincancer cells, resulting in both direct lysis of the tumor cells as well as activation of an antitumor immune response, while leavingnormal, healthy cells unharmed. Despite the promises of oncolytic viruses, a major obstacle against their therapeutic use has been theirrapid elimination by the patient’s immune system; this has meant that oncolytic viruses have been largely relegated to being usedfor local delivery to tumors but have not been successful in patients with extensive metastatic disease. The only approved oncolyticvirus therapy is T-VEC (Imlygic®), a modified herpes simplex virus (HSV) for the treatment of patients with melanoma given intratumorally.
Wehave been working on protecting oncolytic virusesfrom immune clearance for over a decade. Our NeuroNova investigational drug candidate is currently in a Phase 1 trial being run byour partner, City of Hope, in an investigator-initiated trial and we have an open IND for a Phase 1 trial for our SuperNova investigationaldrug candidate. The platforms used in NeuroNova and SuperNova use oncolytic viruses embedded in stem cells to avoid immune clearanceand facilitate initial viral amplification and expansion at the tumor sites. This approach has shown substantial benefit over unprotectedvirus in preclinical studies of intratumoral delivery, but stem cell encapsulation does not allow for systemic delivery of virus to tumormetastases in animal models. The size of the stem cells prohibited efficient dissemination into metastatic sites.
Morerecently, we used the learnings from NeuroNova and SuperNova to create RedTail, a novel oncolytic viral platform for systemicdelivery. The virus used in RedTail has been proprietarily engineered to avoid immune clearance and to specifically replicate in tumortissue where the virus also has the ability to deliver genetic medicines to the tumor microenvironment. RedTail utilizes a proprietaryform of enveloped virus with genetic modifications to avoid immune clearance. Because the virus is not encapsulated in stem cells, itis thousands of times smaller than the NeuroNova or SuperNova products and disseminates efficiently into metastatic sites in syngeneicanimal models. In addition, the virus can be engineered to express genetic medicines while replicating in the tumor.
CLD-401,the first lead derived from the RedTail platform, expresses IL-15 superagonist at high concentrations in the tumor microenvironment.In animal models, CLD-401 can be given systemically and clear metastatic sites in syngeneic tumor mouse models. The combination ofthe RedTail virus with its genetic payload drives complete tumor eradication in the tumor models compared to the RedTail virus alone.We believe RedTail, given its systemic administration and targeting to metastatic sites and its delivery of genetic medicines,represents a major advancement in the space of oncolytic virus in oncology.
| 83 |
OurNovel Oncolytic Virus Platform
NeuroNova™Platform
Ournovel NeuroNova™ Platform utilizes the immortalized neural stem cell bank HB1.F3.CD21 we procured from the City of Hopeloaded with the engineered oncolytic adenovirus CRAd-S-pk7 we procured from Northwestern University (“Northwestern”). Weare currently in the process of extending cell bank HB1.F3.CD21 at a commercial ready CMO. We have licensed from Northwestern the commercialrights to the use of de-identified data from the Northwestern investigator sponsored clinical trial using immortalized neural stem cellsloaded with adenovirus CRAd-S-pk7 and we also have licensed the patents and other intellectual property rights for the commercial developmentof immortalized neural stem cells loaded with adenovirus CRAd-S-pk7 from the University of Chicago.
Theoncolytic adenovirus, CRAd-S-pk7, was engineered by incorporating a survivin promoter to drive expression of the E1A gene, which is essentialfor viral replication, and modifying the Ad5 fiber protein through the incorporation of a poly-lysine sequence (pk7). These alterationsenhanced tumor specificity and viral replication within glioma cells, which improved antitumor activity and increased survival in mouseand hamster models. The neural stem cell line HB1.F3.CD21 was generated from cells harvested from fetal tissue. The final product candidate,CLD-101, was created by incubating the CRAd-S-pk7 virus with neural stem cell line HB1.F3.CD21 using proprietary media and conditions.
Theparent cell line HB1.F3.CD21, which is a component of the NSC CRAd-S-pk7 product candidate, has been used in four clinical studies: (i)A Pilot Feasibility Study of Oral 5-Fluorocytosine and Genetically Modified Neural Stem Cells Expressing E. coli Cytosine Deaminase forTreatment of Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas, (ii) A Phase 1 Study of Cytosine Deaminase-Expressing Neural Stem Cells in Combination withOral 5-Fluorocytosine and Leucovorin for the Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas, (iii) A Phase 1 Study of Intracranially AdministeredCarboxylesterase-Expressing Neural Stem Cells in Combination with Intravenous Irinotecan for the Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas,and (iv) A Phase 1 Study of Neural Stem Cell-Based Virotherapy in Combination With Standard Radiation and Chemotherapy for Newly DiagnosedHigh-Grade Glioma.
Ina series of preclinical studies, the scientists at Northwestern University observed stem cell-based delivery of the CRAd-S-pk7 virusto murine tumors and demonstrated an increase of median survival by 50% as compared with mice that were treated with the same oncolyticvirus alone in experimental glioblastoma mouse models. Additionally, it was observed that intratumorally delivered HB1.F3.CD21 stem cellswere capable of migrating throughout the brain to deliver the therapeutic payload of CRAd-S-pk7 to distal glioma metastasis. These findingswarranted the translation of this therapeutic approach to the clinical setting.
Webelieve our use of allogeneic neural stem cells loaded with CRAd-S-pk7 oncolytic adenovirus in the design and execution of our anticipatedclinical trials differs from other clinical trials utilizing oncolytic viruses that are administered “naked” intratumorallyor systemically that face rapid elimination by the patient’s immune system.
SuperNova™Platform
Ourproprietary SuperNova™ Platform utilizes our own allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (“AD-MSC”)line, VP-001, loaded with a tumor selective “CAL1” oncolytic vaccinia virus strain that we currently manufacture under contractfrom Genscript ProBio in China. We believe our SuperNova™ Platform is covered by four patent families: (i) CombinationImmunotherapy Approach for Treatment of Cancer, (ii) Smallpox Vaccine for Cancer Treatment, (iii) Cell-Based Vehicles forPotentiation of Viral Therapy, and (iv) Enhanced Systems for Cell-Mediated Oncolytic Viral Therapy. See, Intellectual Property.
TheCAL1 vaccinia virus is an unmodified virus belonging to the poxvirus family and is manufactured by propagating ACAM1000 clonal vaccinein CV-1 cells. ACAM1000 (manufactured in MRC-5 cells) is genetically identical to ACAM2000 (manufactured in Vero cells). CAL1 vacciniavirus genome carries key genomic alterations that explain its reduced virulence. Two main disrupted factors are immunomodulatory: (i)the tumor necrosis factor receptor, and (ii) the interferon α/ß binding protein. The FDA approved ACAM2000 as a vaccine forsmallpox in August 2007, based on this strain’s reduced virulence and safety profile in preclinical animal studies and human clinicaltrials.
| 84 |
TheCAL1 virus has the following advantages over other oncolytic viruses:
a)the virus is not a human pathogen — does not cause any known serious diseases in humans;
b)it has a short, well-characterized life cycle, spreading very rapidly from cell to cell;
c)it is highly cytolytic for a broad range of tumor cell types;
d)it has a large insertion carrying capacity (> 25 kb) for the expression of exogenous genes;
e)it has high genetic stability;
f)it is amenable to large scale production of high levels of infectious virus;
g)it remains in the cytoplasm and does not enter the host cell nucleus during the entire life cycle, and thus does not integrate into thehost genome;
h)it has been used extensively over decades as a smallpox vaccine in millions of people with minimal and well documented side effects;
i)existing approved drugs (vaccinia immunoglobulin (VIG), TPOXX (tecovirimat), and cidofovir) are available to treat any potential vacciniainfections effectively; and
j)it has been well tolerated when administered by different routes: intravenous, intraperitoneal, intrapleural, and intratumorally to patientswith advanced cancer.
Mesenchymalstem/stromal cells (MSCs) are stromal regenerative cells with mesenchyme origin during embryonic development and possess the abilityto differentiate into osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondrocytes. MSCs can be harvested from several adult tissue types, including bonemarrow, umbilical cord, and adipose tissue and have the following key characteristics:
i)plastic adherence in standard culture conditions;
ii)surface marker expression of CD105, CD73 and CD90; and
iii)lack expression of CD45, CD34, CD14 or CD11b, CD79 or CD19 and HLA-DR.
Adiposetissue-derived MSCs (AD-MSC) have significant advantages over MSCs derived from other sources because they are obtained from a minimallyinvasive lipoaspiration procedure. The MSC concentration in adipose tissue is greater than all other tissues in the body and the MSC’spotency is maintained with the donor’s age, unlike bone marrow-derived MSCs. Significant numbers of AD-MSC can be obtained dueto accessibility to the subcutaneous adipose tissue and the volume that can easily be extracted. It is well-documented that the AD-MSChas potent immune modulatory properties due to either direct release of immuno-modulatory factors or indirect effects through other immunecells. Significant anti-inflammatory effects of AD-MSC have been confirmed in many veterinary and human clinical studies.
Inorder to develop a clinically relevant oncolytic platform, CAL1 virus was loaded into allogeneic AD-MSC cells to generate CLD-201 toproduce a preclinical drug product, which we intend to demonstrate through clinical trials is more resistant to humoral inactivationthan naked virus, potentially leading to higher antitumor activity.
Webelieve our use of allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells loaded with CAL1 oncolytic virus in the design and execution ofour anticipated clinical trials differs from other clinical trials utilizing oncolytic viruses that are administered “naked”intratumorally or systemically that face rapid elimination by the patient’s immune system.
| 85 |
First-in-humanpreclinical study of vaccinia virus ACAM2000/CAL1 delivered by autologous adipose stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells.
Thetolerability and toxicity of the ACAM2000 virus (equivalent to CAL1) was observed in a first-in-human clinical trial of vaccinia virusdelivered by autologous adipose stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells, in patients with advanced solid tumors or acute myeloid leukemia(AML).
Inpreclinical studies, we observed ACAM2000 virus (aka ACAM1000 or CAL1) as a very potent oncolytic virus, able to infect and kill multiplehuman cancer cell lines in vitro. However, we and others also observed that the human complement system could neutralize most of theviral particles after intravenous deployment. Consequently, we suggested that the viral particles taken up by autologous SVF stem cellsmay be protected from the patient’s immune system, thus allowing delivery of a greater amount of the loaded oncolytic virus tothe tumor sites. In addition, SVF contains stem cells exhibiting a natural tropism towards tumor sites, which could theoretically beexploited to transport the viral payloads directly to the tumor sites. Therefore, a clinical study was designed utilizing autologousSVF cells incubated with vaccinia virus (ACAM2000/SVF) in patients with advanced solid tumors or AML. This physician sponsored studywas designed and completed prior to recent court decisions holding that the use of autologous adipose SVF cells in these studies requiresan IND issued by the FDA.
Thetolerability and toxicity of ACAM2000/SVF administered to patients with advanced metastatic solid tumors or advanced AML observed inthis preclinical study support our intention to apply for an IND from the FDA and to conduct a Phase I clinical trial thereafter usingour CLD-201 product candidate that utilizes allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (“AD-MSC”) line VP-001 loadedwith tumor selective “CAL1” oncolytic vaccinia virus strain having an identical sequence as ACAM2000. We do not intend todevelop a product candidate using autologous adipose SVF cells. However, two important aspects of this study will have clear clinicalimplications in future IND enabled clinical trials: (i) this is the first-in-human clinical study to observe the tolerability and toxicityof a TK-positive oncolytic vaccinia virus delivered by autologous SVF cells, and (ii) the administration of ACAM2000/SVF in severelyimmunocompromised patients with advanced cancer appeared to be well tolerated. In addition, by combining ACAM2000 and SVF as a deliveryvehicle we observed evidence suggesting SVF cells may protect the virus from complement inactivation in the blood. No significant treatment-associatedtoxicities were observed in any of the 26 patients who received IV, IP and IT injections of ACAM2000 loaded onto freshly isolated SVFcells. Although not statistically significant due to small number of patients, several patients experienced significant tumor size reduction,especially when the ACAM2000/SVF treatment was combined with checkpoint inhibition. These early observations must be re-evaluated withina larger and more homogeneous cohort of patients to confirm the feasibility of this treatment approach. The results of this study havebeen published in the Journal of Translational Medicine in 2019.
Becauseclinical autologous approaches do not allow the development of off-the-shelf standardized product candidates for treatment of cancer,we are focusing our development efforts on allogeneic therapies which we believe will allow the immediate treatment of many patientswithout the need of extraction of fresh autologous adipose stem cells. Consequently, we are developing allogeneic cell-based productcandidates, where we believe the virus can be protected from humoral immunity, significantly amplified, and potentiated inside the stemcells to minimize its clearance by the immune system.
Althoughwe have not yet received FDA marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we are advancing a pipeline of “off-the-shelf”allogeneic cell product candidates in preclinical studies and clinical trials to determine whether our product candidates will: (i) protectoncolytic viruses from complement inactivation and innate immune cell inactivation by the body’s immune system; (ii) support oncolyticviral amplification in the allogeneic cells, and (iii) modify the TME to allow tumor cell targeting and viral amplification at the tumorsites for an extended period of time.
| 86 |
Asdescribed in the diagram above, our most advanced product candidates include the following.
RedTailfor metastatic solid tumors, Our pre-clinical program involving enveloped oncolytic viruses (discovery phase), builds upon our experienceof using cells to protect, potentiate and deliver virotherapies. The RedTail platform is derived from research from prior pre-clinicalCLD-202 program. RedTail consists of an engineered vaccinia virus enveloped by a cell membrane, that is potentially capable of targetinglung cancer and advanced metastatic disease due to its increased ability to survive in the bloodstream. Metastatic solid tumors involvecancer cells that break away from where they first formed (primary cancer) and travel through the blood or lymph system to form new tumors,known as metastatic tumors, in other parts of the body. In preclinical studies, RedTail has shown early signs of its resistance to humanhumoral immunity and capability to target multiple distant and diverse tumors and transform their microenvironments leading to theirelimination. In addition, the program has shown potential synergistic effects with other immunotherapies, including cell therapies, toattack and eliminate disseminated solid tumors.
CLD-201product for solid tumors (breast cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (“HNSCC”), and soft tissue sarcoma) (whichwe sometimes refer to as SuperNova 1 or “SNV1”). CLD-201 is our first internally developed preclinical product candidateutilizing our SuperNova™ Platform. Based on our pre-clinical studies, we believe CLD-201 has therapeutic potential forthe treatment of multiple solid tumors such as breast cancer, HNSCC, and soft tissue sarcoma. We filed our IND application with the FDAfor the clinical development of CLD-201 in March 2025 and we anticipate commencing a Phase 1 clinical trial for CLD-201 during the firsthalf of 2025.
CLD-101product for newly diagnosed high-grade glioma (“HGG”) (also referred to as “NNV1” as to the indication).CLD-101 is our product candidate utilizing our NeuroNova™ Platform targeting HGG. Our partner, Northwestern University, has anopen IND for a Phase 1b/2 clinical trial. This trial is currently on hold as we prioritize development of our other product candidates.
CLD-101product for Recurrent HGG (also referred to as “NNV1” as to the indication). CLD-101 is our product candidate utilizingour NeuroNova™ Platform targeting HGG. Prior to our licensing agreement with Northwestern University, an open-label, investigatorsponsored, Phase 1, dose- escalation clinical trial for NNV1 in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas was completed. Thisclinical trial demonstrated that single administration of CLD-101 was well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed HGG.
CLD301 (AAA) for Multiple Indications. We are also currently engaged in early discovery research involving Adult Allogeneic Adiposederived (“AAA”) stem cells for various indications and therapies. Our subsidiary Nova Cell, Inc. (“Nova Cell”)was formed to be a technology service provider that develops innovative stem cell based products using our cellular manufacturing process.
OurStrategy
Ourstrategy is to pioneer next generation immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer by utilizing stem cell-based platforms or envelopedoncolytic virotherapies for delivery and potentiation of oncolytic viruses as well as the use of allogeneic stem cells for treatmentof non-cancer indications. We intend to achieve this strategy by:
| ● | Continuing to advance our enveloped oncolytic virotherapy platform. Our RedTail platform is comprised of an enveloped oncolytic vaccinia virus. In preclinical studies, RedTail has shown an ability to target lung cancer and disseminated cancer disease due to its ability to survive in the bloodstream. Our goal is to utilize this product candidate to target lung cancer and metastatic solid tumors. We believe that this approach may allow for potentially greater antitumor activity and lower toxicity when compared to existing modalities for treating selected disseminated indications. | |
| ● | Continuing to advance our adipose stem cell platform. Our SuperNova™ platform is comprised of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (“AD-MSC”) isolated from healthy adult donors. Our approach represents an economical and highly scalable process. We intend to utilize these cells as a “Trojan Horse”, shielding intracellularly loaded oncolytic vaccina virus for enhanced therapy of patients with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. We believe that this approach to treating cancer may allow for potentially greater antitumor activity and lower toxicity when compared to existing modalities. | |
| ● | Continuing to advance immortalized neural stem cells. Our NeuroNova™ platform is comprised of neural stem cells that are generated from cells harvested from fetal tissue. We utilize these cells by loading them with oncolytic adenovirus with the intention of treating patients who have newly diagnosed or recurrent high grade glioma (“HGG”) and in potentially other therapeutic indications. We believe that this approach to treating HGGs of the brain and spinal cord may allow for potentially greater antitumor activity and lower toxicity when compared to existing modalities. | |
| ● | Collaborating with industry partners in pursuit of combination therapies. In addition to our monotherapy trials, we intend to explore combination therapy studies using our SuperNova™, NeuroNova™ and RedTail platforms in conjunction with certain other immuno-therapies that are already approved or under clinical development. | |
| ● | Advancing clinical programs over the next 24 months. We anticipate advancing three clinical development programs over the next six-to-24 months, namely, i) CLD-101 in a Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with recurrent HGG; ii) CLD-201 in a Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with triple negative breast cancer, head & neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and soft tissue sarcoma and iii) submitting to the FDA for our RedTail product candidate for a Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with metastatic solid tumors by the end of 2026. |
| ● | Continuing to pursue cost-efficient manufacturing. Manufacturing of allogeneic stem cell therapeutic candidates involves a series of complex steps. We believe an important element of our commercialization plans involves the efficient and scalable production of GMP-grade adipose, neuronal and other allogeneic stem cells. | |
| ● | Pursuing opportunistically out-licensing of stem cell derived products. Our stem cell production capabilities enable us to selectively out-license our cell banked or cell derived products to third parties. We anticipate entering into one or more distribution relationships in order to pursue this opportunity. |
OurProduct Candidates
RedTailfor Metastatic Solid Tumors.
RedTailis our preclinical program involving enveloped oncolytic viruses, is in the discovery phase of development and builds upon our researchof using cells to protect, potentiate and deliver virotherapies. Our CLD-400 program is derived from the research conducted in our priorpre-clinical CLD-202 program. The RedTail platform utilizes an engineered vaccinia virus enveloped by a cell membrane, that is potentiallycapable of targeting lung cancer and advanced metastatic disease due to its early remarkable ability to survive in the bloodstream. Metastaticsolid tumors involve cancer cells that break away from where they first formed (primary cancer) and travel through the blood or lymphsystem to form new tumors, known as metastatic tumors, in other parts of the body.
| 87 |
Inpreclinical models, RedTail has shown the early preclinical capability to target multiple distant and diverse tumors and transform theirmicroenvironments leading to their elimination. In addition, the program has shown potential synergistic effects with other immunotherapies,including cell therapies, to attack and eliminate disseminated solid tumors.
CLD-201(SuperNova™) for Solid Tumors (Breast Cancer, Sarcoma, and Head and Neck).
CLD-201is composed of CAL1 vaccinia virus (AKA ACAM1000 or ACAM2000) loaded into the allogeneic AD-MSC cell line VP-001 and is our first internallydeveloped product candidate utilizing our SuperNova™ Platform targeting multiple solid tumors (Breast Cancer, Sarcoma,and Head and Neck). Based on our pre-clinical studies, we believe CLD-201 has therapeutic potential for the treatment of multiple solidtumors such as, head and neck cancer, breast cancer and sarcoma. We have held a pre-IND meeting filed our IND application with the FDAfor the clinical development of CLD-201 in March 2025 and we anticipate commencing a Phase 1 clinical trial for CLD-201 during the firsthalf of 2025.
Inpreclinical in vitro studies, we observed that the naked CAL1 virus was quickly inactivated in the presence of human serum, whileCLD-201 retained the ability to kill tumor cells. In vivo studies demonstrated the ability of CLD-201 to induce direct tumor oncolysisand to modify the tumor microenvironment (TME), converting immunologically invisible or “cold” tumors into immunologicallyvisible or “hot” tumors by reducing immunosuppressive populations such as Tregs (regulatory T cells) and simultaneously increasingtumor infiltration with CD4 and CD8 effector T cells, thus generating anti-tumor immunity in both the treated lesion and untreated distanttumors. Importantly, product candidate CLD-201 contains not only stem cells loaded with viral particles, but also immune modulatory cytokinesproduced by the stem cells as well as virally encoded proteins. Therefore, the TME may be modified immediately upon intra-tumoral injectionto support viral amplification and oncolysis.
Weanticipate our proposed Phase 1/2 trial will be an open label dose escalation safety, PK, and PD study of CLD-201 in adult patients withadvanced metastatic solid tumors who have relapsed from or are refractory to standard therapy. In the Phase 1 dose escalation portionof the anticipated study, the toxicity and tolerability of CLD-201 will be determined. We also anticipate that the dose escalation portionof the Phase 1 trial will determine the recommended Phase 2 dose of CLD-201. The dose escalation cohorts are intended to be composedof patients with any of the selected three indications (breast cancer, head & neck squamous cell carcinoma, and soft tissue sarcoma).In the Phase 1 dose expansion portion of this study, we anticipate 30 patients will be enrolled at the selected dose to assess clinicalobjective response rate (ORR)). In the Phase 2 portion of this study, we anticipate 50 patients with the best responding indication determinedin the study will be treated with the CLD-201 dose identified in Phase 1 of this trial.
CLD-101(NeuroNova™) for Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma (“HGG”).
CLD-101is our product candidate utilizing our NeuroNova™ Platform targeting HGG. Our partner, Northwestern University, has an open INDfor a Phase 1b/2 clinical trial. This program is currently on hold as we prioritize development of our other product candidates.
CLD-101(NeuroNova™) for Recurrent HGG.
Ourpartner City of Hope is conducting clinical studies on CLD-101 utilizing our NeuroNova™ Platform for the indicationof recurring HGG using the same allogeneic neural stem cell bank and oncolytic adenovirus being used in our clinical trials for newlydiagnosed HGG discussed above. City of Hope dosed the first patient in May 2023 in a Phase 1 clinical trial with CLD-101 for recurringHGG. This program is supported by a grant from CIRM awarded to the City of Hope.
| 88 |
CLD-301(AAA)
Weare also currently engaged in early discovery research involving Adult Allogeneic Adipose derived (“AAA”) stem cells forvarious indications and therapies. Our subsidiary Nova Cell, Inc. (“Nova Cell”) was formed to be a technology service providerthat develops innovative stem cell based products using our cellular manufacturing process.
Competition
Thedevelopment and commercialization of new product candidates is highly competitive. We face competition from major pharmaceutical, specialtypharmaceutical and biotechnology companies among others with respect to our NeuroNova™, SuperNova™and RedTail product candidates and will face similar competition with respect to any product candidates that we may seek to develop orcommercialize in the future. We compete in pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other related markets that develop immune-oncology therapiesfor the treatment of cancer. There are other companies working to develop viral immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer includingdivisions of large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies of various sizes. The large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companiesthat have commercialized and/or are developing immuno-oncology treatments for cancer include AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GileadSciences, Inc., Merck & Co., Novartis, Pfizer and Genentech, Inc.
Someof the products and therapies developed by our competitors are based on scientific approaches that are the same as or similar to ourapproach, including with respect to the use of viral immunotherapy with oncolytic viruses. Other competitive products and therapies arebased on entirely different approaches. We are aware that Oncorus, Inc., Replimune Group, Inc., Amgen Inc., ImmVira Co., Ltd., IconOVirBio, Inc., Candel Therapeutics, Inc., CG Oncology, Inc., Genelux Corporation, Imugene Limited, Oncolytics Biotech Inc., and FerGene,Inc., among others, are developing viral immunotherapies that may have utility for the treatment of indications that we are targeting.Potential competitors also include academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations thatconduct research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and commercialization.
Manyof the companies we compete against or may compete against in the future have significantly greater financial resources and expertisein research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketingapproved drugs than we do. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in concentration ofeven more resources among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors,particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These competitors also compete with us in recruitingand retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, in establishing clinical trial sites and enrolling subjects for our clinicaltrials and in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.
Wecould see a reduction or elimination of our commercial opportunity if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer,more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, or are more convenient or are less expensive than any products that we or ourcollaborators may develop. Our competitors also may obtain FDA or other regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we mayobtain approval for ours, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter themarket. The key competitive factors affecting the success of all our product candidates, if approved, are likely to be their efficacy,safety, convenience and price, if required, the level of biosimilar or generic competition and the availability of reimbursement fromgovernment and other third-party payors.
Manufacturing
Themanufacturing process of viruses and allogeneic cell product candidates involves a series of complex and precise steps. A critical componentof our success in this area will be through our research collaboration with our subsidiary, StemVac. The StemVac team has decades ofdeep experience in process and assay development and optimization of virus and cell-based and enveloped oncolytic virus manufacturingof advanced therapeutic biological products. The development services provided by StemVac are highly specialized to meet our needs indeveloping a cost- and time-effective program as compared to services provided by an outsourced entity. We are engaged in developingscalable processes for both upstream and downstream for oncolytic virus, stem cells and final products containing both oncolytic virus,cells and enveloped oncolytic viruses. We believe our processes will have the potential to facilitate the generation of off-the-shelfallogeneic products.
| 89 |
Wehave assembled a management team with extensive experience in developing and manufacturing biological, viral and gene therapies. We havestrong in-house process development capabilities for oncolytic viruses cell banks and combinatory products and are currently leveragingexternal CMOs to implement our in-house developed processes to produce drug substance and drug product. We require that our CMOs producedrug substance and finished drug product in accordance with current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMPs”), Good ManufacturingPractices (“GMP”), and all other applicable laws and regulations. We maintain agreements with our manufacturers that includeconfidentiality and intellectual property provisions to protect our proprietary rights related to our product candidates. We do not havelong-term supply arrangements in place with our CMOs.
Wecurrently do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities. For our CLD-101 product candidate, we procured the neural stem cell bankfrom City of Hope and are currently extending the cell bank in parallel at a commercial ready CMO. The master virus seed for NeuroNovaoncolytic virus production (CRAd-S-pk7) was procured from Northwestern University and an extended master virus bank was manufacturedat City of Hope. For our CLD-201 product candidate, the AAA cell bank, VP-001, was produced by VetStem Biopharma. The CALI1virus forCLD-201 was manufactured at Genscript ProBio in China. Pilot and/or initial GMP batches for both product candidates (CLD-101 and CLD-201)are anticipated to be produced by an early-stage CMO on an as-need basis. In parallel, we are working on partnering and scale-up strategiesto transfer our production to commercial ready CMOs in order to secure sufficient supply of clinical material for Phase 2 and Phase 3clinical trials and subsequent commercialization of our product candidates.
Wecontinue to invest in our internal development capabilities to establish critical in-house manufacturing expertise to support our pipelineof product candidates. We expect to continue to invest in building proprietary processes that will enable us to be at a competitive advantagewhen manufacturing product candidates for our clinical programs. In the near term, we intend to continue to rely on third party CMOswhile we evaluate whether to establish our own cGMP manufacturing facilities for the production of cGMP-grade material in order to secureour supply chain for clinical studies and commercialization.
Commercialization
Weintend to retain significant development and commercial rights to our product candidates and, if marketing approval is obtained, to commercializeour product candidates on our own, or potentially with a partner, in the United States and other regions. We currently have limited sales,marketing or commercial product distribution capabilities and have no experience as a company commercializing products. We intend tobuild the necessary infrastructure and capabilities over time for the United States, and potentially other regions, following furtheradvancement of our product candidates. Clinical data, the size of the addressable patient population, the size of the commercial infrastructureand manufacturing needs may all influence or alter our commercialization plans.
IntellectualProperty
Ourcommercial success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection in the U.S. and other major oncologymarkets and countries for our investigational products, to operate without infringing valid and enforceable patents and proprietary rightsof others, and to prevent others from infringing on our proprietary or intellectual property rights. We seek to protect our proprietaryposition by (1) filing, in the U.S. and certain other regions/countries (including the EU), patent applications intended to cover ourinvestigational products, and maintaining any issued patents in our major markets; (2) maintaining and advancing, and where possibleexpanding, existing patents and patent applications covering the composition-of-matter of our investigational products, their methodsof use and related discoveries, their formulations and methods of manufacture, and related technologies, inventions and improvementsthat may be commercially important to our business; and (3) filing, in the U.S. and certain other regions/countries, new patent applicationson novel therapeutic uses of our investigational products. We may also rely on trade secrets and know-how to protect aspects of our businessthat are not amenable to, or that we do not consider appropriate for, patent protection, and which is difficult to reverse engineer.We seek to protect our confidential information in part through confidentiality agreements with third parties, including corporate partners,collaborators, and vendors. If our trade secrets or confidential information are known or independently discovered by competitors, orif we enter into disputes over ownership of inventions, our business or results of operations could be adversely affected. We also intendto take advantage of regulatory protection afforded through data exclusivity, market exclusivity and patent term extensions where available.We may also seek to rely on regulatory protection afforded through Orphan Drug Designation.
| 90 |
Webelieve that our issued patents and pending patent applications will cover our technology platforms and product candidates until approximately2038, for the most recently filed family, 2045, and possibly beyond. Our strategy includes filing for patent protection on our intellectualproperty we consider important to our business in jurisdictions including the United States, Europe, and Japan and other jurisdictionswe consider commercially relevant to protect our ability to market our product candidates.
Wehave significant ownership rights through our patent portfolio, including rights to issued patents in the United States, Japan, SouthKorea, Canada, Singapore, China, and Eurasian countries, entitled Smallpox Vaccine for Cancer Treatment as of May 25, 2021,expiring in 2036. We also have additional rights to issued patents in Australia, Canada, Singapore, Russia, New Zealand, and Europe;which has been validated in Germany, Spain, France, Great Britain, and Italy for Combination Immunotherapy Approach for Treatmentof Cancer, which expire in October 2035.
Ourpatent portfolio includes five main patent families to protect our current development programs and secure our next generation programsfor the use of stem cell-mediated immunotherapy and oncolytic viral therapy for the treatment of cancer. We have filed composition ofmatter patents and methods of treatment that we believe includes next generation armed oncolytic viruses based on the oncolytic vacciniavirus we use in our product candidates, our own adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs), and other stem cell types. We havealso filed patents on the method of enhancing oncolytic virus-based therapies by loading the virus in cells. In addition, we have developeda universal cell delivery system to protect, amplify, and potentiate current and next generation armed oncolytic vaccinia viruses currentlyin advancement worldwide. We have recently filed a patent application directed to modified vaccinia viruses designed for systemic administration.
Ourfirst two foundational patents are being prosecuted worldwide and have received numerous international and US allowances. This firstpatent family, Combination Immunotherapy Approach for Treatment of Cancer, includes claims protecting the use of stem cellsin combination with oncolytic viruses and other modern immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer and has potential patent coverageuntil at least October 2035. We believe this treatment induces durable clinical immune responses targeting, attacking, and destroyingcancer cells.
Claimsencompass the combination of our investigational product therapy with immuno-checkpoint inhibitors have initially been allowed or validatedin Russia (RU), Israel (IL), Europe (EP), Canada (CA), Singapore (SG), Australia (AU), Germany (DE), Spain (ES), France (FR), Great Britain(GB), and Italy (IT) and are pending in Brazil, Mexico and the U.S.
Oursecond family of patents, Smallpox Vaccine for Cancer Treatment, encompasses the use of adipose-derived stromal vascularfraction stem cells to deliver oncolytic viruses in autologous and allogeneic settings for the treatment of all cancer tumor types andhas potential patent coverage until at least 2038. Claims encompassing use of other stem cells to deliver the smallpox vaccine virusalso have been issued. We believe this patent family encompasses the delivery of the treatment by any route of administration.
Thissecond patent family includes the following patents:
| ● | Key claims encompass the use of adipose-derived stem cells to deliver vaccinia virus have been allowed in the United States (US), Japan (JP), South Korea (KR) and Canada (CA) and are pending in Eurasia, China, Europe, Mexico, Hong Kong and the U.S. |
Ourthird patent family with patent applications pending and issued, Cell-Based Vehicles for Potentiation of Viral Therapy,has potential patent coverage until at least 2039. This third patent family, has been filed in the US and in Australia, Canada, China,Eurasia, Europe, India, Japan, and S. Korea and encompasses novel genetic modifications and treatments of stem cells to improve evasionof allogeneic recognition and inhibition by neutralizing antibodies, describes a companion diagnostic assay to select patients who willrespond better to systemic treatments of the oncolytic virus delivered by adipose-derived stem cells in allogeneic setting.
| 91 |
Ourfourth patent pending family, Enhanced Systems for Cell-Mediated Oncolytic Viral Therapy, encompasses the use of an improvedmethod to potentiate and deliver all naturally occurring and armed viruses using stem cells, named SuperNova™ and haspotential patent coverage until at least 2039. SuperNova™ is composed of live cells, cell-derived factors, amplifiedviruses, as well as viral-encoded immunomodulators and recombinant proteins that act immediately upon administration. The pending patentapplications also encompass the delivery of the treatment by any route of administration and protection of our single cryopreserved vialfor use in hospital settings. This fourth patent family, which has been filed in the US, Australia, Canada, China, Eurasia, Europe, India,Japan, and S. Korea, also encompasses next generation engineered vaccinia viruses encoding additional therapeutic protein-based immunotherapies(checkpoint inhibitors, co-stimulators, cytokines, antiangiogenetic, BITEs, etc.). Patents have been issued in the US, Japan, and Australia,and an application is allowed in Canada.
Afifth patent application has been filed as a PCT application, which encompasses modified vaccinia viruses that have advantageous properties,including serum resistance for systemic administration. Methods for manufacturing the viruses also are included.
Inaddition to our own patent portfolio described above, we have in-licensed a patent family from the University of Chicago, Alabama andCity of Hope National Medical Center for the patents and patent applications encompassing Tropic Cell-Based Virotherapies for theTreatment of Cancer and has potential patent coverage until at least 2034. This family includes issued claims directed to a particularneural stem cell line that contains an oncolytic virus that contains a regulatory element and/or a capsid that specifically binds toa tumor cell, and to methods of killing tumor cells by contacting them with the neural stem cells that contain the virus. A pending applicationincludes claims that, as filed, are not limited to the specific cell line.
Further,we and our subsidiaries own or have rights to trademarks, trade names and service marks that we use in connection with the operationof our business, including “Calidi,” Calidi Biotherapeutics,” “SuperNova, “NeuroNova,” “ SNV-1,”“ SNV,” “NNV,” “NNV1,” and “NNV2.”
Assignmentof Intellectual Property and Know-How to Nova Cell
Inconjunction with a strategic investment by a related party investor on July 26, 2024 (see Note 1), we assigned certain intellectual propertyrights and know-how to Nova Cell, pursuant to an Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement dated July 28, 2024.
LicenseAgreements
NorthwesternUniversity
OnJune 7, 2021, we entered into a license agreement with Northwestern University (“Northwestern”) (the “NorthwesternAgreement”) for the exclusive commercialization rights to the investigational new drug (“IND”) and datagenerated from Northwestern’s phase 1 clinical trial treating brain tumor patients with an engineered oncolytic adenovirus deliveredby neural stem cells (“CLD-101”). Under the Northwestern Agreement, among other rights, Northwestern granted to usa worldwide, twelve-year exclusivity for the use of the clinical data in the commercial development of CLD-101 or other oncolytic virusesfor therapeutic and preventive uses in oncology and a right of reference to Northwestern’s IND application which relates to thetreatment of newly diagnosed HGG. In exchange, we paid Northwestern an upfront payment of $400,000 cash and a commitment to fund up to$10 million towards a phase 2 clinical trial of CLD-101 or other oncolytic viruses. We also agreed to share 20% of any sublicensing revenue.
Theagreement has a term of 12 years unless further extended by mutual agreement. We have the right to terminate the agreement upon 90 dayswritten notice for any reason. Northwestern has the right to terminate the agreement at any time if the Patent Rights License with theUniversity of Chicago, City of Hope, or the University of Alabama at Birmingham is no longer in effect or if we have engaged in any criminalor unethical behavior or have untaken an action adverse to Northwestern. Either party has a right to terminate the agreement upon thebreach of the other party that is not cured within 90 days after notice of the breach is provided. Northwestern has the right to immediatelyterminate the agreement in the event we file a petition in bankruptcy, make any general assignment for the benefit of creditors, or areceiver is appointed to take custody or control of our property.
| 92 |
OnOctober 14, 2021, we entered into a worldwide, non-exclusive, sublicensable royalty free Material License Agreement to license the CLD-101oncolytic virus materials which we intend to use to continue advancing our research, development and commercialization efforts. Northwesternretained the rights to the material not transferred and to non-exclusively license the materials for Non-Commercial Research and hasagreed not to grant further commercial licenses during the term of the agreement. We paid Northwestern a one-time license fee of $100,000in exchange for the transferred materials. The agreement has a term of 12 years. We have a right to terminate the agreement for any reasonupon 90 days written notice. Either party has the right to terminate the agreement upon the material breach by the other party unlesssuch breach is cured within a 90 day notice period. Northwestern may immediately terminate the agreement upon written notice if we filea petition, or a petition is filed against us, under any bankruptcy or insolvency law, if we make any general assignment for the benefitof creditors, or a receiver is appointed to take possession or control of our property.
OnDecember 15, 2024, we entered into an Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trial Agreement for Northwestern to conduct a clinical trial (the“CTA”) under the protocol referenced “A Phase I Study of Repeated Neural Stem Cell Based Virotherapy in Combinationwith N-Acetylcysteine amid and Standard Radiation and Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma” (the “Study”).In connection with the Study, Northwestern granted Calidi a non-exclusive, transferable and sublicensable license to use all availablede-identified data collected from the Study, including, but not limited to, survival data, patient pathology, and immune studies data.We shall have the right of reference to the IND that is being used by Northwestern for the Study. Northwestern agrees to provide a letterof authorization and right of reference to Calidi for Calidi’s right of reference to and including, without limitation, all content,data and previous human experience, in the NU IND 17365. In consideration of the data use license granted by Northwestern to Calidi underthe CTA, Calidi shall pay Northwestern the following: a non-creditable and non-refundable one-time milestone payment of $250,000 uponreaching an aggregate of $2,000,000 of net sales of a licensed product; (b) a non-creditable and nonrefundable one-time milestone paymentof $500,000 upon reaching an aggregate of $10,000,000 of net sales of a licensed product; and (c) sublicensing royalty of twenty percent(20%) of any sublicensing revenue resulting from the grant of rights hereunder. This sublicensing royalty shall be cumulative, meaningit shall be imposed only once with respect to a single unit of sublicensing revenue, regardless of whether the sublicensing revenue derivesfrom the CTA, or the June 7, 2021 Northwestern Agreement described above, or both.
TheCTA shall terminate upon the completion of the parties’ Study-related activities. Either party has the right to terminate the Studyupon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other. The Study may also be terminated immediately at any time for cause, which includesthe following: material breach, which cannot be cured, by either party of the terms and conditions of the CTA; the University of ChicagoAgreement described below is no longer in effect, except in the case of breach by University of Chicago, City of Hope, or Universityof Alabama at Birmingham; Calidi has engaged in any criminal or unethical behavior; Calidi’s bankruptcy; and if it is determinedby the Study’s principal-investigator, Northwestern’s Institutional Review Board or Scientific Review Committee, or the Foodand Drug Administration that the Study is inappropriate, impractical, or inadvisable to continue, in order to protect the Study subjects’rights, welfare, and safety.
Universityof Chicago
OnJuly 22, 2021, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with the University of Chicago on behalf of City of Hope and Universityof Alabama at Birmingham (the “University of Chicago Agreement”) for patents covering cancer therapies using an oncolyticadenovirus in combination with a clinical grade allogeneic neural stem cell line for recurrent HGG. Pursuant to the University of ChicagoAgreement, COH transferred its IND to us for the commercial development of a licensed product, as defined in the University of ChicagoAgreement. This agreement grants to us commercial exclusivity, for the term as specified in the University of Chicago Agreement, in usingneural stem cells with the adenovirus known as CRAd-S-pk7 for oncolytic virotherapy.
| 93 |
Underthe University of Chicago Agreement, we paid an upfront fee of $180,000 in cash and issued 4,162 shares of our common stock. The Universityof Chicago Agreement also provides for us to pay 4% of net sales for any product that falls within a valid claim of the licensed patentor 2% of net sales for any product outside of a valid claim of the licensed patent but uses its technical information, and to pay upto $18.7 million if all of the following milestones are achieved during the clinical trials and post commercialization of the licensedproduct:
| ● | Commencement of a Phase 2 clinical trial with a Licensed Product; | |
| ● | Commencement of a Phase 3 clinical trial with a Licensed Product; | |
| ● | First Submission of an NDA, BLA for a Licensed Product; | |
| ● | First Commercial Sale of a Licensed Product; and | |
| ● | Cumulative Net Sales of all Licensed Products reach one billion dollars. |
Inaddition to the foregoing, we have also agreed to pay 20% of sublicense revenue
Theterm of the University of Chicago Agreement will expire on the later of: (i) the expiration date of the last to expire of the LicensedPatents; and (ii) ten (10) years from the First Commercial Sale, unless earlier terminated pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Universityof Chicago (“University”) has the right to terminate the agreement upon 21 days written notice for our failure to make anypayment when due, with the right to cure the default by payment before the expiration of the notice period. University also has the rightto immediately terminate the agreement if we fail to achieve development milestones within the time frame contemplated by the agreement.Furthermore, University has the right to terminate the agreement if we are in material breach of any other obligation under the agreementnot specified above upon 30 days written notice unless we cure the breach within the notice period. In addition, if we file a petitionunder any bankruptcy or insolvency law, and such petition is not dismissed within 60 days of such filing, the agreement will automaticallyterminate at the end of such 60-day period unless University provides us with written notice that the agreement will not terminate. Uponour liquidation or dissolution, the agreement will automatically terminate and if we fail to begin commercial sales of a Licensed Productwithin 8 years, University may terminate the agreement anytime thereafter on written notice. We have the right to terminate the agreementfor any reason upon written notice to university and the agreement will terminate at the end of the Calendar Quarter following the CalendarQuarter during which we provided our notice of termination.
CollaborationAgreement with Personalized Stem Cells, Inc.
OnApril 9, 2020, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement with Personalized Stem Cells, Inc. (the “PSC Agreement”).Under the terms of the PSC Agreement, we provided two tested SVF cell line banks for use in a Covid-19 Project for use in the generationof a Master Cell Bank (MCB) by Personalized Stem Cells, Inc. (PSC). Fifty percent (50%) ownership of the MCB would be retained by PSCfor use in clinical trials for the treatment of Covid-19 and we are entitled to retain the other 50% ownership in the MCB to pursue ourdevelopment of our product candidates. We are also entitled to full access and use of all clinical data from the Covid-19 Project forour use in developing our product candidates. The agreement is for an unspecified term, but can be terminated by either party upon thematerial breach of the other party if such breach is not cured within a 30 day written notice period, or immediately upon written noticeif the breach is incapable of being cured. We contributed $100,000 in cost towards the manufacturing of the MCB by PSC.
GovernmentRegulation
Inthe United States, biological products are subject to regulation under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) and licensureunder the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act), and other federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations. The FD&C Actand corresponding regulations govern, among other things, the research, development, clinical trial, testing, manufacturing, qualitycontrol, approval, safety, efficacy, labeling, packaging, storage, record keeping, distribution, reporting, marketing, promotion, exportand import, advertising, post-approval monitoring, and post-approval reporting involving biological products. The process of obtainingregulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with appropriate federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations requirethe expenditure of substantial time and financial resources and we may not be able to obtain the required regulatory approvals.
| 94 |
Further,even if we obtain the required regulatory approvals for our products, pharmaceutical companies are subject to myriad federal, state,and foreign healthcare laws, rules, and regulations governing all aspects of our operations, including, but not limited to, our relationshipswith healthcare professionals, healthcare institutions, distributors of our products, and sales and marketing personnel; governmentaland other third-party payor coverage and reimbursement of our products; and data privacy and security. Such laws, rules, and regulationsare complex, continuously evolving, and, in many cases, have not been subject to extensive interpretation by applicable regulatory agenciesor the courts. We are required to invest significant time and financial resources in policies, procedures, processes, and systems toensure compliance with these laws, rules, and regulations, and our failure to do so may result in the imposition of substantial monetaryor other penalties by federal or state regulatory agencies, give rise to reputational harm, or otherwise have a material adverse effecton our results of operations and financial condition.
U.S.biological products development process
Theprocess required by the FDA before a biological product candidate may be licensed for marketing in the U.S. generally involves the following:
| ● | completion of nonclinical laboratory tests and animal studies performed in accordance with FDA’s good laboratory practices, or GLPs, requirements and applicable requirements for the humane use of laboratory animals or other applicable regulations; | |
| ● | submission to the FDA of an application for an investigational new drug application, or IND, which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin; | |
| ● | approval of the protocol and related documentation by an IRB or ethics committee at each clinical trial site before each trial may be initiated; | |
| ● | performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials according to GCPs, requirements and any additional requirements for the protection of human research subjects and their health information, to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed biological product candidate for its intended use; | |
| ● | preparation of and submission to the FDA of a BLA for marketing approval that includes sufficient evidence of establishing the safety, purity, and potency of the proposed biological product for its intended indication, including from results of nonclinical testing and clinical trials; | |
| ● | a determination by the FDA within 60 days of its receipt of a BLA to accept and file the application; | |
| ● | satisfactory completion of an FDA pre-license inspection of the manufacturing facility or facilities where the biological product is produced to assess compliance with current good manufacturing practices, or cGMPs, to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the biological product’s identity, strength, quality and purity; | |
| ● | satisfactory completion of an FDA advisory committee review, if applicable; |
| ● | potential FDA audit of the nonclinical study and clinical trial sites that generated the data in support of the BLA in accordance with any applicable expedited programs or designations; | |
| ● | payment of user fees for FDA review of the BLA (unless a fee waiver applies); and | |
| ● | FDA review and approval, or licensure, of the BLA to permit commercial marketing of the product for particular indications for use in the U.S. |
Pre-clinicalStudies and the IND Process
Beforetesting any biological product candidate in humans, the product candidate enters the preclinical testing stage. Preclinical tests, alsoreferred to as nonclinical studies, include laboratory evaluations of the product’s biological characteristics, chemistry, toxicityand formulation, as well as animal studies to assess the potential safety and activity of the product candidate. The conduct of the preclinicaltests must comply with federal regulations and requirements including GLPs.
| 95 |
Priorto commencing an initial clinical trial in humans with a product candidate in the U.S., an IND must be submitted to the FDA and the FDAmust allow the IND to proceed. An IND is an exemption from the FD&C Act that allows an unapproved product candidate to be shippedin interstate commerce for use in an investigational clinical trial and a request for FDA allowance that such investigational productmay be administered to humans in connection with such trial. Such authorization must be secured prior to interstate shipment and administration.In support of a request for an IND, the clinical trial sponsor must submit the results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturinginformation, analytical data, any available clinical data or literature and a proposed clinical protocol, to the FDA as part of the IND.An IND must become effective before human clinical trials may begin. Once submitted, the IND automatically becomes effective 30 daysafter receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA places the IND on a full or partial clinical hold within that 30-day time period. In such acase, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial or part of the study can begin. Submissionof an IND therefore may or may not result in FDA authorization to begin a clinical trial. The FDA also may impose clinical holds on asponsor’s IND at any time before or during clinical trials due to, among other considerations, unreasonable or significant safetyconcerns, inability to assess safety concerns, lack of qualified investigators, a misleading or materially incomplete investigator brochure,study design deficiencies, interference with the conduct or completion of a study designed to be adequate and well-controlled for thesame or another investigational product, insufficient quantities of investigational product, lack of effectiveness, or non-compliance.If the FDA imposes a clinical hold, studies may not recommence without FDA authorization and then only under terms authorized by theFDA.
ClinicalTrials
Clinicaltrials involve the administration of the biological product candidate to healthy volunteers or patients under the supervision of qualifiedinvestigators, generally physicians not employed by or under control of the trial sponsor. Clinical trials are conducted under protocolsdetailing, among other things, the objectives of the clinical trial, dosing procedures, subject selection and exclusion criteria, andthe parameters and criteria to be used to monitor subject safety, including stopping rules that assure a clinical trial will be stoppedif certain adverse events should occur. Each protocol and any amendments to the protocol must be submitted to the FDA as part of theIND. Clinical trials must be conducted and monitored in accordance with the FDA’s regulations comprising the GCP requirements,including the requirement that all research subjects provide informed consent. An IRB representing each institution participating inthe clinical trial must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial before it commences at that institution, and the IRB mustconduct continuing review and reapprove the trial at least annually. The IRB must review and approve, among other things, the trial protocoland informed consent information to be provided to trial subjects. An IRB must operate in compliance with FDA regulations. An IRB cansuspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution, or an institution it represents, if the clinical trial is not beingconducted in accordance with the IRB’s requirements or if the product candidate has been associated with unexpected serious harmto patients.
Sometrials are overseen by an independent group of qualified experts organized by the trial sponsor, known as a data safety monitoring boardor committee, or DSMB. This group provides authorization as to whether or not a trial may move forward at designated check points basedon access that only the group maintains to available data from the trial and may recommend halting the clinical trial if it determinesthat there is an unacceptable safety risk for subjects or other grounds, such as no demonstration of efficacy.
Certaininformation about certain clinical trials must also be submitted within specific timeframes to the NIH for public dissemination on itsClinicalTrials.gov website.
Clinicaltrials typically are conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap or be combined:
| ● | Phase 1. The biological product candidate is initially introduced into healthy human subjects and tested for safety. In the case of some products for severe or life-threatening diseases, especially when the product may be too inherently toxic to ethically administer to healthy volunteers, the initial human testing is often conducted in patients. These studies are designed to test the safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism and distribution of the biological product candidate in humans, the side effects associated with increasing doses, and, if possible, to gain early evidence of effectiveness. |
| 96 |
| ● | Phase 2. The biological product candidate is evaluated in a limited patient population with a specific disease or condition to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the product for specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance, optimal dosage and dosing schedule. Multiple Phase 2 clinical trials may be conducted to obtain information prior to beginning larger and more expensive Phase 3 clinical trials. | |
| ● | Phase 3. The biological product candidate is administered to an expanded patient population to further evaluate dosage, clinical efficacy, potency, and safety, generally at multiple geographically dispersed clinical trial sites. These clinical trials are intended to establish the overall risk/benefit ratio of the product candidate and provide an adequate basis for approval and product labeling. |
InAugust 2018, the FDA released a draft guidance entitled “Expansion Cohorts: Use in First-In-Human Clinical Trials to Expedite Developmentof Oncology Drugs and Biologics,” which outlines how developers can utilize an adaptive trial design commonly referred to as aseamless trial design in early stages of oncology biological product development (i.e., the first-in-human clinical trial) to compressthe traditional three phases of trials into one continuous trial called an expansion cohort trial. Information to support the designof individual expansion cohorts are included in IND applications and assessed by FDA. Expansion cohort trials can potentially bring efficiencyto biological product development and reduce developmental costs and time.
Insome cases, the FDA may require, or companies may voluntarily pursue, additional clinical trials after a product is approved to gainmore information about the product. These post-approval clinical trials, sometimes referred to as Phase 4 clinical trials, may also bemade a condition to approval of the BLA. Failure to exhibit due diligence with regard to conducting required Phase 4 clinical trialscould result in withdrawal of approval for products.
Concurrentwith clinical trials, companies usually complete additional animal studies and also must develop additional information about the chemistryand physical characteristics of the biological product as well as finalize a process for manufacturing the product in commercial quantitiesin accordance with cGMP requirements. To help reduce the risk of the introduction of adventitious agents with use of biological products,the Public Health Service Act, or PHS Act, emphasizes the importance of manufacturing control for products whose attributes cannot beprecisely defined. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and,among other things, the sponsor must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality, potency and purity of the final biologicalproduct. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate thatthe biological product candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.
Boththe FDA and the EMA provide expedited pathways for the development of biological product candidates for treatment of rare diseases, particularlylife threatening diseases with high unmet medical need. Such biological product candidates may be eligible to proceed to registrationfollowing a single clinical trial in a limited patient population, sometimes referred to as a Phase 1/2 trial, but which may be deemeda pivotal or registrational trial following review of the trial’s design and primary endpoints by the applicable regulatory agencies.Determination of the requirements to be deemed a pivotal or registrational trial is subject to the applicable regulatory authority’sscientific judgement and these requirements may differ in the U.S. and the European Union.
Duringall phases of clinical development, regulatory agencies require extensive monitoring and auditing of all clinical activities, clinicaldata, and clinical trial investigators. Annual progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted to theFDA. Written IND safety reports must be promptly submitted to the FDA and the investigators for serious and unexpected adverse events,any findings from other studies, tests in laboratory animals or in vitro testing that suggest a significant risk for human subjects,or any clinically important increase in the rate of a serious suspected adverse reaction over that listed in the protocol or investigatorbrochure. The sponsor must submit an IND safety report within 15 calendar days after the sponsor determines that the information qualifiesfor reporting. The sponsor also must notify the FDA of any unexpected fatal or life-threatening suspected adverse reaction within sevencalendar days after the sponsor’s initial receipt of the information. Regulatory authorities, the IRB or the sponsor may suspenda clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health riskor that the trial is unlikely to meet its stated objectives. Some trials also include oversight by an independent group of qualifiedexperts organized by the clinical trial sponsor, known as a data safety monitoring board, which provides authorization for whether ornot a trial may move forward at designated check points based on access to certain data from the trial and may halt the clinical trialif it determines that there is an unacceptable safety risk for subjects or other grounds, such as no demonstration of efficacy.
| 97 |
U.S.review and approval processes
Assumingsuccessful the completion of all required testing in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements, the results of product development,nonclinical studies and clinical trials are submitted to the FDA as part of a BLA requesting approval to market the product for one ormore indications. The BLA must include results of product development, laboratory and animal studies, human clinical trials, informationon the manufacture and composition of the product, proposed labeling and other relevant information. The testing and approval processesrequire substantial time and effort and there can be no assurance that the FDA will accept the BLA for filing and, even if filed, thatany approval will be granted on a timely basis, if at all.
Within60 days following submission of the application, the FDA reviews a BLA submitted to determine if it is substantially complete beforethe FDA accepts it for filing. The FDA may refuse to file any BLA that it deems incomplete or not properly reviewable at the time ofsubmission and may request additional information. In this event, the BLA must be resubmitted with the additional information. The resubmittedapplication also is subject to review to determine if it is substantially complete before the FDA accepts it for filing. In most cases,the submission of a BLA is subject to a substantial application user fee, although the fee may be waived under certain circumstances.Under the performance goals and policies implemented by the FDA under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, or PDUFA, for original BLAs,the FDA targets ten months from the filing date in which to complete its initial review of a standard application and respond to theapplicant, and six months from the filing date for an application with priority review. The FDA does not always meet its PDUFA goal dates,and the review process is often significantly extended by FDA requests for additional information or clarification. This review typicallytakes twelve months from the date the BLA is submitted to the FDA because the FDA has approximately two months to make a “filing”decision. The review process and the PDUFA goal date may be extended by three months if the FDA requests or the BLA sponsor otherwiseprovides additional information or clarification regarding information already provided in the submission within the last three monthsbefore the PDUFA goal date.
Oncethe submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive review of the BLA. The FDA reviews the BLA to determine,among other things, whether the proposed product is safe, pure and potent for its intended use and whether the product is being manufacturedin accordance with cGMP to ensure its continued safety, purity and purity. The FDA may refer applications for novel biological productsor biological products that present difficult or novel questions of safety or efficacy to an advisory committee, typically a panel thatincludes clinicians and other experts, for review, evaluation and a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved andunder what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefullywhen making decisions. During the biological product approval process, the FDA also will determine whether a Risk Evaluation and MitigationStrategy, or REMS, is necessary to assure the safe use of the biological product. If the FDA concludes a REMS is needed, the sponsorof the BLA must submit a proposed REMS; the FDA will not approve the BLA without a REMS, if required.
Beforeapproving a BLA, the FDA typically will inspect the facilities at which the product is manufactured. The FDA will not approve the productunless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assureconsistent production of the product within required specifications. Additionally, before approving a BLA, the FDA will typically inspectone or more clinical sites to assure that the clinical trials were conducted in compliance with IND trial requirements and GCP requirements.To assure cGMP and GCP compliance, an applicant must incur significant expenditure of time, money and effort in the areas of training,record keeping, production and quality control.
Underthe Pediatric Research Equity Act, or PREA, a BLA or supplement to a BLA for a novel product (e.g., new active ingredient, new indication,etc.) must contain data to assess the safety and effectiveness of the biological product for the claimed indications in all relevantpediatric subpopulations and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe andeffective. The FDA may grant deferrals for submission of data or full or partial waivers. Unless otherwise required by regulation, PREAdoes not apply to any biological product for an indication for which orphan designation has been granted.
| 98 |
Afterthe FDA evaluates a BLA and conducts inspections of manufacturing facilities where the investigational product and/or its drug substancewill be produced, the FDA may issue an approval letter or a Complete Response letter. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketingof the product with specific prescribing information for specific indications. A Complete Response letter will describe all of the deficienciesthat the FDA has identified in the BLA, except that where the FDA determines that the data supporting the application are inadequateto support approval, the FDA may issue the Complete Response letter without first conducting required inspections, testing submittedproduct lots, and/or reviewing proposed labeling. In issuing the Complete Response letter, the FDA may recommend actions that the applicantmight take to place the BLA in condition for approval, including requests for additional information or clarification. The FDA may delayor refuse approval of a BLA if applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied, require additional testing or information and/or requirepost-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor safety or efficacy of a product.
Ifa product receives regulatory approval, the approval may be significantly limited to specific diseases and dosages or the indicationsfor use may otherwise be limited, including to subpopulations of patients, which could restrict the commercial value of the product.Further, the FDA may require that certain contraindications, warnings, precautions or interactions be included in the product labeling.The FDA may impose restrictions and conditions on product distribution, prescribing, or dispensing in the form of a REMS, or otherwiselimit the scope of any approval. The FDA also may condition approval on, among other things, changes to proposed labeling or the developmentof adequate controls and specifications. Once approved, the FDA may withdraw the product approval if compliance with pre- and post-marketingrequirements is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the marketplace. The FDA may require one or more Phase4 post-market trials and surveillance to further assess and monitor the product’s safety and effectiveness after commercialization,and may limit further marketing of the product based on the results of these post-marketing trials. In addition, new government requirements,including those resulting from new legislation, may be established, or the FDA’s policies may change, which could impact the timelinefor regulatory approval or otherwise impact ongoing development programs.
Orphanproduct designation
Underthe Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan designation to a biological product intended to treat a rare disease or condition, whichis generally a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the U.S., or 200,000 or more individuals in the U.S.and for which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making a biological product available in the U.S. forthis type of disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the product. Orphan product designation must be requested before submittinga BLA. After the FDA grants orphan product designation, the identity of the therapeutic agent and its potential orphan use are disclosedpublicly by the FDA. Orphan product designation does not convey any advantage in or shorten the duration of the regulatory review andapproval process.
Orphanproduct designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, taxadvantages and user-fee waivers. If a product that has orphan product designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for aparticular active ingredient for the disease or condition for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan productexclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications, including a full BLA, to market the same biologic for thesame indication for seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphanproduct exclusivity. Competitors, however, may receive approval of different products for the indication for which the orphan producthas exclusivity or obtain approval for the same product but for a different indication for which the orphan product has exclusivity.Orphan product exclusivity also could block the approval of one of our products for seven years if a competitor obtains approval of thesame biological product as defined by the FDA or if a product candidate is determined to be contained within the competitor’s productfor the same indication or disease. If a biological product designated as an orphan product receives marketing approval for an indicationbroader than what is designated, it may not be entitled to orphan product exclusivity. In addition, orphan drug exclusive marketing rightsin the U.S. may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or, as noted above, ifthe second applicant demonstrates that its product is clinically superior to the approved product with orphan exclusivity or the manufacturerof the approved product is unable to assure sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare diseaseor condition. Orphan drug status in the European Union has similar, but not identical, benefits.
| 99 |
Expediteddevelopment and review programs
TheFDA has various programs, including fast track designation, breakthrough therapy designation, accelerated approval and priority review,that are intended to expedite or simplify the process for the development and FDA review of drugs and biologics that are intended forthe treatment of serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions. To be eligible for fast-track designation, new drugs and biologicalproduct candidates must be intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and demonstrate the potential to addressunmet medical needs for the disease or condition. Fast-track designation applies to the combination of the product and the specific indicationfor which it is being studied. The sponsor of a new drug or biologic may request the FDA to designate the drug or biologic as a fast-trackproduct at any time during the clinical development of the product. One benefit of fast-track designation, for example, is that the FDAmay consider for review sections of the marketing application on a rolling basis before the complete application is submitted if certainconditions are satisfied, including an agreement with the FDA on the proposed schedule for submission of portions of the applicationand the payment of applicable user fees before the FDA may initiate a review.
Underthe FDA’s breakthrough therapy program, a sponsor may seek FDA designation of its product candidate as a breakthrough therapy ifthe product candidate is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs or biologics, to treat a serious or life-threateningdisease or condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that it may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapieson one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. Breakthroughtherapy designation comes with all of the benefits of fast-track designation. The FDA may take other actions appropriate to expeditethe development and review of the product candidate, including holding meetings with the sponsor and providing timely advice to, andinteractive communication with, the sponsor regarding the development program.
Aproduct candidate is eligible for priority review if it treats a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and, if approved, wouldprovide a significant improvement in the safety or effectiveness of the treatment, diagnosis or prevention of a serious disease or condition.The FDA will attempt to direct additional resources to the evaluation of an application for a new drug or biological product designatedfor priority review in an effort to facilitate the review. Under priority review, the FDA’s goal is to review an application insix months once it is filed, compared to ten months for a standard review. Priority review designation does not change the scientific/medicalstandard for approval or the quality of evidence necessary to support approval.
Additionally,a product candidate may be eligible for accelerated approval. Drug or biological products studied for their safety and effectivenessin treating serious or life-threatening illnesses and that provide meaningful therapeutic benefit over existing treatments may receiveaccelerated approval, which means that they may be approved on the basis of adequate and well-controlled clinical trials establishingthat the product has an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict a clinical benefit, or on the basis of aneffect on an intermediate clinical endpoint other than survival or irreversible morbidity or mortality, that is reasonably likely topredict irreversible morbidity or mortality or other clinical benefit, taking into account the severity, rarity, or prevalence of thecondition and the availability or lack of alternative treatments. As a condition of approval, the FDA generally requires that a sponsorof a drug or biological product receiving accelerated approval perform adequate and well-controlled post-marketing clinical trials toverify the clinical benefit in relationship to the surrogate endpoint or ultimate outcome in relationship to the clinical benefit. Inaddition, the FDA currently requires as a condition for accelerated approval pre-approval of promotional materials, which could adverselyimpact the timing of the commercial launch of the product. The FDA may withdraw approval of a drug or indication approved under acceleratedapproval if, for example, the confirmatory trial fails to verify the predicted clinical benefit of the product.
| 100 |
Post-approvalrequirements
Rigorousand extensive FDA regulation of biological products continues after approval, particularly with respect to cGMP requirements, as wellas requirements relating to record keeping, reporting of adverse experiences, periodic reporting, product sampling and distribution,and advertising and promotion of the product. Manufacturers of products are required to comply with applicable requirements in the cGMPregulations, including quality control and quality assurance and maintenance of records and documentation. Other post-approval requirementsapplicable to biological products, include reporting of cGMP deviations that may affect the identity, potency, purity and overall safetyof a distributed product, record keeping requirements, reporting of adverse effects, reporting updated safety and efficacy information,and complying with electronic record and signature requirements. After a BLA is approved, the product also may be subject to officiallot release. As part of the manufacturing process, the manufacturer is required to perform certain tests on each lot of the product beforeit is released for distribution. If the product is subject to official release by the FDA, the manufacturer submits samples of each lotof product to the FDA together with a release protocol showing a summary of the history of manufacture of the lot and the results ofall of the manufacturer’s tests performed on the lot. The FDA also may perform certain confirmatory tests on lots of some products,such as viral vaccines, before releasing the lots for distribution by the manufacturer. In addition, the FDA conducts laboratory researchrelated to the regulatory standards on the safety, purity, potency, and effectiveness of biological products.
Manufacturersmust comply with the FDA’s advertising and promotion requirements, such as those related to direct-to-consumer advertising, theprohibition on promoting products for uses or in patient populations that are not described in the product’s approved labeling(known as “off-label use”), industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities, and promotional activities involvingthe internet. Discovery of previously unknown problems or the failure to comply with the applicable regulatory requirements may resultin restrictions on the marketing of a product or withdrawal of the product from the market as well as possible civil or criminal sanctions.Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process or afterapproval, may subject an applicant or manufacturer to administrative or judicial civil or criminal sanctions and adverse publicity. FDAsanctions could include refusal to approve pending applications, withdrawal of an approval, clinical holds, warning or untitled letters,product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, product detentions or refusal to permitthe import or export of the product, restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, injunctions, fines, refusals of governmentcontracts, mandated corrective advertising or communications with doctors or other stakeholders, debarment, restitution, disgorgementof profits, or civil or criminal penalties. Any agency or judicial enforcement action could have a material adverse effect on us.
Biologicalproduct manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved biological products are required toregister their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDAand certain state agencies for compliance with cGMP and other laws. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money, andeffort in the area of production and quality control to maintain cGMP compliance. Discovery of problems with a product after approvalmay result in restrictions on a product, manufacturer, or holder of an approved BLA, including withdrawal of the product from the market.In addition, changes to the manufacturing process or facility generally require prior FDA approval before being implemented and othertypes of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications and additional labeling claims, are also subject to furtherFDA review and approval.
U.S.patent term restoration and marketing exclusivity
Dependingupon the timing, duration and specifics of the FDA approval of a biological product, some of a sponsor’s U.S. patents may be eligiblefor limited patent term extension under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent restoration term ofup to five years as compensation for patent term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review process. However, patentterm restoration cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the product’s approval date. Thepatent term restoration period is generally one-half the time between the effective date of an IND and the submission date of a BLA plusthe time between the submission date of a BLA and the approval of that application. Only one patent applicable to an approved biologicalproduct is eligible for the extension and the application for the extension must be submitted prior to the expiration of the patent.In addition, a patent can only be extended once and only for a single product. The U.S. PTO, in consultation with the FDA, reviews andapproves the application for any patent term extension or restoration. In the future, we may intend to apply for restoration of patentterm for one of our patents, if and as applicable, to add patent life beyond its current expiration date, depending on the expected lengthof the clinical trials and other factors involved in the filing of the relevant BLA.
Abiological product can obtain pediatric market exclusivity in the U.S. Pediatric exclusivity, if granted, adds six months to existingexclusivity periods, including some regulatory exclusivity periods tied to patent terms. This six-month exclusivity, which runs fromthe end of other exclusivity protection or patent term, may be granted based on the voluntary completion of a pediatric study in accordancewith an FDA-issued “Written Request” for such a study.
| 101 |
ThePatient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively the ACA,includes a subtitle called the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, or BPCIA, which created an abbreviated approvalpathway for biological products shown to be biosimilar to, or interchangeable with, an FDA-licensed reference biological product. Thisamendment to the PHS Act attempts to minimize duplicative testing. Biosimilarity, which requires that there be no clinically meaningfuldifferences between the biological product and the reference product in terms of safety, purity, and potency, can be shown through analyticalstudies, animal studies, and a clinical trial or trials. Interchangeability requires that a product is biosimilar to the reference productand the product must demonstrate that it can be expected to produce the same clinical results as the reference product and, for productsadministered multiple times, the biologic and the reference biologic may be switched after one has been previously administered withoutincreasing safety risks or risks of diminished efficacy relative to exclusive use of the reference biologic. However, complexities associatedwith the larger, and often more complex, structure of biological products, as well as the process by which such products are manufactured,pose significant hurdles to implementation that are still being worked out by the FDA.
FDAwill not accept an application for a biosimilar or interchangeable product based on the reference biological product until four yearsafter the date of first licensure of the reference product, and FDA will not approve an application for a biosimilar or interchangeableproduct based on the reference biological product until 12 years after the date of first licensure of the reference product. “Firstlicensure” typically means the initial date the particular product at issue was licensed in the U.S. Date of first licensure doesnot include the date of licensure of (and a new period of exclusivity is not available for) a biological product if the licensure isfor a supplement for the biological product or for a subsequent application by the same sponsor or manufacturer of the biological product(or licensor, predecessor in interest, or other related entity) for a change (not including a modification to the structure of the biologicalproduct) that results in a new indication, route of administration, dosing schedule, dosage form, delivery system, delivery device orstrength, or for a modification to the structure of the biological product that does not result in a change in safety, purity, or potency.The BPCIA is complex and continues to be interpreted and implemented by the FDA. In addition, government proposals have sought to reducethe 12-year reference product exclusivity period. Other aspects of the BPCIA, some of which may impact the BPCIA exclusivity provisions,have also been the subject of recent litigation. As a result, the ultimate implementation and impact of the BPCIA is subject to significantuncertainty.
U.S.regulation of companion diagnostics
Ourproduct candidates may require use of an in vitro diagnostic to identify appropriate patient populations. These diagnostics, oftenreferred to as companion diagnostics, are regulated as medical devices. In the U.S., the FD&C Act and its implementing regulationsand other federal and state statutes and regulations govern, among other things, medical device design and development, preclinical andclinical testing, premarket clearance or approval, registration and listing, manufacturing, labeling, storage, advertising and promotion,sales and distribution, export and import and post-market surveillance. Unless an exemption applies, companion diagnostic tests requiremarketing clearance or approval from the FDA prior to commercial distribution. The two primary types of FDA marketing authorization applicableto a medical device are premarket notification, also called 510(k) clearance, and premarket approval, or PMA approval.
Ifuse of companion diagnostic is essential to safe and effective use of a drug or biologic product, then the FDA generally will requireapproval or clearance of the diagnostic contemporaneously with the approval of the therapeutic product. On August 6, 2014, the FDA issueda final guidance document addressing the development and approval process for “In Vitro Companion Diagnostic Devices.”According to the guidance, for novel candidates such as our product candidates, a companion diagnostic device and its corresponding drugor biologic candidate should be approved or cleared contemporaneously by FDA for the use indicated in the therapeutic product labeling.The guidance also explains that a companion diagnostic device used to make treatment decisions in clinical trials of a biologic productcandidate generally will be considered an investigational device, unless it is employed for an intended use for which the device is alreadyapproved or cleared. If used to make critical treatment decisions, such as patient selection, the diagnostic device generally will beconsidered a significant risk device under the FDA’s Investigational Device Exemption, or IDE, regulations. Thus, the sponsor ofthe diagnostic device will be required to comply with the IDE regulations. According to the guidance, if a diagnostic device and a drugare to be studied together to support their respective approvals, both products can be studied in the same investigational study, ifthe study meets both the requirements of the IDE regulations and the IND regulations. The guidance provides that depending on the detailsof the study plan and subjects, a sponsor may seek to submit an IND alone, or both an IND and an IDE. In July 2016, the FDA issued adraft guidance document intended to further assist sponsors of therapeutic products and sponsors of in vitro companion diagnosticdevices on issues related to co-development of these products.
| 102 |
TheFDA generally requires companion diagnostics intended to select the patients who will respond to cancer treatment to obtain approvalof a PMA for that diagnostic contemporaneously with approval of the therapeutic. The review of these in vitro companion diagnosticsin conjunction with the review of therapeutic candidates such as those we are developing involves coordination of review by the FDA’sCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research and by the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health. The PMA process, includingthe gathering of clinical and pre-clinical data and the submission to and review by the FDA, can take several years or longer. It involvesa rigorous premarket review during which the applicant must prepare and provide the FDA with reasonable assurance of the device’ssafety and effectiveness and information about the device and its components regarding, among other things, device design, manufacturingand labeling. PMA applications are also subject to an application fee.
PMAsfor certain devices must generally include the results from extensive pre-clinical and adequate and well-controlled clinical trials toestablish the safety and effectiveness of the device for each indication for which FDA approval is sought. In particular, for a diagnostic,the applicant must demonstrate that the diagnostic produces reproducible results when the same sample is tested multiple times by multipleusers at multiple laboratories. In addition, as part of the PMA review, the FDA will typically inspect the manufacturer’s facilitiesfor compliance with the Quality System Regulation, or QSR, which imposes elaborate testing, control, documentation and other qualityassurance requirements.
Ifthe FDA evaluations of both the PMA application and the manufacturing facilities are favorable, the FDA will either issue an approvalletter or a not-approvable letter, which usually contains a number of conditions that must be met in order to secure the final approvalof the PMA, such as changes in labeling, or specific additional information, such as submission of final labeling, in order to securefinal approval of the PMA. If the FDA concludes that the applicable criteria have been met, the FDA will issue a PMA for the approvedindications, which can be more limited than those originally sought by the applicant. The PMA can include post-approval conditions thatthe FDA believes necessary to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device, including, among other things, restrictions on labeling,promotion, sale and distribution.
Ifthe FDA’s evaluation of the PMA or manufacturing facilities is not favorable, the FDA will issue an order denying approval of thePMA or issue a not approvable order. A not approvable letter will outline the deficiencies in the application and, where practical, willidentify what is necessary to make the PMA approvable. The FDA may also determine that additional clinical trials are necessary, in whichcase the PMA approval may be delayed for several months or years while the trials are conducted and then the data submitted in an amendmentto the PMA. Once granted, PMA approval may be withdrawn by the FDA if compliance with post approval requirements, conditions of approvalor other regulatory standards is not maintained or problems are identified following initial marketing. PMA approval is not guaranteed,and the FDA may ultimately respond to a PMA submission with a not approvable determination based on deficiencies in the application andrequire additional clinical trial or other data that may be expensive and time-consuming to generate and that can substantially delayapproval.
Aftera device is placed on the market, it remains subject to significant regulatory requirements. Medical devices may be marketed only forthe uses and indications for which they are cleared or approved. Device manufacturers must also establish registration and device listingswith the FDA. A medical device manufacturer’s manufacturing processes and those of its suppliers are required to comply with theapplicable portions of the QSR, which cover the methods and documentation of the design, testing, production, processes, controls, qualityassurance, labeling, packaging and shipping of medical devices. Domestic facility records and manufacturing processes are subject toperiodic unscheduled inspections by the FDA. The FDA also may inspect foreign facilities that export products to the U.S.
| 103 |
Additionalregulation
Inaddition to the foregoing, state and federal laws regarding environmental protection and hazardous substances, including the OccupationalSafety and Health Act, the Resource Conservancy and Recovery Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act, affect our business. These andother laws govern our use, handling and disposal of various biological, chemical and radioactive substances used in, and wastes generatedby, our operations. If our operations result in contamination of the environment or expose individuals to hazardous substances, we couldbe liable for damages and governmental fines.
Governmentregulation outside of the United States
Inaddition to regulations in the U.S., we are subject to a variety of regulations in other jurisdictions governing, among other things,research and development, clinical trials, testing, manufacturing, safety, efficacy, labeling, packaging, storage, record keeping, distribution,reporting, advertising and other promotional practices involving biological products as well as authorization and approval of our products.Because biologically sourced raw materials are subject to unique contamination risks, their use may be restricted in some countries.
Therequirements and process governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary from country tocountry. In all cases, the clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with GCP and the applicable regulatory requirements and theethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki. If we fail to comply with applicable foreign regulatory requirements,we may be subject to, among other things, fines, suspension of clinical trials, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, productrecalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecution.
Clinicaltrials regulation
Whetheror not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain the requisite approvals from regulatory authorities in foreign countriesprior to the commencement of clinical trials or marketing of the product in those countries. Certain countries outside of the U.S. havea similar process that requires the submission of a clinical trial application (CTA) much like the IND prior to the commencement of humanclinical trials. In the European Union, for example, a CTA must be submitted for each clinical trial to each country’s nationalcompetent authority, or NCA, and at least one independent ethics committee, or EC, much like the FDA and an IRB, respectively. Once theCTA is approved in accordance with a country’s requirements, the corresponding clinical trial may proceed. Under the current regime(the EU Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC or Clinical Trials Regulation (EU) No 536/2014) all suspected unexpected serious adversereactions to the investigated drug that occur during the clinical trial have to be reported to the NCA and ECs of the EU Member Statewhere they occurred.
InApril 2014, the EU adopted a new Clinical Trials Regulation (EU) No 536/2014, which will replace the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC.It will overhaul the current system of approvals for clinical trials in the EU. Specifically, the new Regulation, which will be directlyapplicable in all Member States (meaning that no national implementing legislation in each EU Member State is required), aims at simplifyingand streamlining the approval of clinical trials in the EU. For instance, the new Regulation provides for a streamlined application procedurevia a single entry point and strictly defined deadlines for the assessment of clinical trial applications. The new Regulation took effectJanuary 31, 2022, with a transition period through January 31, 2023, after which all new CTAs must be submitted through the new centralinformation system (CTIS).
EuropeanUnion drug review and approval
Inthe European Economic Area, or EEA, medicinal products can only be commercialized after obtaining a marketing authorization. To obtainregulatory approval of a medicinal product in the EEA, we must submit a marketing authorization application, or MAA. A centralized marketingauthorization is issued by the European Commission through the centralized procedure, based on the opinion of the Committee for MedicinalProducts for Human Use, or CHMP, of the EMA, and is valid throughout the EEA. The centralized procedure is mandatory for certain typesof products, such as biotechnology medicinal products, orphan medicinal products, advanced-therapy medicinal products such as (gene-therapy,somatic cell-therapy or tissue-engineered medicines), and medicinal products containing a new active substance indicated for the treatmentof HIV, AIDS, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes, auto-immune and other immune dysfunctions, and viral diseases. The centralizedprocedure is optional for products containing a new active substance not yet authorized in the EEA, or for products that constitute asignificant therapeutic, scientific or technical innovation or which are in the interest of public health in the EEA.
| 104 |
Underthe centralized procedure the maximum timeframe for the evaluation of a MAA by the EMA is 210 days, excluding clock stops, when additionalwritten or oral information is to be provided by the applicant in response to questions asked by the CHMP. Clock stops may extend thetimeframe of evaluation of a MAA considerably beyond 210 days. Where the CHMP gives a positive opinion, it provides the opinion togetherwith supporting documentation to the European Commission, who make the final decision to grant a marketing authorization, which is issuedwithin 67 days of receipt of the EMA’s recommendation. Accelerated assessment might be granted by the CHMP in exceptional cases,when a medicinal product is expected to be of major public health interest, particularly from the point of view of therapeutic innovation.The timeframe for the evaluation of a MAA under the accelerated assessment procedure is 150 days, excluding clock stops, but it is possiblethat the CHMP may revert to the standard time limit for the centralized procedure if it determines that the application is no longerappropriate to conduct an accelerated assessment.
Theapplication used to submit the BLA in the U.S. is similar to that required in the European Union, although there may be certain specificrequirements, for example those set out in Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products, covering gene therapy,somatic cell therapy and tissue-engineered medicinal products.
Nowthat the UK (which comprises Great Britain and Northern Ireland) has left the European Union, Great Britain will no longer be coveredby centralized marketing authorizations (under the Northern Irish Protocol, centralized marketing authorizations will continue to berecognized in Northern Ireland). All medicinal products with a current centralized marketing authorization were automatically convertedto Great Britain marketing authorizations on January 1, 2021. For a period of two years from January 1, 2021, the Medicines and Healthcareproducts Regulatory Agency, or MHRA, the UK medicines regulator, may rely on a decision taken by the European Commission on the approvalof a new marketing authorization in the centralized procedure, in order to more quickly grant a new Great Britain marketing authorization.A separate application will, however, still be required.
Dataand market exclusivity
Inthe EEA, upon receiving marketing authorization, innovative medicinal products generally receive eight years of data exclusivity andan additional two years of market exclusivity. If granted, data exclusivity prevents generic or biosimilar applicants from referencingthe innovator’s pre-clinical and clinical trial data contained in the dossier of the reference product when applying for a genericor biosimilar marketing authorization in the EEA, during a period of eight years from the date on which the reference product was firstauthorized in the EEA. During the additional two-year period of market exclusivity, a generic or biosimilar marketing authorization applicationcan be submitted, and the innovator’s data may be referenced, but no generic or biosimilar product can be marketed until the expirationof the market exclusivity. The overall ten-year period will be extended to a maximum of eleven years if, during the first eight yearsof those ten years, the marketing authorization holder obtains an authorization for one or more new therapeutic indications which, duringthe scientific evaluation prior to authorization, is held to bring a significant clinical benefit in comparison with existing therapies.There is no guarantee that a product will be considered by the EMA to be an innovative medicinal product, and products may not qualifyfor data exclusivity. Even if a product is considered to be an innovative medicinal product so that the innovator gains the prescribedperiod of data exclusivity, another company may market another version of the product if such company obtained a marketing authorizationbased on a MAA with a completely independent data package of pharmaceutical tests, preclinical tests and clinical trials.
Orphandrug designation and exclusivity
Productsreceiving orphan designation in the EEA can receive ten years of market exclusivity, during which time no “similar medicinal product”may be placed on the market. A “similar medicinal product” is defined as a medicinal product containing a similar activesubstance or substances as contained in an authorized orphan medicinal product, and which is intended for the same therapeutic indication.An orphan product can also obtain an additional two years of market exclusivity in the European Union where an agreed Pediatric InvestigationPlan for pediatric studies has been complied with. No extension to any supplementary protection certificate can be granted on the basisof pediatric studies for orphan indications.
| 105 |
Thecriteria for designating an “orphan medicinal product” in the EEA are similar in principle to those in the U.S. Under Article3 of Regulation (EC) 141/2000, a medicinal product may be designated as orphan if it meets the following criteria: (1) it is intendedfor the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition; (2) either (a) such conditionaffects no more than five (5) in ten thousand (10,000) persons in the EEA when the application is made, or (b) it is unlikely that theproduct, without the benefits derived from orphan status, would generate sufficient return in the European Union to justify the necessaryinvestment in its development; and (3) there exists no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of such condition authorizedfor marketing in the EEA, or if such a method exists, the product will be of significant benefit to those affected by the condition,as defined in Regulation (EC) 847/2000. Orphan medicinal products are eligible for financial incentives such as reduction of fees orfee waivers and are, upon grant of a marketing authorization, entitled to ten years of market exclusivity for the approved therapeuticindication. The application for orphan drug designation must be submitted before the application for marketing authorization. The applicantwill receive a fee reduction for the MAA if the orphan drug designation has been granted, but not if the designation is still pendingat the time the marketing authorization is submitted. Orphan drug designation does not convey any advantage in, or shorten the durationof, the regulatory review and approval process.
The10-year market exclusivity may be reduced to six years if, at the end of the fifth year, it is established that the product no longermeets the criteria for orphan designation, for example, if the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify maintenance of marketexclusivity. Additionally, marketing authorization may be granted to a similar medicinal product for the same indication at any timeif:
| ● | the second applicant can establish that its product, although similar, is safer, more effective or otherwise clinically superior; | |
| ● | the marketing authorization holder of the authorized product consents to a second orphan medicinal product application; or | |
| ● | the marketing authorization holder of the authorized product cannot supply enough orphan medicinal product. |
Pediatricdevelopment
Inthe EEA, companies developing a new medicinal product must agree upon a Pediatric Investigation Plan, or PIP, with the EMA’s pediatriccommittee, or PDCO, and must conduct pediatric clinical trials in accordance with that PIP, unless a waiver applies (e.g., because therelevant disease or condition occurs only in adults). The PIP sets out the timing and measures proposed to generate data to support apediatric indication of the drug for which marketing authorization is being sought. The marketing authorization application for the productmust include the results of pediatric clinical trials conducted in accordance with the PIP, unless a waiver applies, or a deferral hasbeen granted by the PDCO of the obligation to implement some or all of the measures of the PIP until there are sufficient data to demonstratethe efficacy and safety of the product in adults, in which case the pediatric clinical trials must be completed at a later date. Productsthat are granted a marketing authorization with the results of the pediatric clinical trials conducted in accordance with the PIP areeligible for a six month extension of the protection under a supplementary protection certificate (if any is in effect at the time ofapproval) even where the trial results are negative. In the case of orphan medicinal products, a two year extension of the orphan marketexclusivity may be available. This pediatric reward is subject to specific conditions and is not automatically available when data incompliance with the PIP are developed and submitted.
Post-approvalcontrols
Followingapproval, the holder of the marketing authorization is required to comply with a range of requirements applicable to the manufacturing,marketing, promotion and sale of the medicinal product. These include the following:
| ● | The holder of a marketing authorization must establish and maintain a pharmacovigilance system and appoint an individual qualified person for pharmacovigilance, who is responsible for oversight of that system. Key obligations include expedited reporting of suspected serious adverse reactions and submission of periodic safety update reports, or PSURs. |
| 106 |
| ● | All new MAAs must include a risk management plan, or RMP, describing the risk management system that the company will put in place and documenting measures to prevent or minimize the risks associated with the product. The regulatory authorities may also impose specific obligations as a condition of the marketing authorization. Such risk-minimization measures or post-authorization obligations may include additional safety monitoring, more frequent submission of PSURs, or the conduct of additional clinical trials or post-authorization safety studies. RMPs and PSURs are routinely available to third parties requesting access, subject to limited redactions. | |
| ● | All advertising and promotional activities for the product must be consistent with the approved summary of product characteristics, or SmPC, and therefore all off-label promotion is prohibited. Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medicines is also prohibited in the European Union. Although general requirements for advertising and promotion of medicinal products are established under European Union directives, the details are governed by regulations in each European Union Member State and can differ from one country to another. |
Coverageand Reimbursement
Inthe United States and markets in other countries, patients who are prescribed treatments for their conditions and providers performingthe prescribed services generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the associated healthcare costs. Thus, evenif a product candidate is approved, sales of the product will depend, in part, on the extent to which third-party payors, including governmenthealth programs in the United States such as Medicare and Medicaid, commercial health insurers and managed care organizations, providecoverage, and establish adequate reimbursement levels for, the product. In the United States, the principal decisions about reimbursementfor new medicines are typically made by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, an agency within the U.S. Departmentof Health and Human Services, or HHS. CMS decides whether and to what extent a new medicine will be covered and reimbursed under Medicareand private payors tend to follow CMS to a substantial degree. No uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for drug products existsamong third-party payors. Therefore, coverage and reimbursement for drug products can differ significantly from payor to payor. The processfor determining whether a third-party payor will provide coverage for a product may be separate from the process for setting the priceor reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the product once coverage is approved. Third-party payors are increasingly challengingthe prices charged, examining the medical necessity, reviewing the cost-effectiveness of medical products and services and imposing controlsto manage costs. Third-party payors may limit coverage to specific products on an approved list, also known as a formulary, which mightnot include all of the approved products for a particular indication.
Inorder to secure coverage and reimbursement for any product that might be approved for sale, a company may need to conduct expensive pharmacoeconomicstudies in order to demonstrate the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of the product, which will require additional expenditureabove and beyond the costs required to obtain FDA or other comparable regulatory approvals. Additionally, companies may also need toprovide discounts to purchasers, private health plans or government healthcare programs. Nonetheless, product candidates may not be consideredmedically necessary or cost effective. A decision by a third-party payor not to cover a product could reduce physician utilization oncethe product is approved and have a material adverse effect on sales, our operations and financial condition. Additionally, a third-partypayor’s decision to provide coverage for a product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Further,one payor’s determination to provide coverage for a product does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage and reimbursementfor the product, and the level of coverage and reimbursement can differ significantly from payor to payor.
Thecontainment of healthcare costs has become a priority of federal, state and foreign governments, and the prices of products have beena focus in this effort. Governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls,restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products. Adoption of price controls and cost-containmentmeasures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could further limit a company’srevenue generated from the sale of any approved products. Coverage policies and third-party payor reimbursement rates may change at anytime. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more products for which a company or its collaboratorsreceive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.
| 107 |
OtherHealthcare Laws and Compliance Requirements
Healthcareproviders, physicians, and third-party payors will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any products for whichwe obtain marketing approval. Our business operations and any current or future arrangements with third-party payors, healthcare providersand physicians may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the businessor financial arrangements and relationships through which we develop, market, sell and distribute any drugs for which we obtain marketingapproval. In the United States, these laws include, without limitation, state and federal anti- kickback, false claims, physician transparency,and patient data privacy and security laws and regulations, including but not limited to those described below.
| ● | The federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, persons and entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, paying, receiving or providing any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or certain rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare and Medicaid. A person or entity need not have actual knowledge of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. Violations are subject to civil and criminal fines and penalties for each violation, plus up to three times the remuneration involved, imprisonment, and exclusion from government healthcare programs. In addition, the government may assert that a claim that includes items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the civil False Claims Act. | |
| ● | The federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the civil False Claims Act, or FCA, prohibit individuals or entities from, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, claims for payment or approval that are false, fictitious or fraudulent; knowingly making, using, or causing to be made or used, a false statement or record material to a false or fraudulent claim or obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the federal government; or knowingly concealing or knowingly and improperly avoiding or decreasing an obligation to pay money to the federal government. Manufacturers can be held liable under the FCA even when they do not submit claims directly to government payors if they are deemed to “cause” the submission of false or fraudulent claims. The FCA also permits a private individual acting as a “whistleblower” to bring actions on behalf of the federal government alleging violations of the FCA and to share in any monetary recovery. When an entity is determined to have violated the federal civil False Claims Act, the government may impose civil fines and penalties for each false claim, plus treble damages, and exclude the entity from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs. |
| ● | The federal civil monetary penalties laws impose civil fines for, among other things, the offering or transfer or remuneration to a Medicare or state healthcare program beneficiary, if the person knows or should know it is likely to influence the beneficiary’s selection of a particular provider, practitioner, or supplier of services reimbursable by Medicare or a state health care program, unless an exception applies. | |
| ● | The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, imposes criminal and civil liability for knowingly and willfully executing a scheme, or attempting to execute a scheme, to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private payors, knowingly and willfully embezzling or stealing from a healthcare benefit program, willfully obstructing a criminal investigation of a healthcare offense, or falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statements in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. Similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity may be found guilty of violating HIPAA without actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it. |
| 108 |
| ● | HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or HITECH, and their respective implementing regulations, impose, among other things, specified requirements on covered entities and their respective business associates relating to the privacy and security of individually identifiable health information including mandatory contractual terms and required implementation of technical safeguards of such information. HITECH also created new tiers of civil monetary penalties, amended HIPAA to make civil and criminal penalties directly applicable to business associates in some cases, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. |
| ● | The Physician Payments Sunshine Act, enacted as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or collectively, the ACA, imposed new annual reporting requirements for certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics, and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, for certain payments and “transfers of value” provided to physicians (currently defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors) and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members. Effective January 1, 2022, these reporting obligations will extend to include transfers of value made in the previous year to certain non-physician providers such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners. | |
| ● | Federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers. | |
| ● | Analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, state anti-kickback and false claims laws, may be broader in scope than the provisions described above and may apply regardless of payor. Some state laws require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and relevant federal government compliance guidance; require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers; restrict marketing practices or require disclosure of marketing expenditures and pricing information. State and foreign laws may govern the privacy and security of health information in some circumstances. These data privacy and security laws may differ from each other in significant ways and often are not pre-empted by HIPAA, which may complicate compliance efforts. |
Thescope and enforcement of each of these laws is uncertain and subject to rapid change in the current environment of healthcare reform,especially in light of the lack of applicable precedent and regulations. Federal and state enforcement bodies have recently increasedtheir scrutiny of interactions between healthcare companies and healthcare providers, which has led to a number of investigations, prosecutions,convictions and settlements in the healthcare industry. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our businesspractices do not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcarelaws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other related governmental regulationsthat may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, disgorgement,exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, reputational harm, additional oversight and reportingobligations if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar settlement to resolve allegations of non-compliance withthese laws and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. If any of the physicians or other healthcare providers or entitieswith whom we expect to do business are found to not be in compliance with applicable laws, they may be subject to similar actions, penaltiesand sanctions. Ensuring business arrangements comply with applicable healthcare laws, as well as responding to possible investigationsby government authorities, can be time- and resource-consuming and can divert a company’s attention from its business.
Employeesand Human Capital Resources
Asof December 31, 2024, we had 28 total employees in the U.S. and at our German wholly-owned subsidiary, StemVac GmbH. Of these employees,17 perform research and development functions. None of our employees are represented by a labor union and we believe we maintain goodrelations with our employees.
Ourhuman capital resources objectives include, as applicable, identifying, recruiting, retaining, incentivizing and integrating our existingand new employees, advisors and consultants. The principal purposes of our equity and cash incentive plans are to attract, retain andreward personnel through the granting of stock-based and cash-based compensation awards, in order to increase stockholder value and thesuccess of our company by motivating such individuals to perform to the best of their abilities and achieve our objectives.
| 109 |
MANAGEMENT
ExecutiveOfficers and Directors
OurCompany is managed by or under the direction of its board of directors. The following table sets forth certain information regardingour current executive officers and directors, as well as their respective ages, as of June 20, 2025.
| Name | Age | Title | ||
| Eric Poma | 53 | Chief Executive Officer and Director(4) | ||
| Andrew Jackson | 56 | Chief Financial Officer | ||
| Wendy Pizarro Campbell | 55 | Chief Corporate Development Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Chief Diversity Officer and Corporate Secretary | ||
| Boris Minev | 63 | President of Medical and Scientific Affairs | ||
| James Schoeneck | 67 | Chairman of the Board and Director(1)(2)(3) | ||
| Allan Camaisa | 65 | Director | ||
| Alan Stewart | 61 | Director(1)(3) | ||
| Scott Leftwich | 65 | Director(2)(3) | ||
| George Peoples | 63 | Director(2) |
(1)Member of audit committee.
(2)Member of the compensation committee.
(3)Member of the nomination and corporate governance committee.
(4)Effective April 22, 2025, Dr. Eric Poma was appointed to the Board.
Thefollowing are the biographies of our directors and executive officers.
ExecutiveOfficers
EricPoma. Dr. Poma was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer and director of Calidi effective April 22, 2025. Most recently, Dr. Pomaserved as CEO and as a member of the board of directors at Molecular Templates (NASDAQ: MTEM), a clinical-stage biotechnology company,from February 2009 until January 2025. From March 2005 to September 2008, Dr. Poma served as Vice President, Business Development ofInnovive Pharmaceuticals. From 2001 to 2005, Dr. Poma held various senior level positions at Imclone Systems, Inc. From 2000 to 2001Dr. Poma served as an analyst at Eagle Growth Investors, LLC. Dr. Poma received a Ph.D. in Microbiology and Immunology from Universityof North Carolina at Chapel Hill, an M.B.A. from Leonard N. Stern School of Business and a Bachelor of Science in Biology from Universityof North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
AndrewJackson. Mr. Jackson has been the Chief Financial Officer since October 30, 2023. Mr. Jackson is a financial executive withover 25 years of corporate finance experience with success in publicly traded companies and venture capital backed startups. Mr. Jacksonmost recently served as Chief Financial Officer of Eterna Therapeutics Inc. from May 2022 to May 2023. Prior to his position at EternaTherapeutics, Mr. Jackson served as the Chief Financial Officer of Ra Medical Systems, Inc. from April 2018 until May 2022, and as itsInterim Chief Executive Officer from August 2019 to March 2020. From October 2016 to April 2018, he was Chief Financial Officer for AltheaDx,Inc, a molecular diagnostics company specializing in precision medicine. From March 2014 to March 2016, Mr. Jackson held senior financialpositions, including Chief Financial Officer, at Celladon Corporation, a publicly traded, clinical stage biotechnology company. FromApril 2013 to March 2014, he held senior financial positions at Sapphire Energy, an industrial biotechnology company. Mr. Jackson receiveda MSBA in Finance in December 2006 from San Diego State University and a BSB in Accounting in June 1992 from the University of Minnesota.He is a certified public accountant (inactive).
| 110 |
WendyPizarro Campbell, Esq. Ms. Campbell has been our Chief Legal Officer and Chief Diversity Officer since September 2021, and our ChiefAdministrative Officer and Corporate Secretary since December 2021. Ms. Cambell’s title was confirmed as Chief Legal Officer, ChiefCorporate Development Officer, Chief Diversity Officer, and Corporate Secretary in October 2024. Ms. Campbell has over 20 years of experiencein corporate and business law. From January 2010 to September 2021, she founded and led California Law Partners, a boutique law firmprimarily serving as outside general counsel, corporate counsel and the lead crisis manager to select high net worth multi-family offices.She has directed legal strategy related to risk management, compliance and operations to manage and grow an asset portfolio of over $1.5billion in multi-generational wealth with over 60% of the portfolio in private investments. From 1997 to 2002, Ms. Campbell previouslyworked with leading Silicon Valley law firms, including Venture Law Group and DLA Piper in Palo Alto, on numerous general corporate andintellectual property matters and corporate securities transactions for disruptive technology companies in all phases of their life cyclesfrom start-up to liquidity event (IPO and M&A) primarily in small teams serving infrastructure and e-commerce. Since September 2019,Ms. Campbell is also a co-founder and investor of Never Train Alone, a mobile application, where she designed the software user interfacefor an Apple iOS app related to mobile fitness, corporate wellness and preventative health. Ms. Campbell has received numerous guestspeaking engagements and awards, including recognition as one of Discover Magazine’s Power Women of San Diego in 2021. Ms. Campbellis also active as a community leader and volunteer and is currently a board member of the Tec 3 Foundation in Rancho Santa Fe, CA anda lifetime member of Rady Children’s Hospital Auxiliary, previously serving as a unit officer and board member from 2014 –2016. Ms. Campbell received a J.D. from the Harvard Law School, M.ST. from the University of Oxford, and an M.A. and B.A. from Yale Universitygraduating magna cum laude with honors in distinction. Ms. Campbell is a member of the State Bar of California and U.S. District Court,Southern District of California.
BorisMinev, M.D. Dr. Minev has been the President of Medical and Scientific Affairs of Calidi since June 2021. Dr. Minev is a highly accomplishedphysician-scientist with extensive industrial and academic experience in Immuno-Oncology, oncolytic viruses and stem cell biology andapplications. From November 2010 to June 2015, he was the Director of Immunotherapy and Translational Oncology at Genelux Corp, wherehe was directing several preclinical and translational projects on oncolytic virotherapy, immunotherapy, and nanotechnology. Dr. Minevhas also been an adjunct professor at the Moores UCSD Cancer Center since July 2015, and he has also previously served as Principal Investigatorand Director, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy from July 2000 to June 2015, where he focused his research on the discoveryof new target antigens for immunotherapy of cancer and the development of optimized cancer vaccines. Dr. Minev is a member of the Scientificand Clinical Advisory Boards of several biotechnology companies and has been an advisor for Amgen Inc. (Nasdaq: AMGN), Johnson &Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), Geron Corp (Nasdaq: GERN), McKinsey Consulting Services, Inc. and Thomson Current Drugs. Dr. Minev received hisM.D. from the School of Medicine in Sofia, Bulgaria.
Non-EmployeeDirectors
JamesA. Schoeneck. Mr. Schoeneck has been a director of Calidi since July 2020. Mr. Schoeneck is also currently a member and Chairmanof the Board at Fibrogen Inc (Nasdaq: FGEN) since April 2010, and also previously served as its Interim CEO from January 2019 to February2020. From November 2015 to March 2018, Mr. Schoeneck was a director of Anaptysbio, Inc (Nasdaq: ANAB), a therapeutic antibody developmentcompany for severe disease. He was previous a director of the Board of Depomed, Inc. in 2007, and also served as its President and CEOfrom April, 2011 to March 2017, and led Depomed’s transformation into a commercial specialty pharmaceutical company. From 2005until 2011, he was CEO of BrainCells Inc, a privately-held biopharmaceutical company. Mr. Schoeneck’s diverse biotech experiencefurther includes serving as CEO of ActivX BioSciences, Inc., a development-stage biotechnology company from 2003 to 2004, three yearsas President and CEO of Prometheus Laboratories Inc, a pharmaceutical and diagnostics product company, from 1999 to 2003, as well asthree years from 1996 to 1999 as Vice President, Commercial and General Manager, Immunology, at Centocor Inc (now Janssen Biotech, Inc.).Mr. Schoeneck holds a B.S. in Education from Jacksonville State University. Mr. Schoeneck is well qualified to serve as our directorbased on the above qualifications, his executive management leadership, and his extensive experience in the biotechnology and pharmaceuticalindustry.
| 111 |
AllanCamaisa. Mr. Camaisa has been a director of Calidi since February 2018 and resigned as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company effective April 21, 2025. Mr. Camaisa is a serial entrepreneur, investor, and technologist, with proven leadership skillsin bootstrapping startups. His accomplishments include four successful exits sold to publicly-traded Fortune 1000 companies, authorshipof seven US patents, and an Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year award. Mr. Camaisa was previously a director of snaploT, Inc.,a self-service enabled clinical platform designed to create, launch, and manage clinical trials from January 2013 to September 2020.From August 2014 to May 2017, Mr. Camaisa was the CEO and Chairman of Parallel 6, Inc., a digital mobile/cloud software platform formanaging pharmaceutical patient clinical trials. In 2005, Mr. Camaisa founded Anakam, Inc., a software security company for managingdigital access to medical records, and also served as Anakam’s Chief Executive Officer from January 2005 to October 2010. Beforebeginning his career in business, Mr. Camaisa served eight years as a surface warfare officer in the US Navy. He graduated from the UnitedStates Naval Academy with a B.S. in Engineering, and also completed the Owner/President Management program at Harvard Business School.Mr. Camaisa is well qualified to serve as our director because of his extensive leadership experience serving as a director on the boardof directors of other companies, including in the healthcare sector.
AlanR. Stewart. Mr. Stewart has been a director of Calidi since October 10, 2023. Mr. Stewart has extensive experience as a financialexecutive and board member with a proven track record in diverse industries. He is currently the Chief Financial Officer of Soundthinking,Inc., a publicly traded SaaS software company specializing in wide-area acoustic gunshot detection. Since his appointment, he has successfullyled the company through an IPO on the Nasdaq market, facilitated significant growth, and completed acquisitions of technology providers.Mr. Stewart’s prior roles include serving as President of Fit Advisors, LLC, where he launched a successful consultancy and completednumerous M&A transactions in various industries. He also served as a Managing Director at RA Capital Advisors, LLC, specializingin M&A and financing transactions. Mr. Stewart has a strong educational background, holding an M.B.A. in Finance from Harvard BusinessSchool and a Bachelor of Science with Distinction in Oceanography from the United States Naval Academy. He has served as a FINRA LicensedAgent with Series 63 and Series 79 credentials (Inactive)
ScottLeftwich. Mr. Leftwich was an early investor and has been a director of Calidi since May 2019. In addition, since 2017 Mr. Leftwichhas been an investor and member of the Board of Advisors at Skopos Labs, Inc. Mr. Leftwich’s experience includes serving in variousexecutive positions in private companies, overseeing substantial growth and liquidity events with Fortune 1000 companies. From December2011 to April 2016, Mr. Leftwich was the CEO and General Manager at InterMedHx, LLC, a healthcare software company, which was acquiredby Cerner Corporation in 2014. From September 2005 to December 2011, he was the COO and general manager at Anakam, Inc., a security softwarecompany focused on the protection of personal healthcare information within patient-facing portals. Anakam was acquired by Equifax (NYSE:EFX) in 2010. Mr. Leftwich is also a retired Naval officer who served as a P-3 pilot in the Navy and retired with the rank of Commander.Mr. Leftwich holds an MBA (with honors) from Harvard Business School, in addition to a B.S. (with distinction) from the US Naval Academy.Mr. Leftwich is well qualified to serve as our director based on the above qualifications and his executive experience in public andprivate companies in the healthcare industry.
GeorgePeoples Jr., M.D., F.A.C.S. Dr. Peoples has been a director of Calidi since July 1, 2024. Dr. Peoples served 30 years of activeduty as a surgeon and research scientist in the military. Dr. Peoples is currently a Professor of Surgery at Uniformed Services Universityof the Health Sciences (USUHS) and a Professor (adjunct) of Surgical Oncology at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). In addition, Dr.Peoples is also the Founder and CEO of Cancer Insight, and the Founder and a director of the Cancer Vaccine Development Program. He alsocurrently serves as a Board Member for Texas Biomedical Research Institute since 2019 and as a Trustee for San Antonio Medical Foundationsince 2017. Dr. Peoples is a graduate of the United States Military Academy, West Point and the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Hecompleted his surgical training at Harvard’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital and also completed a postdoctoral fellowship atthe Laboratory of Biologic Cancer Therapy at Harvard Medical School. He then completed a surgical oncology fellowship at MDACC priorto becoming the Chief of Surgical Oncology at WRAMC. He has published over 300 peer-reviewed manuscripts, abstracts, and book chapterson immuno-oncology and cancer vaccine development. Dr. Peoples received his M.D. from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in1988 and his Bachelor of Science from the United States Military Academy in 1984.
| 112 |
FamilyRelationships and Arrangements
Thereare no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers. Except as provided in the Merger Agreement in connectionwith the Business Combination, there are no arrangements or understandings with any other person under which any of our directors andofficers was elected or appointed as a director or executive officer.
Involvementin Certain Legal Proceedings
Tothe best of our knowledge, during the past ten (10) years, none of our directors or executive officers were involved in any of the following:(1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either atthe time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to apending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) being subject to any order, judgment, or decree,not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring,suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) being found by acourt of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federalor state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated. For more information regardinglegal proceedings, see the section entitled “Business — Legal Proceedings.”
BoardComposition
Ourbusiness and affairs will be managed under the direction of our board of directors. Mr. Schoeneck was appointed to serve as Chair ofthe board of directors, effective April 22, 2025. The primary responsibilities of the board of directors will be to provide oversight,strategic guidance, counselling and direction to our management. The board of directors will meet on a regular basis and additionallyas required.
Ourstockholders held the Special Meeting, at which meeting the stockholders approved and adopted a proposal to elect seven directors toserve staggered terms on the board of directors upon the consummation of the Business Combination until the first, second and third annualmeetings of stockholders following the date of effectiveness of the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company,as applicable, or until the election and qualification of their respective successors, or until their earlier resignation, removal ordeath. In accordance with the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the board of directors is divided into threeclasses, as nearly equal in number as possible and designated Class I, Class II and Class III. The term of the initial Class I Directorsexpires at the first annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company following the effectiveness of this Second Amended and RestatedCertificate of Incorporation; the term of the initial Class II Directors expires at the second annual meeting of the stockholders ofthe Company following the effectiveness the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation; and the term of the initial ClassIII Directors will expire at the third annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company following the effectiveness of the Second Amendedand Restated Certificate of Incorporation. As of the date of this proxy statement, the directors of the initial Class I, Class II andClass III are as follows:
| ● | Alan Stewart and Eric Poma serve as the Class I directors; |
| ● | George Peoples and James Schoeneck serve as the Class II directors; and |
| ● | Allan Camaisa and Scott Leftwich serve as the Class III directors. |
Inaccordance with the terms of the Bylaws, the board of directors may establish the authorized number of directors from time to time byresolution. On April 17, 2025, upon the appointment of Mr. Eric Poma as the new Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a directoron the Board (effective April 22, 2025), the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Committee”)together with the member of the Board determined that it would be in the best interests of the Company to increase the size of the Boardfrom five (5) members to six (6) members, thereby increasing the number of Class I directors from one (1) to two (2). Accordingly, ourBoard of Directors will be comprised of six (6) members, following the election of the Class II nominees in the 2025 Annual Meeting ofthe stockholders.
| 113 |
Independenceof the Board of Directors
Inconnection with the appointment of the directors to the committees, the board of directors undertook a review of the independence ofeach director. Based on information provided by each director concerning her or his background, employment and affiliations, the boardof directors determined that none of the directors, other than Mr. Camaisa and Dr. Poma, has any relationships that would interfere withthe exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of the directors is “independent”as that term is defined under the NYSE American listing standards. In making these determinations, the board of directors of consideredthe current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with the Company and all other facts and circumstances the boardof directors deems relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our securities by each non-employeedirector and the transactions described in the section entitled “Related Party Transactions.”
OurBoard has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of its committees and the independence of each director. Based uponinformation requested from and provided by each director concerning her or his background, employment and affiliations, including familyrelationships, our Board has determined that the following Board Members are “independent” as defined under the NYSE AmericanCompany Guide; Alan Stewart, George Peoples, Scott Leftwich, and James Schoeneck. In making these determinations, our Board consideredthe current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with the Company and all other facts and circumstances that ourBoard deemed relevant.
BoardLeadership Structure
TheBoard does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of the Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board, as the Boardbelieves it is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders to make that determination based on the position and directionof the Company and the membership of the Board, from time to time. Effective April 22, 2025, Dr. Poma serves as the Chief Executive Officerof Calidi and Mr. Schoeneck, an independent director, serves as the Chair of the Board. We believe at this time that our stockholdersare best served by separate Chair and CEO roles.
Anumber of factors support the separate leadership structure chosen by the Board. Separate Chair and CEO roles promote balance betweenthe Board’s independent authority to oversee the Company’s business and the CEO’s management team, which manages thebusiness on a day-to-day basis. Separation of the Chair and CEO roles allows Dr. Poma to focus his time and energy on operating and managingthe Company and leverages the experience and perspectives of Mr. Schoeneck, who will preside over executive sessions of the Board. Separatingthe Chair and CEO roles fosters accountability, creates an environment that is more conducive to objective evaluation of management’sperformance and enhances the effectiveness of the Board as a whole. Separating these positions allows the Chair to focus on the generalpolicy of the Company and lead the Board in its fundamental role of providing oversight and advice while also allowing Dr. Poma to streamlinehis duties as CEO and attain a comprehensive focus on the Company’s day-to-day business operations. For these reasons, having twoseparate positions is the appropriate leadership structure for the Company at this time.
OurBoard recognizes that depending on future circumstances, other leadership models may become more suitable in addressing the interestsof our stockholders. Accordingly, our Board will periodically review its leadership structure.
Board’sRole in the Oversight of Risk Management
Oneof the key functions of the board of directors is to have informed oversight of our risk management process. The board of directors doesnot have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through our board of directorsas a whole, as well as through various standing committees of our board of directors that address risks inherent in their respectiveareas of oversight. In particular, our board of directors is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure and theaudit committee will have the responsibility to consider and discuss the major financial risk exposures and the steps our managementwill take to monitor and control such exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment andmanagement is undertaken. The audit committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The compensation committeealso assesses and monitors whether the compensation plans, policies and programs comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
| 114 |
Committeesof our Board
AuditCommittee
Theaudit committee consists of the following members: Alan Stewart and James Schoeneck. Our board of directors has determined that eachmember of the audit committee satisfies the independence requirements under the NYSE American listing standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1)of the Exchange Act. The chairman of our audit committee is Alan Stewart. Our board of directors of directors has determined that JamesSchoeneck is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC regulations. Each member of our audit committeecan read and understand fundamental financial statements in accordance with applicable listing standards. In arriving at these determinations,our board of directors has examined each audit committee member’s scope of experience and the nature of his or her employment.
Theprimary purpose of the audit committee is to discharge the responsibilities of our board of directors with respect to our corporate accountingand financial reporting processes, systems of internal control and financial statement audits, and to oversee our independent registeredpublic accounting firm. Specific responsibilities of our audit committee include:
| ● | helping our board of directors oversee our corporate accounting and financial reporting processes; | |
| ● | reviewing and discussing with our management the adequacy and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures; | |
| ● | assisting with design and implementation of our risk assessment functions; | |
| ● | managing the selection, engagement, qualifications, independence and performance of a qualified firm to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements; | |
| ● | discussing the scope and results of the audit with the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewing, with management and the independent accountants, our interim and year-end operating results; | |
| ● | developing procedures for employees to submit concerns anonymously about questionable accounting or audit matters; | |
| ● | reviewing related person transactions; | |
| ● | obtaining and reviewing a report by the independent registered public accounting firm at least annually that describes our internal quality control procedures, any material issues with such procedures and any steps taken to deal with such issues when required by applicable law; and | |
| ● | approving or, as permitted, pre-approving, audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. |
CompensationCommittee
Thecompensation committee consists of the following members: James Schoeneck, Scott Leftwich and George Peoples. The chairman of our compensationcommittee is James Schoeneck. Our board of directors has determined that each member of the compensation committee satisfies the independencerequirements under the listing standards of the NYSE American, and is a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3promulgated under the Exchange Act.
Theprimary purpose of our compensation committee is to discharge the responsibilities of our board of directors in overseeing our compensationpolicies, plans and programs and to review and determine the compensation to be paid to our executive officers, directors and other seniormanagement, as appropriate.
| 115 |
Specificresponsibilities of our compensation committee include:
| ● | reviewing and recommending to our board of directors the compensation of our chief executive officer and other executive officers; | |
| ● | reviewing and recommending to our board of directors the compensation of our directors; | |
| ● | administering our equity incentive plans and other benefit programs; | |
| ● | reviewing, adopting, amending and terminating incentive compensation and equity plans, severance agreements, profit sharing plans, bonus plans, change-of-control protections and any other compensatory arrangements for our executive officers and other senior management; | |
| ● | reviewing and establishing general policies relating to compensation and benefits of our employees, including our overall compensation philosophy; and | |
| ● | reviewing and evaluating with the chief executive officer the succession plans for our executive officers. |
Nominating& Corporate Governance Committee
Thenominating and corporate governance committee consists of the following members: Scott Leftwich, James Schoeneck and Alan Stewart. Thechairman of our nominating and corporate governance committee Scott Leftwich. Our board of directors has determined that each memberof the nominating and corporate governance committee satisfies the independence requirements under the listing standards of the NYSEAmerican.
Thenominating committee is responsible for, among other things:
| ● | identifying and evaluating candidates, including the nomination of incumbent directors for reelection and nominees recommended by stockholders, to serve on our board of directors | |
| ● | considering and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding the composition and chairmanship of the committees of our board of directors; | |
| ● | reviewing with our chief executive officer the plans for succession to the offices of our executive officers and make recommendations to our board of directors with respect to the selection of appropriate individuals to succeed to these positions; | |
| ● | developing and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding corporate governance guidelines and matters; and | |
| ● | overseeing periodic evaluations of the board of directors’ performance, including committees of the board of directors. |
CompensationCommittee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Noneof the members of the compensation committee has ever been an executive officer or employee of the Company. None of our executive officerscurrently serve, or has served during the last completed fiscal year, on the compensation committee or board of directors of any otherentity that has one or more executive officers that serve as a member of our board of directors or compensation committee.
Limitationon Liability and Indemnification of Directors and Officers
OurCharter limits a director’s liability to the fullest extent permitted under the DGCL. The DGCL provides that directors of a corporationwill not be personally liable for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duties as directors, except for liability:
| ● | for any transaction from which the director derives an improper personal benefit; | |
| ● | for any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; | |
| ● | for any unlawful payment of dividends or redemption of shares; or | |
| ● | for any breach of a director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders. |
| 116 |
Delawarelaw and the Bylaws provide that we will, in certain situations, indemnify our directors and officers and may indemnify other employeesand other agents, to the fullest extent permitted by law. Any indemnified person is also entitled, subject to certain limitations, toadvancement, direct payment, or reimbursement of reasonable expenses (including attorneys’ fees and disbursements) in advance ofthe final disposition of the proceeding.
Inaddition, we have entered into separate indemnification agreements with our directors and officers. These agreements, among other things,require us to indemnify our directors and officers for certain expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines, and settlementamounts incurred by a director or officer in any action or proceeding arising out of their services as one of our directors or officersor any other company or enterprise to which the person provides services at its request.
Weplan to maintain a directors’ and officers’ insurance policy pursuant to which our directors and officers are insured againstliability for actions taken in their capacities as directors and officers. We believe these provisions in the Charter and Bylaws andthese indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers.
Insofaras indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers, or control persons, in theopinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Codeof Business Conduct and Ethics for Employees, Executive Officers, and Directors
Wehave adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, or the Code of Conduct, applicable to all of our employees, executive officers anddirectors. The Code of Conduct is available at the investors section of our website at www.calidibio.com. Information containedon or accessible through this website is not a part of this proxy statement, and the inclusion of such website address in this proxystatement is an inactive textual reference only. Any amendments to the Code of Conduct, or any waivers of its requirements, are expectedto be disclosed on our website to the extent required by applicable rules and exchange requirements.
CalidiCompensation Recovery Policy
Wehave adopted a compensation recovery policy, which describes the circumstances under which the Company is required to recover certainexecutive compensation in the event of a financial restatement resulting from material noncompliance with the financial reporting requirementsunder United States federal securities laws. The policy is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 10D of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 811 of the NYSE American Company Guide. A copy of the compensationrecovery policy is available at the governance section of our website www.calidibio.com. Information contained on or accessiblethrough this website is not a part of this proxy statement, and the inclusion of such website address in this proxy statement is an inactivetextual reference only.
EXECUTIVECOMPENSATION
CalidiExecutive Officer and Director Compensation
Thefollowing disclosure concerns the compensation arrangements of Calidi’s named executive officers and directors for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. Such disclosure should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosuresprovided below and in conjunction with Calidi’s financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.As an emerging growth company, Calidi has opted to comply with the executive compensation disclosure rules applicable to “smallerreporting companies” as such term is defined in the rules promulgated under the Securities Act.
| 117 |
Thefollowing table provides information regarding total compensation awarded to, earned by, and paid to certain individuals for servicesrendered to Calidi in all capacities for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, as required by Item 402(m)(2)of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act. We refer to these individuals collectively as our “named executive officers.”
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus | Stock Awards | Option Awards (1) | All Other Compensation(2) | Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | Total Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eric Poma(3) | 2023 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chief Executive Officer and Director | 2024 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allan Camaisa(4) | 2023 | $ | 257,240 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 130,332 | $ | 48,940 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 436,512 | |||||||||||||||||
| Former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | 2024 | $ | 450,000 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 4,341 | $ | 54,780 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 509,121 | |||||||||||||||||
| Andrew Jackson(5) | 2023 | 66,154 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 5,481 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 71,635 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Chief Financial Officer | 2024 | $ | 430,000 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 42,805 | $ | 44,075 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 516,880 | |||||||||||||||||
| Wendy Pizarro Campbell(6) | 2023 | $ | 245,219 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 50,185 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 295,404 | |||||||||||||||||
| Chief Legal Officer, Chief Corporate Development Officer, Chief Diversity Officer and Corporate Secretary | 2024 | $ | 415,385 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 14,372 | $ | 54,258 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 484,015 | |||||||||||||||||
| Boris Minev, Ph.D. | 2023 | $ | 320,192 | $ | 30,000 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 49,904 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 400,096 | |||||||||||||||||
| President, Medical & Scientific Affairs | 2024 | $ | 375,000 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 4,453 | $ | 38,278 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 417,731 | |||||||||||||||||
| (1) | This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards granted during the year measured pursuant to Financial Accounting Standard Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, the basis for computing stock-based compensation in Calidi’s consolidated financial statements. This calculation assumes that the named executive officer will perform the requisite service for the award to vest in full as required by SEC rules. The assumptions we used in valuing options are described in Note 9 to Calidi’s consolidated financial statements included in the 2024 Annual Report. These amounts do not reflect the actual economic value that will be realized, if any, by the named executive officer upon vesting of the stock options, the exercise of the stock options, or the sale of the common stock underlying such stock options. |
| 118 |
| (2) | This column reflects the aggregate value of other categories of payment, consisting of costs of medical, dental, vision, life and disability insurance coverage, commuter reimbursement fees and cell phone plan costs, paid by Calidi, as well as deferred salary, if any, for certain individuals as discussed in the notes below. | |
| (3) | Dr. Poma was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective April 22, 2025. | |
| (4) | Effective April 22, 2025, Mr. Camaisa’s services as Chief Executive Officer of Calidi were terminated. Mr. Camaisa continues to serve as a Class III director of the Company and assumed the title of CEO Emeritus. | |
| (5) | Mr. Jackson was appointed as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company on October 30, 2023. | |
| (6) | In addition to the other payments referenced in note (2), under the terms of her employment contract, Ms. Campbell had deferred salary in the amount of $325,105 for 2022 which was paid upon the Company completing the Business Combination in September 2023. For a brief description of the deferral arrangement see “Agreements with Named Executive Officers” below. As of December 31, 2023, there was no deferred salary payable to Ms. Campbell. |
NarrativeDisclosure to Summary Compensation Table
Wehave employment agreements or offer letters with each of our named executive officers. The material terms of each of these agreementsare described below. These agreements provide for base salaries and incentive compensation, and each component reflects the scope ofeach named executive officer’s anticipated responsibilities and the individual experience they bring to our company. The employmentof each of our named executive officers is “at will” and may be terminated at any time. In addition, each of our named executiveofficers has executed a form of our standard proprietary information and inventions agreement. In addition, we have employment agreementsand arrangements with our other executive officers which provide for similar benefits, participation in bonus plans and severance paymentsupon a qualifying termination or Change in Control.
Agreementswith Named Executive Officers
Wehave employment agreements or offer letters with each of our named executive officers. The material terms of each of these agreementsare described below. These agreements provide for base salaries and incentive compensation, and each component reflects the scope ofeach named executive officer’s anticipated responsibilities and the individual experience they bring to our company. The employmentof each of our named executive officers is “at will” and may be terminated at any time. In addition, each of our named executiveofficers has executed a form of our standard proprietary information and inventions agreement. In addition, we have employment agreementsand arrangements with our other executive officers which provide for similar benefits, participation in bonus plans and severance paymentsupon a qualifying termination or Change in Control.
EricPoma. On April 17, 2025, Dr. Poma was appointed to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective April 22, 2025.In addition, on April 22, 2025, the Board, upon recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, appointedDr. Poma to serve as a Class I director of the Company, also effective April 22, 2025, with a term expiring at the annual meeting ofstockholders to be held in 2027.
AllanCamaisa. On September 1, 2021, we entered into an employment agreement with Allan Camaisa. Mr. Camaisa is entitled to an initialannual base salary of $29,120, which will be increased to an annual base salary of $410,000, in the event we complete a single capitalraise of $10 million or more. Mr. Camaisa may also be eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus under our bonus plan of upto 50% as approved from time to time by the board of directors pursuant to targets set by the compensation committee. Under his employmentagreement, Mr. Camaisa also received an option to purchase 10,425 shares of the Company’s common stock and additional stock optionsmay also be granted to him from time to time as determined by the board of directors. Such stock options shall have an exercise priceequal to the “Fair Market Value” per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and will be granted pursuantto the Company’s 2019 Equity Incentive Plan.
| 119 |
EffectiveFebruary 1, 2022, Calidi and Mr. Camaisa entered into an updated employment agreement, which superseded the September 1, 2021 CamaisaAgreement (“Camaisa Updated Employment Agreement”). Under the Camaisa Updated Employment Agreement, Calidi increased Mr.Camaisa’s initial annual base salary to $31,200 (increased to $43,240 to comply with California non-exempt employee requirements)effective as of January 1, 2022. Under the Camaisa Updated Employment Agreement, Calidi recognized that from January 1, 2019, throughDecember 31, 2019, Mr. Camaisa received a deferred annual base salary of $240,000 which has been paid from January 1, 2020, through January31, 2022, Mr. Camaisa received a deferred annual base salary of $400,000 per year which has been paid; and effective February 1, 2022,Mr. Camaisa’s deferred base salary was increased to $450,000 and continued to accrue at that rate. Upon completion of the BusinessCombination, Mr. Camaisa’s annual base salary was adjusted to $450,000 and his accrued and unpaid deferred compensation was paid.
EffectiveApril 21, 2025 Mr. Camaisa’s services as Chief Executive Officer of Calidi were terminated. Mr. Camaisa continues to serve as aClass III director of the Company, and assumed the title of CEO Emeritus. On April 22, 2025, a General Release of Claims and TransitionAgreement (“Release Agreement”) was executed by the Company with Mr. Camaisa. The Release Agreement contains customary protections,including a general release of claims by Mr. Camaisa in favor of the Company and certain other related parties. The Release Agreementwent effective after the Revocation Period (which was seven business days from April 22, 2025, and excluding such date) expired. Pursuantto the terms of the Release Agreement, after the Revocation Period, the Company shall pay Mr. Camaisa $500,000 separation pay in theform of compensation continuation over 12 months pursuant to the Company’s regular and customary payroll schedule, less all regularand customary payroll withholdings and shall also pay Mr. Camaisa’s COBRA premiums for 12 months, commencing May 2025, upon timelyelection. Mr. Camaisa shall also be entitled to receive a transition/ consulting pay of $10,000 per month during the transition period,and may also be entitled to incentive payments for opportunities that Mr. Camaisa has developed, as more specifically described in theRelease Agreement. Such incentive will be calculated and paid based on revenues, capital, or monies actually received by the Companyon or before December 31, 2026. No incentive will be earned or paid for revenues, capital, or monies that are received by the Companyafter that date. Mr. Camaisa will not receive compensation as a member of the Board during the period that he receives considerationpursuant to the Release Agreement.
AndrewJackson. On October 25, 2023, we entered into an employment agreement with Andrew Jackson to serve as Chief Financial Officer, whichbecame effective on October 30, 2023. Mr. Jackson has an annual base salary of $430,000 and is eligible to receive an annual bonus representingup to 35% of Mr. Jackson’s base salary, subject to the approval of the Board of Directors. In addition, subject to approval bythe Board of Directors, we agreed to grant Mr. Jackson 30,000 incentive stock option to purchase Company common stock at an exerciseprice equal to the fair market value per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant (the “Stock Options”).Vesting of Stock Options will commence on the Effective Date (“Vesting Commencement Date”) and shall have a one (1) yearcliff wherein 25% shall vest upon the one (1) year anniversary of the Vesting Commencement Date, and thereafter, 1/36th of the remainingshares subject to the Stock Options shall vest on the last day of each one month period of Mr. Jackson’s service as an employee,so that all of the shares subject to the Stock Options shall be vested on the fourth (4th) anniversary of the Vesting Commencement Date.
WendyPizarro Campbell. On September 11, 2021, we entered into an agreement with Ms. Campbell (the “Campbell Agreement”). Ms.Campbell’s base salary is deferred until an institutional round of funding closes. Upon closing of an institutional round of funding,Ms. Campbell’s annual base salary will be $315,000 retroactive to Ms. Campbell’s start date. Ms. Campbell’s base salarywill be increased to $380,000 upon Calidi raising a one-time lump sum of $10 million in capital or more. Ms. Campbell also receiveda one-time sign-on bonus of $25,000. Subject to board approval, the Campbell Agreement provides for options to purchase 10,405 sharesof common stock at an exercise price equal to fair market value, subject to vesting restrictions. Ms. Campbell may also be eligible toreceive an annual cash performance bonus under our bonus plan of up to 30% as approved from time to time by the board of directors pursuantto targets set by the compensation committee.
| 120 |
EffectiveFebruary 1, 2022, Calidi and Ms. Campbell entered into an updated employment agreement adding additional roles and responsibilities ofChief Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary to her existing roles and responsibilities of Chief Legal Officer and Chief DiversityOfficer (the “Campbell Updated Employment Agreement”). Ms. Campbell’s role and title was confirmed as the Company’sChief Legal Officer, Chief Corporate Development Officer, Chief Diversity Officer, and Corporate Secretary in October 2024, without anychanges in her roles and responsibilities under the Campbell Updated Employment Agreement. Under the Campbell Updated Employment Agreement,from the date of September 6, 2021 through January 31, 2022, Ms. Campbell will receive a deferred annual base salary of $315,000 andfrom February 1, 2022, Ms. Campbell’s deferred base salary was increased to $400,000. Ms. Campbell’s base salary was deferreduntil an institutional round of funding closes. Ms. Campbell will be eligible to earn an annual discretionary bonus under our bonus planof up to 30% her base salary as approved from time to time by the board of directors. In addition, Ms. Campbell was granted options topurchase 16,650 shares of common stock based on standard vesting conditions under the 2019 Plan at an exercise price of $92.70 per share(as adjusted to $71.10 per share in January 2023 noted above), as well as acceleration of vesting of certain, previously granted stockoptions under the 2019 Plan upon the completion of certain events. The Campbell Updated Employment Agreement also provides for certainseverance benefits, the terms of which are described below under “- Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control”,and for accrued deferred compensation payment described in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column in the Summary CompensationTable above.
EffectiveMay 13, 2024, Ms. Campbell’s annualized base salary was increased by $25,000 to $425,000. Additionally, Ms. Campbell’s annualdiscretionary bonus target was increased from 30% to 40% of her base salary, as approved from time to time by the Board or the CompensationCommittee. Ms. Campbell is also eligible to receive a bonus of $120,000 contingent on the Company closing a $10 million debt or equityround on or before December 31, 2024, with final amount to be determined by the Chief Executive Officer based on the involvement andsupport of Ms. Campbell.
BorisMinev, Ph.D. On March 1, 2023, we entered into an employment agreement, as amended, with Boris Minev, Ph.D. Dr. Minev is entitledto an initial annual base salary of $300,000, which will be increased to $375,000 in the event we complete a single capital raise of$10 million or more. Dr. Minev may also be eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus under our bonus plan of up to 30% asapproved from time to time by the board of directors. In addition, Dr. Minev will be entitled to a bonus of $100,000 for SNVI IND approval,and an additional $100,000 bonus for NNVI Phae 1B/2 IND approval or contributing significantly to signing of a license agreement in excessof $5 million. Under his employment agreement, Dr. Minev is entitled to receive an option to purchase 3,136 shares of common stock. Inaddition, Dr. Minev will be granted options to purchase 3,136 shares of common stock upon approval of the SNVI IND and options to purchasean additional 3,136 shares upon approval of the NNVI Phase 1B/2 IND.
Non-EquityCompensation
Weseek to motivate and reward our named executive officers for achievements relative to our corporate goals and expectations for each fiscalyear. Each of our named executive officers is eligible to receive an annual performance bonus payable in cash of up to 50% for Dr. Poma,up to 40% for Ms. Campbell, up to 35% for Mr. Jackson, up to 30% for Dr. Minev, and up to 35% for other executive officers, as approvedby our board of directors from time to time based on the achievement of individual and company-wide annual performance goals as determinedby our compensation committee.
PotentialPayments upon Termination or Change-in-Control
Pursuantto their respective employment agreements, each named executive officer is entitled to receive amounts described below upon a qualifyingtermination or Change in Control.
| 121 |
EricPoma. Pursuant to his employment Agreement, if Dr. Poma’s employment with us ends due to his resignation for “good reason”or his termination by us other than for “cause,” each as defined in his employment agreement, he is entitled to receive:(i) a severance payment equal to twelve months of his then-current base salary and in the event of his termination other than for “cause”or resignation for “good reason” occurs after a Change in Control (as defined in his employment agreement), he will be entitledto receive severance payments equal to twenty-four months of his then-current base salary following his termination, and (ii) continuedhealth benefits under COBRA for up to twelve months (twenty months upon a Change in Control), or if earlier, the date he is eligiblefor comparable replacement coverage under a subsequent employer’s group health plan. If such termination occurs three months priorto or any time after the occurrence of a Change in Control then, in addition to the foregoing severance payments, all unvested equityawards held by Dr. Poma at the time that such termination occurs will be accelerated in full and deemed to have vested as of the laterdate of his employment termination date or the date of the Change in Control. In addition, upon a Change in Control due to a merger oracquisition, all unvested equity awards held by Dr. Poma at the time will be automatically vested upon execution of the merger or acquisitiontransaction. Dr. Poma’s benefits are conditioned, among other things, on his compliance with his post-termination obligations underhis employment agreement and his execution of a general release of claims in favor of Calidi.
AllanCamaisa. Pursuant to his employment agreement, if Mr. Camaisa’s employment with us ends due to his resignation for “goodreason” or his termination by us other than for “cause,” each as defined in his employment agreement, he is entitledto receive: (i) a severance payment equal to twelve months of his then-current base salary and in the event of his termination otherthan for “cause” or resignation for “good reason” occurs after a Change in Control (as defined in his employmentagreement), he will be entitled to receive severance payments equal to twenty-four months of his then-current base salary following histermination, and (ii) continued health benefits under COBRA for up to twelve months (twenty months upon a Change in Control), or if earlier,the date he is eligible for comparable replacement coverage under a subsequent employer’s group health plan. If such terminationoccurs three months prior to or any time after the occurrence of a Change in Control then, in addition to the foregoing severance payments,all unvested equity awards held by Mr. Camaisa at the time that such termination occurs will be accelerated in full and deemed to havevested as of the later date of his employment termination date or the date of the Change in Control. In addition, upon a Change in Controldue to a merger or acquisition, all unvested equity awards held by Mr. Camaisa at the time will be automatically vested upon executionof the merger or acquisition transaction. Mr. Camaisa’s benefits are conditioned, among other things, on his compliance with hispost-termination obligations under his employment agreement and his execution of a general release of claims in favor of Calidi.
OnApril 22, 2025, Mr. Camaisa and Calidi entered into a General Release of Claims and Transition Agreement (“Release Agreement”)was executed by the Company with Mr. Camaisa. The Release Agreement contains customary protections, including a general release of claimsby Mr. Camaisa in favor of the Company and certain other related parties. The Release Agreement went effective after the Revocation Period(which was seven business days from April 22, 2025, and excluding such date) expired. Pursuant to the terms of the Release Agreement,after the Revocation Period, the Company shall pay Mr. Camaisa $500,000 separation pay in the form of compensation continuation over12 months pursuant to the Company’s regular and customary payroll schedule, less all regular and customary payroll withholdingsand shall also pay Mr. Camaisa’s COBRA premiums for 12 months, commencing May 2025, upon timely election. Mr. Camaisa shall alsobe entitled to receive a transition/ consulting pay of $10,000 per month during the transition period, and may also be entitled to incentivepayments for opportunities that Mr. Camaisa has developed, as more specifically described in the Release Agreement. Such incentive willbe calculated and paid based on revenues, capital, or monies actually received by the Company on or before December 31, 2026. No incentivewill be earned or paid for revenues, capital, or monies that are received by the Company after that date. Mr. Camaisa will not receivecompensation as a member of the Board during the period that he receives consideration pursuant to the Release Agreement.
AndrewJackson. Mr. Jackson’s employment agreement may be terminated, in writing with at least thirty (30) days’ prior writtennotice, by the Company for or without cause or by Mr. Jackson with or without good reason. If Mr. Jackson’s employment is terminatedwithout cause or he resigns with good reason, Mr. Jackson will receive the following severance benefits, including but not limited to,his fully earned but unpaid base salary; six (6) months’(“Severance Period”) pay at Mr. Jackson’s monthly basesalary rate, payable in a lump sum or in instalments subject to the Company’s discretion; and additional stock award accelerationunder the circumstances described therein. In the event Mr. Jackson’s employment is terminated without cause or he resigns withgood reason following a change in control, the Severance Period shall be increased to 12 (twelve) months and the cash severance shallinstead be paid in a lump sum. Such post-termination payments and benefits are conditioned on Mr. Jackson’s execution and non-revocationof a general release of claims in favor of the Company.
| 122 |
WendyPizarro Campbell. Pursuant to her employment agreement, if Ms. Campbell’s employment with us ends due to her resignation for“good reason” or her termination by us other than for “cause,” each as defined in her employment agreement, sheis entitled to receive: (i) severance payments equal to six months of her then-current base salary following her termination and in theevent of her termination other than for “cause” or resignation for “good reason” occurs after a Change in Control,she will be entitled to receive severance payments equal to twelve months of her then-current base salary following her termination,and (ii) continued premiums for health benefits under COBRA for up to six months (twelve months upon a Change in Control) or if earlier,the date she is eligible for comparable replacement coverage under a subsequent employer’s group health plan. If such terminationoccurs three months prior to or any time after the occurrence of a Change in Control then, in addition to the foregoing severance payments,all unvested equity awards held by Ms. Campbell at the time that such termination occurs will be accelerated in full and deemed to havevested as of the later date of her employment termination date or the date of the Change in Control. In addition, upon a Change in Controldue to a merger or acquisition, all unvested equity awards held by Ms. Campbell at the time will be automatically vested upon executionof the merger or acquisition transaction. Ms. Campbell’s benefits are conditioned, among other things, on her compliance with herpost-termination obligations under her employment agreement and her execution of a general release of claims in favor of Calidi.
BorisMinev, Ph.D. Pursuant to his employment agreement, if Dr. Minev’s employment with us ends due to his resignation for “goodreason” or his termination by us other than for “cause,” each as defined in his employment agreement, he is entitledto receive: (i) severance payments equal to six months of his then-current base salary following his termination and in the event ofhis termination other than for “cause” or resignation for “good reason” occurs after a Change in Control, hewill be entitled to receive severance payments equal to twelve months of his then-current base salary following his termination, and(ii) continued premiums for health benefits under COBRA for up to six months (twelve months upon a Change in Control) or if earlier,the date he is eligible for comparable replacement coverage under a subsequent employer’s group health plan. If such terminationoccurs 90 days prior to or any time after the occurrence of a Change in Control then, in addition to the foregoing severance payments,all unvested equity awards held by Dr. Minev at the time that such termination occurs will be accelerated in full and deemed to havevested as of the later date of his employment termination date or the date of the Change in Control. In addition, upon a Change in Controldue to a merger or acquisition, all unvested equity awards held by Dr. Minev at the time will be automatically vested upon executionof the merger or acquisition transaction. Dr. Minev’s benefits are conditioned, among other things, on his compliance with hispost-termination obligations under his employment agreement and his execution of a general release of claims in favor of Calidi.
EquityIncentive Plan
Priorto January 1, 2019, we adopted the 2016 Stock Plan (the “2016 Plan”) under which we were authorized to grant stock options,restricted stock, a stock appreciation right, or a restricted stock unit award. In June 2019, we adopted the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan(the “2019 Plan”) to replace the 2016 Plan. Other than the change of plan name and incorporation state, all the terms ofthe 2016 Plan were carried over into the 2019 Plan. In adopting the 2019 Plan, we terminated the 2016 Plan and may no longer grant anyadditional stock options or sell any stock under restricted stock purchase agreements under the 2016 Plan; however, stock options issuedunder the 2016 Plan will continue to be in effect in accordance with their terms and the terms of the 2019 Plan, which are substantiallythe same terms as the 2016 Plan, until the exercise or expiration of the individual options awards. In connection with the Business Combination,we assumed the outstanding options granted under the 2019 Plan. Upon completion of the Business Combination on September 12, 2023, weadopted the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2023 Plan” or the “Incentive Plan”). Since only the outstandingoptions under the 2019 Plan was assumed, we may no longer grant any additional stock options or sell any stock under restricted stockpurchase agreements under the 2019 Plan; however, stock options issued under the 2019 Plan will continue to be in effect in accordancewith their terms and the terms of the 2023 Plan until the exercise or expiration of the individual options awards.
The2019 Plan reserved the right for the Board of Directors as the administrator of the plan (the “Administrator”) to issue upto shares pursuant to 2,000,000 equity awards, which was increased to up to 2,550,000 in May 2022, including stock options (“Options”),restricted stock awards (“Restricted Stock”), dividend equivalents awards, stock payment awards, restricted stock units (“RSUs”)and/or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”, together with Options, Restricted Stock and RSUs, “Awards”), accordingto its discretion. Awards may be granted under the 2019 Plan to our employees, directors, and consultants. As of December 31, 2024, theAdministrator has not issued any Restricted Stock, RSUs, dividend equivalents awards, stock payment awards or SARs. Stock options remainas the sole outstanding type of award under the 2019 Plans.
| 123 |
Underthe 2019 Plan, awards may vest and thereby become exercisable or have restrictions on forfeiture lapse on the date of grant or in periodicinstallments or upon the attainment of performance goals, or upon the occurrence of specified events depending on the Administrator’sdiscretion. The Administrator has broad authority to determine the terms and conditions of any Award granted pursuant to the 2019 Planincluding, but not limited to, the exercise price, grant price, or purchase price, any reload provision, any restrictions or limitationson the Award, any schedule for lapse of forfeiture restrictions or restrictions on the exercisability of an Award, and accelerationsor waivers thereof as the Administrator, in its sole discretion may determine.
NoAwards may be granted under the 2019 Plan with a term of more than ten years and no Awards granted may be exercised after the expirationof ten years from the date of grant.
The2023 Plan reserved the right for the Compensation Committee or by the Board of Directors acting as the Compensation Committee, as theadministrator of the plan (the “Administrator”) to issue up to 393,781 equity awards, including stock options (“Options”),restricted stock awards (“Restricted Stock”), dividend equivalents awards, stock payment awards, restricted stock units (“RSUs”)and/or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”, together with Options, Restricted Stock and RSUs, “Awards”), accordingto its discretion. Awards may be granted under the 2023 Plan to our employees, directors, and consultants. As of December 31, 2024, theAdministrator has issued RSUs and stock options under the 2023 Plan.
Underthe 2023 Plan, Awards may vest and thereby become exercisable or have restrictions on forfeiture lapse on the date of grant or in periodicinstallments or upon the attainment of performance goals, or upon the occurrence of specified events depending on the Administrator’sdiscretion. The Administrator has broad authority to determine the terms and conditions of any Award granted pursuant to the 2023 Planincluding, but not limited to, the exercise price, grant price, or purchase price, any reload provision, any restrictions or limitationson the Award, any schedule for lapse of forfeiture restrictions or restrictions on the exercisability of an Award, and accelerationsor waivers thereof as the Administrator, in its sole discretion may determine.
NoAwards may be granted under the 2023 Plan with a term of more than ten years and no Awards granted may be exercised after the expirationof ten years from the date of grant.
OnJanuary 18, 2023, the Board approved a repricing of approximately 0.2 million stock options previously granted at an exercise price of$92.70 per share to the then current fair value of $71.10 per share pursuant to an updated valuation report. The year ended December31, 2024 includes a noncash compensation charge of approximately $0.1 million in connection with this repricing. The year ended December31, 2023 included a noncash compensation charge of approximately $0.2 million in connection with this repricing. The stock option repricingand the acceleration of vesting were accounted for as a modification under ASC 718.
OnSeptember 12, 2023, upon closing of the FLAG Merger, the number of equity awards issued and available for grant were retrospectivelyadjusted pursuant to the conversion ratio of approximately 0.04. The mechanism of conversion resulted in the fair value of each optionprior to the Closing equal to the fair value of each option after. All stock option activity presented in these statements has been retrospectivelyadjusted to reflect the conversion.
OnJuly 15, 2024, we effected a 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split. As a result, proportionate adjustments were made to the per share exerciseprice and the number of shares of Common Stock that may be purchased upon exercise of outstanding stock options granted by Calidi, andthe number of shares of Common Stock reserved for future issuance under the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan.
Asof December 31, 2024, there were options to purchase 676,786 shares of Calidi Common Stock outstanding under the 2019 Plan, with exerciseprices ranging from $4.80 per share to $71.10 per share. As of December 31, 2024, there were options to purchase 241,973 shares of CalidiCommon Stock outstanding under the 2023 Plan, with exercise prices ranging from $1.90 per share to $29.80 per share.
| 124 |
StockOptions
Optionsgranted under the 2019 Plan and 2023 Plan may be either “incentive stock options” within the meaning of Section 422(b) ofthe Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), or “non-qualified” stock options that do not qualifyincentive stock options. Incentive stock options may be granted only to the Company’s employees and employees of domestic subsidiaries,as applicable. The exercise price of stock options shall be equal to or greater than the fair market value of common stock on the datethe option is granted. In the case of an optionee who, at the time of grant, owns more than 10% of the combined voting power of all classesof stock, the exercise price of any incentive stock option must be at least 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on thegrant date, and the term of the option may be no longer than five years. The aggregate fair market value of common stock (determinedas of the grant date of the option) with respect to which incentive stock options become exercisable for the first time by an optioneein any calendar year may not exceed $0.1 million, otherwise it will be classified as a Non-Qualified Stock Option.
Theexercise price of an option may be payable in cash or in common stock, or in a combination of cash and common stock, or other legal considerationfor the issuance of stock as the Board or Administrator may approve.
Generally,options vest over four years and will be exercisable only while the optionee remains an employee, director or consultant, or during thethree months thereafter, but in the case of the termination of an employee, director, or consultant’s services due to death ordisability, the period for exercising a vested option shall be extended to the earlier of twelve months after termination or the expirationdate of the option.
OutstandingEquity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
Thefollowing table sets forth certain information about equity awards granted to Calidi’s named executive officers that remained outstandingas of December 31, 2024.
| OPTION AWARDS | ||||||||||||||||
| NAME | grant date | NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED OPTIONS (#) EXERCISABLE | NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED OPTIONS (#) UNEXERCISABLE | OPTION EXERCISE PRICE ($) | OPTION EXPIRATION DATE | |||||||||||
| Allan J. Camaisa (granted to AJC Capital, of which Mr. Camaisa is the sole member except for the grants on February 1, 2022, December 21, 2023 and June 17, 2024 which were granted to Mr. Camaisa individually) | 7/01/2016 | 33,299 | - | 4.80 | 7/01/2026 | |||||||||||
| 7/01/2016 | 33,299 | - | 4.80 | 7/01/2026 | ||||||||||||
| 7/01/2016 | 4,163 | - | 6.01 | 7/01/2026 | ||||||||||||
| 1/01/2017 | 41,623 | - | 6.01 | 1/01/2027 | ||||||||||||
| 1/01/2018 | 41,623 | - | 6.01 | 1/01/2028 | ||||||||||||
| 1/01/2019 | 41,623 | - | 6.01 | 1/01/2029 | ||||||||||||
| 1/01/2020 | 41,623 | - | 24.02 | 1/01/2030 | ||||||||||||
| 3/30/2021 | 9,755 | 651 | 24.02 | 3/30/2031 | ||||||||||||
| 12/02/2021 | 7,284 | 1,041 | 40.12 | 12/02/2031 | ||||||||||||
| 12/02/2021 | 8,454 | 1,952 | 40.12 | 12/02/2031 | ||||||||||||
| 2/01/2022 | 1,257 | 1,176 | 71.10 | (1) | 2/01/2032 | |||||||||||
| 2/01/2022 | 2,841 | 1,171 | 71.10 | (1) | 2/01/2032 | |||||||||||
| 12/21/2023 | 10,000 | - | 18.00 | 12/21/2033 | ||||||||||||
| 6/17/2024 | 917 | 3,083 | 2.15 | 6/17/2029 | ||||||||||||
| Andrew Jackson | 6/17/2024 | 8,749 | 21,251 | 1.95 | 6/17/2034 | |||||||||||
| Wendy Pizarro Campbell | 12/02/2021 | 2,607 | 559 | 40.12 | 12/02/2031 | |||||||||||
| 2/01/2022 | 1,347 | 1,259 | 71.10 | (1) | 2/01/2032 | |||||||||||
| 2/01/2022 | 8,738 | 3,598 | 71.10 | (1) | 2/01/2032 | |||||||||||
| 6/17/2024 | 917 | 3,083 | 1.95 | 6/17/2034 | ||||||||||||
| 6/17/2024 | 875 | 5,125 | 1.95 | 6/17/2034 | ||||||||||||
| Boris Minev | 7/01/2016 | 14,569 | - | 6.01 | 7/01/2026 | |||||||||||
| 12/27/2019 | 347 | - | 24.02 | 12/27/2029 | ||||||||||||
| 4/15/2020 | 347 | - | 24.02 | 4/15/2030 | ||||||||||||
| 3/30/2021 | 3,251 | 651 | 24.02 | 3/30/2031 | ||||||||||||
| 2/28/2022 | 1,300 | 1,215 | 71.10 | (1) | 2/28/2032 | |||||||||||
| 6/17/2024 | 981 | 2,155 | 1.95 | 6/17/2034 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | On January 18, 2023, the $92.70 exercise price per share was adjusted to $71.10 per share pursuant to a January 2023 valuation and a repricing of certain stock options approved by Calidi’s Board of Directors. All vesting conditions remained unchanged. |
| 125 |
EquityCompensation Plan Information
Thefollowing table provides certain information with respect to our equity compensation plans in effect as of December 31, 2024:
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights (a) | Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options and rights (b) | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a) (c) | ||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders(1) | 676,786 | $ | 23.62 | - | ||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders(2) | 266,428 | $ | 3.85 | 88,898 | ||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders(3) | - | $ | - | 393,781 | ||||||||
| Total | 943,214 | $ | 18.41 | (4) | 482,679 | |||||||
| (1) | Represents shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options granted under the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan of Calidi (the “2019 Plan”), which options were assumed by us in connection with the Business Combination. |
| (2) | Represents shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and restricted stock units under the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2023 Plan”) which was approved by our shareholders on August 28, 2023. The weighted-average exercise price does not reflect common stock subject to outstanding awards of restricted stock units. |
| (3) | Represents the number of shares of common stock reserved as authorized for the grant of options under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2023 ESPP”), which was approved by our shareholders on August 28, 2023. |
| (4) | The weighted-average exercise price does not reflect common stock subject to outstanding awards of restricted stock units. |
| 126 |
PensionBenefits
Ournamed executive officers did not participate in, or otherwise receive any benefits under, any pension or retirement plan sponsored byCalidi during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
NonqualifiedDeferred Compensation
Ournamed executive officers did not participate in, nor earn any benefits under, a nonqualified deferred compensation plan sponsored byCalidi during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
Benefits
Eachof the named executive officers is eligible to participate in Calidi’s standard employee benefit plans and programs.
401(k)Plan
Wemaintain a 401(k) plan intended to qualify as a tax-qualified plan under Section 401 of the Code with the 401(k) plan’s relatedtrust intended to be tax exempt under Section 501(a) of the Code. The 401(k) plan provides that each participant may contribute up tothe lesser of 100% of his or her compensation or the statutory limit, which was $23,000 for calendar year 2024. Employees’ pre-taxcontributions are allocated to each participant’s individual account and are then invested in selected investment alternativesaccording to the participant’s directions. Employees are immediately and fully vested in their contributions. As a tax-qualifiedretirement plan, contributions to the 401(k) plan and earnings on those contributions are not taxable to the employees until distributedfrom the 401(k) plan. Effective January 1, 2023, the 401(k) plan was changed to a safe harbor plan under which we will make safe harborcontributions equal to 100% of a participant’s elective deferral, not to exceed 4% of compensation.
OtherBenefits
Ournamed executive officers are eligible to participate in our health and welfare plans to the same extent as all full-time employees.
Wegenerally have not provided perquisites or personal benefits except in limited circumstances, and except as set forth above under “SummaryCompensation Table,” we did not provide any perquisites or personal benefits to our named executive officers in fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2024.
Non-EmployeeDirector Compensation Policy
Theboard of directors will review director compensation periodically to ensure that director compensation remains competitive such thatwe will be able to recruit and retain qualified directors. We intend to develop a director compensation program that is designed to aligncompensation with our business objectives and the creation of stockholder value, while enabling us to attract, retain, incentivize andreward directors who contribute to our long-term success.
| 127 |
2024Non-Employee Director Compensation
Thefollowing table sets forth information concerning the compensation of non-employee directors earned or paid for services rendered toCalidi for the year ended December 31, 2024. Mr. Camaisa also served as our director. Mr. Camaisa’s compensation as a former namedexecutive officer and Mr. Poma’s compensation as named executive officer is set forth above under “Summary Compensation Table.”
| NAME | FEES EARNED OR PAID IN CASH ($) | OPTION AWARDS ($)(1)(2) | RESTRICTED ($) | TOTAL ($) | ||||||||||||
| James A. Schoeneck | 31,875 | 15,603 | 31,874 | 79,352 | ||||||||||||
| Scott Leftwich(3) | 13,438 | 15,603 | 40,311 | 69,352 | ||||||||||||
| Alan Stewart | 14,688 | 15,603 | 44,061 | 74,352 | ||||||||||||
| George Peoples(4) | 23,125 | 19,972 | - | 43,097 | ||||||||||||
| George Ng(5) | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| David LaPre(6) | - | 50,580 | 16,660 | 67,240 | ||||||||||||
| Thomas Vecchiolla(7) | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
| 83,126 | 117,361 | 132,906 | 333,393 | |||||||||||||
| (1) | This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards granted during the year measured pursuant to Financial Accounting Standard Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, the basis for computing stock-based compensation in our consolidated financial statements. This calculation assumes that the director will perform the requisite service for the award to vest in full as required by SEC rules. The assumptions we used in valuing options are described in Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in the 2024 Annual Report. These amounts do not reflect the actual economic value that will be realized by the director upon vesting of the stock options, the exercise of the stock options, or the sale of the common stock underlying such stock options. |
| (2) | The table below lists the aggregate number of shares subject to option awards outstanding as of December 31, 2024, for each of our directors, other than Dr. Poma and Mr. Camaisa. |
| (3) | Certain fees earned by Mr. Leftwich were deferred and unpaid prior to January 1, 2021, and as of December 31, 2024, accrued and unpaid board and advisory fees due to Mr. Leftwich totaled $0.6 million (see Notes 6 and 12), which were paid in January 2025. |
| (4) | Dr. Peoples was appointed to the Board on July 1, 2024. |
| (5) | Mr. Ng. allowed the term of his directorship position to expire and did not seek re-election at the 2024 annual general meeting held on September 20, 2024. |
| (6) | Mr. LaPre resigned as a director effective May 10, 2024. |
| (7) | Mr. Vecchiolla resigned as a director effective January 1, 2024. |
NUMBER OF SHARES SUBJECT TO OUTSTANDING OPTIONS AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 2024 | NUMBER OF SHARES SUBJECT TO OUTSTANDING RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Scott Leftwich | 87,597 | 11,684 | ||||||
| George Ng(1) | 64,518 | - | ||||||
| James A. Schoeneck | 59,501 | - | ||||||
| Alan Stewart | 25,467 | 12,771 | ||||||
| George Peoples(2) | 23,308 | - | ||||||
| (1) | Mr. Ng. allowed the term of his directorship position to expire and did not seek re-election at the 2024 annual general meeting held on September 20, 2024. |
| (2) | Dr. Peoples was appointed to the Board on July 1, 2024. |
| 128 |
Non-EmployeeDirector Compensation Policy
Weprovide cash and/or equity-based compensation to certain of our directors for the time and effort necessary to serve as a member of ourboard of directors. In addition, all of our directors are entitled to reimbursement of direct expenses incurred in connection with attendingmeetings of the board or committees thereof.
EmergingGrowth Company Status
Weare an emerging growth company, as defined in the JOBS Act. As an emerging growth company, we will be exempt from certain requirementsrelated to executive compensation, including, but not limited to, Compensation Discussion and Analysis disclosure, the requirements tohold a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and to provide information relating to the ratio of total compensation of ourChief Executive Officer to the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees, each as required by the Investor Protectionand Securities Reform Act of 2010, which is part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
Compensationof Executive Officers and Directors of FLAG Pre-Business Combination
Noneof our officers or directors received any cash compensation for services rendered to us Pre-Business Combination. Commencing on September10, 2021 (the date our securities first listed on the NYSE) through the earlier of consummation of our initial business combination andour liquidation, we have the option to pay an affiliate of our Sponsor a total of $10,000 per month for administrative support and services.Upon consummation of our initial business combination or our liquidation, we will cease paying these monthly fees. In addition, our Sponsor,executive officers and directors, or any of their respective affiliates, will be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred inconnection with activities on our behalf such as identifying potential target businesses and performing due diligence on suitable businesscombinations. Our audit committee reviews on a quarterly basis any payments that were made to our Sponsor, our officers and our directors,and any affiliates thereof. Any such payments prior to an initial business combination will be made using funds held outside the TrustAccount. Other than quarterly audit committee review of such reimbursements, we do not expect to have any additional controls in placegoverning our reimbursement payments to our directors and executive officers for their out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connectionwith our activities on our behalf in connection with identifying and completing an initial business combination. Other than these paymentsand reimbursements, no compensation of any kind, including finder’s and consulting fees, will be paid by the company to our Sponsor,executive officers and directors, or any of their respective affiliates, prior to consummation of our initial business combination.
Compensationof Executive Officers and Directors
Thecompensation committee oversees the compensation policies, plans and programs and review and determine compensation to be paid to executiveofficers, directors and other senior management, as appropriate. The compensation policies for the Company are intended to provide forcompensation that is sufficient to attract, motivate and retain executives of the Company and potential other individuals and to establishan appropriate relationship between executive compensation and the creation of stockholder value.
Subjectto any modifications or recommendations by the compensation committee, the executive officers and directors of the Company currentlyreceive substantially the same compensation that they receive from Calidi prior to the Business Combination, and also be subject to substantiallythe same severance terms under their respective employment agreement and arrangements with Calidi. The description of the employmentagreements and arrangements is forth in the sections titled “Executive Compensation — Calidi Executive Officer and DirectorCompensation” and section titled, “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions — Calidi Related PartyTransactions.”
| 129 |
EmployeeBenefit and Stock Plans
Equity-basedcompensation is an important foundation in the executive compensation packages as we believe it will maintain a strong link between executiveincentives and the creation of stockholder value. It is anticipated that the performance and equity-based compensation will be an importantcomponent of the total executive compensation package for maximizing stockholder value while, at the same time, attracting, motivatingand retaining high-quality executives. Formal guidelines for the allocations of cash and equity-based compensation have not yet beendetermined, but it is expected that the Incentive Plan will be an important element of our compensation arrangements for both executiveofficers and directors, and that the executive officers will also be eligible to participate in the 2023 ESPP.
ExchangeStock Options
Asa result of the Business Combination, all outstanding options to purchase Calidi stock were assumed by the Company and the Assumed Optionsare currently exercisable for newly issued shares of common stock of Calidi, subject to the terms of their applicable plan and agreementpursuant to which the original options were granted. As such each Assumed Option is subject to the terms and conditions set forth inthe Calidi Equity Plan (except any references therein to Calidi or Calidi Common Stock will instead mean our common stock, and exceptfor any other terms that are rendered inoperative by the Transactions). Each Assumed Option has the right to acquire a number of sharesof our common stock equal to (as rounded down to the nearest whole number) the product of (A) the number of shares of Calidi Common Stockwhich the Calidi Option had the right to acquire immediately prior to the Effective Time, multiplied by (B) the Conversion Ratio; (ii)have an exercise price equal to (as rounded up to the nearest whole cent) the quotient of (A) the exercise price of the Calidi Option(in U.S. Dollars), divided by (B) the Conversion Ratio; and is subject to the same vesting schedule as the applicable Calidi Option.As of March 24, 2025, there were 673,778 Assumed Options issued and outstanding under the 2019 Plan.
2023Equity Incentive Plan
OurBoard approved the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (“Incentive Plan”), subject to the approval of our stockholders. On August28, 2023, the Incentive Plan was approved by our stockholder and the Incentive Plan became effective upon the consummation of the BusinessCombination. The Company is authorized to grant equity awards to eligible service providers following consummation of the Business Combination.The purpose of the Incentive Plan is to provide incentives to attract, retain, and motivate eligible persons whose present and potentialcontributions are important to the success of Company, its parents, subsidiaries and affiliates that exist now or in the future, by offeringthem an opportunity to participate in the Company’s future performance through the grant of Awards (as defined in the IncentivePlan).
Descriptionof the Incentive Plan
Thematerial features of the Incentive Plan are described below. The following description of the Incentive Plan is a summary only. Thissummary is not a complete statement of the Incentive Plan and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the IncentivePlan, a copy of which has been filed with the SEC.
Administration.The Incentive Plan is expected to be administered by Calidi’s compensation committee, all of the members of which are outsidedirectors as defined under applicable federal tax laws, or by the board of directors of Calidi acting in place of the compensation committee(the “Incentive Plan Administrator”). Subject to the terms and conditions of the Incentive Plan, the compensation committeewill have the authority, among other things, to select the persons to whom awards may be granted, construe and interpret the IncentivePlan, determine the number of shares of common stock or other consideration subject to awards, determine the terms of such awards andprescribe, amend and rescind the rules and regulations relating to the plan or any award granted thereunder, as well as to make all otherdeterminations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Incentive Plan. The Incentive Plan provides that the Calidi Boardor compensation committee may delegate its authority, including the authority to grant awards, to one or more executive officers to theextent permitted by applicable law, except, however, that awards granted to non-employee directors may only be established by Calidi’sBoard.
Typesof Awards. The Incentive Plan allows for the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options (“NSOs”), stockappreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock awards, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), other stock-based awardsand other cash-based awards (collectively, the “Awards”) at the discretion of the Incentive Plan Administrator.
ShareReserve. Subject to Sections 2.6 and 21 in the Incentive Plan, the total number of shares of Common Stock (the “Shares”)reserved and available for grant and issuance pursuant to the Incentive Plan is 3,393,781 Shares, which is equal to 10% of the issuedand outstanding shares of Calidi determined as of immediately after the closing of the Merger.
| 130 |
Lapsedor Returned Awards. If Shares are subject to issuance upon exercise of an option or SAR granted under the Incentive Plan but whichcease to be subject to the option or SAR for any reason other than exercise of the option or SAR, are subject to Awards granted underthe Incentive Plan that are forfeited or are repurchased by Calidi at the original issue price, are subject to Awards granted under IncentivePlan that otherwise terminate without such Shares being issued or are surrendered pursuant to an Exchange Program (as defined in theIncentive Plan), the Shares subject to such awards will again be available for issuance under the Incentive Plan. If options or stockappreciation rights granted under the Incentive Plan are exercised or RSUs are settled, only the number of shares actually issued uponexercise or settlement of such awards will reduce the number of shares available under the Incentive Plan. If an award is paid out incash or other property rather than Shares, such cash payment will not result in reducing the number of Shares available for issuanceunder the Incentive Plan. Shares used to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to an RSU or used to pay the exercise priceof an Award or withheld to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to an Award will become available for grant and issuance inconnection with subsequent Awards under this Plan. Shares that otherwise become available for grant and issuance due to the foregoingwill not include Shares subject to Awards that initially became available because of the substitution clause in Section 21.2 in the IncentivePlan.
Sharesissued under the Incentive Plan may be authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. As of the date hereof, no awards have beengranted under the Incentive Plan.
IncentiveStock Option Limit. No more than 300,000 shares of Calidi’s Common Stock may be issued under the Incentive Plan upon the exerciseof ISOs.
AnnualLimitation on Compensation of Non-Employee Directors. Non-employee directors are eligible to receive any type of Award offered underthis Plan except ISOs. The grant date fair value of awards granted to each non-employee director during any fiscal year of Calidimay not exceed $750,000 (on a per-director basis). This limit is increased to $1,000,000 in the fiscal year a non-employee director isinitially appointed or elected to Calidi’s Board. A Non-employee director may elect to receive his or her annual retainer paymentsand/or meeting fees from Calidi in the form of cash or Awards or a combination thereof, if permitted, and as determined, by the IncentivePlan Administrator.
Eligibility.Employees (including officers), directors and consultants who render services to Calidi or a parent or subsidiary thereof (whethernow existing or subsequently established) are eligible to receive awards under the Incentive Plan. ISOs may only be granted to employeesof Calidi or a parent or subsidiary thereof (whether now existing or subsequently established). As of and assuming closing of the Merger,approximately 13 persons (including 8 executive officers and 5 non-employee directors) would be eligible to participate in the IncentivePlan.
InternationalParticipation. The Incentive Plan Administrator has the authority to determine which subsidiaries of Calidi will be covered by theIncentive Plan, determine which individuals outside the United States are eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan, modify the termsand conditions of any Award granted to individuals outside the United States or foreign nationals to comply with applicable foreign laws,policies, customs, and practices, establish subplans and modify applicable grant terms and take any action that the Incentive Plan Administratordetermines to be necessary or advisable to obtain approval or comply with any local governmental regulatory exemptions or approvals.
Repricing.The Incentive Plan Administrator has full authority to reprice options and stock appreciation rights (where such repricing is a reductionin the exercise price of outstanding options or SARs, the consent of the affected participants is not required provided written noticeis provided to them) and to approve programs in which options and stock appreciation rights are exchanged for cash or other equity awardson terms the Incentive Plan Administrator determines, with the consent of the respective participants.
StockOptions. A stock option is the right to purchase a certain number of shares of stock at a fixed exercise price which, pursuant tothe Incentive Plan, may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of Calidi Common Stock on the date of grant. Subject to limitedexceptions, an option may have a term of up to 10 years and will generally expire sooner if the option holder’s service terminates.Options will vest at the rate determined by the Incentive Plan Administrator. An option holder may pay the exercise price of an optionin cash, or, with the Incentive Plan Administrator’s consent, with shares of stock the option holder already owns, with proceedsfrom an immediate sale of the option shares through a broker approved by the Incentive Plan Administrator, through a net exercise procedureor by any other method permitted by applicable law.
| 131 |
TheIncentive Plan Administrator may grant ISOs or NSOs to eligible employees and shall further determine the number of Shares subject tothe option, the exercise price of the option, the period during which the option may vest and be exercised, and all other terms and conditionsof the option.
Withrespect to awards granted as ISOs, to the extent that the aggregate fair market value of Calidi Common Stock with respect to which suchISOs are exercisable for the first time by an option holder during any calendar year under all of Calidi’s stock plans exceedsone hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), such options will generally be treated as NSOs. No ISO may be granted to any person who, atthe time of the grant, owns or is deemed to own stock possessing more than 10% of Calidi’s total combined voting power or thatof any parent or subsidiary of Calidi unless (a) the option exercise price is at least 110% of the fair market value of the stock subjectto the option on the date of grant and (b) the term of the ISO does not exceed five years from the date of grant.
StockAppreciation Rights. A stock appreciation right provides the recipient with the right to the appreciation in a specified number ofshares of stock. The Incentive Plan Administrator shall determine the terms of each SAR, including the number of Shares subject to theSAR, the exercise price, which may not be less than the fair market value of Calidi Common Stock on the date of grant, and exercise period,the consideration to be distributed on exercise and settlement of the SAR, and the effect of the termination of service on each SAR.Subject to limited exceptions, a stock appreciation right may have a term of up to 10 years and will generally expire sooner if the recipient’sservice terminates. SARs will vest at the rate determined by the Incentive Plan Administrator. Upon exercise of a SAR, the recipientwill receive an amount in cash, stock, or a combination of stock and cash determined by the Incentive Plan Administrator, equal to theexcess of the fair market value of the shares being exercised over their exercise price.
RestrictedStock Awards. A restricted stock award is an offer by Calidi to sell to an eligible employee that are subject to restrictions. Sharesof restricted stock may be issued under the Incentive Plan pursuant to a restricted stock award agreement, for such consideration asthe Incentive Plan Administrator may determine, including cash, services rendered or to be rendered to Calidi or such other forms ofconsideration permitted under applicable law. The Incentive Plan Administrator in its discretion shall determine the number of sharesthat may be purchased, the purchase price (if any), the restrictions under which the Shares will be subject, and all other terms andconditions of the restricted stock award. Recipients of restricted stock generally have all of the rights of a shareholder with respectto those shares, including voting rights, however any dividends and other distributions on restricted stock will generally be subjectto the same restrictions on transferability and forfeitability as the underlying shares.
RestrictedStock Units. A restricted stock unit is a right to receive a share, at no cost to the recipient, upon satisfaction of certain conditions,including vesting conditions, established by the Incentive Plan Administrator pursuant to a restricted stock unit agreement. RSUs vestat the rate determined by the Incentive Plan Administrator and any unvested RSUs will generally be forfeited upon termination of therecipient’s service, provided that no RSU will have a term longer than 10 years. If the RSU is being earned upon satisfaction ofperformance criteria, the Incentive Plan Administer shall determine the nature, length, and starting date for the RSU, select from amongthe performance criteria to be used to measure the performance, if any, and determine the number of Shares deemed subject to the RSU.Settlement of RSUs may be made in the form of cash, stock or a combination of cash and stock, as determined by the Incentive Plan Administratorin its sole discretion. Recipients of RSUs generally will have no voting or dividend rights prior to the time the vesting conditionsare satisfied and the award is settled. At the Incentive Plan Administrator’s discretion and as set forth in the applicable restrictedstock unit agreement, RSUs may provide for the right to dividend equivalents which will generally be subject to the same conditions andrestrictions as the RSUs to which they pertain.
Changesto Capital Structure. In the event of certain changes in capitalization, including a stock split, reverse stock split or stock dividend,proportionate adjustments will be made in the number and kind of shares available for issuance under the Incentive Plan, the limit onthe number of shares that may be issued under the Incentive Plan as ISOs, the number and kind of shares subject to each outstanding awardand/or the exercise price of each outstanding award, subject to any required action by the Calidi Board or Calidi Stockholders and incompliance with applicable securities or other laws. No fractional shares shall be issued.
| 132 |
CorporateTransactions; Change in Control. If Calidi is party to a merger, consolidation or certain Change in Control transactions, each outstandingaward will be treated as described in the definitive transaction agreement, which need not treat all outstanding awards in an identicalmanner, and, may include the continuation, assumption or substitution of an outstanding award, the cancellation of an outstanding awardafter an opportunity to exercise or the cancellation of an outstanding award in exchange for a payment equal to the value of the sharessubject to such award less any applicable exercise price. In general, if an award held by a participant who remains in service at theeffective time of a Change in Control transaction is not continued, assumed or substituted, then the award will vest in full. In theevent such successor or acquiring corporation (if any) refuses to assume, convert, replace or substitute outstanding awards pursuantto a Corporate Transaction (as defined in the Incentive Plan), then the Incentive Plan Administrator will notify each participant thatsuch participant’s award will, if exercisable, be exercisable for a period of time determined by the Incentive Plan Administratorin its sole discretion, and such award will terminate upon the expiration of such period.
Transferabilityof Awards. Unless the Incentive Plan Administrator determines otherwise, an award generally will not be transferable other than bybeneficiary designation, a will or the laws of descent and distribution. The Incentive Plan Administrator may permit transfer of an awardin a manner consistent with applicable law.
Amendmentand Termination. The Incentive Plan Administrator may amend or terminate the Incentive Plan at any time. Any such amendment or terminationwill not affect outstanding awards. If not sooner terminated, the Incentive Plan will terminate automatically 10 years after its adoptionby the FLAG Board. Shareholder approval is not required for any amendment of the Incentive Plan, unless required by applicable law, governmentregulation or exchange listing standards.
CertainFederal Income Tax Aspects of Awards Under the Incentive Plan
Thisis a brief summary of the U.S. federal income tax aspects of awards that may be made under the Incentive Plan based on existing U.S.federal income tax laws as of the date of this report. This summary covers only the basic tax rules. It does not describe a number ofspecial tax rules, including the alternative minimum tax and various elections that may be applicable under certain circumstances. Italso does not reflect provisions of the income tax laws of any municipality, state or foreign country in which a holder may reside, nordoes it reflect the tax consequences of a holder’s death. Therefore, no one should rely on this summary for individual tax compliance,planning or decisions. Participants in the Incentive Plan should consult their own professional tax advisors concerning tax aspects ofawards under the Incentive Plan. The discussion below concerning tax deductions that may become available to the Company under U.S. federaltax law is not intended to imply that the Company will necessarily obtain a tax benefit from those deductions. The tax consequences ofawards under the Incentive Plan depend upon the type of award. Changes to tax laws following the date of this report could alter thetax consequences described below.
IncentiveStock Options. No taxable income is recognized by an option holder upon the grant or vesting of an ISO, and no taxable income isrecognized at the time an ISO is exercised unless the option holder is subject to the alternative minimum tax. The excess of the fairmarket value of the purchased shares on the exercise date over the exercise price paid for the shares is includable in alternative minimumtaxable income.
Ifthe option holder holds the purchased shares for more than one year after the date the ISO was exercised and more than two years afterthe ISO was granted (the “required ISO holding periods”), then the option holder will generally recognize long-term capitalgain or loss upon disposition of such shares. The gain or loss will equal the difference between the amount realized upon the dispositionof the shares and the exercise price paid for such shares. If the option holder disposes of the purchased shares before satisfying eitherof the required ISO holding periods, then the option holder will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shareson the date the ISO was price paid for the shares (or, if less, the amount realized on a sale of such shares). Any additional gain willbe a capital gain and will be treated as short-term or long-term capital gain depending on how long the shares were held by the optionholder.
| 133 |
NonqualifiedStock Options. No taxable income is recognized by an option holder upon the grant or vesting of an NSO, provided the NSO does nothave a readily ascertainable fair market value. If the NSO does not have a readily ascertainable fair market value, the option holderwill generally recognize ordinary income in the year in which the option is exercised equal to the excess of the fair market value ofthe purchased shares on the exercise date over the exercise price paid for the shares. If the option holder is an employee or formeremployee, the option holder will be required to satisfy the tax withholding requirements applicable to such income. Upon resale of thepurchased shares, any subsequent appreciation or depreciation in the value of the shares will be treated as short-term or long-term capitalgain or loss depending on how long the shares were held by the option holder.
StockAppreciation Rights. In general, no taxable income results upon the grant of a SAR. A participant will generally recognize ordinaryincome in the year of exercise equal to the value of the shares or other consideration received. In the case of a current or former employee,this amount is subject to income tax withholding. Upon resale of the shares acquired pursuant to a SAR, any subsequent appreciation ordepreciation in the value of the shares will be treated as short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending on how long the shareswere held by the recipient.
RestrictedStock Awards. A participant who receives an award of restricted stock generally does not recognize taxable income at the time ofthe award. Instead, the participant recognizes ordinary income when the shares vest, subject to withholding if the participant is anemployee or former employee. The amount of taxable income is equal to the fair market value of the shares on the vesting date(s) lessthe amount, if any, paid for the shares. Alternatively, a participant may make a one-time election to recognize income at the time theparticipant receives restricted stock in an amount equal to the fair market value of the restricted stock (less any amount paid for theshares) on the date of the award by making an election under Section 83(b) of the Code.
RestrictedStock Unit. In general, no taxable income results upon the grant of an RSU. The recipient will generally recognize ordinary income,subject to withholding if the recipient is an employee or former employee, equal to the fair market value of the shares that are deliveredto the recipient upon settlement of the RSU. Upon resale of the shares acquired pursuant to an RSU, any subsequent appreciation or depreciationin the value of the shares will be treated as short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending on how long the shares were heldby the recipient.
Section409A. The foregoing description assumes that Section 409A of the Code does not apply to an award. In general, options and stock appreciationrights are exempt from Section 409A if the exercise price per share is at least equal to the fair market value per share of the underlyingstock at the time the option or stock appreciation right was granted. RSUs are subject to Section 409A unless they are settled withintwo and one half months after the end of the later of (a) the end of the Company’s fiscal year in which vesting occurs or (b) theend of the calendar year in which vesting occurs. Restricted stock awards are not generally subject to Section 409A. If an award is subjectto Section 409A and the provisions for the exercise or settlement of that award do not comply with Section 409A, then the participantwould be required to recognize ordinary income whenever a portion of the award vested (regardless of whether it had been exercised orsettled). This amount would also be subject to a 20% U.S. federal tax in addition to the U.S. federal income tax at the participant’susual marginal rate for ordinary income, plus premium interest.
TaxTreatment. The Company will generally be entitled to an income tax deduction at the time and to the extent a participant recognizesordinary income as a result of an award granted under the Incentive Plan. However, Section 162(m) of the Code may limit the deductibilityof certain awards granted under the Incentive Plan. Although the Incentive Plan Administrator considers the deductibility of compensationas one factor in determining executive compensation, the Incentive Plan Administrator retains the discretion to award and pay compensationthat is not deductible as it believes that it is in the shareholders’ best interests to maintain flexibility in the approach toexecutive compensation and to structure a program that the Company considers to be the most effective in attracting, motivating and retainingkey employees.
NewPlan Benefits
Benefitsto be received under the Incentive Plan are not determinable since they depend on awards to be established by the Incentive Plan Administrator.
| 134 |
Registrationwith the SEC
OnOctober 1, 2024, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 registering the shares of our common stock reserved for issuanceunder the Incentive Plan.
2023Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Priorto the consummation of the Business Combination, our Board approved and adopted, subject to our stockholders approval, the 2023 EmployeeStock Purchase Plan, hereinafter the 2023 ESPP. The purpose of the 2023 ESPP is to provide a means whereby the Company can align thelong-term financial interests of its employees with the financial interests of its shareholders. In addition, the board of directorsbelieves that the ability to allow its employees to purchase shares of our common stock will help it to attract, retain, and motivateemployees and encourages them to devote their best efforts to our business and financial success.
OnAugust 28, 2023 our stockholders approved the 2023 ESPP which became effective on the consummation of the Business Combination.
Descriptionof the 2023 ESPP
Thematerial features of the 2023 ESPP are described below. The following description of the 2023 ESPP is a summary only. This summary isnot a complete statement of the 2023 ESPP and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the 2023 ESPP, a copyof which has been filed with the SEC.
Purpose.The purpose of the 2023 ESPP is to provide a means by which eligible employees of Calidi and certain designated companies may begiven an opportunity to purchase shares of Calidi Common Stock following the closing of the Business Combination, to assist Calidi inretaining the services of eligible employees, to secure and retain the services of new employees and to provide incentives for such personsto exert maximum efforts for Calidi’s success.
ThePlan includes two components: a 423 Component and a Non-423 Component. Calidi intends that the 423 Component will qualify as optionsissued under an “employee stock purchase plan” as that term is defined in Section 423(b) of the Code. Except as otherwiseprovided in the 2023 ESPP or determined by Calidi board of directors, the Non-423 Component will operate and be administered in the samemanner as the 423 Component.
ShareReserve. The maximum number of shares of Calidi Common Stock that may be issued under the 2023 ESPP was to be set by the Calidi Boardat a number that represents approximately 2.0% of Calidi’s issued and outstanding Common Stock immediately after the closing ofthe Business Combination (after giving effect to the Redemption) or such lesser amount as determined by the Board at such time. The numberof shares of Calidi Common Stock available for issuance under the 2023 ESPP upon it becoming effective could not exceed 393,781. Thenumber of shares of Calidi Common Stock that may be issued under the 2023 ESPP was set by the Calidi Board at 393,781 . Shares subjectto purchase rights granted under the 2023 ESPP that terminate without having been exercised in full will not reduce the number of sharesavailable for issuance under the 2023 ESPP.
Administration.Calidi Board, or a duly authorized committee thereof, will administer the 2023 ESPP.
Limitations.Calidi employees and the employees of any of its designated affiliates, will be eligible to participate in the 2023 ESPP, provided theymay have to satisfy one or more of the following service requirements before participating in the 2023 ESPP, as determined by the administrator:(1) customary employment with Calidi or one of its affiliates for more than 20 hours per week and five or more months per calendar yearor (2) continuous employment with Calidi or one of its affiliates for a minimum period of time, not to exceed two years, prior to thefirst date of an offering. In addition, Calidi Board may also exclude from participation in the 2023 ESPP employees who are “highlycompensated employees” (within the meaning of Section 423(b)(4)(D) of the Code) or a subset of such highly compensated employees.If this proposal is approved by the FLAG stockholders, all the employees of Calidi and its related corporations will be eligible to participatein the 2023 ESPP following the closing of the Business Combination. An employee may not be granted rights to purchase stock under the2023 ESPP (a) if such employee immediately after the grant would own stock possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting power orvalue of all classes of Calidi capital stock or (b) to the extent that such rights would accrue at a rate that exceeds $25,000 worthof Calidi capital stock for each calendar year that the rights remain outstanding.
| 135 |
The2023 ESPP is intended to qualify as an employee stock purchase plan under Section 423 of the Code. The administrator may specify offeringswith a duration of not more than 27 months and may specify one or more shorter purchase periods within each offering. Each offering willhave one or more purchase dates on which shares of Calidi Common Stock will be purchased for the employees who are participating in theoffering. The administrator, in its discretion, will determine the terms of offerings under the 2023 ESPP. The administrator has thediscretion to structure an offering so that if the fair market value of a share of Calidi Common Stock on any purchase date during theoffering period is less than or equal to the fair market value of a share of Calidi Common Stock on the first day of the offering period,then that offering will terminate immediately, and the participants in such terminated offering will be automatically enrolled in a newoffering that begins immediately after such purchase date.
Aparticipant may not transfer purchase rights under the 2023 ESPP other than by will, the laws of descent and distribution, or as otherwiseprovided under the 2023 ESPP.
PayrollDeductions. The 2023 ESPP permits participants to purchase shares of Calidi Common Stock through payroll deductions of up to 15%of their earnings. Unless otherwise determined by the administrator, the purchase price of the shares will be 85% of the lower of thefair market value of Calidi Common Stock on the first day of an offering or on the date of purchase. Participants may end their participationat any time during an offering and will be paid their accrued contributions that have not yet been used to purchase shares, without interest.Participation ends automatically upon termination of employment with Calidi and its related corporations.
Withdrawal.Participants may withdraw from an offering by delivering a withdrawal form to Calidi and terminating their contributions. Such withdrawalmay be elected at any time prior to the end of an offering, except as otherwise provided by the plan administrator. Upon such withdrawal,Calidi will distribute to the employee his or her accumulated but unused contributions without interest, and such employee’s rightto participate in that offering will terminate. However, an employee’s withdrawal from an offering does not affect such employee’seligibility to participate in any other offerings under the 2023 ESPP.
Terminationof Employment. A participant’s rights under any offering under the 2023 ESPP will terminate immediately if the participanteither (i) is no longer employed by Calidi or any of its parent or subsidiary companies (subject to any post-employment participationperiod required by law) or (ii) is otherwise no longer eligible to participate. In such event, Calidi will distribute to the participanthis or her accumulated but unused contributions, without interest.
CorporateTransactions. In the event of certain specified significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or Change in Control, a successorcorporation may assume, continue, or substitute each outstanding purchase right. If the successor corporation does not assume, continue,or substitute for the outstanding purchase rights, the offering in progress will be shortened and a new purchase date will be set. Theparticipants’ purchase rights will be exercised on the new purchase date and such purchase rights will terminate immediately thereafter.
Amendmentand Termination. Calidi Board of directors has the authority to amend, suspend, or terminate the 2023 ESPP, at any time and for anyreason, provided certain types of amendments will require the approval of Calidi Stockholders. Any benefits privileges, entitlementsand obligations under any outstanding purchase rights granted before an amendment, suspension or termination of the Plan will not bematerially impaired by any such amendment, suspension or termination except (i) with the consent of the person to whom such purchaserights were granted, (ii) as necessary to facilitate compliance with any laws, listing requirements, or governmental regulations, or(iii) as necessary to obtain or maintain favorable tax, listing, or regulatory treatment. The 2023 ESPP will remain in effect until terminatedby Calidi Board in accordance with the terms of the 2023 ESPP.
U.S.Federal Income Tax Consequences
Thefollowing is a summary of the principal U.S. federal income tax consequences to participants and Calidi with respect to participationin the 2023 ESPP. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and does not discuss the income tax laws of any local, state or foreignjurisdiction in which a participant may reside. The information is based upon current U.S. federal income tax rules and therefore issubject to change when those rules change. Because the tax consequences to any participant may depend on his or her particular situation,each participant should consult the participant’s tax adviser regarding the federal, state, local, and other tax consequences ofthe grant or exercise of a purchase right or the sale or other disposition of Calidi Common Stock acquired under the 2023 ESPP. The 2023ESPP is not qualified under the provisions of Section 401(a) of the Code and is not subject to any of the provisions of the EmployeeRetirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
| 136 |
423Component of the 2023 ESPP
Rightsgranted under the 423 Component of the 2023 ESPP are intended to qualify for favorable U.S. federal income tax treatment associated withrights granted under an employee stock purchase plan which qualifies under the provisions of Section 423 of the Code.
Aparticipant will be taxed on amounts withheld for the purchase of shares of Calidi Common Stock as if such amounts were actually received.Otherwise, no income will be taxable to a participant as a result of the granting or exercise of a purchase right until a sale or otherdisposition of the acquired shares. The taxation upon such sale or other disposition will depend upon the holding period of the acquiredshares.
Ifthe shares are sold or otherwise disposed of more than two years after the beginning of the offering period and more than one year afterthe shares are transferred to the participant, then the lesser of the following will be treated as ordinary income: (i) the excess ofthe fair market value of the shares at the time of such sale or other disposition over the purchase price; or (ii) the excess of thefair market value of the shares as of the beginning of the offering period over the purchase price (determined as of the beginning ofthe offering period). Any further gain or any loss will be taxed as a long-term capital gain or loss.
Ifthe shares are sold or otherwise disposed of before the expiration of either of the holding periods described above, then the excessof the fair market value of the shares on the purchase date over the purchase price will be treated as ordinary income at the time ofsuch sale or other disposition. The balance of any gain will be treated as capital gain. Even if the shares are later sold or otherwisedisposed of for less than their fair market value on the purchase date, the same amount of ordinary income is attributed to the participant,and a capital loss is recognized equal to the difference between the sales price and the fair market value of the shares on such purchasedate. Any capital gain or loss will be short-term or long-term, depending on how long the shares have been held.
Non-423Component
Aparticipant will be taxed on amounts withheld for the purchase of shares of Calidi Common Stock as if such amounts were actually received.Under the Non-423 Component, a participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of theunderlying stock on the date of exercise of the purchase right over the purchase price. If the participant is employed by Calidi or oneof its affiliates, that income will be subject to withholding taxes. The participant’s tax basis in those shares will be equalto their fair market
Limitationsof Liability and Indemnification Matters
OurCharter limits the liability of our current and former directors and officers for monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted byDelaware law. Delaware law provides that directors and officers of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary damages forany breach of fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:
| ● | any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders; | |
| ● | any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; | |
| ● | unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions; | |
| ● | any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit; or | |
| ● | an officer in any action by or in the right of the corporation. |
Suchlimitation of liability does not apply to liabilities arising under federal securities laws and does not affect the availability of equitableremedies such as injunctive relief or rescission.
| 137 |
OurCharter authorizes us to indemnify our directors, officers, employees and other agents to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.The Bylaws provide that we are required to indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law and mayindemnify our other employees and agents. The Bylaws also provide that, on satisfaction of certain conditions, we will advance expensesincurred by a director or officer in advance of the final disposition of any action or proceeding, and permit us to secure insuranceon behalf of any officer, director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions in that capacity regardlessof whether we would otherwise be permitted to indemnify him or her under the provisions of Delaware law. We have entered and expect tocontinue to enter into agreements to indemnify our directors and executive officers. With certain exceptions, these agreements providefor indemnification for related expenses including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by any ofthese individuals in connection with any action, proceeding or investigation. We believe that the Charter and Bylaws provisions and indemnificationagreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. We also maintain customary directors’and officers’ liability insurance.
Thelimitation of liability and indemnification provisions in our Charter and Bylaws may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuitagainst our directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. They may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against our directorsand officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit us and other stockholders. Further, a stockholder’s investmentmay be adversely affected to the extent that we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers as requiredby these indemnification provisions.
Insofaras indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted for directors, executive officers or persons controllingus, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the SecuritiesAct and is therefore unenforceable.
CERTAINRELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
Otherthan as set forth below and compensation arrangements, including employment, and indemnification arrangements, discussed, there havebeen no transactions since January 1, 2024, in which the amount involved in the transaction exceeded or will exceed the lesser of $120,000or one percent of the average of our total assets as at the year-end for the last two completed fiscal years, and to which any of ourdirectors, executive officers or beneficial holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any immediate family member of, or personsharing the household with, any of these individuals, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Pursuantto the Audit Committee’s written charter, our Audit Committee has the responsibility to review, approve and oversee transactionsbetween the Company and any related person (as defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K) and any potential conflict of interest situationson an ongoing basis, in accordance with our policies and procedures, and to develop policies and procedures for the Audit Committee’sapproval of related party transactions.
Priorto completing the Business Combination and becoming publicly traded in September 2023, the Company funded its operations primarily throughissuances of convertible promissory notes and private sales of common stock. These investments included various related parties, includingfrom AJC Capital and certain directors as further discussed below.
| 138 |
Thefollowing table presents the various significant related party transactions and investments in the Company for the periods presented(in thousands):
| Related Party | Description of investment or transaction | March 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Director A and Director E | Current term notes payable, net of discount, including accrued interest(1) | 1,132 | 2,702 | |||||||
| AJC Capital and relative of Officer A | Accounts payable and accrued expenses(2) | 43 | 30 | |||||||
| Director D | Former President and Chief Operating Officer(3) | — | 434 | |||||||
| Director A | Advisory services included in accrued expenses(4) | — | 18 | |||||||
| AJC Capital | Lease guaranty(5) | 190 | 186 | |||||||
| Director A | Other liabilities(6) | — | 638 | |||||||
| AJC Capital and Director A | Warrant liability(7) | 6 | 9 | |||||||
| Relative of Officer A | Loan payable(8) | — | 223 | |||||||
| (1) | As of March 31, 2025, related party term note payable amounts due to Directors A totaling $1.1 million, inclusive of principal amounts totaling $0.7 million and accrued interest amounts totaling $0.4 million, have been classified as a short term liability on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2024, related party term note payable amounts due to Directors A and E totaled $2.7 million. See Note 7 of the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further details. |
| (2) | Amounts owed to AJC Capital as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, for reimbursable expenses; in addition, amounts owed to a relative of Officer A for certain legal fees, included in accounts payable and accrued expenses. In April 2025, $28,000 was settled with AJC Capital. |
| (3) | On February 1, 2022, the Company appointed a then current board member (Director D referenced above), George K. Ng, as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company under an Employment Agreement (the “Ng Agreement”). Under the Ng Agreement, Mr. Ng was entitled to a base annual salary of $0.5 million and a signing bonus of $0.3 million, payable in three equal monthly installments. Mr. Ng was eligible for standard change in control and severance benefits. On June 23, 2023, the Company entered into a Separation and Release Agreement with Mr. Ng which included a severance accrual and accrued interest as of December 31, 2024 (see Note 11 of the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further details). The lump sum payment and accrued interest was settled in January 2025. |
| (4) | On April 1, 2022, the Company entered into an Advisory Agreement with Scott Leftwich (Director A referenced above), for providing certain strategic and advisory services. Director A received an advisory fee of $9,166 per month not to exceed $0.1 million per annum, accrued and payable upon the Company raising $10 million or more in equity proceeds, as defined in the Advisory Agreement. The Advisory Agreement terminated on August 31, 2023. The accrued advisory fees were settled in January 2025. |
| (5) | In October 2022, in order for the Company to secure and execute the San Diego Lease discussed in Note 11 of the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further details, Mr. Allan Camaisa, former Chief Executive Officer of the Company, provided a personal Guaranty of Lease of (the “Guaranty”) up to $0.9 million to the lessor for the Company’s future performance under the San Diego Lease agreement. As consideration for the Guaranty, the Company agreed to pay Mr. Camaisa 10% of the Guaranty amount for the first year of the San Diego Lease, and 5% per annum of the Guaranty amount thereafter through the life of the lease, with all amounts accrued and payable at the termination of the San Diego Lease or release of Mr. Camaisa from the Guaranty by the lessor, whichever occurs first. The amount shown in the table above represents the present value, including accrued interest as of the period shown, of the aggregate $0.2 million payment due to Mr. Camaisa upon the release or termination of the Guaranty, which is included in noncurrent operating lease right-of-use liability. |
| (6) | In August 2023, the Company entered into an agreement with Director A for deferred compensation including advisory fees for $0.5 million, which was paid in January 2025 (see Note 11 of the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further details). The $0.5 million note bore interest at 24% through August 12, 2024, at which time the note was amended and replaced with an interest rate of 14% per annum. The deferred compensation and advisory fees were settled in January 2025. |
| (7) | See disclosures around Warrants in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements on Form 10-Q for the year ended December 31, 2024, and included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
| (8) | In January 2024, the Company entered into a loan agreement with a relative of Officer A for a loan payable for $0.2 million, which bears interest at 12%. The loan was settled in full in January 2025. |
| 139 |
TheBusiness Combination and Related Transactions
OnSeptember 12, 2023, First Light Acquisition Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“FLAG”) consummated a series of transactionsthat resulted in the merger of FLAG Merger Sub Inc., a Nevada corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of FLAG (“Merger Sub”)and Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Calidi NV”) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger (as thesame has been or may be amended, modified, supplemented or waived from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”) dated as ofJanuary 9, 2023 by and among FLAG, Calidi NV, First Light Acquisition Group, LLC, in the capacity as representative for the stockholdersof FLAG (the “Sponsor” or the “Purchaser Representative”) and Allan Camaisa, in the capacity as representativeof the stockholders of Calidi NV (“Seller Representative”). On August 28, 2023, FLAG held the Special Meeting, at which meetingthe FLAG stockholders considered and adopted, among other matters, a proposal to approve the business combination. Pursuant to the termsof the Merger Agreement, the business combination was effected through the merger of Merger Sub with and into Calidi NV, with CalidiNV surviving such merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of FLAG (the “Merger,” and the transactions contemplated by the MergerAgreement, the “Business Combination”). Following the consummation of the Business Combination, FLAG was renamed “CalidiBiotherapeutics, Inc.”
Asa result of the Business Combination, all outstanding stock of Calidi NV were cancelled in exchange for the right to receive newly issuedshares of Common Stock of Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc., par value $0.0001 per share (“Common Stock”), and all outstandingoptions to purchase Calidi NV stock were exchanged for options exercisable for newly issued shares of Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc. CommonStock.
Thetotal consideration received by Calidi Security Holders at the Closing of the transactions by the Merger Agreement is the newly issuedshares of Common Stock and securities convertible or exchangeable for newly issued shares of Common Stock with an aggregate value equal$250.0 million, plus an adjustment of $23.8 million pursuant to the net debt adjustment provisions of the Merger Agreement by reasonof the Series B Financing (the “Merger Consideration”), with each Calidi NV Stockholder receiving for each share of CalidiNV Common Stock held (after giving effect to the exchange or conversion of all outstanding Calidi NV Preferred Stock for shares of CalidiNV Common Stock and treating all vested in-the-money Calidi NV Convertible Securities (including, on a net exercise basis, all outstandingCalidi NV warrants and vested qualified Calidi NV Options but excluding all vested non-qualified stock options) as if such securitieshad been exercised as of immediately prior to the Merger, but excluding all unvested Calidi NV Options and any treasury stock) a numberof shares of Common Stock equal to a conversion ratio of approximately 0.42. As a result, the Calidi NV Security Holders received anaggregate of 2,737,560 shares of newly issued Common Stock as Merger Consideration.
Asan additional consideration, each Calidi NV Stockholder was entitled to earn, on a pro rata basis, up to 1,800,000 shares of non-votingcommon stock (the “Escalation Shares”). During the Escalation Period, Calidi NV Stockholders may be entitled to receive upto 1,800,000 Escalation Shares with incremental releases of 450,000 shares upon the achievement of each share price hurdle if the tradingprice of Common Stock is $120.00, $140.00, $160.00 and $180.00, respectively, for a period of any 20 days within any 30-consecutive-daytrading period. The Escalation Shares are in escrow and have been outstanding from and after the Closing, subject to cancellation ifthe applicable price targets are not achieved. While in escrow, the shares will be non-voting.
Holdersof FLAG Class A Common Stock who did not redeem their shares obtained the right to receive up to 8,585 additional Non-Redeeming ContinuationShares. Upon the consummation of the Business Combination, 268,735 FLAG public shares were redeemed for aggregate redemption paymentsof approximately $28.2 million from the Trust. The remaining approximate $15.0 million funds in the Trust were distributed as follows:i) $12.5 million to the Seller investors pursuant to the Forward Purchase Agreements and Non-Redemption Agreements discussed above, ii)$1.8 million to Calidi in connection with the Non-Redemption Agreements discussed above, and iii) $0.7 million in cash to Calidi availablein the Trust from non-redeeming shareholders discussed below. The Escalation Shares and the Non-Redeeming Continuation Shares are determinedto be equity classified.
| 140 |
ForwardPurchase Agreements
OnAugust 28 and August 30, 2023, FLAG and Calidi NV entered into Forward Purchase Agreements as a derivative security with each of theSellers for an OTC Equity Prepaid Forward Transaction. This derivative security purchased from the Sellers is based on the value of ourcommon stock to be settled in cash in three years subject to reset price features and earlier termination as set forth in the ForwardPurchase Agreement. For purposes of the Forward Purchase Agreement, FLAG is referred to as the “Counterparty” prior to theconsummation of the Business Combination, while Calidi is referred to as the “Counterparty” after the consummation of theBusiness Combination.
FLAGand the Sellers entered into the Forward Purchase Agreements, and related Non-Redemption Agreements and FPA Funding Amount PIPE SubscriptionAgreements each as defined below, in conjunction with and as an inducement to the Sellers to invest in a concurrent Series B Financingby Calidi in order to provide financing to the combined company. FLAG and Calidi NV entered into the Forward Purchase Agreements, asderivative securities, with the Sellers as a condition to the Sellers’ participation in Calidi NV’s Series B Financing andto potentially receive a settlement amount of $100 per share provided that the Company’s trading price remained above or equalto the Initial Reset Price. In addition, entering into these agreements provided the combined company with cash (through the Non-RedemptionAgreements) in order to meet a cash closing condition to complete the Business Combination. The Forward Purchase Agreements, Non-RedemptionAgreements and PIPE Subscription Agreement collectively provided approximately $2.6 million, and the Series B financing in Calidi providedapproximately $24.5 million, to the combined company. As discussed above, the Forward Purchase Agreements and related Non-RedemptionAgreements and FPA Funding Amount PIPE Subscription Agreement were entered into as an inducement to the Sellers to invest in a concurrentSeries B Financing by Calidi NV and were not entered into to provide a source of liquidity to the combined company. Further, as discussedbelow, because of certain reset price features of the Forward Purchase Agreement, and a Settlement Amount Adjustment of $20.00 per share,based on our current trading price, it is unlikely that the combined company will receive any funds as a result of the eventual settlementof the Forward Purchase Agreements. Calidi is subject to the following risks associated with the Forward Purchase Agreement: (i) a reducedsettlement amount if it conducts a Dilutive Offering or Sellers elect an Optional Early Termination and the then reset price is below$100, and (ii) no settlement amount if Calidi conducts a Dilutive Offering or Sellers elect an Optional Early Termination and the thenreset price is at or below $20.00 per share. Calidi NV, however, benefited from the Series B investment. Calidi will also benefit ifat the time of settlement, the price of its common stock is above $100 per share. The Sellers benefit if at the time of settlement theprice of common stock is above $100, but are subject to risk if Calidi’s stock price decreases and there is no Dilutive Offeringor the reset price is at $100. Sellers will also benefit from the Settlement Amount Adjustment of $20.00 per share which has the effectof reducing the Settlement Amount due to the Counterparty.
Pursuantto the terms of the Forward Purchase Agreement, the Sellers purchased up to an aggregate of up to 100,000 shares, par value $0.0001 pershare, of FLAG Class A Common Stock concurrent with the Business Combination closing pursuant to Seller’s respective FPA FundingAmount PIPE Subscription Agreement (as defined below), less, the number of FLAG Class A Common Stock purchased by Sellers separatelyfrom third parties who had previously elected to redeem their shares through a broker in the open market and subsequently reversed theredemption election (“Recycled Shares”). Sellers were not required to purchase an amount of FLAG Class A Common Stock inthe event that following such purchase, each Seller’s ownership would exceed 9.9% of the total FLAG Class A Common Stock outstandingimmediately after giving effect to such purchase, unless Seller, at its sole discretion, waives such 9.9% ownership limitation. The numberof shares subject to a Forward Purchase Agreement is subject to reduction following a termination of the Forward Purchase Agreement withrespect to such shares as described under “Optional Early Termination” in the Forward Purchase Agreement.
TheForward Purchase Agreements provide that Sellers will be paid directly an aggregate cash amount (the “Prepayment Amount”)equal to the product of (i) the Number of Shares as set forth in each Pricing Date Notice and (ii) the redemption price per share asdefined in Section 9.2(a) of FLAG’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the “Initial Price”)less (iii) an amount equal to 0.50% of the product of (i) the Recycled Shares multiplied by (ii) the Initial Price paid by Seller toCounterparty on the Prepayment Date (which amount shall be netted from the Prepayment Amount) (the “Prepayment Shortfall”).
TheCounterparty paid to Sellers the Prepayment Amounts directly from FLAG’s Trust Account representing the net proceeds of the saleof the units in the Counterparty’s initial public offering and the sale of private placement warrants (the “Trust Account),except that to the extent the Prepayment Amount payable to a Seller is to be paid from the purchase of Additional Shares by such Sellerpursuant to the terms of its FPA Funding Amount PIPE Subscription Agreement, such amount will be netted against such proceeds, with suchSeller being able to reduce the purchase price for the Additional Shares by the Prepayment Amount. On the Business Combination ClosingDate, Sellers were paid an aggregate of $12,479,252 from the Trust Account pursuant to the Forward Purchase Agreements and Non-RedemptionAgreements.
| 141 |
Followingthe Business Combination Closing, the reset price (the “Reset Price”) was initially $100.00; provided, however, that theReset Price may be reduced immediately to any lower price at which the Counterparty sells, issues or grants any FLAG Class A Common Stockor securities convertible or exchangeable into FLAG Class A Common Stock (excluding any secondary transfers) (a “Dilutive Offering”),then the Reset Price shall be modified to equal such reduced price as of such date.
OnSeptember 12, 2023, the date of the Business Combination Closing, a net 65,948 shares of common stock were issued to the Sellers underthe Forward Purchase Agreements with the possibility of an additional 24,679 shares to be issued in the future at the election of theSellers. Except for the possible issuance of 24,679 shares at the election of the Sellers for no additional consideration, no furthershares are anticipated to be issued under the Forward Purchase Agreements. Under the terms of the Forward Purchase Agreements, Sellersare obligated to pay us a settlement amount based on the value of 100,000 shares times the Forward Purchase Agreement reset price of$100.00 per share which is subject to adjustment in the event we conduct an offering or the seller elects an optional early terminationat less than the current reset price. In addition, pursuant to the Forward Purchase Agreement, the settlement amount is subject to afurther reduction settlement amount adjustment equal to the number of shares times $20.00.
Onthe cash settlement date, in the event a Valuation Date (as defined below) is determined by the Seller, a cash settlement amount equalto (1) the number of shares as of the Valuation Date, multiplied by (2) the closing price of the shares immediately preceding the ValuationDate. In the event that Valuation Date is determine other than by the Seller, a cash settlement amount equal to the number of sharesas of the Valuation Date less the number of unregistered shares, multiplied by the volume weighted daily VWAP price over the valuationperiod shall be paid to the Counter Party. The foregoing cash settlement amount is subject to adjustment by the Settlement Amount Adjustment.The Settlement Amount Adjustment is equal to (1) the maximum number of shares as of the Valuation Date multiplied by (2) $20.00 per share,and the Settlement Amount Adjustment will be automatically netted from the cash settlement amount. If the Settlement Amount Adjustmentexceeds the cash settlement amount, the Counterparty will pay the Seller in FLAG Class A Common Stock or in cash.
Fromtime to time and on any date following the Trade Date (any such date, an “OET Date”), Seller may terminate its Forward PurchaseAgreement by providing notice to the Counterparty (the “OET Notice”) which OET Notice shall specify the quantity by whichthe number of shares shall be reduced (such quantity, the “Terminated Shares”); provided that “Terminated Shares”includes only such quantity of shares by which the number of shares is to be reduced and included in an OET Notice and does not includeany other share sales, shortfall sale shares or sales of shares that are designated as shortfall sales (which designation can be madeonly up to the amount of shortfall sale proceeds), any share consideration sales or any other shares, whether or not sold, which shareswill not be included in any OET Notice when calculating the number of Terminated Shares. The effect of an OET Notice shall be to reducethe number of shares by the number of Terminated Shares specified in such OET Notice. As of each OET Date, the Counterparty shall beentitled to an amount from the Seller equal to the product of (x) the number of Terminated Shares and (y) the Reset Price in respectof such OET Date, except that no such amount will be due to Counterparty upon any Shortfall Sale.
Fromtime to time and on any date following the Trade Date (any such date, a “Shortfall Sale Date”) Seller may sell ShortfallSale Shares. Seller shall not have any Early Termination Obligation in connection with any Shortfall Sale Shares.
Unlessand until the proceeds from Shortfall Sales Shares equal 100% of the Prepayment Shortfall, in the event that the product of (x) the differencebetween (i) the number of shares as specified in the pricing date notice, less (ii) any Shortfall Sale Shares as of such measurementtime, multiplied by (y) the VWAP Price, is less than (z) the difference between (i) the Prepayment Shortfall, less (ii) the proceedsfrom Shortfall Sales, then the Counterparty, at its option shall within five (5) business days either:
(A)Pay in cash an amount equal to the Shortfall Variance; or
(B)Issue and deliver to Seller such number of additional shares that are equal to (1) the Shortfall Variance, divided by (2) 90% of theVWAP Price (the “Shortfall Variance Shares”).
| 142 |
TheValuation Date will be the earliest to occur of (a) 36 months after of the closing date, (b) the date specified by a Seller in a writtennotice to be delivered to the Counterparty at a Seller’s discretion after the occurrence of any of (v) a Shortfall Variance RegistrationFailure, (w) a VWAP Trigger Event (x) a Delisting Event, (y) a Registration Failure or (z) unless otherwise specified therein, upon anyAdditional Termination Event and (c) the date specified by Seller in a written notice to be delivered to Counterparty at Seller’ssole discretion (which Valuation Date shall not be earlier than the day such notice is effective) (the “Valuation Date”).
Sellerhas agreed to waive any redemption rights under FLAG’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, with respectto any FLAG Class A Common Stock purchased through the FPA Funding Amount PIPE Subscription Agreement and any Recycled Shares in connectionwith the Business Combination, that would require redemption by FLAG of the Class A Common Stock. Such waiver may reduce the number ofFLAG Class A Common Stock redeemed in connection with the Business Combination, and such reduction could alter the perception of thepotential strength of the Business Combination.
Afterthe Business Combination, in the event Seller sells its Calidi’s common stock (FLAG Class A Common Stock) above the Reset Price,Counterparty will receive the Reset Price from Seller and Seller will keep the excess of the sales price above the Reset Price. In theevent Seller sells Calidi’s common stock below the Reset Price, Seller will pay Calidi the price of the sale of the Calidi commonstock less $20.00 per share which will be kept by Seller. In the event Seller sells Calidi common stock for $20.00 or less per shares,there will be no proceeds to Calidi and the Forward Purchase Agreement will be terminated.
Becausewe need to seek additional financing for our operations at current trading prices, which are significantly below the initial $100 pershare reset price, such financing at our current trading price will reduce the Forward Purchase Agreement initial $100 reset price, andthe settlement amount that we may receive from the Sellers, if any. Therefore, in light of our current trading price and after givingfurther effect to the reduction settlement amount adjustment of $20.00 per share, it is unlikely that Sellers will pay, and that we willreceive any funds in connection with the settlement of the Forward Purchase.
OnMarch 8, 2024, Calidi and one of the sellers mutually terminated and cancelled 34,000 shares per the Forward Purchase Agreement describedabove.
FPAFunding Amount PIPE Subscription Agreement
OnAugust 28, 2023, and August 30, 2023, FLAG entered into a subscription agreement (the “FPA Funding Amount PIPE Subscription Agreement”)with the Seller. Pursuant to the FPA Funding PIPE Subscription Agreement, the FPA Funding PIPE Subscriber agreed to subscribe for andpurchase, and FLAG agreed to issue and sell to the FPA Funding PIPE Subscriber, on the Business Combination Closing date, an aggregatenumber of shares of FLAG Class A Common Stock equal to the Maximum Number of Shares, less the Recycled Shares in connection with theForward Purchase Agreement.
Non-RedemptionAgreement
OnAugust 28, 2023, and August 30, 2023, FLAG entered into a non-redemption agreement (the “Non-Redemption Agreement”) withSeller, pursuant to which Seller agreed to reverse the redemption of FLAG Class A Common Stock.
| 143 |
FormerChief Accounting Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
OnNovember 15, 2023, Tony Kalajian, our prior chief accounting officer and interim chief financial officer, filed a complaint in the SuperiorCourt of the State of California County of San Diego against us, Mr. Camaisa, our former Chief Executive Officer, and Ms. Campbell, ourChief Legal Officer and Chief Corporate Development Officer, alleging constructive discharge of Mr. Kalajian’s position of interimChief Financial Officer and defamation by us, Mr. Camaisa and Ms. Campbell in connection with Mr. Kalajian’s alleged discharge.Mr. Kalajian is seeking $575,000 in damages under his employment contract, damages to be proven at trial, punitive damages, and attorney’sfees. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself and will seek recovery of a $150,000 bonus Mr. Kalajian approved to be paid tohimself without first obtaining proper authorization by the Company’s board of directors.
Consultingand Other Arrangements
Asof December 31, 2023, Calidi had accounts payable and accrued expenses for approximately $104,000 owed to AJC Capital for primarily rentexpense for temporary use of a personal house for company office space in 2020.
OnJune 23, 2023, Calidi entered into a Separation and Release Agreement (“Separation Agreement”) with George Ng, Chief OperatingOfficer and President, effective on that date. In accordance with the provisions of the Separation Agreement, Calidi will pay Mr. Ngin the amount of $450,000 payable in a lump sum due one year after the effective date, and in the event that this amount is not paidwhen due, the unpaid amount will accrue interest at the rate of 8.0% per annum to be paid no later than the two year anniversary of theeffective date. Calidi will also pay for certain benefits, including healthcare for six months following the effective date.
Mr.Ng also agreed to convert approximately $166,000 due to him for a contingent bonus and certain prior consulting services into a SAFEagreement with terms substantially similar to the 2023 SAFEs. Mr. Ng also agreed to convert approximately $166,000 due to him for a contingentbonus and certain prior consulting services into a SAFE agreement with terms substantially similar to the 2023 SAFEs, which were allconverted in connection with the Business Combination.
OnApril 1, 2022, Calidi entered into an advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) with Scott Leftwich, a member of theCalidi Board of Directors, for providing certain strategic and advisory services. Mr. Leftwich will receive an advisory fee of $9,166per month not to exceed $120,000 per annum, accrued and payable upon Calidi raising $10 million or more in equity proceeds, as definedin the Advisory Agreement. In connection with the closing of the Business Combination, total amount due under the Advisory Agreementwas deferred to January 1, 2025.
PRINCIPALSECURITYHOLDERS
Thefollowing table and the accompanying footnotes sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stockof the Company as of June 20, 2025,by:
| ● | each of our named executive officers; | |
| ● | each of our directors; | |
| ● | all of our current directors and named executive officers as a group; and | |
| ● | each stockholder known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock. |
Beneficialownership is determined according to the rules of the SEC, which generally provide that a person has beneficial ownership of a securityif they possess sole or shared voting (which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of) or investment power (which includesthe power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of) that security, including options and warrants that are currently exercisableor exercisable within sixty (60) days. To our knowledge, no shares beneficially owned by any executive officer, director or directornominee have been pledged as security. In addition, this table is based upon information Schedules 13D or 13G filed with the SEC.
| 144 |
Thebeneficial ownership information below is based on an aggregate of 34,520,580 shares of Common Stock (excluding 1,800,000 Non-VotingCommon Stock held in escrow) of Common Stock issued and outstanding as of June 20, 2025. Unless otherwise noted in the footnotes to thefollowing table, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting andinvestment power with respect to their beneficially owned securities.
| Title of Class | Name of Beneficial Owners(1) | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class | |||||||
| Directors and Executive Officers | ||||||||||
| Common Stock | Eric Poma (2) Chief Executive Officer and Director | 0 | n/a | |||||||
| Common Stock | Andrew Jackson (3) Chief Financial Officer | 13,124 | * | |||||||
| Common Stock | Wendy Pizarro Campbell (4) Chief Legal Officer and Chief Corporate Development Officer | 35,723 | * | |||||||
| Common Stock | Boris Radoslavov Minev (5) President of Medical and Scientific Affairs | 65,022 | * | |||||||
| Common Stock | Allan Camaisa (6) Director | 1,295,147 | 3.7 | % | ||||||
| Common Stock | Scott Leftwich (7) Director | 392,718 | 1.1 | % | ||||||
| Common Stock | Alan R. Stewart (8) Director | 48,222 | * | |||||||
| Common Stock | James Schoeneck (9) Director and Chairman of the Board | 336,514 | 1.0 | % | ||||||
| Common Stock | George Peoples (10) Director | 17,956 | * | |||||||
| All executive officers and directors as a group (9 individuals) | 2,204,426 | 6.2 | % | |||||||
| Beneficial owners of more than 5% | ||||||||||
| Armistice Capital, LLC (11) 510 Madison Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022 | 3,359,661 | 9.73 | % | |||||||
*Represents a percentage that is less than 1%.
| (1) | Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of the following entities or individuals is c/o Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc., 4475 Executive Drive, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92121. |
| (2) | Dr. Poma was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer and as a director effective April 22, 2025. |
| (3) | These shares are issuable upon exercise of vested options within sixty (60) days. |
| (4) | Includes (i) 7,234 shares of Common Stock held by Wendy Pizarro Campbell, (ii) 19,485 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of vested options within sixty (60) days held by Ms. Campbell, and (iii) 9,004 shares of Common Stock held by Gerwend, LLC, an entity in which Ms. Campbell is a managing member. As such, Ms. Campbell may be deemed to have shared voting, investment and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by Gerwend, LLC. Ms. Campbell disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of her pecuniary interest, if any, therein. |
| (5) | Includes (i) 42,446 shares of Common Stock and (ii) 22,576 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of vested options within sixty (60) days. |
| (6) | Includes (i) 66,712 shares of Common Stock held by Allan Camaisa, (ii) 17,070 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of vested options within sixty (60) days held by Mr. Camaisa, (iii) 46,972 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of warrants within sixty (60) days held by Mr. Camaisa, (iv) 274,497 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of vested options within sixty (60) days held by AJC Capital, LLC (“AJC”), (v) 281,513 shares of Common Stock held by AJC, and (vi) 608,383 shares of Common Stock held by Jamir Trust. Mr. Camaisa is the sole managing member and owner of AJC and the sole trustee of Jamir Trust; as such, Mr. Camaisa may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of the Common Stock held by AJC and Jamir Trust. |
| (7) | Includes (i) 67,774 shares of Common Stock held by Scott Leftwich, (ii) 83,179 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of vested options within sixty (60) days held by Mr. Leftwich, (iii) 50,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of warrants within sixty (60) days held by Mr. Leftwich, (iv) 176,057 shares of Common Stock held by SECBL, LLC (“SECBL”), (v) 15,708 shares of Common Stock held by WEBCL, LLC (“WEBCL”). Mr. Leftwich is the managing member of SECBL and WEBCL; as such, Mr. Leftwich may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of the common stock held by SECBL and WEBCL. |
| (8) | Includes (i) 28,976 shares of Common Stock and (ii) 19,246 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of vested options within sixty (60) days. |
| (9) | Includes (i) 13,579 shares of Common Stock held by James Schoeneck, (ii) 55,083 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of vested options within sixty (60) day held by Mr. Schoeneck, (iii) 4,163 shares of Common Stock held by Mr. Schoeneck and his wife, (iv) 96,389 shares of Common Stock held by the James & Cynthia Schoeneck Family Trust, of which Mr. Schoeneck is a trustee, and (v) 167,300 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of warrants within sixty (60) days held by the James & Cynthia Schoeneck Family Trust, of which Mr. Schoeneck is a trustee. As such, Mr. Schoeneck may be deemed to have shared voting, investment and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by the James & Cynthia Schoeneck Family Trust. Mr. Schoeneck disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest, if any, therein. |
| (10) | These shares are issuable upon exercise of vested options within sixty (60) days. |
| (11) | Based on the Schedule 13G filed by Armistice Capital, LLC (“Armistice Capital”) and Steven Boyd with the SEC on May 15, 2025, Armistice Capital beneficially owned 3,359,661 common shares, with shared voting and dispositive power. The investment manager of Armistice Capital Master Fund Ltd. (the “Master Fund”), the direct holder of the common shares, and pursuant to an Investment Management Agreement, Armistice Capital exercises voting and investment power over the securities of the Company held by the Master Fund and thus may be deemed to beneficially own the securities of the Company held by the Master Fund. Mr. Boyd, as the managing member of Armistice Capital, may be deemed to beneficially own the securities of the Company held by the Master Fund. The Master Fund specifically disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities of the Company directly held by it by virtue of its inability to vote or dispose of such securities as a result of its Investment Management Agreement with Armistice Capital. According to the Company’s records, The Master Fund holds 2,350,000 shares of common stock warrants exercisable within sixty (60) days. These warrants include a 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation provision. The Company has no knowledge of how many common shares Armistice Capital held as of the date of this prospectus.. |
| 145 |
DESCRIPTIONOF SECURITIES
Thefollowing is a summary of the rights of our capital stock and warrants and some of the provisions of our second amended and restatedcertificate of incorporation (the “Charter”) and amended and restated bylaws, as amended (the “Bylaws”), andrelevant provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”). The descriptions herein are qualified by referenceto the Charter, the Bylaws and the warrant-related documents described herein, copies of which have been filed as exhibits to the registrationstatement of which this prospectus is a part, as well as the relevant provisions of the DGCL
Authorizedand Outstanding Stock
Ourauthorized capital stock consists of two classes of stock to be designated, respectively, “Common Stock,” and “PreferredStock.” The total number of shares of capital stock which we have the authority to issue is Three Hundred Thirty One Million (331,000,000).
Thetotal number of shares of common stock we are authorized to issue is Three Hundred Thirty Million (330,000,000), having a par value of$0.0001 per share, of which Three Hundred Twelve Million (312,000,000) are designated as Voting Common Stock (“Common Stock”)and Eighteen Million (18,000,000) are designated as Non-Voting Common Stock (the “Non-Voting Common Stock”). The total numberof shares of Preferred Stock that the Corporation is authorized to issue is One Million (1,000,000), having a par value of $0.0001 pershare. The following description summarizes certain terms of our capital stock as set out more particularly in our Charter. Because itis only a summary, it may not contain all the information that is important to you.
Asof June 20, 2025, there were (i) 36,320,580 shares of common stock outstanding, consisting of (a) 34,520,580 shares of Common Stock and(b) 1,800,000 shares of Non-Voting Common Stock held in escrow (the “Escalation Shares”); (iii) 1,150,000 Public Warrantsoutstanding; (iv) 191,217 Private Placement Warrants outstanding; and 15,548,256 warrants to purchase shares of common stock outstanding.There is no Preferred Stock outstanding.
CommonStock
VotingPower
Holdersof Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the electionof directors, and do not have cumulative voting rights. Accordingly, the holders of a plurality of votes cast can elect all of the directorsstanding for election, if they so choose, other than any directors that holders of any preferred stock may issue may be entitled to elect.Subject to supermajority votes for some matters, other matters shall be decided by the affirmative vote of our stockholders having amajority in voting power of the votes cast by the stockholders present or represented and voting on such matter.
Theshares of Non-Voting Common Stock shall automatically convert into shares of Common Stock on a one-to-one basis at such time that suchshares of Non-Voting Common Stock are released from the escrow account holding such shares in accordance with the Merger Agreement andthe escrow agreement governing such escrow account.
Dividends
Subjectto applicable law and the rights and preferences, if any, of any holders of any outstanding series of Preferred Stock, holders of CommonStock will be entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared by the Board, payable either in cash, in property or in shares ofcapital stock.
Liquidation,Dissolution and Winding Up
Uponour liquidation, dissolution or winding up and after payment in full of all amounts required to be paid to creditors and to any holdersof preferred stock having liquidation preferences, if any, the holders of Common Stock will be entitled to receive pro rata our remainingassets available for distribution.
Preemptiveor Other Rights
Holdersof Common Stock are not entitled to preemptive rights, and the Common Stock is not subject to conversion, redemption or sinking fundprovisions.
Electionof Directors
TheCharter and the Bylaws establish a classified board of directors that is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms.Only the directors in one class are subject to election by a plurality of the votes cast at each annual meeting of stockholders, withthe directors in the other classes continuing for the remainder of their respective three-year terms. Our Charter does not provide forcumulative voting for the election of directors.
| 146 |
Preferredstock
OurCharter provides that shares of preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series. The Board is authorized to establishthe number of shares to be included in each such series, to fix the designation, vesting, powers (including voting powers), preferencesand relative, participating, optional or other rights (and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof) of the shares ofeach such series and to increase (but not above the total number of authorized shares of the class) or decrease (but not below the numberof shares of such series then outstanding) the number of shares of any such series, in each case without further vote or action by thestockholders. The Board is able to, without stockholder approval, issue preferred stock with voting and other rights that could adverselyaffect the voting power and other rights of the holders of Common Stock and could have anti-takeover effects. The ability of the Boardto issue preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, amongother things, have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of us or the removal of our existing management.
Warrants
Asof June 20, 2025, there were 16,839,473 warrants to purchase Common Stock outstanding, including 1,150,000 Public Warrants and191,217 Private Placement Warrants.
PublicWarrants
Thewarrants are issued under a warrant agreement between us and Equiniti Trust Company, LLC as warrant agent. Pursuant to the warrant agreement,a holder may exercise its warrants only for a whole number of shares of Common Stock. This means that only a whole warrant may be exercisedat any given time by a holder.
Eachwhole warrant entitles the registered holder to purchase one whole share of Common Stock at a price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustmentas discussed below, at any time commencing on October 12, 2023, which is the date that is 30 days after the Closing Date, provided thata registration statement under the Securities Act covering the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is theneffective and a current prospectus relating thereto is available (or holders are permitted to exercise their warrants on a cashless basisunder the circumstances specified in the warrant agreement) and such shares are registered, qualified or exempt from registration underthe securities, or blue sky, laws of the state of residence of the holder. The warrants expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on October12, 2028, which is the fifth anniversary of the Closing Date, or earlier upon redemption or liquidation.
Redemptionof Public Warrants for Cash
Redemptionof warrants when the price per share of our Common Stock equals or exceeds $18.00.
Oncethe public warrants become exercisable, we may redeem the outstanding public warrants:
| ● | in whole and not in part; | |
| ● | at a price of $0.01 per public warrant; | |
| ● | upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption to each registered holder of a public warrant; and | |
| ● | if, and only if, the last reported sales price of the Common Stock for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending three trading days before we send the notice of redemption equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for adjustments to the number of shares issuable upon exercise or the exercise price of a public warrant). |
Wewill not redeem the Public Warrants as described above unless a registration statement under the Securities Act covering the sale ofthe shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is then effective and a current prospectus relating to those sharesof our common stock is available throughout the 30-day redemption period or we require the warrants to be exercised on a cashless basis.If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify theunderlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws.
| 147 |
Redemptionof warrants when the price per Common Stock equals or exceeds $10.00.
Oncethe Public Warrants become exercisable, the Company may redeem the Public Warrants:
| ● | in whole and not in part; | |
| ● | at $0.10 per warrant; | |
| ● | upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption provided that holders will be able to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis prior to redemption and receive that number of shares based on the redemption date and the fair market value of the Common Stock; | |
| ● | if, and only if, the reference value equals or exceeds $10.00 per share (as adjusted for adjustments to the number of shares issuable upon exercise or the exercise price of a warrant as described under the heading; and | |
| ● | if the reference value is less than $18.00 per share (as adjusted for adjustments to the number of shares issuable upon exercise or the exercise price of a warrant as described under the heading, the private placement warrants must also be concurrently called for redemption on the same terms as the | |
| ● | outstanding public warrants, as described above. |
Beginningon the date the notice of redemption is given until the warrants are redeemed or exercised, holders may elect to exercise their warrantson a cashless basis.
PrivatePlacement Warrants
Theprivate placement warrants (and shares of our common stock issued or issuable upon exercise of the private placement warrants) in general,are not be transferable, assignable or salable until 30 days after the closing of the Business Combination (excluding permitted transferees)and they will not be redeemable under certain redemption scenarios by us so long as they are held by the Sponsor, Metric or their respectivepermitted transferees. Otherwise, the private placement warrants have terms and provisions that are identical to those of the publicwarrants being, including as to exercise price, exercisability and exercise period. If the private placement warrants are held by holdersother than our sponsor, Metric or their respective permitted transferees, the private placement warrants will be redeemable by us underall redemption scenarios and exercisable by the holders on the same basis as the public warrants.
Ifholders of the private placement warrants elect to exercise them on a cashless basis, they would pay the exercise price by surrenderingits private placement warrants for that number of shares of Common Stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product ofthe number of shares of Common Stock underlying the private placement warrants, multiplied by the excess of the “fair market value”(defined below) less the exercise price of the private placement warrants by (y) the Sponsor fair market value. For these purposes, the“fair market value” means the average last reported sale price of the Common Stock for the 10 trading days ending on thethird trading day prior to the date on which the notice of warrant exercise is sent to the warrant agent.
Anti-DilutionAdjustments
Ifthe number of outstanding shares of common stock is increased by a stock dividend payable in shares of common stock, or by a split-upof common stock or other similar event, then, on the effective date of such stock dividend, split-up or similar event, the number ofshares of common stock issuable on exercise of each public warrant will be increased in proportion to such increase in the outstandingshares of common stock.
OtherMatters
Thewarrant agreement provides that the terms of the public warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguityor correct any defective provision or mistake, and that all other modifications or amendments will require the vote or written consentof the holders of at least 50% of the then-outstanding public warrants, and, solely with respect to any amendment to the terms of theprivate placement warrants, a majority of the then-outstanding private placement warrants.
| 148 |
Thepublic warrants may be exercised upon surrender of the warrant certificate on or prior to the expiration date at the offices of the warrantagent, with the exercise form on the reverse side of the warrant certificate completed and executed as indicated, accompanied by fullpayment of the exercise price (or on a cashless basis, if applicable), by certified or official bank check payable to us, for the numberof warrants being exercised. The public warrant holders do not have the rights or privileges of holders of Common Stock and any votingrights until they exercise their public warrants and receive Common Stock. After the issuance of shares of Common Stock upon exerciseof the public warrants, each holder will be entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters to be voted on by stockholders.
Nofractional shares will be issued upon exercise of the public warrants. If, upon exercise of the public warrants, a holder would be entitledto receive a fractional interest in a share, we will, upon exercise, round down to the nearest whole number the number of shares of CommonStock to be issued to the public warrant holder.
Wehave agreed that, subject to applicable law, any action, proceeding or claim against us arising out of or relating in any way to thewarrant agreement will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the SouthernDistrict of New York, and we irrevocably submitted to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction will be the exclusive forum for any suchaction, proceeding or claim. This provision applies to claims under the Securities Act but does not apply to claims under the ExchangeAct or any claim for which the federal district courts of the United States of America are the sole and exclusive forum.
Rule144
Rule144 under the Securities Act (“Rule 144”) is not available for the resale of securities initially issued by shell companies(other than business combination related shell companies) or issuers that have been at any time previously a shell company, such as theCompany. However, Rule 144 also includes an important exception to this prohibition if the following conditions are met:
| ● | the issuer of the securities that was formerly a shell company has ceased to be a shell company; | |
| ● | the issuer of the securities is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; | |
| ● | the issuer of the securities has filed all Exchange Act reports and material required to be filed, as applicable, during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports and materials), other than Form 8-K reports; and | |
| ● | at least one year has elapsed from the time that the issuer filed current Form 10-type information with the SEC reflecting its status as an entity that is not a shell company. |
Uponthe Closing, we ceased to be a shell company, and so, once the conditions set forth in the exceptions listed above are satisfied, Rule144 will become available for the resale of our securities.
Whenand if Rule 144 becomes available for the resale of our securities, a person who has beneficially owned restricted shares of our commonstock or warrants for at least six months would be entitled to sell their securities provided that (i) such person is not deemed to havebeen one of our affiliates at the time of, or at any time during the three months preceding, a sale and (ii) we are subject to the ExchangeAct periodic reporting requirements for at least three months before the sale and have filed all required reports under Section 13 or15(d) of the Exchange Act during the 12 months (or such shorter period as we were required to file reports) preceding the sale.
Personswho have beneficially owned restricted shares of our common stock or warrants for at least six months but who are our affiliates at thetime of, or at any time during the three months preceding, a sale, would be subject to additional restrictions, by which such personwould be entitled to sell within any three-month period only a number of securities that does not exceed the greater of:
| ● | 1% of the total number of shares of common stock then outstanding; or | |
| ● | the average weekly reported trading volume of the common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to the sale. |
Salesby our affiliates under Rule 144 are also limited by manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of currentpublic information about us.
| 149 |
Anti-takeovereffects of Delaware law and the Charter and Bylaws
Someprovisions of Delaware law, the Charter and the Bylaws contain provisions that could make the following transactions more difficult:an acquisition of us by means of a tender offer; an acquisition of us by means of a proxy contest or otherwise; or the removal of ourincumbent officers and directors. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish or could deter transactionsthat stockholders may otherwise consider to be in their best interest or in our best interests, including transactions which providefor payment of a premium over the market price for our shares of Common Stock.
Theseprovisions, summarized below, are intended to discourage coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids. These provisions arealso designed to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to first negotiate with our board of directors. We believe that thebenefits of the increased protection of its potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposalto acquire or restructure of us outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging these proposals because negotiation of these proposals couldresult in an improvement of their terms.
Undesignatedpreferred stock
Theability of our board of directors, without action by the stockholders, to issue up to one million (1,000,000) shares of undesignatedpreferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences as designated by the board of directors could impede the success of any attemptto change control of us. These and other provisions may have the effect of deferring hostile takeovers or delaying changes in controlor management of our company.
Stockholdermeetings
TheCharter provides that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by our board of directors or chair of the board of directors,chief executive officer or president.
Requirementsfor advance notification of stockholder nominations and proposals
TheBylaws establish advance notice procedures with respect to stockholder proposals to be brought before a stockholder meeting and the nominationof candidates for election as directors, other than nominations made by or at the direction of the board of directors or a committeeof the board of directors.
Eliminationof stockholder action by written consent
TheCharter expressly eliminates the right of our stockholders to act by written consent. Stockholder action must take place at the annualor a special meeting of stockholders.
Staggeredboard of directors
Underour Charter our board of directors are divided into three classes. The directors in each class serve for a three-year term, with oneclass being elected each year by our stockholders. This system of electing directors may tend to discourage a third party from attemptingto obtain control of use, because it generally makes it more difficult for stockholders to replace a majority of the directors.
Removalof directors
TheCharter provides that no member of our board of directors may be removed from office except for cause and, in addition to any other voterequired by law, upon the approval of not less than two-thirds of the total voting power of all of our outstanding voting stock thenentitled to vote in the election of directors.
Stockholdersnot entitled to cumulative voting
TheCharter does not permit stockholders to cumulate their votes in the election of directors. Accordingly, the holders of a plurality ofvotes cast by the holders of the Common Stock who entitled to vote in any election of directors can elect all of the directors standingfor election, if they choose, other than any directors that holders, if any, of our preferred stock may be entitled to elect.
Delawareanti-takeover statute
Weare subject to Section 203 of the DGCL, which prohibits persons deemed to be “interested stockholders” from engaging in a“business combination” with a publicly held Delaware corporation for three years following the date these persons becomeinterested stockholders unless the business combination is, or the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder was,approved in a prescribed manner or another prescribed exception applies. Generally, an “interested stockholder” is a personwho, together with affiliates and associates, owns, or within three years prior to the determination of interested stockholder statusdid own, 15% or more of a corporation’s voting stock. Generally, a “business combination” includes a merger, assetor stock sale, or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. The existence of this provision mayhave an anti-takeover effect with respect to transactions not approved in advance by the board of directors.
| 150 |
Choiceof forum
OurCharter provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware(or, in the event the Chancery Court does not have jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware or other statecourts of the State of Delaware) will be the sole and exclusive forum for the following types of actions or proceedings under Delawarestatutory or common law: (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach ofa fiduciary duty by any of our directors, officers or stockholders to us or our stockholders; (iii) any action asserting a claim arisingpursuant to any provision of the DGCL, the Charter or the Bylaws (as each may be amended from time to time); or (iv) any action assertinga claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, in all cases to the fullest extent permitted by law. The provision would not applyto suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act, as amended, or any other claim for which the federal courtshave exclusive jurisdiction. For the avoidance of doubt, this provision is intended to benefit and may be enforced by us, our officersand directors, the underwriters to any offering giving rise to such complaint, and any other professional entity whose profession givesauthority to a statement made by that person or entity and who has prepared or certified any part of the documents underlying the offering.However, we note that there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce this provision and that investors cannot waive compliancewith the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdictionfor state and federal courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulationsthereunder. The Charter also provides that any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any security of ourswill be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to these choice of forum provisions.
Amendmentof Charter provisions
Theprovisions of DGCL, the Charter and the Bylaws could have the effect of discouraging others from attempting hostile takeovers and, asa consequence, they may also inhibit temporary fluctuations in the market price of Common Stock that often result from actual or rumoredhostile takeover attempts. These provisions may also have the effect of preventing changes in the composition of our board of directorsand management. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish transactions that stockholders may otherwisedeem to be in their best interests.
TheCharter provides that the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds (66 and 2/3%) of the total voting power of our outstandingshares entitled to vote thereon, voting as a single class, is required to amend certain provisions relating to the issuance of preferredstock, the number, term, classification, removal and filling of vacancies with respect to the board of directors, the advance noticeto be given for nominations for elections of directors, the calling of special meetings of stockholders, stockholder actionby written consent, forum selection, the ability to amend the bylaws, the elimination of liability of directors and officers to the extentpermitted by Delaware law, director and officer indemnification and any provision relating to the amendment of any of these provisions.
Amendmentof bylaws
TheCharter and Bylaws provide that the Bylaws may only be amended by the board of directors or by the affirmative vote of holders of atleast two-thirds (66 and 2/3%) of the total voting power of our outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon, voting as a single class.Additionally, the Charter provides that the Bylaws may be adopted, amended, altered or repealed by our board of directors.
OnFebruary 28, 2024, our Board approved and adopted an amendment to our Bylaws, which became effective the same day.
ArticleII, Section 2.8 of the Bylaws was amended to modify the quorum required for the transaction of business at a meeting of stockholdersof the Company to provide that the holders of one-third (1/3) in voting power of the stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote,present in person, or by remote communication, if applicable, or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction ofbusiness at such meeting, except as otherwise provided by applicable law, the Charter or the Bylaws.
Priorto this amendment, the presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of stock issued andoutstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting constituted a quorum for the transaction of business at such meeting. The change to thequorum requirement for stockholder meetings was made to improve our ability to hold stockholder meetings when called.
Listingof Securities
OurCommon Stock is listed on the NYSE American under the symbol “CLDI”.
TransferAgent and Registrar
Thetransfer agent and registrar for our Common Stock and warrant agent for the warrants is Equiniti Trust Company, LLC.
| 151 |
PLANOF DISTRIBUTION
EachSelling Stockholder (together the “Selling Stockholders”) of the securities and any of their pledgees, assignees and successors-in-interestmay, from time to time, sell any or all of their securities covered hereby on the Nasdaq or any other stock exchange, market or tradingfacility on which the securities are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at fixed or negotiated prices. A Selling Stockholdermay use any one or more of the following methods when selling securities:
| ● | ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers; | |
| ● | block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the securities as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction; | |
| ● | purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account; | |
| ● | an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange; | |
| ● | privately negotiated transactions; | |
| ● | settlement of short sales; | |
| ● | in transactions through broker-dealers that agree with the Selling Stockholders to sell a specified number of such securities at a stipulated price per security; | |
| ● | through the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions, whether through an options exchange or otherwise; | |
| ● | a combination of any such methods of sale; or | |
| ● | any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law. |
TheSelling Stockholders may also sell securities under Rule 144 or any other exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933,as amended (the “Securities Act”), if available, rather than under this resale prospectus.
Broker-dealersengaged by the Selling Stockholders may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissionsor discounts from the Selling Stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of securities, from the purchaser)in amounts to be negotiated, but, except as set forth in a supplement to this Prospectus, in the case of an agency transaction not inexcess of a customary brokerage commission in compliance with FINRA Rule 2440; and in the case of a principal transaction a markup ormarkdown in compliance with FINRA IM-2440.
Inconnection with the sale of the securities or interests therein, the Selling Stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealersor other financial institutions, which may in turn engage in short sales of the securities in the course of hedging the positions theyassume. The Selling Stockholders may also sell securities short and deliver these securities to close out their short positions, or loanor pledge the securities to broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities. The Selling Stockholders may also enter into optionor other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or create one or more derivative securities which require thedelivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of securities offered by this prospectus, which securities such broker-dealeror other financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).
TheSelling Stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the securities may be deemed to be “underwriters”within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealersor agents and any profit on the resale of the securities purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discountsunder the Securities Act. Each Selling Stockholder has informed the Company that it does not have any written or oral agreement or understanding,directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the securities.
TheCompany has agreed to indemnify the Selling Stockholders against certain losses, claims, damages and liabilities, including liabilitiesunder the Securities Act.
TheSelling Stockholders will pay any underwriting discounts and commissions and expenses incurred by the Selling Stockholders for brokerage,accounting, tax or legal services or any other expenses incurred by the Selling Stockholders in disposing of the securities covered bythis prospectus. We will bear the costs, fees and expenses incurred in effecting the registration of the securities covered by this prospectus,including all registration and filing fees, and fees and expenses of our counsel and our independent registered public accountants.
Weagreed to keep this prospectus effective until the earlier of (i) the date on which the securities may be resold by the Selling Stockholderswithout registration and without regard to any volume or manner-of-sale limitations by reason of Rule 144, without the requirement forthe Company to be in compliance with the current public information under Rule 144 under the Securities Act or any other rule of similareffect or (ii) all of the securities have been sold pursuant to this prospectus or Rule 144 under the Securities Act or any other ruleof similar effect. The resale securities will be sold only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers if required under applicablestate securities laws. In addition, in certain states, the resale securities covered hereby may not be sold unless they have been registeredor qualified for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is available and iscomplied with.
Underapplicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the resale securities may not simultaneouslyengage in market making activities with respect to the common stock for the applicable restricted period, as defined in Regulation M,prior to the commencement of the distribution. In addition, the Selling Stockholders will be subject to applicable provisions of theExchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of thecommon stock by the Selling Stockholders or any other person. We will make copies of this prospectus available to the Selling Stockholdersand have informed them of the need to deliver a copy of this prospectus to each purchaser at or prior to the time of the sale (includingby compliance with Rule 172 under the Securities Act).
Oncesold under the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part, the shares of Common Stock will be freely tradable in thehands of persons other than our affiliates.
| 152 |
LEGALMATTERS
Thevalidity of securities offered hereby will be passed upon for us by Sichenzia Ross Ference Carmel LLP.
EXPERTS
Theconsolidated financial statements of Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc., as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 and for each of the two years inthe period ended December 31, 2024, as appearing in Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc.’s Annual Report on the Form 10-K, for the yearended December 31, 2024 have been audited by Marcum LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their reportthereon, which includes an explanatory paragraph as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, included therein,and incorporated herein by reference. Such consolidated financial statements are incorporated herein by reference in reliance upon suchreport given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
CHANGESIN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH
ACCOUNTANTSON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
OnNovember 1, 2024, CBIZ CPAs P.C. (“CBIZ”) acquired the attest business of Marcum LLP (“Marcum”), and substantiallyall of the partners and staff that provided attestation services with Marcum joined CBIZ in connection with the acquisition. Accordingly,on April 30, 2025, as a result of the acquisition, Marcum resigned as the independent registered public accounting firm of Calidi Biotherapeutics,Inc. (the “Company”) and, on April 30, 2025, the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “AuditCommittee”) approved the appointment of CBIZ as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
Thereports of Marcum on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023,did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, oraccounting principles, except that the reports for both years included an explanatory paragraph relating to substantial doubt about theCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Duringthe fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, and the subsequent interim period through April 30, 2025, there were(i) no “disagreements” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of RegulationS-K) between the Company and Marcum on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditingscope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Marcum, would have caused Marcum to make reference tothe subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for suchyears and (ii) no “reportable events” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).
TheCompany provided Marcum with a copy of the above disclosures and requested that Marcum furnish the Company with a letter addressed tothe Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether it agrees with the statements made above and, if it does not agree, the respectsin which it does not agree.
OnApril 30, 2025, the Audit Committee approved the appointment of CBIZ as the Company’s independent registered public accountingfirm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025. In connection with the engagement, CBIZ will prepare the report on the Company’sconsolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, andDecember 31, 2023, and the subsequent interim period through April 30, 2025, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf has consultedwith CBIZ regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific completed or contemplated transaction or regarding thetype of audit opinions that might be rendered by CBIZ on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and neither a writtenreport nor oral advice was provided by CBIZ to the Company that CBIZ concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reachinga decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement”(as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K) or a “reportableevent” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).
WHEREYOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Wehave filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stock andwarrants offered hereby. This prospectus, which constitutes part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the informationset forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules thereto. For further information with respect to our company andour common stock and warrants, reference is made to the registration statement and the exhibits and any schedules filed therewith. Statementscontained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or any other document referred to are not necessarily complete, and ineach instance, we refer you to the copy of the contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. Each ofthese statements is qualified in all respects by this reference.
Youcan read our SEC filings, including the registration statement, over the internet at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Weare subject to the information reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and we are required to file reports, proxy statements and otherinformation with the SEC. These reports, proxy statements, and other information are available for inspection and copying at the SEC’swebsite referred to above. We also maintain a website at www.calidibio.com at which you may access these materials freeof charge as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Information containedon or accessible through our website is not a part of this prospectus, and the inclusion of our website address in this prospectus isan inactive textual reference only.
| 153 |
CALIDIBIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
INDEXTO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| F-1 |
CALIDI BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except for par value data)
March 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| (Unaudited) | ||||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||
| Cash | $ | $ | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | ||||||||
| Total current assets | ||||||||
| NONCURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||
| Machinery and equipment, net | ||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use assets, net | ||||||||
| Other noncurrent assets | ||||||||
| TOTAL ASSETS | $ | $ | ||||||
| LIABILITIES AND TOTAL EQUITY | ||||||||
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | $ | ||||||
| Related party accounts payable | ||||||||
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | ||||||||
| Related party accrued expenses and other current liabilities | ||||||||
| Term notes payable, net of discount, including accrued interest | ||||||||
| Related party term notes payable, net of discount, including accrued interest | ||||||||
| Related party bridge loan payable, including accrued interest | ||||||||
| Related party other current liability | ||||||||
| Finance lease liability, current | ||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use liability, current | ||||||||
| Total current liabilities | ||||||||
| NONCURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use liability, noncurrent | ||||||||
| Finance lease liability, noncurrent | ||||||||
| Promissory note | ||||||||
| Warrant liability | ||||||||
| Related party warrant liability | ||||||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | ||||||||
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) | ||||||||
| TOTAL EQUITY | ||||||||
| Common stock, $ par value, shares authorized; and shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively | ||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | ||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income loss, net of tax | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Accumulated deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total stockholders’ equity | ||||||||
| Noncontrolling interest | ||||||||
| Total equity | ||||||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND TOTAL EQUITY | $ | $ | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of theseunaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
| F-2 |
CALIDI BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| (Unaudited) | ||||||||
| OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||
| Research and development | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| General and administrative | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total operating expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Loss from operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES), NET | ||||||||
| Interest expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Interest expense – related party | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Change in fair value of other liabilities and derivatives | ( | ) | ||||||
| Change in fair value of other liabilities and derivatives – related party | ( | ) | ||||||
| Grant income | ||||||||
| Other expense, net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total other income (expenses), net | ( | ) | ||||||
| LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Income tax provision | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| NET LOSS | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | ( | ) | ||||||
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net loss per share; basic and diluted | $ | ) | $ | ) | ||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding; basic and diluted | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of theseunaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
| F-3 |
CALIDI BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVELOSS
(In thousands)
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| (Unaudited) | ||||||||
| NET LOSS | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | ||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | ||||||||
| COMPREHENSIVE LOSS | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | ( | ) | ||||||
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of theseunaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
| F-4 |
CALIDI BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF TOTAL EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
| Common Stock | Additional Paid-in | Accumulated Other Comprehensive | Accumulated | Total Stockholders’ | Non controlling | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Capital | Income (Loss) | Deficit | Equity | Interest | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2024 | $ | | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock through At the Market Offering | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock and warrants through January Confidentially Marketed Public Offering, net of financing costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock and warrants for March Registered Direct Offering and Concurrent Private Placement, net of financing costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock unit shares released | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at March 31, 2025 | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | Additional Paid-in | Accumulated Other Comprehensive | Accumulated | Total Stockholders’ | Non controlling | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Capital | Income (Loss) | Deficit | Equity | Interest | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock in lieu of cash for services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock in lieu of cash for SEPA commitment fee | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock to Calidi stockholders as result of Merger | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of warrants for legal settlement | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financing fees | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at March 31, 2024 | $ | | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| F-5 |
CALIDI BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| (Unaudited) | ||||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation expense | ||||||||
| Amortization of right of use assets | ||||||||
| Amortization of debt discount and financing costs | ||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | ||||||||
| Change in fair value of other liabilities and derivatives | ( | ) | ||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | ( | ) | ||||||
| Accounts payable | ( | ) | ||||||
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Operating lease right of use liability | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
| Purchases of machinery and equipment | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
| Proceeds from Public Offerings | ||||||||
| Proceeds from Registered Direct Offering | ||||||||
| Repayment of principal on related party term notes payable | ( | ) | ||||||
| Repayment of principal on term notes payable | ( | ) | ||||||
| Repayment of principal on related party bridge loan payable | ( | ) | ||||||
| Repayment of financing lease obligations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes payable | ||||||||
| Related party proceeds from issuance of loan payable | ||||||||
| Payment of interest on loan payable | ( | ) | ||||||
| Payment of financing costs | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | ||||||||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | ||||||||
| NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH | ( | ) | ||||||
| CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH BALANCE: | ||||||||
| At beginning of the period | ||||||||
| At end of the period | $ | $ | ||||||
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | ||||||||
| Cash paid for interest | $ | $ | ||||||
| Cash paid for income taxes | $ | $ | ||||||
| SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH FINANCING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
| Financing fees | $ | $ | ||||||
| Issuance of common stock in lieu of cash for services | $ | $ | ||||||
| Issuance of common stock in lieu of cash for SEPA commitment fee | $ | $ | ||||||
| Issuance of warrants for legal settlement | $ | $ | ||||||
| Issuance of convertible note for legal settlement | $ | $ | ||||||
| Discount on convertible note payable | $ | $ | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of theseunaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
| F-6 |
CALIDI BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Organization and Nature of Operations
On September 12, 2023, FirstLight Acquisition Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“FLAG”) consummated a series of transactions that resulted in the mergerof FLAG Merger Sub Inc., a Nevada corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of FLAG and Calidi Biotherapeutics. Inc., a Nevada corporation(“Calidi” and the transactions the “Business Combination”). Following the consummation of the Business Combination,FLAG was renamed “Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc.” and Calidi was renamed “Calidi Biotherapeutics (Nevada), Inc. and becamea wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company” refers to Calidi Biotherapeutics,Inc., a Delaware corporation (f/k/a First Light Acquisition Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation) and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The Company is a clinical stageimmuno-oncology company that is developing proprietary allogeneic stem cell-based and enveloped platforms to potentiate and deliver oncolyticviruses (vaccinia virus and adenovirus) and potentially other molecules to cancer patients. The Company is developing a pipeline of off-the-shelfallogeneic cell product candidates that are designed to: (i) protect oncolytic viruses from complement inactivation and innate immunecell inactivation by the body’s immune system; (ii) support oncolytic viral amplification in the allogeneic cells, and (iii) modifythe tumor microenvironment to facilitate tumor cell targeting and viral amplification at the tumor sites for an extended period of time,potentially leading to an improved cancer therapy.
The Company’s operationsto date have focused on organization and staffing, business planning, raising capital, licensing, acquiring and developing technology,establishing intellectual property portfolio, identifying potential product candidates and undertaking preclinical studies, process developmentand procuring manufacturing for preclinical and clinical trials. The Company’s product candidates are subject to long developmentcycles and the Company may be unsuccessful in its efforts to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market its product candidates.
The Company is subject to risksand uncertainties common to early-stage companies in the biotechnology industry, including, but not limited to, possible failure of preclinicalstudies or clinical trials, the need to obtain marketing approval for its product candidates, development by competitors of new technologicalinnovations, dependence on key personnel, protection of proprietary technology, compliance with government regulations, the need to successfullycommercialize and gain market acceptance of any of the Company’s products that are approved and the ability to secure additionalcapital to fund operations. Product candidates currently under development will require significant additional research and developmentefforts, including extensive preclinical and clinical testing, and regulatory approval prior to commercialization. These efforts requiresignificant amounts of additional capital, adequate personnel and infrastructure, and extensive compliance-reporting capabilities. Evenif the Company’s drug development efforts are successful, it is uncertain when, if ever, the Company will realize significant revenuefrom product sales.
Reverse Stock Split
On July 10, 2024, the Companyfiled a First Certificate of Amendment to its Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State ofthe State of Delaware to effect a
All references to share and pershare amounts for all periods presented in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively restatedto reflect this Reverse Stock Split. All rights to receive shares of common stock under outstanding securities, including but not limitedto, warrants, options, and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) were adjusted to give effect to the reverse stock split. Furthermore,proportionate adjustments were made to the per share exercise price and the number of shares of Common Stock that may be purchased uponexercise of outstanding stock options granted by the Company, and the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for future issuance underthe Company’s 2023 Equity Incentive Plan.
| F-7 |
Liquidity and Going Concern
The unaudited condensed consolidatedfinancial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of liabilitiesin the normal course of business, and do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability andclassification of assets or amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
The Company has experienced recurringlosses from operations and negative cash flows from operating activities, has a significant accumulated deficit and expects to continueto incur net losses into the foreseeable future. The Company had an accumulated deficit of $
Managementestimates that based on the Company’s liquidity resources, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability tocontinue as a going concern within 12 months from the date of issuance of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of the Company continuing tooperate in the normal course of business and does not reflect any adjustments to the assets and liabilities related to thesubstantial doubt of its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management’s ability tocontinue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise additional funding. Management’s plans to raise additional capitalthrough public or private equity or debt financings to fulfill its operating and capital requirements for at least 12 months from thedate of the issuance of the financial statements. However, the Company may not be able to secure such financing in a timely manner oron favorable terms, if at all. Furthermore, if the Company issues equity securities to raise additional funds, its existing stockholdersmay experience dilution, and the new equity securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of the Company’sexisting stockholders.
Risks and Uncertainties
Changes in economic conditions,including rising interest rates, public health issues, lower consumer confidence, volatile equity capital markets, ongoing supply chaindisruptions and the impacts of geopolitical conflicts, may affect the Company’s operations.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Unaudited Interim Financial Information
The accompanying unaudited condensedconsolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2025, and for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, have been prepared inaccordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in conformity with accountingprinciples generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial reporting. Accordingly,these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAPfor complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain alladjustments necessary, all of which are of a normal and recurring nature, to state fairly the Company’s financial position, resultsof operations and cash flows. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year or future periods. These unauditedcondensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with Calidi’s audited consolidated financial statementsfor the year ended December 31, 2024 in the Company’s Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on March 31, 2025.
| F-8 |
Any reference in these notesto applicable guidance is meant to refer to the authoritative U.S. GAAP as found in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)and Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) of the FASB.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying unaudited condensedconsolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of its wholly owned subsidiary, Calidi Biotherapeutics (Nevada),Inc., a company incorporated in the state of Nevada and Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc., StemVac GmbH (“StemVac”), a companyorganized under the laws of Germany, and Calidi Biotherapeutics Australia Pty Ltd (“Calidi Australia”), a wholly owned Australiansubsidiary, Nova Cell, Inc. (“Nova Cell”), a subsidiary incorporated in the state of Nevada, and Redtail Biopharma, Inc. (“Redtail”),a wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in the state of Nevada. StemVac’s primary operating activities include process developmentand other research and development activities for the SNV1 program performed for the Company under a cost-plus intercompany developmentagreement funded by the Company. Calidi Australia’s principal purpose was for conducting certain parts of the SNV1 clinical enabling activities in Australia.Nova Cell’s primary operating activities will be expanding potential uses of the Company’s AAA stem cell programs from oncologyto other fields that require regenerative medical applications, such as cosmetics, orthopedics, auto-immune diseases, and various othertherapies. Nova Cell will also serve as a technology service provider to develop innovative stem cell-based products, such as anti-agingcreams and lotions. Redtail’s primary operating activities will be to expand on the Company’s systemic antitumor virotherapies.Both Nova Cell and Redtail were incorporated in May 2024. Redtail has had no activity to date.
Variable interest entities (“VIEs”)are legal entities that either have an insufficient amount of equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additionalsubordinated financial support or, as a group, the holders of equity investment at risk lack the ability to direct the entity’sactivities that most significantly impact economic performance through voting or similar rights, or do not have the obligation to absorbthe expected losses or the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity.
For all VIEs in which the Companyis involved, it assesses whether it is the primary beneficiary on an ongoing basis. In circumstances where the Company has both the powerto direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIEs performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receivethe benefits of the VIE that could be significant, the Company would conclude that it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE, and the Companyconsolidates the VIE. In situations where the Company is not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE, it does not consolidatethe VIE and only recognizes the Company’s interests in the VIE.
Asthe Board of Directors of the Company acknowledged a strategic investment by a related party investor into Nova Cell, the Company’sownership interest decreased to 75% (see Note 7). Under the rules of determining whether an entity is a VIE, the Company hasa controlling financial interest and is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of Nova Cell and therefore consolidates Nova Cell’sfinancial statements. Since the Company owns less than 100% of Nova Cell, the Company records net loss attributable to noncontrollinginterest in its consolidated statements of operations equal to the percentage of the economic or ownership interests retained in NovaCell by the noncontrolling party.
CalidiCure LLC (“Calidi Cure”), a Delaware limited liability company formed in June 2023, was a special purpose vehicle entitythat was solely managed and operated by Allan J. Camaisa, former Chief Executive Officer and former Chairman of the Board of Directorsof the Company. Calidi Cure was created for the sole purpose of supporting the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock financing arrangementfor the Company, had no other operations, and was dissolved on July 17, 2024. As such, the level of equity in Calidi Cure was not sufficientto permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by other parties. Accordingly,it was determined that Calidi Cure was a VIE and the Company was the primary beneficiary. As such, the Company consolidated Calidi Cureinto its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein for the three months ended March 31, 2024.
The accompanying unaudited condensedconsolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentationof the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminatedin consolidation.
| F-9 |
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financialstatements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets andliabilities, and contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, and thereported amounts during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates estimates which are subject to significant judgment,including, but not limited to, valuation methods used, assumptions requiring the use of judgment to prepare financial projections, timingof potential commercialization of acquired in-process intangible assets, applicable discount rates, comparable companies or transactions,liquidity events, assumptions related to the going concern assessments, allocation of direct and indirect expenses, useful lives associatedwith long- lived assets, key assumptions in operating and financing leases including incremental borrowing rates, loss contingencies,valuation allowances related to deferred income taxes, assumptions used to value common stock, debt and debt-like instruments, warrants,and stock-based awards and other equity instruments. Actual results may differ materially from those estimates.
Cash and Restricted Cash
The Company considers all highlyliquid investments purchased with an original maturity date of ninety days or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents includecash in readily available checking, money market accounts and brokerage accounts.
The Company classifies cash thathas contractual or legal restrictions imposed by third parties as restricted cash, which is restricted as to withdrawal or use exceptfor the specified purpose under a contract. The Company classifies restricted cash as either part of prepaids and other current assets,or as part of other noncurrent assets, depending on the term and nature of the underlying contract with a financial institution, whichrequires the Company to hold a fixed amount of funds in a restricted money market account as collateral to the financial institution forthe Company’s corporate credit card program with that financial institution.
The following table providesa reconciliation of cash and restricted cash reported within the balance sheet dates that comprise the total of the same such amountsshown in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):
March 31, 2025 | March 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Cash | $ | $ | ||||||
| Restricted cash included within prepaid expenses and other current assets | ||||||||
| Restricted cash included within other noncurrent assets | ||||||||
| Total cash and restricted cash as shown in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows | $ | $ | ||||||
Machinery and Equipment
Machinery and equipment are statedat cost, less accumulated depreciation, and includes assets purchased under financing leases. Depreciation is computed using the straight-linemethod over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally over a period of
| F-10 |
Leases
The Company accounts for leasesin accordance with ASC 842, Leases. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Leases are classified aseither finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the unaudited condensed consolidatedstatements of operations. When determining whether a lease is a finance lease or an operating lease, ASC 842 does not specifically definecriteria to determine “major part of remaining economic life of the underlying asset” and “substantially all of thefair value of the underlying asset.” For lease classification determination, the Company continues to use: (i) greater than or equalto 75% to determine whether the lease term is a major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset; and (ii) greater thanor equal to 90% to determine whether the present value of the sum of lease payments is substantially all of the fair value of the underlyingasset. The Company accounts for the lease and non-lease components as a single lease component.
For operatingleases, the Company recognizes right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities for leases with terms greater than 12months in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet, while leases with terms of 12 months or less are not capitalized. ROUassets represent the right to use an underlying asset during the lease term and lease liabilities represent the obligation to makelease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on thepresent value of lease payments over the lease term. As most leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses an incrementalborrowing rate commensurate with the lease term, based on the information available at commencement date in determining the presentvalue of lease payments. The Company uses the implicit rate when it is readily determinable. The operating lease ROU asset alsoincludes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives. Lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the leasewhen it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on astraight-line basis over the lease term. The Company discloses the amortization of ROU assets and operating lease payments as a netamount, “Amortization of right-of-use assets and liabilities”, on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements ofcash flows.
Finance leases are included inmachinery and equipment, and in finance lease liabilities, current and noncurrent, in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
See Note 11 for further disclosuresin accordance with ASC 842.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
The Company assesses the impairmentof long-lived assets, which consist primarily of right-of-use assets for operating leases and machinery and equipment, whenever eventsor changes in circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired and the carrying value may not be recoverable. If events or changesin circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable and the expected undiscounted future cash flowsattributable to the asset are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss equal to the excess of the assets carryingvalue over its fair value is recorded in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Warrants
The Company accounts for warrantsas either equity-classified or liability-classified instruments based on an assessment of the warrant’s specific terms and applicableauthoritative guidance in ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Warrants thatmeet the definition of a derivative financial instrument and the equity scope exception in ASC 815-10-15-74(a) are classified as equityand are not subject to remeasurement provided that the Company continues to meet the criteria for equity classification. Warrants thatare classified as liabilities are accounted for at fair value and remeasured at each reporting date until exercise, expiration, or modificationthat results in equity classification. Any change in the fair value of the warrants is recognized as change in fair value of warrant liabilitiesin the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The classification of warrants, including whether warrants should berecorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. The fair value of liability-classified warrantsis determined using the Black-Scholes options pricing model (“Black-Scholes model”) which includes Level 3 inputs.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company follows ASC 820,Fair Value Measurement, which among other things, defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair valueand expands disclosure for each major asset and liability category measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis.Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderlytransaction between market participants. Accordingly, fair value is a market-based measurement determined based on assumptions that marketparticipants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observableinputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
| F-11 |
ASC 820 establishes a fair valuehierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be usedto measure fair value, which are as follows:
| Level 1: | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; | |
| Level 2: | Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and | |
| Level 3: | Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. |
When quoted marketprices are available in active markets, the fair value of assets and liabilities is estimated within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.If quoted prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of assets and liabilities withsimilar characteristics, or discounted cash flows, within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. In cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputsare not available, the fair values are estimated by using inputs within Level 3 of the hierarchy. See Note 3 for fair value measurements.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company does not use derivativeinstruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments,including warrants, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives in accordancewith ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The Company values its derivatives using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model or otheracceptable valuation models, as applicable, with the assistance of valuation specialists. Derivative instruments accounted for as liabilitiesare valued at inception and subsequent valuation dates for each reporting period the derivative instrument remains outstanding. The classificationof derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities, is reassessed at each reporting period.
The Company evaluates equityor liability classification for common stock warrants in accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and ASC815 and accounts for common stock warrants as liabilities if the warrant requires net cash settlement or gives the holder the option ofnet cash settlement or it otherwise does not meet other equity classification criteria. The Company accounts for common stock warrantsas equity if the contract requires physical settlement or net physical settlement or if the Company has the option of physical settlementor net physical settlement and the warrants meet the requirements to be classified as equity. Common stock warrants classified as liabilitiesare initially recorded at fair value and remeasured at fair value at each subsequent reporting period with the offset adjustments recordedin change in fair value of warrant liability within the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. Common stock warrantsclassified as equity are initially measured at fair value on the grant date and are not subsequently remeasured.
| F-12 |
Government Grants
On October 27, 2022, the CaliforniaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine (“CIRM”) approved the Company’s application for a CIRM grant for the Company’scontinued development of the SNV1 program. CIRM awarded the Company approximately $
Proceeds from the CIRM grantare recognized over the period necessary to match the related research and development expenses when it is probable that the Company hascomplied with the CIRM conditions and will receive the proceeds pursuant to the milestones defined in the grant as reimbursement of thoseexpenditures. The CIRM grant proceeds, if any, received in advance of having incurred the related research and development expenses arerecorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and recognized as grant income included in other income (expense), net, onthe Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations when the related research and development expenses are incurred.
During the three months endedMarch 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company recognized approximately $
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expensesare expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses consist of costs incurred to discover, research and develop drug candidates,including compensation-related expenses for research and development personnel, including stock-based compensation expense, preclinicaland clinical activities, costs of manufacturing, overhead expenses including facilities and laboratory expenses, materials and supplies,amounts paid to consultants and outside service providers, and depreciation and amortization.
Upfront and annual license paymentsrelated to acquired technologies or technology licenses which have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative futureuse are also included in research and development expense in the period in which they are incurred.
| F-13 |
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expensesconsist primarily of salaries and related costs, including stock-based compensation expense, for personnel in executive, finance and accounting,business development, operations and administrative functions. General and administrative expenses also include fees for legal, patentprosecution, legal settlements, consulting, charge off of deferred financing costs for aborted or terminated financing offerings, accountingand audit services as well as insurance, outside service providers, direct and allocated facility-related costs and depreciation and amortization.
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments and OtherComprehensive Income or Loss
StemVac, the Company’swholly owned subsidiary, is located and operates in Germany and its functional currency is the Euro. Calidi Australia, the Company’swholly owned subsidiary, is located and operates in Australia and its functional currency is the Australian Dollar (“AUD”).Accordingly, StemVac’s and Calidi Australia’s assets and liabilities are translated using respective published exchange ratesin effect at the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet date. Expenses and cash flows are translated using respective approximateweighted average exchange rates for the reporting period. Resulting foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded as other comprehensiveincome or loss, net of tax, in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income or loss and included as a componentof accumulated other comprehensive income or loss on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. For the three months ended March31, 2025 and 2024, comprehensive loss includes such foreign currency translation adjustments and was insignificant for all periods presented.
Foreign Currency Transaction Gains and Losses
For transactions denominatedin currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the Company recognizes foreign currency transaction gains and losses in the unaudited condensedconsolidated statements of operations and classifies the gain or loss based on the nature of the item that generated it. The Company’sforeign currency transaction gains and losses are principally generated by intercompany transfers to StemVac denominated in Euros to payfor the research and development activities performed by StemVac under an intercompany development agreement with the Company. Furthermore,the Company’s foreign currency transaction gains and losses include intercompany transfers to Calidi Australia denominated in AUDto pay for the research and development activities performed by Calidi Australia. These foreign currency remeasurement gains and lossesare included in other income (expense), net, and were insignificant for all periods presented.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes compensationexpense related to employee option grants and restricted stock grants, if any, in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation — StockCompensation (“ASC 718”).
The Company measures all stockoptions and other stock-based awards granted based on the fair value of the award on the date of the grant and recognizes compensationexpense for those awards over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the respective award. The Companyhas elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur. The reversal of compensation cost previously recognized for an award that is forfeitedbecause of a failure to satisfy a service condition is recognized in the period of the forfeiture. Generally and unless otherwise specified,the Company’s grants stock options with service-based only vesting conditions and records the expense for these awards using thestraight-line method over the requisite service period.
The Company classifies stock-basedcompensation expense in its consolidated statements of operations in the same manner in which the award recipient’s payroll costsare classified or in which the award recipients’ service payments are classified.
The fair value of each stockoption grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company estimates its expected stock volatility based on thehistorical volatility of a publicly traded set of peer companies within the biotechnology industry with characteristics similar to theCompany. The expected term of the Company’s stock options has been determined utilizing the “simplified” method forawards that qualify as “plain-vanilla” options provided under Staff Accounting Bulletin, Topic 14, or SAB Topic 14, as necessary.The risk-free interest rate is determined by reference to the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant of the award fortime periods approximately equal to the expected term of the award. Expected dividend yield is zero, based on the fact that the Companyhas never paid cash dividends and does not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
| F-14 |
Earnings per share attributableto common stockholders is calculated using the two-class method, which is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings pershare for the holders of the Company’s common shares and participating securities. However, the participating securities do notinclude a contractual obligation to share in the losses of the Company and are not included in the calculation of net loss per share inthe periods that have a net loss. In addition, common stock equivalent shares (whether or not participating) are excluded from the computationof diluted earnings per share in periods in which they have an anti-dilutive effect on net loss per common share.
Diluted net loss per share iscomputed using the more dilutive of (a) the two-class method or (b) the if-converted method and treasury stock method, as applicable.In periods in which the Company reports a net loss attributable to common stockholders, diluted net loss per share attributable to commonstockholders is the same as basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders since dilutive common shares are not assumedto have been issued if their effect is anti-dilutive. Diluted net loss per share is equivalent to basic net loss per share for the periodspresented herein because common stock equivalent shares from the outstanding warrants, earnout shares, convertible notes, stock optionawards, restricted stock units, and contingently issuable warrants (see Note 8) were antidilutive.
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 (2) | |||||||
| Warrants for common stock | ||||||||
| Earnout Shares | ||||||||
| Employee stock options | ||||||||
| Convertible notes payable | ||||||||
| Restricted stock units | ||||||||
| Contingently issuable warrant(1) | ||||||||
| Total common stock equivalents | ||||||||
| (1) |
| (2) |
Segments
Operating segments are identifiedas components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operatingdecision maker (or CODM), the Executive Management Team, consisting of the following individuals:
| ● | Chief Executive Officer | |
| ● | Chief Financial Officer | |
| ● | Chief Legal Officer | |
| ● | Chief Scientific Officer and Head of Technical Operations | |
| ● | Chief Medical Officer, Consultant and Advisor | |
| ● | President of Medical and Clinical Affairs |
| F-15 |
The Company views its operationsand manages its business as a single reportable segment whose operations includes the research, development and commercialization effortsof cell-based platforms to potentiate oncolytic virus therapies on a consolidated basis, as further described in Note 1. The Company managesits Research and Development (“R&D”) activities on a consolidated basis. The Company expects to generate future incomefrom a combination of license fees and other upfront payments, funded R&D agreements, milestone payments, product sales, governmentand other third-party funding, and royalties, which depend on the results, regulatory approval, and timing of the successful commercializationof the Company’s products.
Net loss is the measure of segmentprofit or loss used by CODM in making decisions regarding resource allocation and evaluating financial performance, which is also reportedon the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The CODM does not evaluate its reportable segmentusing asset or liability information. The CODM uses net loss in making decisions regarding resource allocation and evaluating financialperformance.
The following table presentsselected financial information with respect to the Company’s single operating segment for the three months ended March 31, 2025and 2024:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||
| Salaries and benefits | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Insurance | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Legal | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Consulting | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Rent and Maintenance | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Clinical & research and development | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Depreciation expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Change in fair value of other liabilities and derivatives | ( | ) | ||||||
| Other segment items (1) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Income tax provision | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| NET LOSS | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| (1) |
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
There were no new accountingpronouncements adopted during the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not YetAdopted
In December 2023, the FASB issuedASU No. 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (Topic 740). The ASU requires disaggregated information about a reportingentity’s effective tax rate reconciliation as well as additional information on income taxes paid. The ASU is effective on a prospectivebasis for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is also permitted for annual financial statements that havenot yet been issued or made available for issuance. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2023-09.
In November 2024, the FASB issuedASU 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation ofIncome Statement and in January 2025, issued ASU 2025-01 Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense DisaggregationDisclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Clarifying the Effective Date to clarify the effective date of ASU 2024-03. ASU 2024-03 requires thedisaggregation of certain costs and expenses in the notes to the financial statements to provide enhanced transparency into the expensecaptions presented on the face of the income statement. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 andfor interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The guidance may be applied on a prospectiveor retrospective basis and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2024-03.
| F-16 |
3. Fair Value Measurements
The following table presentsthe Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, inclusive of related party components,as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 (in thousands):
| March 31, 2025 (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Restricted cash held in a money market account | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Forward Purchase Agreement Derivative Asset included in other noncurrent assets | ||||||||||||||||
| Total assets, at fair value | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Public Warrants | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Private warrants | ||||||||||||||||
| Total warrant liabilities, at fair value | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Restricted cash held in a money market account | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Forward Purchase Agreement Derivative Asset included in other noncurrent assets | ||||||||||||||||
| Total assets, at fair value | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Public Warrants | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Private warrants | ||||||||||||||||
| Total warrant liabilities, at fair value | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
The Company’s financialinstruments consist of cash, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities.The carrying value of these financial instruments is generally considered to approximate their fair values because of the short-term natureof those instruments.
The following table presentsthe changes in fair value of valued instruments for the three months ended March 31, 2025 (in thousands):
Forward Purchase Agreement Derivative Asset, at fair value | Public Warrants, at fair value | Private Warrants, at fair value | ||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2025 | $ | ( | ) | $ | | $ | | |||||
| Change in fair value | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Balance at March 31, 2025 | $ | ( | ) | |||||||||
| F-17 |
The following table presentsthe changes in fair value of valued instruments for the three months ended March 31, 2024 (in thousands):
Forward Purchase Agreement Derivative Asset, at fair value | Public Warrants, at fair value | Private warrants, at fair value | ||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2024 | $ | ( | ) | $ | | $ | | |||||
| Change in fair value | ||||||||||||
| Balance at March 31, 2024 | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||
4. Selected Balance Sheet Components
Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, accrued expenses and other current liabilities were comprised of the following (in thousands):
March 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Accrued compensation | $ | $ | ||||||
| Accrued vendor and other expenses | ||||||||
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||
See Note 11 for additional commitments.
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, prepaid expenses and other current assets were comprised of the following (in thousands):
March 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Prepaid expenses | $ | $ | ||||||
| Prepaid insurance | ||||||||
| CIRM receivable | ||||||||
| Other | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | $ | $ | ||||||
5. Machinery and Equipment, net
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, machinery and equipment, net, was comprised of the following (in thousands):
| March 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Machinery and equipment | $ | $ | ||||||
| Accumulated depreciation | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Machinery and equipment, net | $ | $ | ||||||
Depreciation expense amountedto approximately $
| F-18 |
6. Related Party Transactions
Prior to completing the Business Combination and becoming publicly traded in September 2023, the Company funded its operations primarily through issuances of convertible promissory notes and private sales of commonstock. These investments included various related parties, including from AJC Capital and certain directors as furtherdiscussed below.
The following table presentsthe various significant related party transactions and investments in the Company for the periods presented (in thousands):
| Related Party | Description of investment or transaction | March 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Director A and Director E | ||||||||||
| AJC Capital and relative of Officer A | ||||||||||
| Director D | ||||||||||
| Director A | ||||||||||
| AJC Capital | ||||||||||
| Director A | ||||||||||
| AJC Capital and Director A | ||||||||||
| Relative of Officer A | ||||||||||
| (1) | |
| (2) | |
| (3) | |
| (4) | |
| (5) | |
| (6) | |
| (7) | |
| (8) |
| F-19 |
7. Debt
The Company’s outstandingdebt obligations as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, including related party components, are as follows (in thousands):
| March 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||
Unpaid Balance | Accrued Interest | Net Carrying Value | ||||||||||
| Term notes payable | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Promissory note | ||||||||||||
| Total debt | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Less: current portion of long-term debt | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Long-term debt, net of current portion | $ | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||
Unpaid Balance | Accrued Interest | Net Carrying Value | ||||||||||
| Term notes payable | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Bridge loan payable | ||||||||||||
| Promissory note | ||||||||||||
| Total debt | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Less: current portion of long-term debt | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Long-term debt, net of current portion | $ | |||||||||||
Scheduled maturities of outstanding debt,net of discounts as of March 31, 2025 are as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ending December 31: | ||||
| 2025 (April — December) | $ | |||
| 2026 | ||||
| 2027 | ||||
| 2028 and thereafter | ||||
| Plus: accrued interest | ||||
| Total debt | $ | |||
The following discussion includesa description of the Company’s outstanding debt as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. The weighted average interest rate relatedto the Company’s outstanding debt was approximately
| F-20 |
Term Notes Payable
2021 Term Notes Payable
In January 2021, Calidi enteredinto a note agreement with a related party investor and director to borrow up to $
As of December 31, 2024, theinterest rate of the 2021 Term Notes was
2022 Term Notes Payable
In November and December 2022,the Company issued $
On October 3 and November 8,2023, the Company settled in cash $
As of December 31, 2024, theinterest rate of the 2022 Term Notes was
2023 Term Notes Payable
From January through September2023, the Company issued $
On October 3, 2023,as agreed upon above in connection with the Closing of the FLAG Merger, the Company settled in cash $
During the year ended December31, 2024, the Company settled in cash $
On December 23, 2024, pursuantto the debt amendment on $
During the three months endedMarch 31, 2025, $
As of March 31, 2025, the interestrate of the 2023 Term Notes was
| F-21 |
2024 Bridge Loan
On January 19, 2024, the Companyreceived approximately $
As of December 31, 2024, thetotal carrying value of the 2024 Bridge Loan, including accrued interest and net of debt discount, was $
The total outstanding principaland accrued interest of the 2024 Bridge Loan of $
Convertible Promissory Notes
On January 26, 2024, the Companyentered into a convertible promissory note purchase agreement (the “2024 Purchase Agreement”) with an Accredited Investor(the “Investor”) for a loan in the principal amount of $
On April18, 2024, pursuant to the April Public Offering, the Company’s $
Promissory Note Loan Agreement
On July 1, 2024, the Companyentered into a Loan Agreement with a third party lender (the “Lender”). Under the Loan Agreement, the Lender agreed to loanthe Company the principal amount of $
The Promissory Note bears a simpleinterest rate at
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, the total carrying value of the promissory note, including accrued interest, was $
8. Total Equity
Preferred Stock
Pursuant to the Second Amendedand Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed on September 19, 2023 (“the Amended Articles”), the Company is authorizedto issue a total of shares of preferred stock, par value $ per share. As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, therewere shares of preferred stock outstanding.
Common Stock
Pursuant to the Amended Articles,the Company is authorized to issue shares of common stock, par value $ per share, of which shares are designatedas Voting Common Stock (“Common Stock”) and are designated as Non-Voting Common Stock (the “Non-Voting CommonStock”). As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, there were and shares of common stock issued and outstanding,respectively, and shares of non-voting common stock outstanding. Since inception to date, no dividends have been declared orpaid. Issuance costs related to common stock issuances during all periods presented were immaterial.
| F-22 |
During the three months endedMarch 31, 2025, the Company issued shares of common stock through an At The Market Offering,
During the three months endedMarch 31, 2024, the Company issued shares of common stock in lieu of cash for certain marketing services (see Note 11), sharesof common stock in lieu of cash for payment of a commitment fee related to the Company’s SEPA agreement (see Note 11), and
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, common stock reserved for future issuance consisted of the following:
March 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Common stock warrants outstanding | ||||||||
| Common stock options issued and outstanding | ||||||||
| Restricted stock units vested and unreleased | ||||||||
| Shares available for future issuance under the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan | ||||||||
| Shares reserved under the 2023 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | ||||||||
April Public Offering
On April 18, 2024, in connectionwith the April Public Offering, the Company sold an aggregate of Common Stock Units and Pre-Funded Warrant (“PFW”)Units at an effective combined purchase price of $ per Common Stock Unit or PFW Unit.
Each Common Stock Unit consistsof: (i) one share of the Company’s voting common, (ii) a Series A warrant to purchase one share common stock, (iii) a Series B warrantto purchase one Series B Unit, with each Series B Unit consisting of (a) one share of common stock and (b) a Series B-1 Warrant to purchaseone share of common stock, and (iv) a Series C warrant to purchase one Series C Unit, with each Series C Unit consisting of (a) one shareof common stock and (b) a Series C-1 Warrant to purchase one share of common stock. See further warrant details per each issued seriesbelow.
Each PFW Unit consists of: (i)a pre-funded warrant to purchase one share of common stock, (ii) a Series A warrant to purchase one share common stock, (iii) a SeriesB warrant to purchase one Series B Unit, with each Series B Unit consisting of (a) one share of common stock and (b) a Series B-1 Warrantto purchase one share of common stock, and (iv) a Series C warrant to purchase one Series C Unit, with each Series C Unit consisting of(a) one share of common stock and (b) a Series C-1 Warrant to purchase one share of common stock. See further warrant details per eachissued series below.
The Company issued the PlacementAgent common stock warrants to purchase up to
May Inducement Offer
On May 31, 2024, following theclosing of the May Inducement Offer, warrant holders immediately exercised some or all of their respective outstanding Series B Warrantsand Series C Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of
| F-23 |
The Company accounted for theexercise price decrease of the Existing Warrants as a modification. Based on the nature of the modification (i.e., reduction in exerciseprice to induce exercise and raise additional capital), the modification was accounted for as an equity issuance cost on the date theoffer was accepted by the Holders, calculated as the excess fair value of the modified warrants post modification.
The Company issued the PlacementAgent common stock warrants to purchase up to
Subscription Agreement
On July 26, 2024, the Board ofDirectors of the Company approved a Subscription Agreement dated July 28, 2024 entered with an accredited investor, a related-party. Pursuantto the Agreement, the Company sold to the Investor and the Investor purchased, (i)
At the Market Offering
On October 11, 2024, the Companyentered into an At The Market Offering Agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. (“Ladenburg”), under which the Companymay, from time to time, in its sole discretion, issue and sell through Ladenburg, acting as agent or principal, shares of the Company’scommon stock, par value $ per share, initially having an aggregate offering price of up to $
The Company will pay Ladenburga cash commission of
Under the terms of the SalesAgreement, the Company may also sell shares to Ladenburg as principal for its own account at prices agreed upon at the time of sale. Ifthe Company sells shares to Ladenburg as principal, it will enter into a separate terms agreement with Ladenburg in substantially theform attached to the Sales Agreement. The Company is not obligated to sell any shares under the Sales Agreement. The offering of the sharespursuant to the Sales Agreement may be terminated by either the Company or Ladenburg, as permitted therein.
On February 4, 2025, the Companyincreased the maximum aggregate offering amount of the shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $ per share issuableunder the At The Market Offering Agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., dated October 11, 2024, from $
October Public Offering
On October 23, 2024, the Companyentered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain institutional investors (the “Purchasers”), pursuant to which theCompany agreed to issue to the Purchasers, (i) in a registered offering, shares of the Company’s common stock, par value$ per share, at a purchase price of $ per share, and (ii) in a concurrent private placement, Series E common stock purchasewarrants to purchase up to
| F-24 |
The closing of the Transactionstook place on October 24, 2024. The gross proceeds from the Transactions were approximately $
The shares were offered by theCompany pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-282456), which was declared effective by the Securities ExchangeCommission on October 10, 2024.
The Company issued the PlacementAgent common stock warrants to purchase up to
November Confidentially Marketed Public Offering(CMPO)
On November 14, 2024, the Companyentered into a CMPO Agreement with Ladenburg, the “Placement Agent”, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue in a publicoffering shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $ per share, at a purchase price of $
The Company issued the PlacementAgent common stock warrants to purchase up to
January Confidentially Marketed Public Offering(CMPO)
On January 9, 2025, the Companyentered into a CMPO Agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc, the “Placement Agent”, pursuant to which the Companyagreed to issue and sell in a public offering shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $ per share, at apurchase price of $
The common stock shares wereoffered by the Company pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3, which was declared effective by the Securities ExchangeCommission on October 10, 2024.
The Company issued the PlacementAgent common stock warrants to purchase up to
March Registered Direct Offering and ConcurrentPrivate Placement
On March 28, 2025, the Companyentered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with a single institutional investor, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to thePurchaser, (i) in a registered offering, shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $ per share, at a purchaseprice of $
The Shares, the PFW, and thePFW Shares were offered by the Company pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-284229), which was declaredeffective by the Securities Exchange Commission on February 7, 2025. The Series G Warrants and the Warrant Shares were issued in a concurrentprivate placement and without registration under the Securities Act, and in reliance on the exemption provided in Section 4(a)(2) underthe Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder.
| F-25 |
The Company issued the PlacementAgent common stock warrants to purchase up to
Nova Cell Investment
On July 26, 2024, the Board ofDirectors of the Company acknowledged a strategic investment of approximately $
Warrants
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, the Company has outstanding warrants to purchase
March 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| Private Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Public Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Warrants to purchase Restricted Shares | ||||||||
| Placement Agent Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series A Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series B Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series B-1 Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series C-1 Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series D Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series E Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series F Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series G Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Pre-Funded Series G Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
Private Warrants
In connection with the closingof the FLAG Merger on September 12, 2023, the Company assumed
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, Private Warrants to purchase
Public Warrants
In connection with the closingof the FLAG Merger on September 12, 2023, the Company assumed
| F-26 |
The Company accounts for thePublic Warrants in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 815-40. Such guidance provides that because the warrants do not meetthe criteria for equity treatment thereunder, each warrant must be recorded as a liability.
The accounting treatment of derivativefinancial instruments in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, requires that the Company record a derivative liabilityupon the closing of the FLAG Merger. Accordingly, the Company classifies each warrant as a liability at its fair value and the warrantswere allocated a portion of the proceeds from the issuance of the Units equal to its fair value. This liability is subject to re-measurementat each balance sheet date. With each such re-measurement, the warrant liability will be adjusted to fair value, with the change in fairvalue recognized in the Company’s statement of operations. The Company will reassess the classification at each balance sheet date.If the classification changes as a result of events during the period, the warrants will be reclassified as of the date of the event thatcauses the reclassification.
On October 17, 2024, the Companyreceived notice from the NYSE that the Company’s Public Warrants to purchase common stock are no longer suitable for listing pursuantto Section 1001 of the NYSE American Company Guide due to the low trading price of such public warrants, and that the NYSE Regulationhas determined to commence proceedings to delist the public warrants. The Public Warrants may be traded on the OTC Pink Marketplace underthe symbol CLDWW.
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, Public Warrants to purchase
Warrants to Purchase Restricted Shares
On February 21, 2024, in connectionwith a settlement agreement (see Note 11), the Company issued an additional
On July 26, 2024, pursuant toa subscription agreement entered into with an accredited investor, a related-party (see Note 11), the Company sold to the investor warrantsto purchase
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, non-series warrants to purchase
Placement Agent Warrants
On April 18, 2024, in connectionwith the closing of the April Public Offering, the Company issued to the placement agent warrants to purchase up to
On June 3, 2024, in connectionwith the closing of the May Inducement Offer, the Company issued to the placement agent warrants to purchase up to
| F-27 |
On October 23, 2024, in connectionwith the October Public Offering, the Company issued to the placement agent warrants to purchase up to
On November 14, 2024, in connectionwith the November CMPO, the Company issued to the placement agent warrants to purchase up to
On January 9, 2025, in connectionwith the January CMPO, the Company issued to the placement agent warrants to purchase up to
On March 28, 2025, in connectionwith the March Registered Direct Offering and Concurrent Private Placement, the Company issued to the placement agent warrants to purchaseup to
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, placement agent warrants to purchase a total of
Series A Warrants
On April 18, 2024, in connectionwith the closing of the April Public Offering, the Company issued Series A warrants to purchase
Pursuant to the Reverse StockSplit effected July 15, 2024, the exercise price of the Series A warrants was reset to $
During the year ended December31, 2024, Series A warrants to purchase
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, Series A warrants to purchase
Series B Warrants
On April 18, 2024, in connectionwith the closing of the April Public Offering, the Company issued Series B warrants to purchase
Series B warrants to purchase
Pursuant to the Reverse StockSplit effected July 15, 2024, the exercise price of the Series B warrants was reset to $
| F-28 |
During the year ended December31, 2024, Series B warrants to purchase
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, Series B warrants to purchase
Series B-1 Warrants
On June 3, 2024, in connectionwith the closing of the May Inducement Offer, the Company issued Series B-1 warrants to purchase
Pursuant to the Reverse StockSplit effected July 15, 2024, the exercise price of the Series B-1 warrants was reset to $
During the year ended December31, 2024, pursuant to the terms of the Series B Warrants, the Company issued Series B-1 warrants to purchase
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, Series B-1 warrants to purchase
Series C-1 Warrants
On June 3, 2024, in connectionwith the closing of the May Inducement Offer, the Company issued Series C-1 warrants to purchase
Pursuant to the Reverse StockSplit effected July 15, 2024, the exercise price of the Series C-1 warrants was reset to $
During the year ended December31, 2024, pursuant to the terms of the Series C Warrants, the Company issued Series C-1 warrants to purchase
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, Series C-1 warrants to purchase
Series D Warrants
On June 3, 2024, in connectionwith the closing of the May Inducement Offer, the Company issued Series D warrants to purchase
| F-29 |
Pursuant to the Reverse StockSplit effected July 15, 2024, the exercise price of the Series D warrants was reset to $
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, Series D warrants to purchase
Series E Warrants
On October 23, 2024, in connectionwith the October Public Offering, the Company issued Series E warrants to purchase
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, Series E warrants to purchase
Series F Warrants
On October 23, 2024, in connectionwith the October Public Offering, the Company issued Series F warrants to purchase
As of March 31, 2025 and December31, 2024, Series F warrants to purchase
Series G Warrants
On March 28, 2025, in connectionwith the March Registered Direct Offering and Concurrent Private Placement, the Company issued Series G warrants to purchase
As of March 31, 2025, SeriesG warrants to purchase
Pre-funded Series G Warrants
On March 28, 2025, in connectionwith the March Registered Direct Offering and Concurrent Private Placement, the Company issued Pre-Funded Series G warrants to purchase
As of March 31, 2025, Pre-fundedSeries G warrants to purchase
| F-30 |
The following table summarizesthe Company’s aggregate warrant activity for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Number of Warrants | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | ||||||||||
| Outstanding at January 1, 2025 | $ | |||||||||||
| Issued | — | — | ||||||||||
| Exercised | — | — | ||||||||||
| Cancelled | — | — | ||||||||||
| Outstanding at March 31, 2025 | $ | |||||||||||
The following table summarizesthe Company’s aggregate warrant activity for the three months ended March 31, 2024.
Number of Warrants | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | ||||||||||
| Outstanding at January 1, 2024 | $ | |||||||||||
| Issued | — | — | ||||||||||
| Exercised | — | — | ||||||||||
| Expired | — | — | ||||||||||
| Outstanding at March 31, 2024 | $ | |||||||||||
Equity Incentive Plans
Upon completion of the BusinessCombination on September 12, 2023, the Company adopted the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2023 Plan”). The 2023 Plan reservedthe right for the Compensation Committee or by the Board of Directors acting as the Compensation Committee, as the administrator of theplan (the “Administrator”) to issue up to equity awards, including stock options (“Options”), restrictedstock awards (“Restricted Stock”), dividend equivalents awards, stock payment awards, restricted stock units (“RSUs”)and/or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”, together with Options, Restricted Stock and RSUs, “Awards”), accordingto its discretion. Awards may be granted under the 2023 Plan to our employees, directors, and consultants. As of March 31, 2025, the Administratorhas issued RSUs and stock options under the 2023 Plan.
Under the 2023 Plan, Awards mayvest and thereby become exercisable or have restrictions on forfeiture lapse on the date of grant or in periodic installments or uponthe attainment of performance goals, or upon the occurrence of specified events depending on the Administrator’s discretion. TheAdministrator has broad authority to determine the terms and conditions of any Award granted pursuant to the 2023 Plan including, butnot limited to, the exercise price, grant price, or purchase price, any reload provision, any restrictions or limitations on the Award,any schedule for lapse of forfeiture restrictions or restrictions on the exercisability of an Award, and accelerations or waivers thereofas the Administrator, in its sole discretion may determine.
No Awards may be granted underthe 2023 Plan with a term of more than ten years and no Awards granted may be exercised after the expiration of ten years from the dateof grant.
On July 15, 2024, the Companyeffected a
2023 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”)
On August 28, 2023, the Companyapproved the 2023 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, hereinafter the 2023 ESPP, which became effective on the consummation of the FLAG Merger.Under the 2023 ESPP, eligible employees may purchase a limited number of shares of common stock at a discount of up to
| F-31 |
Stock Options
Options granted under the 2023Plan may be either “incentive stock options” within the meaning of Section 422(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, asamended (the “Code”), or “non-qualified” stock options that do not qualify incentive stock options. Incentivestock options may be granted only to the Company’s employees and employees of domestic subsidiaries, as applicable.
The exercise price of an optionmay be payable in cash or in common stock, or in a combination of cash and common stock, or other legal consideration for the issuanceof stock as the Board or Administrator may approve.
Generally,
Employee Benefit Plans Securities RegistrationStatement
On October 1, 2024, the Companyfiled a Registration Statement on Form S-8, which includes a Reoffer Prospectus which may be used for reoffers and resales of shares ofthe Company. The Reoffer Prospectus covers the shares issuable to the holders pursuant to awards granted by the Company under the Calidi2023 Equity Incentive Plan. The Company will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares offered by the Reoffer Prospectus.
Option Awards Activity
Number of Options Outstanding | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |||||||||||||
| Outstanding at January 1, 2025 | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Options granted | ||||||||||||||||
| Options exercised | ||||||||||||||||
| Options forfeited or cancelled | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Outstanding at March 31, 2025 | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Exercisable at March 31, 2025 | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| F-32 |
Restricted Stock Units
Number of Units Outstanding | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value | |||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2025 | $ | |||||||
| Vested and released | ( | ) | ||||||
| Balance at March 31, 2025 | ||||||||
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Research and development | $ | $ | ||||||
| General and administrative | ||||||||
| Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | $ | ||||||
On January 18, 2023, the Boardapproved a repricing of approximately million stock options previously granted at an exercise price of $ per share to the thencurrent fair value of $ per share pursuant to an updated valuation report. The three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 includesa noncash compensation charge of approximately $
As of March 31, 2025, the totalunamortized stock-based compensation expense related to stock options was approximately $ million, expected to be amortized over anestimated weighted average life of years. The weighted-average estimated fair value of stock options with service-conditions grantedduring the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 was $ and $ per share, respectively, using the Black-Scholes option pricingmodel with the following weighted-average assumptions:
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Expected volatility | % | % | ||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | % | % | ||||||
| Expected option life (in years) | ||||||||
| Expected dividend yield | % | % | ||||||
The Company does not recognizedeferred income taxes for incentive stock option compensation expense and records a tax deduction only when a disqualified dispositionhas occurred.
10. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxesfor interim periods is determined using an estimated annual effective tax rate. The effective tax rate may be subject to fluctuationsduring the year as new information is obtained, which may affect the assumptions used to estimate the annual effective tax rate, includingfactors such as valuation allowances against deferred tax assets, the recognition or de-recognition of tax benefits related to uncertaintax positions, if any, and changes in or the interpretation of tax laws in jurisdictions where the Company conducts business.
For the three months ended March31, 2025 and 2024, the Company did not record any federal or state income tax provision or benefit due to net losses incurred for allperiods presented. The Company’s net deferred tax assets generated mainly from net operating losses are fully offset by a valuationallowance as the Company believes it is not more likely than not that the benefit will be realized. StemVac’s income tax provisionin Germany for all periods presented was insignificant.
| F-33 |
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Operating and Financing Leases
On October 10, 2022, the Companyentered into an Office Lease Agreement (the “San Diego Lease”) of a building containing
To secure and execute the SanDiego Lease, Mr. Allan Camaisa provided a personal Guaranty of Lease of up to $
The San Diego Lease has an initialterm of
Beginning on the CommencementDate, the Company pays base monthly rent in the amount of $
In addition to base monthly rentand management fees, the Company will pay in monthly installments its share of (a) all costs and expenses, other than certain excludedexpenses, incurred by the lessor in each calendar year in connection with operating, maintaining, repairing (including replacements ifrepairs are not feasible or would not be effective) and managing the Premises and the building in which the Premises are located (“Expenses”),and (b) all real estate taxes and assessments on the Premises and the building in which the Premises are located, all personal propertytaxes for property that is owned by Landlord and used in connection with the operation, maintenance and repair of the Premises (“Taxes”).
Upon execution of the San DiegoLease, the Company provided the lessor a payment of $
On April 1, 2022, StemVac enteredinto an office lease which includes laboratory space which expires on March 31, 2027, with monthly payments of €
Operating lease expense recognizedduring the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 was approximately $
The Company is also party tocertain financing leases for machinery and equipment (see Note 5).
The following table presentssupplemental cash flow information related to operating and financing leases for the periods presented (in thousands):
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | $ | ||||||
| Operating cash flows from financing leases | $ | $ | ||||||
| Financing cash flows from financing leases | $ | $ | ||||||
| F-34 |
The following table presentssupplemental balance sheet information related to operating and financing leases for the periods presented (in thousands, except leaseterm and discount rate):
March 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||||
| (Unaudited) | ||||||||
| Operating leases | ||||||||
| Right-of-use assets, net | $ | $ | ||||||
| Right-of-use lease liabilities, current | $ | $ | ||||||
| Right-of-use lease liabilities, noncurrent | ||||||||
| Total operating lease liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||
| Financing Leases | ||||||||
| Machinery and equipment, gross | $ | $ | ||||||
| Accumulated depreciation | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Machinery and equipment, net | $ | $ | ||||||
| Current liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||
| Noncurrent liabilities | ||||||||
| Total financing lease liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||
| Weighted average remaining lease term | ||||||||
| Operating leases | ||||||||
| Financing leases | ||||||||
| Weighted average discount rate | ||||||||
| Operating leases | % | % | ||||||
| Financing leases | % | % | ||||||
The following table presentsfuture minimum lease commitments as of March 31, 2025 (in thousands):
| Operating Leases | Financing Leases | |||||||
| Year Ending December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 (April – December) | $ | $ | ||||||
| 2026 | ||||||||
| 2027 | ||||||||
| 2028 | ||||||||
| 2029 | ||||||||
| 2030 and thereafter | ||||||||
| Total minimum lease payments | ||||||||
| Less: amounts representing interest | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Present value of net minimum lease payments | $ | |||||||
Litigation — General
The Company is subject to variousclaims and contingencies in the ordinary course of its business, including those related to litigation, business transactions, employee-relatedmatters, and other matters. At each reporting date, the Company evaluates whether or not a potential loss amount or a potential rangeof loss is probable and reasonably estimable under the provisions of the authoritative guidance that addresses accounting for contingencies.If it is probable that a loss will result and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company will record a liabilityfor the loss. If the loss is not probable or the amount of the loss cannot be reasonably estimated, the Company discloses the claim ifthe likelihood of a potential loss is reasonably possible, and the amount involved could be material. The Company expenses the costs relatedto legal proceedings as incurred. See other legal matters discussed below. Other than the matters discussed below, the Company is notcurrently party to any material legal proceedings.
| F-35 |
Legal Proceedings
Former Chief Accounting Officer and Interim ChiefFinancial Officer
On November 15, 2023,Tony Kalajian, the Company’s prior Chief Accounting Officer and interim Chief Financial Officer, filed a complaint in theSuperior Court of the State of California County of San Diego against the Company, Mr. Camaisa, the Company’s director andformer Chief Executive Officer, and Ms. Pizarro, the Company’s Chief Corporate Development Officer and Chief Legal Officer,alleging defamation and constructive discharge of Mr. Kalajian’s position of Chief Accounting Officer and interim ChiefFinancial Officer (Case No. 37-203-00049813-CU-DF-CTL) (the “Primary Case”). Mr. Kalajian is seeking $
The Company successfully movedto disqualify Mr. Kalajian’s counsel, Robert Brownlie, which is now on appeal. It also filed a claim against Mr. Kalajian in arbitrationfor breach of fiduciary duty, constructive fraud, conversion, and declaratory relief relating to bonuses Mr. Kalajian caused to be paidto himself and the accounting team. Due to the appeal, the Court in November 2024, issued a discretionary stay on this case and all relatedcases, as described below. The stay was lifted in March 2025 by stipulation when Mr. Kalajian engaged new counsel in connection with theproceedings.
The Company denies the allegationsand, along with the director and named officer, continues to vigorously defend the lawsuit and related claims, prosecute its claims againstMr. Kalajian, and seek recovery of a $150,000 bonus Mr. Kalajian approved to be paid to himself without first obtaining proper authorizationby the Company’s Board of Directors. No trial date is scheduled. Discovery and regular law and motion have commenced. At this time,the Company is unable to evaluate the outcome of this case or estimate the amount or range of potential loss.
On February 29, 2024, Mr. Kalajianfiled a Petition for Writ of Mandate in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, seeking to compel the production of certaincorporate records from the Company. This case is deemed related to the Primary Case above and is stayed.
On May 1, 2024, Mr. Kalajianfiled a complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego against the Company alleging intentional conversionand violation of Section 158 of the Delaware General Corporations Code due to the Company’s failure to remove a restrictive legendfrom 13,943 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Mr. Kalajian is seeking compensatory damages to be proven at trial, punitive damagesand attorney’s fees, and an order requiring removal of the restrictive legend from his share certificates. The Company intends tovigorously defend itself. This case is deemed related to the Primary Case above and was dismissed by Mr. Kalajian as part of a stipulationexecuted in March 2025.
Securities Matter
On October 29, 2024, Mr. Yian Zeng filed a complaint against the Company related to securities fraud in violationof the California Corporations Code, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, restitution, breach of fiduciaryduty, and constructive fraud in US District Court, Southern District of California (Case Number 3:24-cv-02026-H-KSC). The Company vigorouslyopposes this case and categorically denies all claims. On April 9, 2025, the parties engaged in a mandatory settlement conference whichresulted in no resolution of the case. Discovery has commenced. No trial date has been set. At this time, the Company is unable to evaluatethe outcome of this case or estimate the amount or range of potential loss.
| F-36 |
Employment Contracts
The Company has entered intoemployment and severance benefit contracts with certain executive officers and other employees. Under the provisions of the contracts,the Company may be required to incur severance obligations for matters relating to changes in control, as defined, and certain terminationsof those executives and employees. As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company had not accrued any such benefits except forthe severance accrual for Mr. Ng discussed below.
Manufacturing and Other Supplier Contracts
The Company has entered intocertain manufacturing and other supplier agreements with vendors principally for manufacturing drug product for clinical trials and continueddevelopment of the CLD-101 and CLD-201 programs.
As of March 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, the remaining expected commitments are approximately $
License Agreements with Northwestern University
On June 7, 2021, the Companyentered into a License Agreement with Northwestern University (“Northwestern”) (the “Northwestern Agreement”)for the exclusive commercialization rights to the investigational new drug (“IND”) and data generated from Northwestern’sphase 1 clinical trial treating brain tumor patients with an engineered oncolytic adenovirus delivered by neural stem cells (“NSC-CRAd-S-pk7”).Under the Northwestern Agreement, among other rights, Northwestern granted to the Company a worldwide, twelve-year exclusivity for thecommercial development of NSC-CRAd-S-pk7 or other oncolytic viruses for therapeutic and preventive uses in oncology and a right of referenceto Northwestern’s IND application which relates to the treatment of newly diagnosed HGG.
Pursuant to the NorthwesternAgreement, the Company agreed to a best-efforts commitment to fund up to $
On October 14, 2021, the Companyentered into a Material License Agreement with Northwestern to license the NSC-CRAd-S-pk7 oncolytic virus materials which the Companyintends to use to continue advancing its research, development and commercialization efforts of the NNV1 and NNV2 programs.
On December 15, 2024, the Companyentered into an Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trial Agreement for Northwestern to conduct a clinical trial (the “CTA”) underthe protocol referenced “A Phase I Study of Repeated Neural Stem Cell Based Virotherapy in Combination with N-Acetylcysteine amidand Standard Radiation and Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma” (the “Study”). In connection with theStudy, Northwestern granted the Company a non-exclusive, transferable and sublicensable license to use all available de-identified datacollected from the Study, including, but not limited to, survival data, patient pathology, and immune studies data.
| F-37 |
In consideration of the datause license granted by Northwestern to the Company under the CTA, the Company shall pay Northwestern the following:
The CTA shall terminate uponthe completion of the parties’ Study-related activities. Either party has the right to terminate the Study upon 30 days prior writtennotice to the other. The Study may also be terminated immediately at any time for cause, which includes the following: material breach,which cannot be cured, by either party of the terms and conditions of the CTA.
As of the date of issuance ofthese unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, it is not probable that the Company will make these payments, if any at all.The Company will record the contingent payments if and when they become payable, in accordance with the applicable guidance.
License Agreement with City of Hope and the Universityof Chicago
On July 22, 2021, the Companyentered into an Exclusive License Agreement with City of Hope (“COH”) and the University of Chicago (the “City of HopeAgreement”) for patents covering cancer therapies using an oncolytic adenovirus loaded into allogeneic neural stem cells for treatmentof HGG. Pursuant to the City of Hope Agreement, COH transferred its IND to the Company for the commercial development of a licensed product,as defined in the City of Hope Agreement. This agreement grants to the Company commercial exclusivity in using neural stem cells withthe adenovirus known as CRAd-S-pk7 for oncolytic virotherapy.
The City of Hope Agreement providesfor the Company to pay royalties in low single digit percentage of net sales generated for any product of the licensed patents for specificperiods, and to pay up to $
As of the date of the issuanceof these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, it is not probable that the Company will make these payments. The Companywill record the contingent payments if and when they become payable, in accordance with the applicable guidance.
Indemnification
In the normal course of business,the Company may provide indemnification of varying scope under the Company’s agreements with other companies or consultants, typicallythe Company’s clinical research organizations, investigators, clinical sites, suppliers and others. Pursuant to these agreements,the Company will generally agree to indemnify, hold harmless, and reimburse the indemnified parties for losses and expenses suffered orincurred by the indemnified parties arising from claims of third parties. Indemnification provisions could also cover third party infringementclaims with respect to patent rights, copyrights, or other intellectual property pertaining to the Company. The Company’s officeand laboratory facility leases also will generally contain indemnification obligations, including obligations for indemnification of thelessor for environmental law matters and injuries to persons or property of others, arising from the Company’s use or occupancyof the leased property. The term of these indemnification agreements will generally continue in effect after the termination or expirationof the particular research, development, services, lease, or other agreement to which they relate. The potential future payments the Companycould be required to make under these indemnification agreements will generally not be subject to any specified maximum amounts. Historically,the Company has not been subject to any claims or demands for indemnification. The Company also maintains various liability insurancepolicies that limit the Company’s financial exposure. As a result, the Company’s management believes that the fair value ofthese indemnification agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any liabilities for these agreements as of March31, 2025 and December 31, 2024.
| F-38 |
Separation Agreement with Chief Operating Officerand President
On June 23, 2023, the Companyentered into a Separation and Release Agreement (“Separation Agreement”) with George Ng, Chief Operating Officer and President,effective on that date. In accordance with the provisions of the Separation Agreement, the Company will pay Mr. Ng in the amount of $
In June 2024, the Company madea payment of $
Settlement, Deferral or Payment of Deferred Compensationof Certain Executives and a Director
On August 31, 2023, Mr.Camaisa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mr. Leftwich, a director of the Company, entered into certain amendmentswith respect to their deferred compensation arrangements in connection with the FLAG Merger. Mr. Camaisa agreed to settleapproximately $
Standby Equity Purchase Agreement
On December 10, 2023, the Companyentered into a Standby Equity Purchase Agreement (the “SEPA”) with YA II PN, Ltd., a Cayman Island exempt limited partnership(“Yorkville”). Pursuant to the SEPA, the Company will have the right, but not the obligation, to sell to Yorkville up to $
As consideration for Yorkville’scommitment to purchase the Common Stock at the Company’s direction upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in theSEPA, upon execution of the SEPA, the Company paid a structuring fee of $
On January 23, 2025, the Companydelivered to Yorkville a Notice of Termination of the SEPA, dated as of December 10, 2023, by and between the Company and Yorkville. Terminationof the SEPA became effective as of January 23, 2025, as mutually agreed by the Company and Yorkville.
At the time of the termination,there were no outstanding borrowings, advance notices or shares of common stock to be issued under the SEPA.
Subscription Agreement
In recognition of a SubscriptionAgreement entered into with a related party investor on July 26, 2024, the Board has approved the appointment of the Investor, a distinguishedphysician and expert in stem cell therapy, to the Company’s Scientific and Medical Advisory Board (“SMAB”). This appointmentwas made in accordance with the SMAB Consulting Agreement dated July 28, 2024 (“Consulting Agreement”). As part of the ConsultingAgreement, the Investor will be awarded stock options, with a standard four-year vesting period.
Assignment of Intellectual Property to Nova Cell
In conjunction with a strategicinvestment by a related party investor on July 26, 2024, the Board has approved the assignment of certain intellectual property rightsto Nova Cell, pursuant to an Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement dated July 28, 2024.
12. Subsequent Events
TheCompany has evaluated subsequent events through the filing of this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q and determined that there have been nosignificant subsequent events that have occurred during such period thatwould require adjustment nor disclosure in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
| F-39 |
Reportof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Tothe Stockholders and Board of Directors of
CalidiBiotherapeutics, Inc.
Opinionon the Financial Statements
Wehave audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, convertible preferred stock and totalequity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectivelyreferred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all materialrespects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cashflows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally acceptedin the United States of America.
ExplanatoryParagraph – Going Concern
Theaccompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As morefully described in Note 1, the Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has incurred significant losses and needs to raiseadditional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s abilityto continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financialstatements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basisfor Opinion
Thesefinancial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’sfinancial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federalsecurities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
Weconducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtainreasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Companyis not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our auditswe are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinionon the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Ouraudits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due toerror or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidenceregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles usedand significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believethat our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/Marcum llp
Marcum LLP
Wehave served as the Company’s auditor since 2022
CostaMesa, California
March 31, 2025
| F-40 |
CALIDIBIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATEDBALANCE SHEETS
(Inthousands, except for par value data)
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||
| Cash | $ | $ | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | ||||||||
| Total current assets | ||||||||
| NONCURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||
| Machinery and equipment, net | ||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use assets, net | ||||||||
| Other noncurrent assets | ||||||||
| TOTAL ASSETS | $ | $ | ||||||
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT) | ||||||||
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | $ | ||||||
| Related party accounts payable | ||||||||
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | ||||||||
| Related party accrued expenses and other current liabilities | ||||||||
| Term notes payable, net of discount, including accrued interest | ||||||||
| Related party term notes payable, net of discount, including accrued interest | ||||||||
| Related party bridge loan payable, including accrued interest | ||||||||
| Related party other current liability | ||||||||
| Finance lease liability, current | ||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use liability, current | ||||||||
| Total current liabilities | ||||||||
| NONCURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use liability, noncurrent | ||||||||
| Finance lease liability, noncurrent | ||||||||
| Promissory note | ||||||||
| Related party term notes payable, net of discount, including accrued interest | ||||||||
| Other noncurrent liabilities | ||||||||
| Related party other noncurrent liabilities | ||||||||
| Warrant liability | ||||||||
| Related party warrant liability | ||||||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | ||||||||
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) | ||||||||
| TOTAL EQUITY (DEFICIT) | ||||||||
| Common stock, $ par value, shares authorized; and shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively | ||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | ||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Accumulated deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Noncontrolling interest | ||||||||
| Total equity (deficit) | ( | ) | ||||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT) | $ | $ | ||||||
Theaccompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
| F-41 |
CALIDIBIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Inthousands, except per share data)
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||
| Research and development | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| General and administrative | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total operating expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Loss from operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES), NET | ||||||||
| Interest expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Interest expense – related party | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Series B convertible preferred stock financing costs – related party | ( | ) | ||||||
| Change in fair value of debt, other liabilities, and derivatives | ( | ) | ||||||
| Change in fair value of debt, other liabilities, and derivatives – related party | ||||||||
| Grant income | ||||||||
| Debt extinguishment | ( | ) | ||||||
| Debt extinguishment – related party | ( | ) | ||||||
| Other income (expense), net | ( | ) | ||||||
| Total other income (expenses), net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Income tax provision | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| NET LOSS | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | ( | ) | ||||||
NETLOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONTROLLING INTEREST | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Deemed dividend on warrants | ( | ) | ||||||
| NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net loss per share; basic and diluted | $ | ) | $ | ) | ||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding; basic and diluted | ||||||||
Theaccompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
| F-42 |
CALIDIBIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Inthousands)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| NET LOSS | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Other comprehensive income (expense), net of tax: | ||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | ( | ) | ||||||
| COMPREHENSIVE LOSS | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | ( | ) | ||||||
| COMPREHENSIVE LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
Theaccompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
| F-43 |
CALIDIBIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENTS OF CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND TOTAL EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(Inthousands, except share amounts)
| Common Stock | Additional Paid-in | Accumulated Other Comprehensive | Accumulated | Total Stockholders’ | Non controlling | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Capital | Income (Loss) | Deficit | Equity | Interest | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock in lieu of cash for services | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock in lieu of cash for SEPA commitment fee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock to Calidi stockholders as result of Merger | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financing fees | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common shares and pre-funded warrants through April Public Offering, net of financing costs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock per Convertible Note conversion | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common shares through May Inducement Offer, net of financing costs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of common stock warrants | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of pre-funded warrants | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of restricted stock units for liability settlement | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock and warrants for legal settlement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock for Reverse Stock Split fractional shares | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock and warrants per subscription agreement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock and warrants for registered direct offering | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock through At the Market Offering | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common shares through November Public Offering, net of financing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment in Nova Cell | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock unit shares released | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| F-44 |
| Founders Convertible Preferred Stock | Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock | Series A-2 Convertible Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Additional Paid-in | Accumulated Other Comprehensive | Accumulated | Non controlling | Total Stockholders’ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Income (Loss) | Deficit | Interest | Deficit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2022(1) | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conversion of preferred stock into common stock | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock with term notes as interest paid in kind and other | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock in lieu of cash per settlement agreement | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of common stock options | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Series B financing costs | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock for Calidi debt settlement in connection with Merger | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock for deferred compensation settlement in connection with Merger | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock to Calidi stockholders as result of Merger | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock to Non-Redemption and PIPE Agreement Investor in connection with Merger | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock under Forward Purchase Agreement in connection with Merger | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of warrants for deferred compensation settlement in connection with Merger | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assumed liabilities from Merger | — | — | — | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assumed warrant liability from Merger | — | — | — | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financing fees in connection with Merger | — | — | — | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of restricted stock units for liability settlement | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | — | — | — | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) |
| F-45 |
CALIDIBIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Inthousands)
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation expense | ||||||||
| Amortization of right of use assets | ||||||||
| Amortization of debt discount and financing costs | ||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | ||||||||
| Change in fair value of debt, other liabilities, and derivatives | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Series B convertible preferred stock financing costs | ||||||||
| Debt extinguishment | ||||||||
| Disposal of fixed assets | ||||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | ( | ) | ||||||
| Accounts payable | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | ( | ) | ||||||
| Other noncurrent liabilities | ||||||||
| Operating lease right of use liability | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
| Purchases of machinery and equipment | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Cash assumed in connection with the FLAG Merger | ||||||||
| Security deposits, net | ||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
| Proceeds from Public Offerings | ||||||||
| Proceeds from May Inducement Offer | ||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of noncontrolling interest in Nova Cell | ||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of Convertible Notes | ||||||||
| Related party proceeds from issuance of bridge loans | ||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of promissory note | ||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of common shares and warrants per subscription agreement | ||||||||
| Proceeds from exercise of pre-funded warrants | ||||||||
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | ||||||||
| Proceeds from exercise of common stock warrants | ||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of Series B convertible preferred stock | ||||||||
| Related party proceeds from issuance of Series B convertible preferred stock | ||||||||
| Proceeds from Non-Redemption and PIPE Agreements | ||||||||
| Proceeds from simple agreements for future equity (SAFE) | ||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of term notes payable | ||||||||
| Related party proceeds from issuance of term notes payable | ||||||||
| Repayment of convertible note payable | ( | ) | ||||||
| Repayment of principal on loan payable to bank | ( | ) | ||||||
| Repayment of principal on related party term notes payable | ( | ) | ||||||
| Repayment of principal on term notes payable | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Repayment of financing lease obligations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Payment of financing costs | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Payment of debt issuance costs | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | ||||||||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| NET INCREASE IN CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH | ||||||||
| CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH BALANCE: | ||||||||
| At beginning of the year | ||||||||
| At end of the year | $ | $ | ||||||
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | ||||||||
| Cash paid for interest | $ | $ | ||||||
| Cash paid for income taxes | $ | $ | ||||||
| SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH FINANCING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
| Issuance of common stock per convertible note conversion | $ | $ | ||||||
| Deemed dividend on warrants | $ | $ | ||||||
| Issuance of convertible note for legal settlement | $ | $ | ||||||
| Issuance of common stock in lieu of cash for services | $ | $ | ||||||
| Related party issuance of common stock in lieu of cash for services | $ | $ | ||||||
| Issuance of common stock and warrants for legal settlement | $ | $ | ||||||
| Debt discount on Convertible Notes | $ | $ | ||||||
| Issuance of common stock in lieu of cash for SEPA commitment fee | $ | $ | ||||||
| Financing fees | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Issuance of restricted stock units for liability settlement | $ | $ | ||||||
| Issuance of common stock for deferred compensation settlement in connection with FLAG Merger | $ | $ | ||||||
| Issuance of warrants for deferred compensation settlement in connection with FLAG Merger | $ | $ | ||||||
| Issuance of common stock with term notes as interest paid in kind and other | $ | $ | ||||||
| Assumed liabilities from FLAG Merger | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| Assumed warrant liability from FLAG Merger | $ | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| Issuance of common stock as a result of the FLAG Merger | $ | $ | ||||||
| Forward purchase agreement derivative asset | $ | $ | ||||||
| Issuance of common stock upon conversion of convertible preferred stock | $ | $ | ||||||
| Issuance of SAFE in lieu of cash for advisory services | $ | $ | ||||||
| Issuance of common stock for Calidi debt settlement in connection with FLAG Merger | $ | $ | ||||||
| Machinery and equipment acquired through financing leases | $ | $ | ||||||
Theaccompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
| F-46 |
CALIDIBIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTESTO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.Organization and Nature of Operations
OnSeptember 12, 2023, First Light Acquisition Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“FLAG”) consummated a series of transactionsthat resulted in the merger of FLAG Merger Sub Inc., a Nevada corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of FLAG and Calidi Biotherapeutics,Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Calidi” and the transactions the “Business Combination”). Following the consummationof the Business Combination, FLAG was renamed “Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc.” and Calidi was renamed “Calidi Biotherapeutics(Nevada), Inc.” and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company”refers to Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (f/k/a First Light Acquisition Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation) andits consolidated subsidiaries.
TheCompany is a clinical stage immuno-oncology company that is developing proprietary allogeneic stem cell-based and enveloped platformsto potentiate and deliver oncolytic viruses (vaccinia virus and adenovirus) and potentially other molecules to cancer patients. The Companyis developing a pipeline of off-the-shelf allogeneic cell product candidates that are designed to: (i) protect oncolytic viruses fromcomplement inactivation and innate immune cell inactivation by the body’s immune system; (ii) support oncolytic viral amplificationin the allogeneic cells, and (iii) modify the tumor microenvironment to facilitate tumor cell targeting and viral amplification at thetumor sites for an extended period of time, potentially leading to an improved cancer therapy.
TheCompany’s operations to date have focused on organization and staffing, business planning, raising capital, licensing, acquiringand developing technology, establishing intellectual property portfolio, identifying potential product candidates and undertaking preclinicalstudies, process development and procuring manufacturing for preclinical and clinical trials. The Company’s product candidatesare subject to long development cycles and the Company may be unsuccessful in its efforts to develop, obtain regulatory approval foror market its product candidates.
TheCompany is subject to risks and uncertainties common to early-stage companies in the biotechnology industry, including, but not limitedto, possible failure of preclinical studies or clinical trials, the need to obtain marketing approval for its product candidates, developmentby competitors of new technological innovations, dependence on key personnel, protection of proprietary technology, compliance with governmentregulations, the need to successfully commercialize and gain market acceptance of any of the Company’s products that are approvedand the ability to secure additional capital to fund operations. Product candidates currently under development will require significantadditional research and development efforts, including extensive preclinical and clinical testing, and regulatory approval prior to commercialization.These efforts require significant amounts of additional capital, adequate personnel and infrastructure, and extensive compliance-reportingcapabilities. Even if the Company’s drug development efforts are successful, it is uncertain when, if ever, the Company will realizesignificant revenue from product sales.
ReverseStock Split
OnJuly 10, 2024, the Company filed a First Certificate of Amendment to its Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation withthe Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to effect a
Allreferences to share and per share amounts for all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements have been retrospectivelyrestated to reflect this Reverse Stock Split. All rights to receive shares of common stock under outstanding securities, including butnot limited to, warrants, options, and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) were adjusted to give effect to the reverse stocksplit. Furthermore, proportionate adjustments were made to the per share exercise price and the number of shares of Common Stock thatmay be purchased upon exercise of outstanding stock options granted by the Company, and the number of shares of Common Stock reservedfor future issuance under the Company’s 2023 Equity Incentive Plan.
Liquidityand Going Concern
Theconsolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and settlementof liabilities in the normal course of business, and do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverabilityand classification of assets or amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
TheCompany has experienced recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows from operating activities, has a significant accumulateddeficit and expects to continue to incur net losses into the foreseeable future. The Company had an accumulated deficit of $
| F-47 |
Managementestimates that based on the Company’s liquidity resources, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continueas a going concern within 12 months from the date of issuance of the financial statements.
Management’sability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise additional funding. Management’s plans to raise additionalcapital through public or private equity or debt financings to fulfill its operating and capital requirements for at least 12 monthsfrom the date of the issuance of the financial statements. However, the Company may not be able to secure such financing in a timelymanner or on favorable terms, if at all. Furthermore, if the Company issues equity securities to raise additional funds, its existingstockholders may experience dilution, and the new equity securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of theCompany’s existing stockholders.
Risksand Uncertainties
Changesin economic conditions, including rising interest rates, public health issues, lower consumer confidence, volatile equity capital markets,ongoing supply chain disruptions and the impacts of geopolitical conflicts, may affect the Company’s operations.
2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basisof Presentation
Theaccompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, have been prepared in accordancewith the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in conformity with accounting principlesgenerally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
Anyreference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to the authoritative U.S. GAAP as found in the Accounting StandardsCodification (“ASC”) and Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”).
| F-48 |
Principlesof Consolidation
Theaccompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of its wholly owned subsidiary, Calidi Biotherapeutics(Nevada), Inc., a company incorporated in the state of Nevada Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc., StemVac GmbH (“StemVac”), a companyorganized under the laws of Germany, Calidi Biotherapeutics Australia Pty Ltd (“Calidi Australia”), a wholly owned Australiansubsidiary, Nova Cell, Inc. (“Nova Cell”), a subsidiary incorporated in the state of Nevada, and Redtail Biopharma, Inc.(“Redtail”), a wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in the state of Nevada. StemVac’s primary operating activitiesinclude process development and other research and development activities for the SNV1 program performed for the Company under a cost-plusintercompany development agreement funded by the Company. Calidi Australia’s principal purpose is for conducting a part of theSNV1 clinical trials in Australia. Nova Cell’s primary operating activities will be expanding potential uses of the Company’sAAA stem cell programs from oncology to other fields that require regenerative medical applications, such as cosmetics, orthopedics,auto-immune diseases, and various other therapies. Nova Cell will also serve as a technology service provider to develop innovative stemcell-based products, such as anti-aging creams and lotions. Redtail’s primary operating activities will be to expand on the Company’ssystemic antitumor virotherapies. Both Nova Cell and Redtail were incorporated in May 2024. Redtail has had no activity to date.
Variableinterest entities (“VIEs”) are legal entities that either have an insufficient amount of equity at risk for the entity tofinance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or, as a group, the holders of equity investment at risk lackthe ability to direct the entity’s activities that most significantly impact economic performance through voting or similar rights,or do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses or the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity.
Forall VIEs in which the Company is involved, it assesses whether it is the primary beneficiary on an ongoing basis. In circumstances wherethe Company has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIEs performance and the obligation to absorblosses or the right to receive the benefits of the VIE that could be significant, the Company would conclude that it is the primary beneficiaryof the VIE, and the Company consolidates the VIE. In situations where the Company is not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of theVIE, it does not consolidate the VIE and only recognizes the Company’s interests in the VIE.
Asthe Board of Directors of the Company acknowledged a strategic investment by a related party investor into Nova Cell, the Company’sownership interest decreased to 75% (see Note 1 and Note 7). Under the rules of determining whether an entity is a VIE, the Company hasa controlling financial interest and is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of Nova Cell and therefore consolidates Nova Cell’sfinancial statements. Since the Company owns less than 100% of Nova Cell, the Company records net loss attributable to noncontrollinginterest in its consolidated statements of operations equal to the percentage of the economic or ownership interests retained in NovaCell by the noncontrolling party.
CalidiCure LLC (“Calidi Cure”), a Delaware limited liability company formed in June 2023, was a special purpose vehicle entitythat was solely managed and operated by Allan J. Camaisa, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company.Calidi Cure was created for the sole purpose of supporting the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock financing arrangement for the Companyand had no other operations, whereby the historical level of equity in Calidi Cure was not sufficient to permit the entity to financeits activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by other parties. Accordingly, it was determined that CalidiCure was a VIE and the Company was the primary beneficiary. As such, the Company consolidated Calidi Cure into its consolidated financialstatements. Calidi Cure was dissolved on July 17, 2024, and was no longer in existence as of December 31, 2024.
Theaccompanying consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary fora fair presentation of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. All material intercompany accounts and transactionshave been eliminated in consolidation.
Useof Estimates
Thepreparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reportedamounts of assets and liabilities, and contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and thereported amounts during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates estimates which are subject to significant judgment,including, but not limited to, valuation methods used, assumptions requiring the use of judgment to prepare financial projections, timingof potential commercialization of acquired in-process intangible assets, applicable discount rates, comparable companies or transactions,liquidity events, determination of fair value of financial instruments under the fair value option of accounting, assumptions relatedto the going concern assessments, allocation of direct and indirect expenses, useful lives associated with long- lived assets, key assumptionsin operating and financing leases including incremental borrowing rates, loss contingencies, valuation allowances related to deferredincome taxes, assumptions used to value common stock, debt and debt-like instruments, warrants, and stock-based awards and other equityinstruments. Actual results may differ materially from those estimates.
| F-49 |
Reclassification
Certainprior year financial statement amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation. These reclassificationshad no effect on our previously reported results of operations or accumulated deficit.
Cashand Restricted Cash
TheCompany considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity date of ninety days or less to be cash equivalents.Cash and cash equivalents include cash in readily available checking, money market accounts and brokerage accounts.
TheCompany classifies cash that has contractual or legal restrictions imposed by third parties as restricted cash, which is restricted asto withdrawal or use except for the specified purpose under a contract. The Company classifies restricted cash as either part of prepaidsand other current assets, or as part of other noncurrent assets, depending on the term and nature of the underlying contract with a financialinstitution, which requires the Company to hold a fixed amount of funds in a restricted money market account as collateral to the financialinstitution for the Company’s corporate credit card program with that financial institution.
Thefollowing table provides a reconciliation of cash and restricted cash reported within the balance sheet dates that comprise the totalof the same such amounts shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):
December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||
| Cash | $ | $ | ||||||
| Restricted cash included within prepaid expenses and other current assets | ||||||||
| Restricted cash included within other noncurrent assets | ||||||||
| Total cash and restricted cash as shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows | $ | $ | ||||||
Machineryand Equipment
Machineryand equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation, and includes assets purchased under financing leases. Depreciation iscomputed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally over a period of
Leases
TheCompany accounts for leases in accordance with ASC 842, Leases. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception.Leases are classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the consolidatedstatements of operations. When determining whether a lease is a finance lease or an operating lease, ASC 842 does not specifically definecriteria to determine “major part of remaining economic life of the underlying asset” and “substantially all of thefair value of the underlying asset.” For lease classification determination, the Company continues to use: (i) greater than orequal to 75% to determine whether the lease term is a major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset; and (ii) greaterthan or equal to 90% to determine whether the present value of the sum of lease payments is substantially all of the fair value of theunderlying asset. The Company accounts for the lease and non-lease components as a single lease component.
| F-50 |
Foroperating leases, the Company recognizes right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities for leases with terms greaterthan 12 months in the consolidated balance sheet, while leases with terms of 12 months or less are not capitalized. ROU assetsrepresent the right to use an underlying asset during the lease term and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make leasepayments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the presentvalue of lease payments over the lease term. As most leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses an incrementalborrowing rate commensurate with the lease term, based on the information available at commencement date in determining the presentvalue of lease payments. The Company uses the implicit rate when it is readily determinable. The operating lease ROU asset alsoincludes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives. Lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the leasewhen it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on astraight-line basis over the lease term. The Company discloses the amortization of ROU assets and operating lease payments as a netamount, “Amortization of right-of-use assets and liabilities”, on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Financeleases are included in machinery and equipment, and in finance lease liabilities, current and noncurrent, in the consolidated balancesheets.
SeeNote 11 for the San Diego Office lease which commenced on March 1, 2023, and was accounted for as an operating lease in accordance withASC 842.
Impairmentof Long-Lived Assets
TheCompany assesses the impairment of long-lived assets, which consist primarily of right-of-use assets for operating leases and machineryand equipment, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired and the carrying value may notbe recoverable. If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable and the expectedundiscounted future cash flows attributable to the asset are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss equal tothe excess of the assets carrying value over its fair value is recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
Warrants
TheCompany accounts for warrants as either equity-classified or liability-classified instruments based on an assessment of the warrant’sspecific terms and applicable authoritative guidance in ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and ASC 815, Derivativesand Hedging. Warrants that meet the definition of a derivative financial instrument and the equity scope exception in ASC 815-10-15-74(a)are classified as equity and are not subject to remeasurement provided that the Company continues to meet the criteria for equity classification.Warrants that are classified as liabilities are accounted for at fair value and remeasured at each reporting date until exercise, expiration,or modification that results in equity classification. Any change in the fair value of the warrants is recognized as change in fair valueof warrant liabilities in the consolidated statements of operations. The classification of warrants, including whether warrants shouldbe recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. The fair value of liability-classified warrantsis determined using the Black-Scholes options pricing model (“Black-Scholes model”) which includes Level 3 inputs.
FairValue Measurements
TheCompany follows ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, which among other things, defines fair value, establishes a consistent frameworkfor measuring fair value and expands disclosure for each major asset and liability category measured at fair value on either a recurringor nonrecurring basis. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfera liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Accordingly, fair value is a market-based measurement determined basedon assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximizethe use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
| F-51 |
ASC820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the lastunobservable, that may be used to measure fair value, which are as follows:
| Level 1: | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; | |
| Level 2: | Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and | |
| Level 3: | Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. |
Whenquoted market prices are available in active markets, the fair value of assets and liabilities is estimated within Level 1 of the valuationhierarchy. If quoted prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of assets and liabilitieswith similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows, within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. In cases where Level 1 or Level 2inputs are not available, the fair values are estimated by using inputs within Level 3 of the hierarchy. See Note 3 for fair value measurements.
ForwardPurchase Agreement
OnAugust 28, 2023, and August 29, 2023, FLAG and the Company entered into forward purchase agreements (each a “Forward Purchase Agreement”,and together, the “Forward Purchase Agreement”) with each of Meteora Strategic Capital, LLC (“MSC”), MeteoraCapital Partners, LP (“MCP”), Meteora Select Trading Opportunities Master, LP (“MSTO”), Great Point Capital LLC(“Great Point”), Funicular Funds, LP (“Funicular Funds”) and Marybeth Wootton (“Wootton”) (with eachof MSC, MCP, MSTO, Great Point, Funicular, and Wootton, individually a “Seller”, and together, the “Sellers”)for an OTC Equity Prepaid Forward Transaction. For purposes of the Forward Purchase Agreement, FLAG is referred to as the “Counterparty”prior to the consummation of the business combination), while the Company is referred to as the “Counterparty” after theconsummation of the business combination. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed tosuch terms in the Forward Purchase Agreement.
Pursuantto the terms of the Forward Purchase Agreements, each Sellers intends to purchase up to a number of shares of Class A Common Stock, parvalue $ per share, of FLAG (“FLAG Class A Common Stock”) in the aggregate amount equal to up to , concurrentlywith the Closing pursuant to each Seller’s respective FPA Funding Amount PIPE Subscription Agreement, less, the number of FLAGClass A Common Stock purchased by each Seller separately from third parties through a broker in the open market (“Recycled Shares”).
TheForward Purchase Agreements provide that Sellers will be paid directly an aggregate cash amount (the “Prepayment Amount”)equal to the product of (i) the Number of Shares as set forth in each Pricing Date Notice and (ii) the redemption price per share asdefined in Section 9.2(a) of FLAG’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the “Initial Price”)less (iii) an amount in USD equal to
TheCounterparty will pay to Seller the Prepayment Amount required under the respective Forward Purchase Agreement directly from the Counterparty’sTrust Account maintained by Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company holding the net proceeds of the sale of the units in the Counterparty’sinitial public offering and the sale of private placement warrants (the “Trust Account”) no later than the earlier of (a)one business day after the Closing Date and (b) the date any assets from the Trust Account are disbursed in connection with the BusinessCombination, except that to the extent the Prepayment Amount payable to a Seller is to be paid from the purchase of Additional Sharesby such Seller pursuant to the terms of its FPA Funding Amount PIPE Subscription Agreement, such amount will be netted against such proceeds,with such Seller being able to reduce the purchase price for the Additional Shares by the Prepayment Amount.
Followingthe Closing, the reset price (the “Reset Price”) will initially be $
| F-52 |
Fromtime to time and on any date following the Trade Date (any such date, an “OET Date”), Seller may, in its discretion, terminateits Forward Purchase Agreement in whole or in part by providing written notice to the Counterparty (the “OET Notice”), bythe later of (a) the fifth Local Business Day following the OET Date and (b) no later than the next Payment Date following the OET Date(which shall specify the quantity by which the Number of Shares shall be reduced (such quantity, the “Terminated Shares”));provided that “Terminated Shares” includes only such quantity of Shares by which the Number of Shares is to be reduced andincluded in an OET Notice and does not include any other Share sales, Shortfall Sale Shares or sales of Shares that are designated asShortfall Sales (which designation can be made only up to the amount of Shortfall Sale Proceeds), any Share Consideration sales or anyother Shares, whether or not sold, which shares will not be included in any OET Notice when calculating the number of Terminated Shares.The effect of an OET Notice shall be to reduce the Number of Shares by the number of Terminated Shares specified in such OET Notice witheffect as of the related OET Date. As of each OET Date, the Counterparty shall be entitled to an amount from the Seller, and the Sellershall pay to the Counterparty an amount, equal to the product of (x) the number of Terminated Shares and (y) the Reset Price in respectof such OET Date, except that no such amount will be due to Counterparty upon any Shortfall Sale. The payment date may be changed withina quarter at the mutual agreement of the parties.
Fromtime to time and on any date following the Trade Date (any such date, a “Shortfall Sale Date”) Seller may, in its absolutediscretion, at any sales price, sell Shortfall Sale Shares, and in connection with such sales, Seller shall provide written notice toCounterparty (the “Shortfall Sale Notice”) no later than the later of (a) the fifth Local Business Day following the ShortfallSales Date and (b) the first Payment Date after the Shortfall Sales Date, specifying the quantity of the Shortfall Sale Shares and theallocation of the Shortfall Sale Proceeds. Seller shall not have any Early Termination Obligation in connection with any Shortfall Sales.The Counterparty covenants and agrees for a period of at least sixty (60) Local Business Days (commencing on the Prepayment Date or ifan earlier Registration Request is submitted by Seller on the Registration Statement Effective Date) not to issue, sell or offer or agreeto sell any Shares, or securities or debt that is convertible, exercisable or exchangeable into Shares, including under any existingor future equity line of credit, until the Shortfall Sales equal the Prepayment Shortfall.
Unlessand until the proceeds from Shortfall Sales equal
(A)Pay in cash an amount equal to the Shortfall Variance; or
(B)Issue and deliver to Seller such number of additional Shares that are equal to (1) the Shortfall Variance, divided by (2)
Thevaluation date will be the earliest to occur of (a)
Onthe Cash Settlement Payment Date, which is the
| F-53 |
Sellerhas agreed to waive any redemption rights under FLAG’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, with respectto any FLAG Class A Common Stock purchased through the FPA Funding Amount PIPE Subscription Agreement and any Recycled Shares in connectionwith the Business Combination, that would require redemption by FLAG of the Class A Common Stock. The Forward Purchase Agreement hasbeen structured, and all activity in connection with such agreement has been undertaken, to comply with the requirements of all tenderoffer regulations applicable to the Business Combination under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Duringthe
OnMarch 8, 2024, the Company and one of the sellers mutually terminated and cancelled shares per the Forward Purchase Agreementdescribed above.
ConvertibleInstruments
TheCompany evaluates and accounts for conversion options embedded in convertible instruments in accordance with ASC 815 – Derivativesand Hedging. Applicable GAAP requires companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for themas freestanding derivative financial instruments according to certain criteria. The criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economiccharacteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics andrisks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract isnot re-measured at fair value under other GAAP with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrumentwith the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument.
TheCompany reviews the terms of convertible instruments issued to determine whether there are embedded derivative instruments, includingembedded conversion options, which are required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately as derivative financial instruments. Incircumstances where the host instrument contains more than one embedded derivative instrument, including the conversion option, thatis required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.
Bifurcatedembedded derivatives are initially recorded at fair value and are then revalued at each reporting date with changes in the fair valuereported as nonoperating income or expense. When the convertible instruments contain embedded derivative instruments that are to be bifurcatedand accounted for as liabilities, the total proceeds received are first allocated to the fair value of all the bifurcated derivativeinstruments. The remaining proceeds, if any, are then allocated to the host instruments themselves, usually resulting in those instrumentsbeing recorded at a discount from their face value. The discount from the face value of the convertible debt, together with the statedinterest on the instrument, is amortized over the life of the instrument through periodic charges to interest expense.
DerivativeFinancial Instruments
TheCompany does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluatesall of its financial instruments, including warrants, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualifyas embedded derivatives in accordance with ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging. The Company values its derivatives using the Black-Scholesoption-pricing model or other acceptable valuation models, as applicable, with the assistance of valuation specialists. Derivative instrumentsaccounted for as liabilities are valued at inception and subsequent valuation dates for each reporting period the derivative instrumentremains outstanding. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities,is reassessed at each reporting period.
| F-54 |
TheCompany evaluates equity or liability classification for common stock warrants in accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilitiesfrom Equity, and ASC 815 and accounts for common stock warrants as liabilities if the warrant requires net cash settlement or givesthe holder the option of net cash settlement or it otherwise does not meet other equity classification criteria. The Company accountsfor common stock warrants as equity if the contract requires physical settlement or net physical settlement or if the Company has theoption of physical settlement or net physical settlement and the warrants meet the requirements to be classified as equity. Common stockwarrants classified as liabilities are initially recorded at fair value and remeasured at fair value at each subsequent reporting periodwith the offset adjustments recorded in change in fair value of warrant liability within the consolidated statements of operations. Commonstock warrants classified as equity are initially measured at fair value on the grant date and are not subsequently remeasured.
Asof December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Forward Purchase Agreement discussed above was accounted for as a derivative asset under ASC 815 –Derivatives and Hedging. The fair value of the Forward Purchase Agreement at the closing of the Business Combination was estimatedto be a $
DebtIssuance Costs
Debtissuance costs incurred to obtain debt financings are deferred and are amortized over the term of the debt using the effective interestmethod for all debt financings in which the fair value option has not been elected. Debt issuance costs on debt financings in which thefair value option is not elected are recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of the debt and are amortized to interest expenseor interest expense — related party, as applicable, in the consolidated statements of operations.
Forany debt financing in which the Company has elected the fair value option, any debt issuance costs associated with the debt financingare immediately recognized in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations and are not deferred.
RevenueRecognition
Todate, the Company has not generated any revenues from commercial products. The Company analyzes its research collaboration arrangementsto assess whether they are within the scope of ASC Topic 808, Collaborative Arrangements (“ASC 808”), to determine whethersuch arrangements involve joint operating activities performed by parties that are both active participants in the activities and exposedto significant risks and rewards that are dependent on the commercial success of such activities. To the extent the arrangement is withinthe scope of ASC 808, the Company assesses whether aspects of the arrangement is within the scope of other accounting literature.
Ifthe Company concludes that some or all aspects of the arrangement represent a transaction with a customer, the Company accounts for thoseaspects of the arrangement within the scope of ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), by applyingthe following five-step model: (i) identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer; (ii) identification of the performanceobligations in the contract, including whether they are distinct within the context of the contract; (iii) determination of the transactionprice, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations inthe contract; and (v) recognition of revenue when, or as, performance obligations are satisfied.
Ifa contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606 at inception, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within thecontract, determines which of those goods and services are performance obligations, and assesses whether each promised good or serviceis distinct. The Company considers the intended benefit of the contract in assessing whether a promised good or service is separatelyidentifiable from other promises in the contract. If a promised good or service is not distinct, the Company combines that good or servicewith other promised goods or services until it identifies a bundle of goods or services that is distinct. The Company may provide optionsto additional goods or services in such arrangements exercisable at a customer’s discretion. The Company assesses if these optionsprovide a material right to the customer and if so, they are considered performance obligations. The identification of material rightsrequires judgments related to the determination of the value of the underlying good and services to the optional price, if any, thatmay be offered.
| F-55 |
TheCompany determines the transaction price based on the amount of consideration that the Company expects to receive for transferring thepromised goods or services in the contract. Consideration may be fixed, variable, or a combination of both. The Company then allocatesthe transaction price to each performance obligation based on the relative standalone selling prices (“SSP”). SSP is determinedat contract inception and is not updated to reflect changes between contract inception and when the performance obligations are satisfied.In developing the SSP for a performance obligation, the Company considers applicable market conditions and relevant entity-specific factors,including factors that were contemplated in negotiating the agreement with the customer and estimated costs.
Ifthe consideration promised in a contract includes a variable amount, the Company estimates the amount of consideration to which it willbe entitled by using the expected value method or the most likely amount method. The Company includes the unconstrained amount of estimatedvariable consideration in the transaction price. The amount included in the transaction price is constrained to the amount for whichit is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. At each reporting period, the Company re-evaluatesthe estimated variable consideration included in the transaction price and any related constraint, and if necessary, adjusts its estimateof the overall transaction price.
TheCompany recognizes revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as)the performance obligation is satisfied, either at a point in time or over time, and if over time, recognition is based on the use ofan output or input method. Amounts received prior to satisfying the revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue inthe Company’s consolidated balance sheets. If the related performance obligation is expected to be satisfied within the next twelvemonths, deferred revenue will be classified in current liabilities. Revenue recognized, if any, prior to contractual billings made tothe customer, and if the Company expects to have an unconditional right to receive the consideration in the next twelve months, thesecontractual assets are included in other current assets in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2024,and December 31, 2023, there are no deferred revenue or contractual assets recorded.
TheCompany further analyzes changes to contracts from customers to assess whether they qualify as a contract modification within the scopeof ASC 606. The Company considers that a contract modification exists when the parties to a contract approve a modification that eithercreates new, or changes, existing enforceable rights and obligations of the parties to the contract. The Company considers that a contractapproval could be approved in writing, by oral agreement, or implied by customary practices. Whenever a change in the scope or price,or both, of a contract is approved by the parties to the contract, the Company analyzes whether the contract modification qualifies asa separate contract or a contract combination.
TheCompany accounts for a contract modification as a separate contract when (i) the scope of the contract increases because of the additionof promised goods or services that are distinct and (ii) the price of the contract increases by an amount of consideration that reflectsthe Company’s SSP of the additional promised goods or services and any appropriate adjustments to that price to reflect the circumstancesof the particular contract. If the modification is not accounted for as a separate contract, the Company analyzes whether one of thefollowing should occur: (i) a termination of the original contract and the creation of a new contract, (ii) a cumulative catch-up adjustmentto the original contract, or (iii) a combination of (i) and (ii) in a way that faithfully reflects the economics of the transaction.
| F-56 |
IncomeTaxes
TheCompany accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, using the asset and liability method, which requiresthe recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized inthe consolidated financial statements or in the Company’s tax returns. Deferred taxes are determined based on the difference betweenthe consolidated financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in whichthe differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded in the provision for income taxes.The Company assesses the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be realized and, to the extent it believes, based upon the weightof available evidence, that it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuationallowance is established through a charge to income tax expense. The potential for recovery of deferred tax assets is evaluated by analyzingcarryback capacity in periods with taxable income, reversal of existing taxable temporary differences and estimating the future taxableprofits expected and considering prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. The Company’s judgments regarding future taxableincome may change over time due to changes in market conditions, changes in tax laws, tax planning strategies or other factors. If theCompany’s assumptions and consequently its estimates change in the future, the valuation allowance may be increased or decreased,which may have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
TheCompany accounts for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the consolidated financial statements by applying a two-step process todetermine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized, if any. First, the tax position must be evaluated to determine the likelihood thatit will be sustained upon external examination by the taxing authorities. If the tax position is deemed more-likely-than-not to be sustained,the tax position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the consolidated financial statements. The amountof the benefit that may be recognized is the largest amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.The provision for income taxes includes the effects of any resulting tax reserves, or unrecognized tax benefits, that are consideredappropriate as well as the related net interest and penalties. The Company recognizes any interest and penalties related to uncertaintax positions in income tax expense. No amounts were accrued for the payment of interest and penalties as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.The Company is not aware of any uncertain tax positions that could result in significant additional payments, accruals, or other materialdeviation for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. The Company is currently unaware of any tax issues under review.
TheInflation Reduction Act of 2022 specifically introduces the topic of corporate alternative minimum tax (“CAMT”) on adjustedfinancial statement income on applicable corporations for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022. The Company does not expectthe CAMT will have a material impact to its consolidated income tax provision (see Note 10).
UnderSection 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and corresponding provisions of state law, if a corporation undergoes an“ownership change,” which generally occurs if the percentage of the corporation’s stock owned by 5% stockholders increasesby more than 50% over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change NOL carryforwards and other pre-changetax attributes to offset its post-change income may be limited. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating lossesbefore utilization. The Company performed a Section 382 study for the period February 15, 2015 to December 31, 2021. There was an ownershipchange identified on March 26, 2018 after the Company’s Series A-2 preferred stock issuance. The Company has not undertaken a Section382 study through December 31, 2024. The Company’s ability to utilize their net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributesto offset future taxable income or tax liabilities may be limited as a result of ownership changes.
GovernmentGrants
OnOctober 27, 2022, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (“CIRM”) approved the Company’s application fora CIRM grant for the Company’s continued development of the SNV1 program. CIRM awarded the Company approximately $
Proceedsfrom the CIRM grant are recognized over the period necessary to match the related research and development expenses when it is probablethat the Company has complied with the CIRM conditions and will receive the proceeds pursuant to the milestones defined in the grantas reimbursement of those expenditures. The CIRM grant proceeds, if any, received in advance of having incurred the related researchand development expenses are recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and recognized as grant income included in otherincome (expense), net, on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations when the related research and developments expensesare incurred.
| F-57 |
Duringthe year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recognized approximately $
Researchand Development Expenses
Researchand development expenses are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses consist of costs incurred to discover, researchand develop drug candidates, including compensation-related expenses for research and development personnel, including stock-based compensationexpense, preclinical and clinical activities, costs of manufacturing, overhead expenses including facilities and laboratory expenses,materials and supplies, amounts paid to consultants and outside service providers, and depreciation and amortization.
Upfrontand annual license payments related to acquired technologies or technology licenses which have not yet reached technological feasibilityand have no alternative future use are also included in research and development expense in the period in which they are incurred.
Generaland Administrative Expenses
Generaland administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related costs, including stock-based compensation expense, for personnelin executive, finance and accounting, business development, operations and administrative functions. General and administrative expensesalso include fees for legal, patent prosecution, legal settlements, consulting, charge off of deferred financing costs for aborted orterminated financing offerings, accounting and audit services as well as insurance, outside service providers, direct and allocated facility-relatedcosts and depreciation and amortization.
ForeignCurrency Translation Adjustments and Other Comprehensive Income or Loss
StemVac,the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, is located and operates in Germany and its functional currency is the Euro. Calidi Australia,the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, is located and operates in Australia and its functional currency is the Australian Dollar(“AUD”). Accordingly, StemVac’s and Calidi Australia’s assets and liabilities are translated using respectivepublished exchange rates in effect at the consolidated balance sheet date. Expenses and cash flows are translated using respective approximateweighted average exchange rates for the reporting period. Resulting foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded as other comprehensiveincome or loss, net of tax, in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income or loss and included as a component of accumulatedother comprehensive income or loss on the consolidated balance sheets. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, comprehensiveloss includes such foreign currency translation adjustments and was insignificant for all periods presented.
ForeignCurrency Transaction Gains and Losses
Fortransactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the Company recognizes foreign currency transaction gains and lossesin the consolidated statements of operations and classifies the gain or loss based on the nature of the item that generated it. The Company’sforeign currency transaction gains and losses are principally generated by intercompany transfers to StemVac denominated in Euros topay for the research and development activities performed by StemVac under an intercompany development agreement with the Company. Furthermore,the Company’s foreign currency transaction gains and losses include intercompany transfers to Calidi Australia denominated in AUDto pay for the research and development activities performed by Calidi Australia. These foreign currency remeasurement gains and lossesare included in other income (expense), net, and were insignificant for all periods presented.
Stock-BasedCompensation
TheCompany recognizes compensation expense related to employee option grants and restricted stock grants, if any, in accordance with ASC718, Compensation — Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”).
| F-58 |
TheCompany measures all stock options and other stock-based awards granted based on the fair value of the award on the date of the grantand recognizes compensation expense for those awards over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of therespective award. The Company has elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur. The reversal of compensation cost previously recognizedfor an award that is forfeited because of a failure to satisfy a service condition is recognized in the period of the forfeiture. Generallyand unless otherwise specified, the Company’s grants stock options with service-based only vesting conditions and records the expensefor these awards using the straight-line method over the requisite service period.
TheCompany classifies stock-based compensation expense in its consolidated statements of operations in the same manner in which the awardrecipient’s payroll costs are classified or in which the award recipients’ service payments are classified.
TheCompany estimated the fair value of common stock through the date of the FLAG Merger using an appropriate valuation methodology, in accordancewith the framework of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Technical Practice Aid, Valuation of Privately-HeldCompany Equity Securities Issued as Compensation. Each valuation methodology includes estimates and assumptions that require the Company’sjudgment. These estimates and assumptions include a number of objective and subjective factors, including external market conditions,guideline public company information, the prices at which the Company sold convertible preferred stock and common stock to third partiesin arms’ length transactions, the rights and preferences of securities senior to the Company’s common stock at the time,and the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event such as an initial public offering or sale. Significant changes to the assumptionsused in the valuations could result in materially different fair values of stock options at each valuation date, as applicable. Followingthe FLAG Merger, the Company used the public price of its common stock.
Thefair value of each stock option grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company estimates its expected stockvolatility based on the historical volatility of a publicly traded set of peer companies within the biotechnology industry with characteristicssimilar to the Company. The expected term of the Company’s stock options has been determined utilizing the “simplified”method for awards that qualify as “plain-vanilla” options provided under Staff Accounting Bulletin, Topic 14, or SAB Topic14, as necessary. The risk-free interest rate is determined by reference to the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grantof the award for time periods approximately equal to the expected term of the award. Expected dividend yield is zero, based on the factthat the Company has never paid cash dividends and does not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Earningsper share attributable to common stockholders is calculated using the two-class method, which is an earnings allocation formula thatdetermines earnings per share for the holders of the Company’s common shares and participating securities. Net loss attributableto common stockholders and participating securities is allocated to each share on an if-converted basis as if all of the earnings forthe period had been distributed. However, the participating securities do not include a contractual obligation to share in the lossesof the Company and are not included in the calculation of net loss per share in the periods that have a net loss. In addition, commonstock equivalent shares (whether or not participating) are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share in periods inwhich they have an anti-dilutive effect on net loss per common share.
Dilutednet loss per share is computed using the more dilutive of (a) the two-class method or (b) the if-converted method and treasury stockmethod, as applicable. In periods in which the Company reports a net loss attributable to common stockholders, diluted net loss per shareattributable to common stockholders is the same as basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders since dilutive commonshares are not assumed to have been issued if their effect is anti-dilutive. Diluted net loss per share is equivalent to basic net lossper share for the periods presented herein because common stock equivalent shares from the outstanding warrants, earnout shares, convertiblenotes, stock option awards, restricted stock units, and contingently issuable warrants were antidilutive.
| F-59 |
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 (2) | |||||||
| Warrants for common stock | ||||||||
| Earnout Shares | ||||||||
| Employee stock options | ||||||||
| Restricted stock units | ||||||||
| Contingently issuable warrant(1) | ||||||||
| Total common stock equivalents | ||||||||
| (1) | |
| (2) |
Segments
Operatingsegments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluationby the chief operating decision maker (or CODM), the Executive Management Team, consisting of the following individuals:
| ● | Chief Executive Officer | |
| ● | Chief Financial Officer | |
| ● | Chief Legal Officer | |
| ● | Chief Scientific Officer and Head of Technical Operations | |
| ● | President of Medical and Clinical Affairs and Interim Chief Medical Officer |
TheCompany views it operations and manages its business as a single reportable segment whose operations includes the research, developmentand commercialization efforts of cell-based platforms to potentiate oncolytic virus therapies on a consolidated basis, as further describedin Note 1. The Company manages its R&D activities on a consolidated basis. The Company expects to generate future income froma combination of license fees and other upfront payments, funded R&D agreements, milestone payments, product sales, government andother third-party funding, and royalties, which depend on the results, regulatory approval, and timing of the successful commercializationof the Company’s products.
Netloss is the measure of segment profit or loss used by CODM in making decisions regarding resource allocation and evaluating financialperformance, which is also reported on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The CODM does not evaluate itsreportable segment using asset or liability information. The CODM uses net loss in making decisions regarding resource allocationand evaluating financial performance.
| F-60 |
Thefollowing table presents selected financial information with respect to the Company’s single operating segment for the years endedDecember 31, 2024 and 2023:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||
| Salaries and benefits | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Insurance | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Legal | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Consulting | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Rent and Maintenance | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Clinical & research and development | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Depreciation expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Series B convertible preferred stock financing costs – related party | ( | ) | ||||||
| Change in fair value of debt, other liabilities, and derivatives | ||||||||
| Other segment items (1) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Income tax provision | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| NET LOSS | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| (1) |
RecentlyAdopted Accounting Pronouncements
InNovember 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvementsto Reportable Segment Disclosures, which requires public entities to disclose information about their reportable segments’significant expenses and other segment items on an interim and annual basis. Public entities with a single reportable segment are requiredto apply the disclosure requirements in ASU 2023-07, as well as all existing segment disclosures and reconciliation requirements in ASC280 on an interim and annual basis. ASU 2023-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and for interim periodswithin fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. On January 1, 2024, the Company adopted ASU 2023-07and the adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements, other than disclosures.
InJune 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2022-03, Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions (“ASU2022-03”) which clarifies that a contractual restriction on the sale of an equity security is not considered part of the unit ofaccount of the equity security and, therefore, is not considered in measuring fair value. ASU 2022-03 is effective for public businessentities for fiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2023. On January 1, 2024,the Company adopted ASU 2022-03 and the standard did not have any impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosuresas the Company carries no such financial instruments.
RecentlyIssued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
InDecember 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (Topic 740). The ASU requires disaggregatedinformation about a reporting entity’s effective tax rate reconciliation as well as additional information on income taxes paid.The ASU is effective on a prospective basis for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is also permitted forannual financial statements that have not yet been issued or made available for issuance. The Company is currently evaluating the impactof adopting ASU 2023-09.
| F-61 |
3.Fair Value Measurements
Thefollowing table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, inclusive ofrelated party components, as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 (in thousands):
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Restricted cash held in a money market account | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Forward Purchase Agreement Derivative Asset included in other noncurrent assets | ||||||||||||||||
| Total assets, at fair value | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Public Warrants | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Private Warrants | ||||||||||||||||
| Total warrant liabilities, at fair value | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Restricted cash held in a money market account | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Forward Purchase Agreement Derivative Asset included in other noncurrent assets | ||||||||||||||||
| Total assets, at fair value | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Public Warrants | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Private Warrants | ||||||||||||||||
| Total warrant liabilities, at fair value | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
TheCompany’s financial instruments consist of cash, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses,and other current liabilities. The carrying value of these financial instruments is generally considered to approximate their fair valuesbecause of the short-term nature of those instruments.
Thefollowing table presents the changes in fair value of valued instruments for the year ended December 31, 2024 (in thousands):
| Forward Purchase Agreement Derivative Asset, at fair value | Public Warrants, at fair value | Private warrants, at fair value | ||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2024 | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||
| Change in fair value | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2024 | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | |||||||
| F-62 |
Thefollowing table presents the changes in fair value of valued instruments for the year ended December 31, 2023 (in thousands):
| Contingently convertible notes payable, including accrued interest, at fair value | SAFEs | Series B convertible preferred stock, at fair value | Forward Purchase Agreement Derivative Asset, at fair value | Public Warrants, at fair value | Private Placement Warrants, at fair value | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recognition of Forward Purchase Agreement Derivative Asset | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warrants Liability assumed at the close of the FLAG Merger as of September 12, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of SAFE in lieu of cash for advisory services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss at inception | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Conversion into Common Stock | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||
4.Selected Balance Sheet Components
AccruedExpenses and Other Current Liabilities
Asof December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, accrued expenses and other current liabilities were comprised of the following (in thousands):
December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||
| Accrued compensation(1) | $ | $ | ||||||
| Accrued vendor and other expenses | ||||||||
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||
| (1) |
SeeNote 11 for additional commitments.
PrepaidExpenses and Other Current Assets
Asof December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, prepaid expenses and other current assets were comprised of the following (in thousands):
December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||
| Prepaid expenses | $ | $ | ||||||
| Prepaid insurance | ||||||||
| CIRM receivable | ||||||||
| Other | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | $ | $ | ||||||
5.Machinery and Equipment, net
Asof December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, machinery and equipment, net, was comprised of the following (in thousands):
December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||
| Machinery and equipment | $ | $ | ||||||
| Accumulated depreciation | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Machinery and equipment, net | $ | $ | ||||||
Depreciationexpense amounted to approximately $
| F-63 |
6.Related Party Transactions
TheCompany has funded its operations to date primarily through private sales of convertible preferred stock, contingently convertible andconvertible promissory notes, and common stock. These investments have included various related parties, including from AJC Capital andcertain directors as further discussed below.
Thefollowing table presents the various significant related party transactions and investments in the Company for the periods presented(in thousands):
| Related Party | Description of investment or transaction | December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||
| Director A and Director E | ||||||||||
| Director A | ||||||||||
| AJC Capital and relative of Officer A | ||||||||||
| Director D | ||||||||||
| Director A | ||||||||||
| AJC Capital | ||||||||||
| Director A | ||||||||||
| AJC Capital and Director A | ||||||||||
| Relative of Officer A | ||||||||||
| (1) | |
| (2) | |
| (3) | |
| (4) | |
| (5) | |
| (6) | |
| (7) | |
| (8) |
| F-64 |
7.Debt
TheCompany’s outstanding debt obligations as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, including related party components, are asfollows (in thousands):
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
Unpaid Balance | Discount | Accrued Interest | Net Carrying Value | |||||||||||||
| Term notes payable | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Bridge loan payable | ||||||||||||||||
| Promissory note | ||||||||||||||||
| Total debt | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Less: current portion of long-term debt | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt, net of current portion | $ | |||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||
Unpaid Balance | Discount | Accrued Interest | Net Carrying Value | |||||||||||||
| Term notes payable | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Total debt | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Less: current portion of long-term debt | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt, net of current portion | $ | |||||||||||||||
Scheduledmaturities of outstanding debt, net of discounts as of December 31, 2024 are as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ending December 31: | ||||
| 2025 | $ | |||
| 2026 | ||||
| 2027 | ||||
| 2028 and thereafter | ||||
| Plus: accrued interest | ||||
| Total debt | $ |
Thefollowing discussion includes a description of the Company’s outstanding debt as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. Theweighted average interest rate related to the Company’s outstanding debt was approximately
| F-65 |
TermNotes Payable
2021Term Note Payable
InJanuary 2021, the Company entered into a note agreement with a related party investor and director to borrow up to $
Inconnection with the closing of the FLAG Merger on September 12, 2023, the 2021 Term Note plus accrued interest was amended, with an extendedmaturity date of January 1, 2025. For this holder, a related party, the Company agreed to accrue an interest rate of
Theinterest rate on the 2021 Term Notes was amended on August 12, 2024, to
Asof December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the interest rate of the 2021 Term Notes was
2022Term Notes Payable
InNovember and December 2022, the Company issued $
OnSeptember 12, 2023, with regard to the 2022 Term Notes, approximately $
OnOctober 3 and November 8, 2023, the Company settled in cash $
OnMarch 1, 2024, the maturity date of $
OnApril 12, 2024, the maturity date of $
| F-66 |
Theinterest rate of
Asof December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the interest rate of the 2022 Term Notes was
2023Term Notes Payable
FromJanuary through September 2023, the Company issued $
OnSeptember 12, 2023, approximately $
OnOctober 3, 2023, as agreed upon above in connection with the Closing of the FLAG Merger, the Company settled in cash $
OnApril 12, 2024, the maturity date of $
Duringthe year ended December 31, 2024, the Company settled in cash $
Theinterest rate of
OnDecember 23, 2024, pursuant to the debt amendment on $
Asof December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the interest rate of the 2023 Term Notes was
| F-67 |
2024Bridge Loan
OnJanuary 19, 2024, the Company received approximately $
Asof December 31, 2024, the total carrying value of the 2024 Bridge Loan, including accrued interest and net of debt discount, was $
ConvertiblePromissory Notes
OnJanuary 26, 2024, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note purchase agreement (the “2024 Purchase Agreement”)with an Accredited Investor (the “Investor”) for a loan in the principal amount of $
OnApril 18, 2024, pursuant to the April Public Offering (see Note 1), the Company’s $
ConvertiblePromissory Notes and Unasserted Claim Settlement
OnMarch 8, 2024, the Company entered into settlement agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) with an investor who previously enterinto a series of related agreements including (i) an agreement with Calidi Cure to fund the purchase of Calidi Series B Preferred Stock;(ii) a Non-Redemption Agreement with the Company; (iii) an OTC Equity Prepaid Forward Purchase Agreement with the Company; and (iv) aSubscription Agreement with the Company (items (i) through (iv) collectively “the Supplemental Funding Agreements”) for thepurpose of satisfying the “Minimum Cash Condition” required under the Business Combination agreement between First LightAcquisition Group, Inc., and Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc., a Nevada corporation among others. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, (i)the investor purchased a $
| F-68 |
OnApril 14, 2024, the $
Duringthe year ended December 31, 2024, the $
PromissoryNote Loan Agreement
OnJuly 1, 2024, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with a third party lender (the “Lender”). Under the Loan Agreement,the Lender agreed to loan the Company the principal amount of $
ThePromissory Note bears a simple interest rate at
8.Convertible Preferred Stock, Common Stock and Stockholders’ Equity
PreferredStock
Pursuantto the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed on September 19, 2023, as amended (“the Amended Articles”),the Company is authorized to issue a total of shares of preferred stock, par value $ per share. As of December 31, 2024and 2023, there were shares of preferred stock outstanding.
ConvertiblePreferred Stock
Inconnection with the closing of the FLAG Merger on September 12, 2023, all Convertible Preferred Stock, including the Series B ConvertiblePreferred stock classified as a liability which were completed as to the Series B financing, were converted to Calidi common stock pursuantto the conversion provisions and were longer outstanding as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.
CommonStock
Pursuantto the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Company is authorized to issue shares of common stock,par value $ per share, of which shares are designated as Voting Common Stock (“Common Stock”) and are designated as Non-Voting Common Stock (the “Non-Voting Common Stock”). As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023,there were and shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively, and shares of non-voting commonstock outstanding. Since inception to date,
| F-69 |
Duringthe year ended December 31, 2024, the Company issued shares of common stock in lieu of cash for certainservices (see Note 11), shares of common stock in lieu of cash for paymentof a commitment fee related to the Company’s SEPA agreement (see Note 11),
Duringthe year ended December 31, 2023, the Company issued shares of common stock in connection with the conversion of convertiblepreferred stock (see above),
Asof December 31, 2024 and 2023, common stock reserved for future issuance consisted of the following:
December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||
| Common stock warrants outstanding | ||||||||
| Common stock options issued and outstanding | ||||||||
| Restricted stock units vested and unreleased | ||||||||
| Shares available for future issuance under the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan | ||||||||
| Shares reserved under the 2023 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | ||||||||
AprilPublic Offering
OnApril 18, 2024, in connection with the April Public Offering (see Note 1), the Company sold an aggregate of
EachCommon Stock Unit consists of: (i) one share of the Company’s voting common, (ii) a Series A warrant to purchase one share commonstock, (iii) a Series B warrant to purchase one Series B Unit, with each Series B Unit consisting of (a) one share of common stock and(b) a Series B-1 Warrant to purchase one share of common stock, and (iv) a Series C warrant to purchase one Series C Unit, with eachSeries C Unit consisting of (a) one share of common stock and (b) a Series C-1 Warrant to purchase one share of common stock. See furtherwarrant details per each issued series below.
EachPFW Unit consists of: (i) a pre-funded warrant to purchase one share of common stock, (ii) a Series A warrant to purchase one share commonstock, (iii) a Series B warrant to purchase one Series B Unit, with each Series B Unit consisting of (a) one share of common stock and(b) a Series B-1 Warrant to purchase one share of common stock, and (iv) a Series C warrant to purchase one Series C Unit, with eachSeries C Unit consisting of (a) one share of common stock and (b) a Series C-1 Warrant to purchase one share of common stock. See furtherwarrant details per each issued series below.
| F-70 |
TheCompany issued the Placement Agent common stock warrants to purchase up to
MayInducement Offer
OnMay 31, 2024, following the closing of the May Inducement Offer (see Note 1), warrant holders immediately exercised some or all of theirrespective outstanding Series B Warrants and C Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of
TheCompany accounted for the exercise price decrease of the Existing Warrants as a modification. Based on the nature of the modification(i.e., reduction in exercise price to induce exercise and raise additional capital), the modification was accounted for as an equityissuance cost on the date the offer was accepted by the Holders, calculated as the excess fair value of the modified warrants post modification.
TheCompany issued the Placement Agent common stock warrants to purchase up to
SubscriptionAgreement
OnJuly 26, 2024, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a Subscription Agreement dated July 28, 2024 entered with an accreditedinvestor, a related-party (see Note 1). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company sold to the Investor and the Investor purchased, (i)
AtThe Market Offering Agreement
OnOctober 11, 2024, the Company entered into an At The Market Offering Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Ladenburg Thalmann& Co. Inc. (“Ladenburg”), under which the Company may, from time to time, in its sole discretion, issue and sell throughLadenburg, acting as agent or principal, shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $ per share, initially having anaggregate offering price of up to $ million. Pursuant to the Sales Agreement, Ladenburg may sell the Shares by any method permittedby law deemed to be an “at the market” offering as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Ladenburgwill use commercially reasonable efforts consistent with its normal trading and sales practices to sell the Shares from time to time,based upon instructions from the Company (including any price or size limits or other customary parameters or conditions the Companymay impose).
TheCompany will pay Ladenburg a cash commission of
Underthe terms of the Sales Agreement, the Company may also sell shares to Ladenburg as principal for its own account at prices agreed uponat the time of sale. If the Company sells shares to Ladenburg as principal, it will enter into a separate terms agreement with Ladenburgin substantially the form attached to the Sales Agreement. The Company is not obligated to sell any shares under the Sales Agreement.The offering of the shares pursuant to the Sales Agreement may be terminated by either the Company or Ladenburg, as permitted therein.
OnFebruary 4, 2025, the Company increased the maximum aggregate offering amount of the shares of the Company’s common stock, parvalue $ per share issuable under the At The Market Offering Agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., dated October 11,2024, from $
| F-71 |
OctoberPublic Offering
OnOctober 23, 2024, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutionalinvestors (the “Purchasers”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the Purchasers, (i) in a registered offering, shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $ per share, at a purchase price of $
Theclosing of the Transactions took place on October 24, 2024. The gross proceeds from the Transactions were approximately $
Theshares were offered by the Company pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-282456), which was declared effectiveby the Securities Exchange Commission on October 10, 2024.
TheCompany issued the Placement Agent common stock warrants to purchase up to
NovemberPublic Offering
OnNovember 14, 2024, the Company entered into a Placement Agency Agreement with Ladenburg (the “Placement Agent”), pursuantto which the Company agreed to issue in a public offering shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”),par value $ per share (“Common Stock”), at a purchase price of $ per Share.
Theclosing of the offering took place on November 15, 2024. The gross proceeds from the offering were approximately $
TheShares were offered by the Company pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3, which was declared effective by the SecuritiesExchange Commission on October 10, 2024.
TheCompany issued the Placement Agent common stock warrants to purchase up to shares of Common Stock. See further warrant detailsbelow.
NovaCell Investment
OnJuly 26, 2024, the Board of Directors of the Company acknowledged a strategic investment of approximately $
| F-72 |
Warrants
Asof December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company has outstanding warrants to purchase
December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 (1) | |||||||
| Private Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Public Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Warrants to purchase Restricted Shares | ||||||||
| Placement Agent Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series A Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series B Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series B-1 Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series C-1 Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series D Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series E Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| Series F Warrants to purchase Common Stock | ||||||||
| (1) |
PrivateWarrants
Inconnection with the closing of the FLAG Merger on September 12, 2023, the Company assumed private warrants to purchase
Asof December 31, 2024 and 2023, Private Warrants to purchase ofCommon Stock remain outstanding.
PublicWarrants
Inconnection with the closing of the FLAG Merger on September 12, 2023, the Company assumed
TheCompany may redeem the outstanding Public Warrants for $ per warrant upon at least days’ prior written notice of redemptiongiven after the warrants become exercisable, if the reported last sale price of the common stock equals or exceeds $ per share(as adjusted for stock dividends, sub-divisions, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within a 30-tradingday period commencing after the warrants become exercisable and ending on the third trading day before the Company sends the notice ofredemption to the warrant holders. Upon issuance of a redemption notice by the Company, the warrant holders may, at any time after theredemption notice, exercise the public warrants on a cashless basis.
| F-73 |
TheCompany accounts for the public warrants in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 815-40. Such guidance provides that becausethe warrants do not meet the criteria for equity treatment thereunder, each warrant must be recorded as a liability.
Theaccounting treatment of derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, requires that theCompany record a derivative liability upon the closing of the FLAG Merger. Accordingly, the Company classifies each warrant as a liabilityat its fair value and the warrants were allocated a portion of the proceeds from the issuance of the Units equal to its fair value. Thisliability is subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date. With each such re-measurement, the warrant liability will be adjustedto fair value, with the change in fair value recognized in the Company’s statement of operations. The Company will reassess theclassification at each balance sheet date. If the classification changes as a result of events during the period, the warrants will bereclassified as of the date of the event that causes the reclassification.
OnOctober 17, 2024, the Company received notice from the NYSE that the Company’s Public Warrants to purchase common stock are nolonger suitable for listing pursuant to Section 1001 of the NYSE American Company Guide due to the low trading price of such public warrants,and that the NYSE Regulation has determined to commence proceedings to delist the public warrants. The Public Warrants may be tradedon the OTC Pink Marketplace under the symbol CLDWW.
Asof December 31, 2024 and 2023, Public Warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock remained outstanding.
Warrantsto Purchase Restricted Shares
OnFebruary 21, 2024, in connection with a settlement agreement (see Note 11), the Company issued additional warrants to purchase
On July 26, 2024, pursuant toa subscription agreement entered into with an accredited investor, a related-party (see Note 11), the Company sold to the investor warrantsto purchase 600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, which (i) have an exercise price equal to $1.90 per share; and (ii) areexercisable for 3 years after the date of issuance of the warrants, subject to the terms set forth in such warrant.
As of December 31, 2024, non-serieswarrants to purchase 640,000 shares of Calidi common stock remained outstanding. There were no such warrants as of December 31, 2023.
PlacementAgent Warrants
OnApril 18, 2024, in connection with the closing of the April Public Offering (see Note 1), the Company issued to the placement agent warrantsto purchase up to
OnJune 3, 2024, in connection with the closing of the May Inducement Offer (see Note 1), the Company issued to the placement agent warrantsto purchase up to
OnOctober 23, 2024, in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement (see Note 1), the Company issued to the placement agent warrantsto purchase up to
OnNovember 14, 2024, in connection with a Placement Agency Agreement (see Note 1), the Company issued to the placement agent warrants topurchase up to
Asof December 31, 2024, placement agent warrants to purchase a total of shares of common stock remained outstanding. There wereno such warrants as of December 31, 2023.
| F-74 |
SeriesA Warrants
OnApril 18, 2024, in connection with the closing of the April Public Offering (see Note 1), the Company issued Series A warrants to purchase
Pursuantto the Reverse Stock Split effected July 15, 2024 (See Note 1), the exercise price of the Series A warrants was reset to $
Duringthe year ended December 31, 2024, Series A warrants to purchase
Asof December 31, 2024, Series A warrants to purchase shares of common stock remained outstanding. There were no such warrantsas of December 31, 2023.
SeriesB Warrants
OnApril 18, 2024, in connection with the closing of the April Public Offering (see Note 1), the Company issued Series B warrants to purchase
SeriesB warrants to purchase
Pursuantto the Reverse Stock Split effected July 15, 2024 (See Note 1), the exercise price of the Series B warrants was reset to $
Duringthe year ended December 31, 2024, Series B warrants to purchase
Asof December 31, 2024, Series B warrants to purchase shares of common stock remained outstanding. There were no such warrantsas of December 31, 2023.
SeriesC Warrants
OnApril 18, 2024, in connection with the closing of the April Public Offering (see Note 1), the Company issued Series C warrants to purchase
SeriesC warrants to purchase
Pursuantto the Reverse Stock Split effected July 15, 2024 (See Note 1), the exercise price of the Series C warrants was reset to $
| F-75 |
Duringthe year ended December 31, 2024, Series C warrants to purchase
Asof December 31, 2024 Series C warrants remained outstanding. There were no such warrants as of December 31, 2023.
SeriesB-1 Warrants
OnJune 3, 2024, in connection with the closing of the May Inducement Offer (see Note 1), the Company issued Series B-1 warrants to purchase
Pursuantto the Reverse Stock Split effected July 15, 2024 (See Note 1), the exercise price of the Series B-1 warrants was reset to $
Duringthe year ended December 31, 2024, pursuant to the terms of the Series B Warrants, the Company issued Series B-1 warrants to purchase
Asof December 31, 2024, Series B-1 warrants to purchase shares of common stock remained outstanding. There were no such warrantsas of December 31, 2023.
SeriesC-1 Warrants
OnJune 3, 2024, in connection with the closing of the May Inducement Offer (see Note 1), the Company issued Series C-1 warrants to purchase
Pursuantto the issuance of common stock per the Series C-1 warrant exercises, the Company received gross proceeds of approximately $
Duringthe year ended December 31, 2024, pursuant to the terms of the Series C Warrants, the Company issued Series C-1 warrants to purchase
Asof December 31, 2024, Series C-1 warrants to purchase shares of common stock remained outstanding. There were no such warrantsas of December 31, 2023.
SeriesD Warrants
OnJune 3, 2024, in connection with the closing of the May Inducement Offer (see Note 1), the Company issued Series D warrants to purchase
| F-76 |
Pursuantto the Reverse Stock Split effected July 15, 2024 (See Note 1), the exercise price of the Series D warrants was reset to $
Asof December 31, 2024, Series D warrants to purchase shares of common stock remained outstanding. There were no such warrantsas of December 31, 2023.
SeriesE Warrants
OnOctober 23, 2024, in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement with certain institutional investors (see Note 1), the Companyissued Series E warrants to purchase
Asof December 31, 2024, Series E warrants to purchase shares of common stock remained outstanding. There were
SeriesF Warrants
OnOctober 23, 2024, in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement with certain institutional investors (see Note 1), the Companyissued Series F warrants to purchase
Asof December 31, 2024, Series F warrants to purchase shares of common stock remained outstanding. There were no such warrantsas of December 31, 2023.
Thefollowing table summarizes the Company’s aggregate warrant activity for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Number of Warrants | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | ||||||||||
| Outstanding at January 1, 2024 | $ | |||||||||||
| Issued | — | — | ||||||||||
| Exercised | ( | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Expired | ( | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2024 | $ | |||||||||||
Thefollowing table summarizes the Company’s aggregate warrant activity for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Number of Warrants (1) | Weighted Average Exercise Price (1) | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | ||||||||||
| Outstanding at January 1, 2023 | $ | |||||||||||
| Issued | — | — | ||||||||||
| Exercised | — | — | ||||||||||
| Converted into Common Stock | ( | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2023 | $ | |||||||||||
| (1) |
| F-77 |
EquityIncentive Plans
Priorto January 1, 2019, the Company adopted the 2016 Stock Plan (the “2016 Plan”) under which the Company was authorized to grantstock options, restricted stock, a stock appreciation right, or a restricted stock unit award. In June 2019, the Company adopted the2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”) to replace the 2016 Plan. Other than the change of plan name and incorporationstate, all the terms of the 2016 Plan were carried over into the 2019 Plan. In adopting the 2019 Plan, the Company terminated the 2016Plan and may no longer grant any additional stock options or sell any stock under restricted stock purchase agreements under the 2016Plan; however, stock options issued under the 2016 Plan will continue to be in effect in accordance with their terms and the termsof the 2019 Plan, which are substantially the same terms as the 2016 Plan, until the exercise or expiration of the individual optionsawards. In connection with the Business Combination, the Company assumed the options granted under the 2019 Plan. Upon completion ofthe Business Combination on September 12, 2023, the Company adopted the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2023 Plan”). Sincethe 2019 Plan was not assumed by the Company, the Company may no longer grant any additional stock options or sell any stock under restrictedstock purchase agreements under the 2019 Plan; however, stock options issued under the 2019 Plan will continue to be in effect inaccordance with their terms and the terms of the 2023 Plan until the exercise or expiration of the individual options awards.
The2019 Plan reserved the right for the Board of Directors as the administrator of the plan (the “Administrator”) to issue upto shares pursuant to (pre-Business Combination) equity awards, which was increased to up to (pre-Business Combination)in May 2022, including stock options (“Options”), restricted stock awards (“Restricted Stock”), dividend equivalentsawards, stock payment awards, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and/or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”, togetherwith Options, Restricted Stock and RSUs, “Awards”), according to its discretion. Awards may be granted under the 2019 Planto our employees, directors, and consultants. As of December 31, 2023, the Administrator has not issued any Restricted Stock, RSUs, dividendequivalents awards, stock payment awards or SARs. Stock options remain as the sole outstanding type of award under the 2019 Plans.
Underthe 2019 Plan, awards may vest and thereby become exercisable or have restrictions on forfeiture lapse on the date of grant or in periodicinstallments or upon the attainment of performance goals, or upon the occurrence of specified events depending on the Administrator’sdiscretion. The Administrator has broad authority to determine the terms and conditions of any Award granted pursuant to the 2019 Planincluding, but not limited to, the exercise price, grant price, or purchase price, any reload provision, any restrictions or limitationson the Award, any schedule for lapse of forfeiture restrictions or restrictions on the exercisability of an Award, and accelerationsor waivers thereof as the Administrator, in its sole discretion may determine.
NoAwards may be granted under the 2019 Plan with a term of more than ten years and no Awards granted may be exercised after the expirationof ten years from the date of grant.
The2023 Plan reserved the right for the Compensation Committee or by the Board of Directors acting as the Compensation Committee, as theadministrator of the plan (the “Administrator”) to issue up to equity awards, including stock options (“Options”),restricted stock awards (“Restricted Stock”), dividend equivalents awards, stock payment awards, restricted stock units (“RSUs”)and/or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”, together with Options, Restricted Stock and RSUs, “Awards”), accordingto its discretion. Awards may be granted under the 2023 Plan to our employees, directors, and consultants.
Underthe 2023 Plan, Awards may vest and thereby become exercisable or have restrictions on forfeiture lapse on the date of grant or in periodicinstallments or upon the attainment of performance goals, or upon the occurrence of specified events depending on the Administrator’sdiscretion. The Administrator has broad authority to determine the terms and conditions of any Award granted pursuant to the 2023 Planincluding, but not limited to, the exercise price, grant price, or purchase price, any reload provision, any restrictions or limitationson the Award, any schedule for lapse of forfeiture restrictions or restrictions on the exercisability of an Award, and accelerationsor waivers thereof as the Administrator, in its sole discretion may determine.
| F-78 |
NoAwards may be granted under the 2023 Plan with a term of more than ten years and no Awards granted may be exercised after the expirationof ten years from the date of grant.
OnSeptember 12, 2023, upon closing of the FLAG Merger, the number of equity awards issued and available for grant were retrospectivelyadjusted pursuant to the conversion ratio of approximately
OnJuly 15, 2024, the Company effected a
2023Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”)
OnAugust 28, 2023, the Company approved the 2023 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, hereinafter the 2023 ESPP, which became effective on theconsummation of the FLAG Merger. Under the 2023 ESPP, eligible employees may purchase a limited number of shares of common stock at adiscount of up to
StockOptions
Optionsgranted under the 2019 Plan and 2023 Plan may be either “incentive stock options” within the meaning of Section 422(b) ofthe Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), or “non-qualified” stock options that do not qualifyincentive stock options. Incentive stock options may be granted only to the Company’s employees and employees of domestic subsidiaries,as applicable. The exercise price of stock options shall be equal to or greater than the fair market value of Calidi common stock onthe date the option is granted. In the case of an optionee who, at the time of grant, owns more than 10% of the combined voting powerof all classes of Calidi stock, the exercise price of any incentive stock option must be at least 110% of the fair market value of thecommon stock on the grant date, and the term of the option may be no longer than five years. The aggregate fair market value of commonstock (determined as of the grant date of the option) with respect to which incentive stock options become exercisable for the firsttime by an optionee in any calendar year may not exceed $0.1 million, otherwise it will be classified as a Non-Qualified Stock Option.
Theexercise price of an option may be payable in cash or in common stock, or in a combination of cash and common stock, or other legal considerationfor the issuance of stock as the Board or Administrator may approve.
Generally,options vest over four years and will be exercisable only while the optionee remains an employee, director or consultant, or during thethree months thereafter, but in the case of the termination of an employee, director, or consultant’s services due to death ordisability, the period for exercising a vested option shall be extended to the earlier of twelve months after termination or the expirationdate of the option.
EmployeeBenefit Plans Securities Registration Statement
OnOctober 1, 2024, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8, which includes a Reoffer Prospectus which may be used for reoffersand resales of shares of the Company. The Reoffer Prospectus covers the shares issuable to the holders pursuant to awards granted bythe Company under the Calidi Equity Plans. The Company will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares offered by the ReofferProspectus.
| F-79 |
OptionAwards Activity
Number of Options Outstanding | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |||||||||||||
| Outstanding at January 1, 2024 | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| Options granted | ||||||||||||||||
| Options exercised | ||||||||||||||||
| Options forfeited or cancelled | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2024 | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Exercisable at December 31, 2024 | $ | |||||||||||||||
RestrictedStock Units
Number of Units Outstanding | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value | |||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2024 | $ | |||||||
| Granted | $ | |||||||
| Vested and released | ( | ) | $ | |||||
| Balance at December 31, 2024 | $ | |||||||
| Vested and unreleased | $ | |||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2024 | $ | |||||||
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Research and development | $ | $ | ||||||
| General and administrative | ||||||||
| Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | $ | ||||||
OnJanuary 18, 2023, the Board approved a repricing of approximately million stock options previously granted at an exercise price of$ per share to the then current fair value of $ per share pursuant to an updated valuation report. The year ended December31, 2024 and 2023 include a noncash compensation charge of approximately $
| F-80 |
Asof December 31, 2024, the total unamortized stock-based compensation expense related to stock options was approximately $ million,expected to be amortized over an estimated weighted average life of years.The weighted-average estimated fair value of stock options with service-conditions granted during the year ended December 31, 2024and 2023 was $ and$ pershare, respectively, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Expected volatility | % | % | ||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | % | % | ||||||
| Expected option life (in years) | ||||||||
| Expected dividend yield | % | % | ||||||
TheCompany does not recognize deferred income taxes for incentive stock option compensation expense and records a tax deduction only whena disqualified disposition has occurred.
Inconnection with the closing of the FLAG Merger on September 12, 2023, all stock options underlying of the 2019 Plan were assumed by Calidiat the appropriate conversion ratio and the legacy Calidi 2019 Plan was terminated.
10.Income Taxes
Income/(Loss)before provision for income taxes consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 (in thousands):
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| United States | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| International | ( | ) | ||||||
| Loss before provision for income taxes | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
Theincome tax expense (benefit) by jurisdiction for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, were as follows (in thousands):
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Current: | ||||||||
| Federal | $ | $ | ||||||
| State and local | ||||||||
| Foreign | ||||||||
| Total current | $ | $ | ||||||
| Deferred: | ||||||||
| Federal | $ | $ | ||||||
| State and local | ||||||||
| Foreign | ||||||||
| Total deferred | ||||||||
| Total tax expense | $ | $ | ||||||
Sinceinception, the Company has incurred net operating losses primarily for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes and has not reflectedany benefit of such net operating loss carryforwards for any periods presented herein. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023,no U.S. provision or benefit for income taxes was recorded and an insignificant amount of German provision for income taxes was recordedas presented on the consolidated statements of operations.
| F-81 |
Incometaxes during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 differed from the amounts computed by applying the applicable U.S. federal incometax rates indicated to pretax loss from operations as a result of the following:
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Computed tax benefit at federal statutory rate | % | % | ||||||
| Permanent differences | % | % | ||||||
| State tax benefit | % | % | ||||||
| Stock based compensation | ( | )% | ( | )% | ||||
| Other permanent differences | ( | )% | ( | )% | ||||
| Change in valuation allowance | ( | )% | ( | )% | ||||
| Research and development credit | % | % | ||||||
| Change in fair value of debt | % | % | ||||||
| Stock issuance cost | % | ( | )% | |||||
| Acquired startup costs | % | % | ||||||
| % | % | |||||||
Deferredincome taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financialreporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
Theprimary components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2024 and 2023 were as follows (in thousands):
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Deferred tax assets/(liabilities): | ||||||||
| Net operating loss carryforwards | $ | $ | ||||||
| Research and development credit carryforwards | ||||||||
| Stock-based and other compensation | ||||||||
| Lease liability | ||||||||
| Capitalized research and development expenditures | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | ||||||||
| Accrued liabilities and other reserves | ||||||||
| Total deferred tax assets | ||||||||
| Right-of-use and other assets | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total deferred tax liabilities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Valuation allowance | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net deferred tax asset | $ | $ | ||||||
Asof December 31, 2024, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $
Asof December 31, 2024, the Company has research and development credit carryforwards for federal purposes of $
Utilizationof the net operating loss carryforwards and credits may be subject to substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitationsprovided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. The annual limitation may result in the expirationof net operating losses before utilization. The Company performed a Section 382 study for the period February 15, 2015 to December 31,2021. There was an ownership change identified on March 26, 2018 after the Company’s Series A-2 preferred stock issuance. The Companyhas not undertaken a Section 382 study through December 31, 2024. Our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards and othertax attributes to offset future taxable income or tax liabilities may be limited as a result of ownership changes.
| F-82 |
Avaluation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.The Company established a full valuation allowance for all periods presented due to the uncertainty of realizing future tax benefitsfrom its net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets. The change in the valuation allowance was $
TheCompany has uncertain tax benefits (“UTBs”) totaling approximately $
Areconciliation of the beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefit amount is as follows (in thousands):
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Balance at the beginning of the year | $ | $ | ||||||
| Additions based on tax positions related to current year | ||||||||
| Adjustments based on tax positions related to prior years | ||||||||
| Balance at end of year | $ | $ | ||||||
TheCompany files tax returns in the U.S. for federal purposes and California for state purposes. For jurisdictions in which tax filingshave been filed, all tax years remain open for examination by the federal and California state authorities for three and four years,respectively, from the date of utilization of any net operating losses or credits. The Company is not currently under audit by any taxingjurisdiction.
TheCompany tax filings are subject to audit by taxing authorities in jurisdictions where it conducts business. These audits may result inassessments of additional taxes that are subsequently resolved with the authorities or potentially through the courts. Management believesthe Company has adequately provided for any ultimate amounts that are likely to result from these audits; however, final assessments,if any, could be significantly different than the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
11.Commitments and Contingencies
Operatingand Financing Leases
OnOctober 10, 2022, the Company entered into an Office Lease Agreement (the “San Diego Lease”) of a building containing
Tosecure and execute the San Diego Lease, Mr. Allan Camaisa provided a personal Guaranty of Lease of up to $
TheSan Diego Lease has an initial term of
Beginningon the Commencement Date, the Company pays base monthly rent in the amount of $
Inaddition to base monthly rent and management fees, the Company pays in monthly installments its share of (a) all costs and expenses,other than certain excluded expenses, incurred by the lessor in each calendar year in connection with operating, maintaining, repairing(including replacements if repairs are not feasible or would not be effective) and managing the Premises and the building in which thePremises are located (“Expenses”), and (b) all real estate taxes and assessments on the Premises and the building in whichthe Premises are located, all personal property taxes for property that is owned by Landlord and used in connection with the operation,maintenance and repair of the Premises (“Taxes”).
| F-83 |
Uponexecution of the San Diego Lease, the Company provided the lessor a payment of $
OnApril 1, 2022, StemVac entered into an office lease which includes laboratory space which expires on March 31, 2027, with monthly paymentsof €
Operatinglease expense recognized during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was approximately $
TheCompany is also party to certain financing leases for machinery and equipment (see Note 5).
Thefollowing table presents supplemental cash flow information related to operating and financing leases for the periods presented (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||
| Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | $ | ||||||
| Operating cash flows from financing leases | ||||||||
| Financing cash flows from financing leases | ||||||||
| Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities: | ||||||||
| Operating lease | $ | $ | ||||||
Thefollowing table presents supplemental balance sheet information related to operating and financing leases for the periods presented (inthousands, except lease term and discount rate):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Operating leases | ||||||||
| Right-of-use assets, net | $ | $ | ||||||
| Right-of-use lease liabilities, current | $ | $ | ||||||
| Right-of-use lease liabilities, noncurrent | ||||||||
| Total operating lease liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||
| Financing Leases | ||||||||
| Machinery and equipment, gross | $ | $ | ||||||
| Accumulated depreciation | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Machinery and equipment, net | $ | $ | ||||||
| Current liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||
| Noncurrent liabilities | ||||||||
| Total financing lease liabilities | $ | $ | ||||||
| Weighted average remaining lease term | ||||||||
| Operating leases | ||||||||
| Financing leases | ||||||||
| Weighted average discount rate | ||||||||
| Operating leases | % | % | ||||||
| Financing leases | % | % | ||||||
| F-84 |
Thefollowing table presents future minimum lease commitments as of December 31, 2024 (in thousands):
Operating Leases | Financing Leases | |||||||
| Year Ending December 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||
| 2026 | ||||||||
| 2027 | ||||||||
| 2028 | ||||||||
| 2029 | ||||||||
| 2030 and thereafter | ||||||||
| Total minimum lease payments | ||||||||
| Less: amounts representing interest | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Present value of net minimum lease payments | $ | $ | ||||||
Litigation— General
TheCompany is subject to various claims and contingencies in the ordinary course of its business, including those related to litigation,business transactions, employee-related matters, and other matters. At each reporting date, the Company evaluates whether or not a potentialloss amount or a potential range of loss is probable and reasonably estimable under the provisions of the authoritative guidance thataddresses accounting for contingencies. If it is probable that a loss will result and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated,the Company will record a liability for the loss. If the loss is not probable or the amount of the loss cannot be reasonably estimated,the Company discloses the claim if the likelihood of a potential loss is reasonably possible, and the amount involved could be material.The Company expenses the costs related to legal proceedings as incurred. See other legal matters discussed below. Other than the mattersdiscussed below, the Company is not currently party to any material legal proceedings.
LegalProceedings
PhysicianAgreement Matter
OnJuly 19, 2016, the Company entered into a Partnership Agreement between certain physicians (the “Physicians”, as one of the“partners”) and the Company for the Physicians to provide certain services to the Company. In connection with the PartnershipAgreement, the Company granted the Physicians stock options as consideration for those services pursuant to the Company’s EquityIncentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Partnership Agreement was deemed terminated on March 21, 2018. Pursuant to the terms ofthe stock option agreements and the Plan, the Physicians had three months from the termination date to exercise their vested stock optionsbefore those options would automatically expire and cancel unexercised, while all unvested stock options are forfeited immediately onthe termination date. The Physicians did not elect to exercise any of their vested options thereby resulting in full cancellation ofthose options in accordance with the Plan.
OnMarch 14, 2022, the Physicians filed a lawsuit against the Company in San Diego Superior Court, seeking, among other claims, declaratoryrelief and claiming that the stock options granted to them pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, have not expired and remain exercisableby the Physicians. The Physicians are claiming in vested stock options to be valid and exercisable, even though the Physicianshave not provided any services to the Company since the March 2018 termination date.
| F-85 |
OnDecember 6, 2022, the Company and the Physicians participated in mediation in San Diego, California. In order to attempt to settle allclaims and avoid a costly trial, the Company offered the Physicians shares of Calidi common stock valued at $ per share and options to purchase Calidi common stock at an exercise price of $ per share in full settlement of the claims. As of December31, 2022, the Company estimated this offer of settlement to be valued at approximately $
OnFebruary 9, 2024, the Company entered into a settlement agreement and mutual release (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Dr.Elliot Lander, Saralee Berman, as Trustee of the Mark Howard Berman and Saralee Turrell Berman Living Trust, successor in interest tothe Estate of Dr. Mark Berman, and Cell Surgical Network, Inc. (the “physicians”) in connection with the dispute outlinedabove. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, as consideration for a full release and discharge of claims, and dismissal of claims bythe parties, the Company agreed to provide to the physicians the following: (a) the issuance of restricted shares of common stock(the “Restricted Shares”) and (b) the issuance of
FormerChief Accounting Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
On November 15, 2023, Tony Kalajian,the Company’s prior Chief Accounting Officer and interim Chief Financial Officer, filed a complaint in the Superior Court of theState of California County of San Diego against the Company, Mr. Camaisa, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Ms. Pizarro,the Company’s Chief Corporate Development Officer and Chief Legal Officer, alleging defamation and constructive discharge of Mr.Kalajian’s position of Chief Accounting Officer and interim Chief Financial Officer (Case No. 37-203-00049813-CU-DF-CTL) (the “PrimaryCase”). Mr. Kalajian is seeking $0.6 million in damages under his employment contract, damages to be proven at trial, punitive damages,and attorney’s fees.
The Companysuccessfully moved to disqualify Mr. Kalajian’s counsel, Robert Brownlie, which is now on appeal. It also filed a claim againstMr. Kalajian in arbitration for breach of fiduciary duty, constructive fraud, conversion, and declaratory relief relating to bonuses Mr.Kalajian caused to be paid to himself and the accounting team. Due to the appeal, the Court in November 2024, issued a discretionary stayon this case and all related cases, as described below.
The Company denies the allegationsand, along with the two named officers, continues to vigorously defend the lawsuit and related claims, prosecute its claims against Mr.Kalajian, and seek recovery of a $150,000 bonus Mr. Kalajian approved to be paid to himself without first obtaining proper authorizationby the Company’s Board of Directors. No trial date is scheduled. Discovery has not yet commenced. Therefore, at this time, the Companyis unable to evaluate the outcome of this case or estimate the amount or range of potential loss
On February 29, 2024, Mr. Kalajianfiled a Petition for Writ of Mandate in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, seeking to compel the production of certaincorporate records from the Company. This case is deemed related to the Primary Case above and is stayed.
On May 1, 2024, Mr. Kalajianfiled a complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego against the Company alleging intentional conversionand violation of Section 158 of the Delaware General Corporations Code due to the Company’s failure to remove a restrictive legendfrom 13,943 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Mr. Kalajian is seeking compensatory damages to be proven at trial, punitive damagesand attorney’s fees, and an order requiring removal of the restrictive legend from his share certificates. The Company intends tovigorously defend itself. This case is deemed related to the Primary Case above and is stayed.
In March 2025, the Company receivednotice that Mr. Kalajian retained new counsel in the above cases. Accordingly, it is possible that the Court will lift the stays on allrelated cases.
| F-86 |
Securities Matter
On October29, 2024, Mr. Yian Zeng filed a complaint against the Company related to securities fraud in violation of the California CorporationsCode, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, restitution, breach of fiduciary duty, and constructive fraudin US District Court, Southern District of California (Case Number 3:24-cv-02026-H-KSC). The Company filed an Answer to the complainton February 10, 2025. The Company vigorously opposes this case and categorically denies all claims. Discovery has not commenced. Therefore,at this time, the Company is unable to evaluate the outcome of this case or estimate the amount or range of potential loss.
UnassertedClaim Settlement
OnMarch 8, 2024, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note purchase agreement with an accredited investor (the “Investor”)for a loan in the principal amount of $
OnApril 19, 2024, the $
EmploymentContracts
TheCompany has entered into employment and severance benefit contracts with certain executive officers and other employees. Under the provisionsof the contracts, the Company may be required to incur severance obligations for matters relating to changes in control, as defined,and certain terminations of those executives and employees. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the Company had not accruedany such benefits except for the severance accrual for Mr. Ng discussed below.
Manufacturingand Other Supplier Contracts
TheCompany has entered into certain manufacturing and other supplier agreements with vendors principally for manufacturing drug productfor clinical trials and continued development of the CLD-101 and CLD-201 programs, amounting to approximately $
Asof December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had incurred approximately $
LicenseAgreements with Northwestern University
OnJune 7, 2021, the Company entered into a License Agreement with Northwestern University (“Northwestern”) (the “NorthwesternAgreement”) for the exclusive commercialization rights to the investigational new drug (“IND”) and data generated fromNorthwestern’s phase 1 clinical trial treating brain tumor patients with an engineered oncolytic adenovirus delivered by neuralstem cells (“NSC-CRAd-S-pk7”). Under the Northwestern Agreement, among other rights, Northwestern granted to the Companya worldwide, twelve-year exclusivity for the commercial development of NSC-CRAd-S-pk7 or other oncolytic viruses for therapeutic andpreventive uses in oncology and a right of reference to Northwestern’s IND application which relates to the treatment of newlydiagnosed HGG.
Pursuantto the Northwestern Agreement, the Company agreed to a best-efforts commitment to fund up to $
| F-87 |
OnOctober 14, 2021, the Company entered into a Material License Agreement with Northwestern to license the NSC-CRAd-S-pk7 oncolytic virusmaterials which the Company intends to use to continue advancing its research, development and commercialization efforts of the NNV1and NNV2 programs.
On December 15, 2024, the Company entered into an Investigator-InitiatedClinical Trial Agreement for Northwestern to conduct a clinical trial (the “CTA”) under the protocol referenced “A PhaseI Study of Repeated Neural Stem Cell Based Virotherapy in Combination with N-Acetylcysteine amid and Standard Radiation and Chemotherapyfor Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma” (the “Study”). In connection with the Study, Northwestern granted the Companya non-exclusive, transferable and sublicensable license to use all available de-identified data collected from the Study, including, butnot limited to, survival data, patient pathology, and immune studies data.
In consideration of the datause license granted by Northwestern to the Company under the CTA, the Company shall pay Northwestern the following:
The CTA shall terminate uponthe completion of the parties’ Study-related activities. Either party has the right to terminate the Study upon thirty (30) daysprior written notice to the other. The Study may also be terminated immediately at any time for cause, which includes the following: materialbreach, which cannot be cured, by either party of the terms and conditions of the CTA.
As of the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements,it is not probable that the Company will make these payments, if any at all. The Company will record the contingent payments if and whenthey become payable, in accordance with the applicable guidance.
LicenseAgreement with City of Hope and the University of Chicago
OnJuly 22, 2021, the Company entered into an Exclusive License Agreement with City of Hope (“COH”) and the University of Chicago(the “City of Hope Agreement”) for patents covering cancer therapies using an oncolytic adenovirus loaded into allogeneicneural stem cells for treatment of HGG. Pursuant to the City of Hope Agreement, COH transferred its IND to the Company for the commercialdevelopment of a licensed product, as defined in the City of Hope Agreement. This agreement grants to the Company commercial exclusivityin using neural stem cells with the adenovirus known as CRAd-S-pk7 for oncolytic virotherapy.
TheCity of Hope Agreement provides for the Company to pay royalties in low single digit percentage of net sales generated for any productof the licensed patents for specific periods, and to pay up to $
Asof the date of the issuance of these consolidated financial statements, it is not probable that the Company will make these payments.The Company will record the contingent payments if and when they become payable, in accordance with the applicable guidance.
Indemnification
Inthe normal course of business, the Company may provide indemnification of varying scope under the Company’s agreements with othercompanies or consultants, typically the Company’s clinical research organizations, investigators, clinical sites, suppliers andothers. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company will generally agree to indemnify, hold harmless, and reimburse the indemnified partiesfor losses and expenses suffered or incurred by the indemnified parties arising from claims of third parties. Indemnification provisionscould also cover third party infringement claims with respect to patent rights, copyrights, or other intellectual property pertainingto the Company. The Company’s office and laboratory facility leases also will generally contain indemnification obligations, includingobligations for indemnification of the lessor for environmental law matters and injuries to persons or property of others, arising fromthe Company’s use or occupancy of the leased property. The term of these indemnification agreements will generally continue ineffect after the termination or expiration of the particular research, development, services, lease, or other agreement to which theyrelate. The potential future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements will generally notbe subject to any specified maximum amounts. Historically, the Company has not been subject to any claims or demands for indemnification.The Company also maintains various liability insurance policies that limit the Company’s financial exposure. As a result, the Company’smanagement believes that the fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded anyliabilities for these agreements as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
SeparationAgreement with Chief Operating Officer and President
OnJune 23, 2023, the Company entered into a Separation and Release Agreement (“Separation Agreement”) with George Ng, ChiefOperating Officer and President, effective on that date. In accordance with the provisions of the Separation Agreement, the Company willpay Mr. Ng in the amount of $
| F-88 |
Settlement,Deferral or Payment of Deferred Compensation of Certain Executives and a Director
OnAugust 31, 2023, Mr. Camaisa and Mr. Leftwich entered into certain amendments with respect to their deferred compensation arrangementsin connection with the FLAG Merger. Mr. Camaisa agreed to settle approximately $
OnSeptember 12, 2023, Mr. Kalajian was issued shares of common stock in exchange for settlement of $
StandbyEquity Purchase Agreement
OnDecember 10, 2023, the Company entered into a Standby Equity Purchase Agreement (the “SEPA”) with YA II PN, Ltd., a CaymanIsland exempt limited partnership (“Yorkville”). Pursuant to the SEPA, the Company will have the right, but not the obligation,to sell to Yorkville up to $ million of its shares of Common Stock, par value $ per share, at the Company’s request anytime during the 36 months following the execution of the SEPA. The maximum advance under the SEPA is the lower of (i) an amount equalto 100% of the average of the daily traded amount during the five consecutive trading days immediately preceding an advance notice, or(ii) 500,000 shares. For the SEPA to be utilized, the shares underlying the agreement need to be registered pursuant to a registrationstatement filed with the SEC.
Asconsideration for Yorkville’s commitment to purchase the Common Stock at the Company’s direction upon the terms and subjectto the conditions set forth in the SEPA, upon execution of the SEPA, the Company paid a structuring fee of $
EffectiveJanuary 23, 2025, the SEPA was terminated via a Notice of Termination as required under Section 10.01(b) of the SEPA (See Note 12).
ConsultingAgreement
InFebruary 2024, the Company entered into a consulting agreement whereby the consultant agreed to provide the Company with marketing anddistribution services to communicate information. As compensation, the Company issued shares of common stock to the consultanton March 25, 2024 (see Note 8).
SubscriptionAgreement
Inrecognition of a Subscription Agreement entered into with a related party investor on July 26, 2024 (see Note 1), the Board has approvedthe appointment of the Investor, a distinguished physician and expert in stem cell therapy, to the Company’s Scientific and MedicalAdvisory Board (“SMAB”). This appointment was made in accordance with the SMAB Consulting Agreement dated July 28, 2024 (“ConsultingAgreement”). As part of the Consulting Agreement, the Investor will be awarded stock options, with a standard four-year vestingperiod.
| F-89 |
Assignmentof Intellectual Property to Nova Cell
Inconjunction with a strategic investment by a related party investor on July 26, 2024 (see Note 1), the Board has approved the assignmentof certain intellectual property rights to Nova Cell, pursuant to an Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement dated July 28, 2024.
12.Subsequent Events
ConfidentiallyMarketed Public Offering (CMPO)
OnJanuary 9, 2025, the Company entered into a Placement Agency Agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. (the “Placement Agent”),pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell in a public offering shares of the Company’s common stock (the“Shares”), par value $ per share, at a purchase price of $
Thecommon stock shares were offered by the Company pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3, which was declared effectiveby the Securities Exchange Commission on October 10, 2024.
Terminationof Standby Equity Purchase Agreement
OnJanuary 23, 2025, the Company delivered to YA II PN, LTD. (“Yorkville”), a Notice of Termination of the Standby Equity PurchaseAgreement (“SEPA”), as required under Section 10.01(b) of the SEPA, which notifies Yorkville of the Company’s electionto terminate the SEPA, dated as of December 10, 2023, by and between the Company and Yorkville. Termination of the SEPA became effectiveas of January 23, 2025, as mutually agreed by the Company and Yorkville.
Atthe time of the termination, there were no outstanding borrowings, advance notices or shares of common stock to be issued under the SEPA.
Settlementof 2024 Bridge Loan
OnJanuary 21, 2025, the total outstanding principal and accrued interest of the 2024 Bridge Loan of $
Settlementof Term Notes
OnJanuary 3, 2025, $
Settlementof Deferred Compensation
OnJanuary 3, 2025, $
Increasein Maximum Aggregate Offering Amount under the At The Market Offering Agreement
OnFebruary 4, 2025, the Company increased the maximum aggregate offering amount of the shares of the Company’s common stock, parvalue $per share issuable under the At The Market Offering Agreement(the “Sales Agreement”) with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., dated October 11, 2024, from $
Registered Direct and Concurrent Private Placement
On March 28, 2025, the Companyentered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with a single institutional investor (the “Purchaser”),pursuant to which the Company issued to the Purchaser, (i) in a registered offering, shares of the Company’s Common Stock,at a purchase price of $ per share, and at the election of the investor, in lieu of the common stock, pre-funded warrants to purchaseup to
The series G common warrants havean exercise price of $
The closing of the Transactions took place on March 31, 2025. The grossproceeds from the Transactions were approximately $
| F-90 |
CALIDIBIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
6,355,650Shares of Common Stock
PRELIMINARYPROSPECTUS
,2025
PARTII
INFORMATIONNOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
| Item 13. | Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution. |
Exceptfor SEC registration fee, the following table sets forth the estimated costs and expenses to be borne by the registrant in connectionwith the offerings described in this registration statement.
| SEC registration fee | $ | |||
| Legal fees and expenses | $ | 30,000 | ||
| Accounting fees and expenses | $ | [ ] | ||
| Miscellaneous | $ | 10,000 | ||
| Total | $ | [ ] |
| Item 14. | Indemnification of Directors and Officers. |
Section145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) provides, in general, that a corporation may indemnify directorsand officers as well as other employees and individuals against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amountspaid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with any threatened, pending or completed actions, suitsor proceedings in which such person is made a party by reason of such person being or having been a director, officer, employee or agentof the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation,partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise. The DGCL provides that Section 145 is not exclusive of other rights to which thoseseeking indemnification may be entitled under any bylaws, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise. Theregistrant’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws together provide for indemnificationby the registrant of its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL.
Section102(b)(7) of the DGCL permits a corporation to provide in its certificate of incorporation that a director of the corporation shall notbe personally liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except forliability (1) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (2) for acts or omissionsnot in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (3) for unlawful payments of dividends or unlawfulstock repurchases, redemptions or other distributions or (4) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personalbenefit. The registrant’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for such limitation of liability to the fullestextent permitted by the DGCL.
Theregistrant has entered into, and expects to continue to enter into, indemnification agreements with each of its directors and executiveofficers. These agreements provide that the registrant will indemnify each of its directors and such officers to the fullest extent permittedby law.
Theregistrant maintains insurance policies that indemnify its directors and officers against various liabilities arising under the SecuritiesAct and the Exchange Act that might be incurred by any director or officer in his or her capacity as such.
Certainof the registrant’s non-employee directors may, through their relationships with their employers, be insured and/or indemnifiedagainst certain liabilities incurred in their capacity as members of the registrant’s board of directors.
| Item 15. | Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities. |
InApril 2021, we issued an aggregate of 5,750,000 shares of Class B common stock to the sponsor and Metric for an aggregate purchase priceof $25,000. In connection with the closing of our Initial Public Offering, certain anchor investors acquired from First Light AcquisitionGroup, LLC, our sponsor (the “Sponsor”) and Metric Finance Holdings I, LLC (“Metric”) in the aggregate 1,452,654shares of Class B common stock at the original purchase price that the sponsor and Metric paid for the shares of Class B common stock,pursuant to an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
| II-1 |
OnSeptember 14, 2021, simultaneously with the consummation of the closing of our Initial Public Offering, we consummated the private placementof an aggregate of 3,397,155 Private Placement Warrants (the “Private Warrants”) to certain funds and accounts managed bythe Sponsor and Metric, at a price of $1.50 per Private Warrant, generating total gross proceeds of $5,095,733. No underwriting discountsor commissions were paid with respect to such sale. Each whole private placement warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase oneshare of Class A common stock at a price of $11.50 per share, subject to certain adjustments.
ForwardPurchase Agreement
OnAugust 28, 2023, and August 30, 2023, we entered into a forward purchase agreements (each a “Forward Purchase Agreement”,and together, the “Forward Purchase Agreement”) with each of Meteora Strategic Capital, LLC (“MSC”), MeteoraCapital Partners, LP (“MCP”), Meteora Select Trading Opportunities Master, LP (“MSTO”), Great Point Capital LLC(“Great Point”), Funicular Funds, LP (“Funicular Funds”) and Marybeth Wootton (“Wootton”) (with eachof MSC, MCP, MSTO, Great Point, Funicular, and Wootton, individually a “Seller”, and together, the “Sellers”)for an OTC Equity Prepaid Forward Transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the Forward Purchase Agreements, each Sellers intends, but isnot obligated, to purchase up to a number of shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of our predecessor (“FLAGClass A Common Stock”) in the aggregate amount equal to up to 1,000,000, concurrently with the Closing pursuant to each Seller’srespective FPA Funding Amount PIPE Subscription Agreement, less, the number of FLAG Class A Common Stock purchased by each Seller separatelyfrom third parties through a broker in the open market (“Recycled Shares”).
TheForward Purchase Agreements provide that Sellers will be paid directly an aggregate cash amount (the “Prepayment Amount”)equal to the product of (i) the Number of Shares as set forth in each Pricing Date Notice and (ii) the redemption price per share asdefined in Section 9.2(a) of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the “Initial Price”) less(iii) an amount in USD equal to 0.50% of the product of (i) the Recycled Shares multiplied by (ii) the Initial Price paid by Seller toCounterparty on the Prepayment Date (which amount shall be netted from the Prepayment Amount) (the “Prepayment Shortfall”).
Duringthe 36-month term of the Forward Purchase Agreement, if the Sellers liquidate the 1,000,000 shares in the market above $10.00 per share,then Calidi will be entitled to receive up to $10.0 million in cash from the Sellers pursuant to the Forward Purchase Agreement. If theSellers liquidate the shares below $10.00 per share, then Calidi will be entitled to the price sold, less $2.00 per share, from the Sellers.No proceeds will be available to Calidi if the Forward Purchase Agreement shares are sold below $2.00 per share. The Forward PurchaseAgreement may be terminated earlier by the Sellers if certain default events occur, including the stock price trading below defined thresholdsfor a defined period of time. In no event will Calidi be obligated to pay cash to the Sellers during the term of the Forward PurchaseAgreement or at its expiration.
Therecan be no assurance that any proceeds from the Sellers will be made to us under the Forward Purchase Agreement.
NewMoney PIPE Subscription Agreement
OnAugust 30, 2023, we entered into a subscription agreement (the “New Money PIPE Subscription Agreement” and together withthe FPA Funding Amount PIPE Subscription Agreements, the “PIPE Subscription Agreements”) with Wootton (the “New MoneyPIPE Investor”). Pursuant to the New Money PIPE Subscription Agreement, the New Money PIPE Investor agreed to subscribe for andpurchase an aggregate of 132,817 shares of FLAG Class A Common Stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $240,000 to us atthe Closing.
| II-2 |
Issuanceof Shares of Common Stock for fees; Issuance due to Administrative Error in connection with the Business Combination
OnOctober 10, 2023, we issued stock options to purchase 52,500 shares of common stock to a director.
OnDecember 21, 2023, we granted, in the aggregate, 40,218 restricted stock units to our five independent directors as director fees, stockoption to purchase 140,497 shares of common stock to two directors as director fees and a stock option to purchase 100,000 shares ofcommon stock to a director for guaranteeing certain capital raising obligations Calidi. Each restricted stock unit was valued at, andthe stock option per share exercise price equaled, $1.80 which represented the closing price of our common stock on such date. In addition,on January 4, 2024, we issued 15,804 shares of common stock to a former investor of Calidi as part of the merger consideration in connectionwith the Business Combination. The investor, who was an accredited investor, was not properly recorded as a shareholder of Calidi dueto an administrative error.
StandbyEquity Purchase Agreement
OnDecember 10, 2023, we entered into a Standby Equity Purchase Agreement (the “SEPA”) with an institutional investor. Pursuantto the SEPA, we have the right, but not the obligation, to sell to the institutional investor up to $25,000,000 of our common stock,at our request at any time during the 36 months following the execution of the SEPA. The institutional investors has represented thatit is an “accredited investor” as defined in Rule 501(a)(3) of Regulation D under the Securities Act.
OnMarch 25, 2024, we issued 138,750 shares to the institutional investor as consideration for the institutional investor’s commitmentto purchase our common at our direction upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the SEPA.
Amendedand Restated Consulting Agreement
EffectiveNovember 1, 2023, we entered into an amended and restated consulting agreement whereby the consultant agreed to provide us business adviceand research, media, and marketing services. As part of its fees, the consultant received 100,000 shares of our common stock with theright to receive an additional 75,000 shares of common stock provided that certain objectives are achieved.
BridgeLoan for $200,000
OnJanuary 19, 2024, we entered into a loan agreement with a lender for a short term loan in the principal amount of $200,000 (the “Lender”).In connection with such loan, we issued a 1 year promissory note to the Lender for an aggregate principal amount of $200,000. As considerationfor the Loan, we agreed to issue an aggregate of 8,929 shares of restricted common stock to the Lender.
BridgeLoan for $1,000,000
OnJanuary 26, 2024, we entered into a convertible promissory note purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with an accreditedinvestor (the “Investor”), for a loan in the principal amount of $1,000,000, the proceeds of which will be used by us forworking capital purpose (the “Loan”). In connection with the Loan, we issued a 1 year convertible promissory note evidencingthe aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 under the Loan, which accrues at a 12.0% simple interest rate per annum (the “Note”).The Note also provides the Investor a voluntary right to convert all, but not less than all, the Principal Amount (as defined in theNote) and accrued interest into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate equal to a 10% discount to the 10-day VWAP as determinedimmediately before January 26, 2024 (the “Conversion Price”). In addition, upon such voluntary conversion by the Investor,the Investor will be entitled to a warrant for 50% of the number of shares of our common stock issued upon the Note conversion at anexercise equal to 120% of the Conversion Price (the “Warrant”). In the event we consummate a public offering prior to thematurity date of the Note, the Note and accrued interest will be subject to a mandatory conversion into our equity securities issuedand sold to investors in such public offering, equal to the price per share of the equity security sold to other purchasers and subjectto similar terms and conditions of such public offering, except that such equity securities received under a mandatory conversion willbe restricted securities.
| II-3 |
ConsultingAgreement
EffectiveFebruary 24, 2024, we entered into a consulting agreement whereby the consultant agreed to provide us marketing and distribution servicesto communicate information us. As compensation, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock to the consultant on March 25, 2024, and agreedto issue an additional 50,000 shares of common stock 6 months from the effective date of the consulting agreement.
SettlementAgreement and Mutual Release
OnFebruary 9, 2024, we entered into a settlement agreement and mutual release with the plaintiffs (the “Settlement Agreement”)in connection with a dispute relating to certain stock options and the termination of that certain partnership agreement and relatedagreements. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, as consideration for a full release and discharge of claims, and dismissal of claimsby the parties, we agreed to provide to the plaintiffs the following: (a) the issuance of 200,000 restricted shares of our common stockand (b) the issuance of 400,000 warrants to purchase our common stock which (i) has an exercise price equal to $1.32; and (ii) are exercisablefor 5 years after the date of issuance of the warrants, subject to the terms set forth in such warrant.
OnMarch 8, 2024, we entered into a settlement agreement with an investor who previously entered into a series of related agreements including(i) an agreement with Calidi Cure, LLC, an affiliate of the Company, in connection with an equity financing to fund the purchase of SeriesB Convertible Preferred Stock of Calidi Biotherapeutics (Nevada), Inc. (formerly Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc.), a Nevada corporationand our wholly-owned subsidiary; (ii) a Non-Redemption Agreement with the Company; (iii) an OTC Equity Prepaid Forward Purchase Agreementwith the Company; and (iv) a Subscription Agreement with the Company (items (i) through (iv) collectively “the Supplemental FundingAgreements”) for the purpose of satisfying the “Minimum Cash Condition” required under the Business Combination. Pursuantto the settlement agreement, (i) the investor purchased a $2.0 million convertible note from the us for cash and (ii) we issued to theinvestor a $1.5 million convertible note in consideration for the settlement of all claims related to the Supplemental Funding Agreements.The $2.0 million convertible note and $1.5 million convertible note are collectively herein referred to as the “Convertible Notes”.The settlement agreement also includes a mutual release of all claims by both parties. The Convertible Notes bear semiannual interestat 10.0% per annum and each mature on March 8, 2028, unless due earlier due to an event of a default. After the earlier of 180 days orthe effective date of a registration statement registering our common stock underlying the Convertible Notes, we may prepay the ConvertibleNotes, including any interest earned thereon, without penalty. The Convertible Notes also provide the investor a right to convert inwhole or in part, the Principal Amount (as defined in the Convertible Notes) and accrued interest into shares of our common stock atan initial note conversion price equal to 94% of the 10-day VWAP ending the business day preceding execution of the Convertible Notessubject to a reset note conversion price, as subsequently amended, equal to 94% of 10-day VWAP ending on the one hundredth eightieth(180th) day after the issuance of the Convertible Notes. In the event we complete a financing (i) of at least $8 million inan offering registered with the SEC; or (ii) of at least $2 million with a non-affiliated purchaser at an effective price of at least150% of the initial note conversion price, then the Convertible Notes will be subject to mandatory conversion, subject to certain conditions,at the lower of the initial note conversion price and reset note conversion price.
MayInducement Offer
OnMay 31, 2024, as part of the Company’s May Inducement Offer, we agreed to issue unregistered new Series D Warrants to purchaseup to 1,069,800 shares of Common Stock.
| II-4 |
PlacementAgent Warrants
OnApril 18, 2024, in connection with the closing of the April Public Offering, we issued to the placement agent unregistered warrants topurchase up to 75,988 shares of Common Stock.
OnJune 3, 2024, in connection with the closing of the May Inducement Offer, we issued to the placement agent unregistered warrants to purchaseup to 53,490 shares of Common Stock.
OnOctober 24, 2024, in connection with the closing of a registered direct offering, we issued to the placement agent unregistered warrantsto purchase up to 102,500 shares of Common Stock.
OnNovember 15, 2024, in connection with the closing of a public offering, we issued to the placement agent unregistered warrants to purchaseup to 221,893 shares of Common Stock.
OnJanuary 10, 2025, in connection with the closing of a public offering, we issued to the placement agent unregistered warrants to purchaseup to 250,000 shares of Common Stock.
OnMarch 28, 2025, in connection with the closing of a registered direct offering, we issued to the placement agent unregistered warrantsto purchase up to 102,500 shares of Common Stock.
ConsultingAgreement
EffectiveFebruary 21, 2024, we entered into a marketing services agreement with a third party consultant. As compensation, we issued 5,000 sharesof common stock to the consultant on March 25, 2024.
SubscriptionAgreement
EffectiveJuly 28, 2024, we entered into a subscription agreement with an accredited investor and issued 698,812 shares of Common Stock to theinvestor on September 26, 2024, and issued warrants to purchase 600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exercise priceof $1.90 per share. The Warrant is exercisable only for cash, at any time in whole or in part, until July 28, 2027.
Settlementof Liabilities
OnSeptember 26, 2024, the Company settled a legal settlement by issuing 20,000 shares of Common Stock and settled certain liabilities byissuing 120,847 shares of Common Stock.
RegisteredDirect and Concurrent Private Placements
OnOctober 23, 2024, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain institutional investors, pursuant to which we issued tosuch institutional investors Series E common stock purchase warrants to purchase up to 2,050,000 shares of Common Stock and Series Fcommon stock purchase warrants to purchase up to 2,050,000 shares of Common Stock, in a concurrent private placement. The Series E CommonWarrants are exercisable on the date that is six (6) months from the date of issuance for a term of one (1) year from the initial exercisedate and have an exercise price of $1.13 per share of Common Stock, and the Series F Common Warrants are exercisable on the date thatis six (6) months from the date of issuance for a term of five (5) years from the initial exercise date and have an exercise price of$1.13 per share of Common Stock.
OnMarch 28, 2025, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with an institutional investor, pursuant to which we issued to such institutionalinvestor Series G common stock purchase warrants to purchase up to 6,053,000 shares of Common Stock, in a concurrent private placement.The Series G Common Warrants are exercisable on the date that is six (6) months from the date of issuance for a term of seven and on-halfyears from the initial exercise date and have an exercise price of $0.6954 per share of Common Stock.
| II-5 |
Thesecurities described above were issued in reliance upon an exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the SecuritiesAct or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act. Each investor acquired such securities for investment purposeswithout a view to distribution and had access to information concerning us and our business prospects, as required by the SecuritiesAct. In addition, there was no general solicitation or advertising for the purchase of our securities. Our securities were sold onlyto accredited investors, as defined in the Securities Act with whom we had a direct personal preexisting relationship, and after a thoroughdiscussion. Each certificate contained a restrictive legend as required by the Securities Act. Finally, our stock transfer agent hasbeen instructed not to transfer any of such securities, unless such securities are registered for resale or there is an exemption withrespect to their transfer.
| Item 16. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. |
| (a) | Exhibits. |
| II-6 |
| II-7 |
| II-8 |
| II-9 |
| II-10 |
| * | Filed herewith. |
| † | Pursuant to item 601(b)(10)(iv) of Regulation S-K, certain information has been excluded because it is both not material and the type of information that the registrant treats as private or confidential. |
(b)Financial Statement Schedules.
Allfinancial statement schedules are omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in theconsolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
| II-11 |
| Item 17. | Undertakings. |
Theundersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
| (1) | to file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement: |
| (i) | to include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933; | |
| (ii) | to reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and | |
| (iii) | to include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement; |
| (2) | that, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof; | |
| (3) | to remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering; | |
| (4) | that, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser: each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use; and | |
| (5) | that, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities, the undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser: |
| (a) | any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424; | |
| (b) | any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant; | |
| (c) | the portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and | |
| (d) | any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser. |
Insofaras indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers, and controllingpersons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion ofthe Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 andis, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrantof expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer, or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action,suit, or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer, or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered,the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court ofappropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Actof 1933 and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
| II-12 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuantto the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement on Form S-1 to be signedon its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of San Diego, California on July 3, 2025.
| CALIDI BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. | ||
| By: | /s/ Eric Poma | |
| Name: | Eric Poma | |
| Title: | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | |
| By: | /s/ Andrew Jackson | |
| Name: | Andrew Jackson | |
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | |
Eachperson whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Andrew Jackson, as his true and lawful attorney in fact and agent, withfull powers of substitution and re-substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any orall amendments (including post effective amendments) to the Registration Statement, and to sign any registration statement for the sameoffering covered by this Registration Statement that is to be effective upon filing pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, and all post effective amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents inconnection therewith, with the SEC, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, each acting alone, full power and authority to doand perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposesas he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, each acting alone,or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuantto the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement on Form S-1 has been signed by the following persons inthe capacities and on the dates indicated below:
| Signature | Title | Date | ||
| /s/ Eric Poma | Chief Executive Officer | July 3, 2025 | ||
| Eric Poma | (Principal Executive Officer) | |||
| /s/ Andrew Jackson | Chief Financial Officer | July 3, 2025 | ||
| Andrew Jackson | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | |||
| /s/ James Schoeneck | Director and Chairman of the Board | July 3, 2025 | ||
| James Schoeneck | ||||
| /s/ Alan Stewart | Director | July 3, 2025 | ||
| Alan Stewart | ||||
| /s/ Allan J. Camaisa | Director | July 3, 2025 | ||
| Allan J. Camaisa | ||||
| /s/ Scott Leftwich | Director | July 3, 2025 | ||
| Scott Leftwich | ||||
| /s/ George Peoples | Director | July 3, 2025 | ||
| George Peoples |
| II-13 |
Exhibit5.1
July3, 2025
VIAELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION
CalidiBiotherapeutics, Inc.
4475Executive Drive, Suite 200
SanDiego, CA 92121
Re:Registration Statement on Form S-1
Ladiesand Gentlemen:
Werefer to the above-captioned registration statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”) under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), filed by Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
TheRegistration Statement pertains to the registration for resale of up to 6,355,650 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value$0.0001, by certain selling stockholders (the “Resale Shares”). We understand that the Resale Shares are to be sold, as describedin the Registration Statement.
Wehave examined the originals, photocopies, certified copies or other evidence of such records of the Company, certificates of officersof the Company and public officials, and other documents as we have deemed relevant and necessary as a basis for the opinion hereinafterexpressed. In such examination, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the authenticity of all documents submitted to usas certified copies or photocopies and the authenticity of the originals of such latter documents.
Basedon the foregoing, and subject to the assumptions, limitations and qualifications set forth herein, we are of the opinion that the issuanceand sale of the Resale Shares has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of the Company and, when issuedand sold in the manner described in the Registration Statement, the Resale Shares, will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
Withoutlimiting any of the other limitations, exceptions and qualifications stated elsewhere herein, we express no opinion with regard to theapplicability or effect of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the corporate laws of the State of Delaware and the laws of the Stateof New York, as currently in effect (based solely upon our review of a standard compilation thereof). This opinion letter deals onlywith the specified legal issues expressly addressed herein, and you should not infer any opinion that is not explicitly stated hereinfrom any matter addressed in this opinion letter.
Wehereby consent to the filing of this opinion as Exhibits 5.1 and 23.2 to the Registration Statement and to the reference to our firmunder “Legal Matters” in the related Prospectus. In giving the foregoing consent, we do not hereby admit that we are in thecategory of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Act, or the rules and regulations of the Securities and ExchangeCommission.
| Very truly yours, | |
| /s/ Sichenzia Ross Ference Carmel LLP |
1185AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS | 31ST FLOOR | NEW YORK, NY | 10036 T (212)
930-9700 | F (212) 930-9725 | WWW.SRFC.LAW
Exhibit21.1
| Name of Subsidiary | Jurisdiction of Organization | |
| Calidi Biotherapeutics (Nevada), Inc. | Nevada | |
| StemVac GmbH* | Germany | |
| Calidi Biotherapeutics Australia Pty Ltd** | Australia | |
| Nova Cell, Inc.*** | Nevada | |
| Retail Biopharma, Inc.**** | Nevada |
*StemVac GmbH is a wholly owned subsidiary of Calidi Biotherapeutics (Nevada), Inc., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of CalidiBiotherapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
**Calidi Biotherapeutics Australia Pty Ltd is a wholly owned subsidiary of Calidi Biotherapeutics (Nevada), Inc., which is a whollyowned subsidiary of Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
***Nova Cell, Inc. is a subsidiary owned 75% by Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
****Redtail Biopharma, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
Exhibit23.1
IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent
Weconsent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our report dated March 31, 2025 relating to the financial statementsof Calidi Biotherapeutics, Inc. appearing in this Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts”in such Registration Statement.
| /s/ Marcum LLP | |
| Marcum LLP | |
| Costa Mesa, CA | |
| July 3, 2025 |
Marcumllp / 600 Anton Boulevard / Suite 1600 / Costa Mesa, CA 92626 / Phone 949.236.5600/ marcumllp.com
Calculationof Filing Fee Tables
Form
(FormType)
(ExactName of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
| Security Type | Security Class Title | Fee Calculation Rule | Amount Registered | Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Unit | Maximum Aggregate Offering Price | Fee Rate | Amount of Registration Fee(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Newly Registered Securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fees to Be Paid | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Carry Forward Securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Offering Amounts | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Fees Previously Paid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Fee Offsets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Fee Due | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Rounded up to the nearest cent. | |
| (2) | The price per share used to obtain the maximum offering amount of such Common Stock for the purposes of calculating the registration fee was the average of the high and low trading prices of the Company’s Common Stock reported by NYSE American on July 2, 2025 ($0.234). |